Project number: 2010-226
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $161,000.00
Principal Investigator: Robert Kearney
Organisation: University of Tasmania (UTAS)
Project start/end date: 23 Dec 2010 - 30 Dec 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This research is necessary to address many priorities under FRDC strategic RD&E themes. The project will: “provide information to the community to demonstrate improvements in the fishing industry’s environmental performance” (Theme 2. Habitat and ecosystem protection) and “incorporate understandings of the cumulative impacts of fishing into fisheries management plans” (Theme 4. Ecologically sustainable development) via detailed and careful evaluation of the potential and real threats of fishing to the marine environment. In addition, ’user-friendly’ versions of the publications will “better inform the community’s perceptions of the industry and to increase support for the industry”. The possibilities for better presenting Australia’s credentials as responsible fisheries managers will be enhanced.

One of the goals of AFMA as outlined in their Corporate Plan 2010-2014 is to improve the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fisheries administration (this concept is echoed in all Australian states and territories but the actual wording differs). The research proposed here will provide an evaluation of the degree to which fishing does actually represent a threat to marine biodiversity and the cost-effectiveness of traditional fisheries management for ameliorating that threat(s) compared as far as possible with the threats to biodiversity and fisheries from other sources. This will be vital to clarifying the current confusion between fisheries management and biodiversity conservation. These assessments are critical to improving fisheries management strategies and making them more cost-effective and proportionate to environmental problems (a requirement of the Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment). In light of national commitments to establish a comprehensive system of representative marine protected areas by 2012, peer-reviewed publications will prove an invaluable and urgently needed tool to defend the credentials of the Australian fishing industry and to more appropriately position fishing interests in the decision making process.

Ref:
AFMA (2010). Corporate Plan 2010-2014. Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra

Objectives

1. Investigate cases of real threats from fishing to fish stocks and/or biodiversity more generally in Australian waters, and alternative management strategies for sustainable fishing and the recovery of populations and areas that have been previously overfished.
2. Assess and discuss the threats to marine biodiversity from non-fishing related activities and the management strategies (or lack thereof) to combat these. This will include consideration of the principles of cost and effectiveness of potential amelioration strategies for fishing and non-fishing related activities (note, it will not be within the scope of this project to carry out cost-benefit analyses for individual strategies or fisheries).
3. Align the accepted benefits of ‘reserves’ where all fishing is excluded (such as for scientific reference points) with realistic expectations for ‘off-reserve’ benefits and the degree to which area management is an appropriate ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management for individual fisheries across the whole area of selected fisheries.

Related research

Communities
Industry
Environment