FRDC Resource: Development and ongoing maintenance of Australian Fish Names Standard 2019-2020

Project Number:



Alan Snow Konsulting

Principal Investigator:

Alan J. Snow

Project Status:


FRDC Expenditure:



Environment, Industry


All Australian Standards developed by FRDC will demonstrate a net benefit and therefore have an overall positive impact on Australia’s seafood industry. This means that all FRDC developed Australian Standards must provide a value or benefit that exceeds the costs to the seafood industry with associated action plans to implement continuous improvement to ensure this is met. Public, consumer and stakeholder confidence is vital to the well-being of Australia’s seafood industry. Australian Standards are not legal documents. However, when a government references a standard in legislation, it becomes mandatory. An Australian Standard does have status and is recognised as being a credible document. Usage of the names included in the Australian Fish Names Standard is not mandated in Australia but is listed in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code - Standard 2.2.3 - Fish and Fish Products as an advisory note (see https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2011C00569) Standard fish names removes confusion, strengthens consumer confidence, creates market efficiencies and consistency, underpins effective fisheries monitoring and improves management of food fraud / food safety. The use of standard fish names achieves outcomes that are consistent with the aims of industry and governments: 1 Improved monitoring and stock assessment enhances the sustainability of fisheries resources. 2 Increased consistency and efficiency in seafood marketing to improve consumer confidence and industry profitability. 3 Improved accuracy and consistency in trade descriptions enables consumers to make more informed choices when purchasing seafood and reduces the potential for misleading and deceptive conduct. 4 More efficient management of seafood related public health incidents and food safety through improved labelling and species identification reduces public health risk. Within the next decade, the AFNS must: • Be all inclusive including increased stakeholder awareness • Improve the AFNS database to ensure all data is current • Meet stakeholder expectation • Be world’s best practice • Be a national benchmark for sustainability • Be part of an ongoing continuous improvement processes • Be a transparent process to create trust


1. Ensure FRDC maintains accreditation as a Standards Development Organisation through audits from the Standards Development Advisory Committee

2. Continue to promote and provide advice on the content and uptake of Australian Fish Names Standard and other FRDC developed standards to the broader seafood industry and government through strategic submissions and presentations to government in consultation with FRDC

3. Evaluate and implement the recommendations from the draft “Report on Stakeholder Consultation about the Australian Fish Names Standard and the Associated Processes” conducted in 2018 to ensure the AFNS continues to meet stakeholder needs and expectations

4. Continually improve the content and relevance of the Australian Fish Names Standard AS 5300 and underlying procedures to meet market, regulator and stakeholder needs and expectations.