8 results

RD&E capability audit and assessment for the Australian fishing and aquaculture industry 2013

Project number: 2013-410
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $23,450.00
Principal Investigator: Tom Lewis
Organisation: RDS Partners Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 30 Jul 2013 - 28 Nov 2013
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This proposal is a response to an request by the FRDC to RDS Partners to undertake a current (2013) RD&E capability audit for the Australian Fishing and Aquaculture Industry, following the successful completion of the initial RD&E capability audit in 2009.

The final report to FRDC from the RD&E capability audit 2009 provided an analysis of the research, development and extension (RD&E) effort supporting Australia’s fisheries and aquaculture industries in the latter quarter of 2009 and supported the development of Working Together: The National Fishing and Aquaculture RD&E Strategy.

Since the release of - and in response to - Working Together: The National Fishing and Aquaculture RD&E Strategy, it is our understanding that significant changes have occurred in national RD&E capability. The advent of: the ARC Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) for Australian universities; Major-Support-Link Research Provider concept; National Research Providers Network (NRPN) and NRPN Hubs; and the Fisheries and Aquaculture Extension and Adoption Working Group, is likely to have seen restructuring of Fishing and Aquaculture RD&E capability at a national, State and institutional level.

Updating the RD&E capability audit for 2013 will provide a direct comparison with the capability status in 2009, allowing a current understanding of RD&E capability, capacity and future demand.

Australian agencies investing in RD&E need to understand current RD&E capability and capacity and future demand, in order to to plan for and deliver effective and efficient services to the Fishing and Aquaculture industry.

Objectives

1. To audit and assess the existing RD&E capability in the field of fisheries and aquaculture, and their aquatic ecology and biodiversity, within a national context
2. To identify change from 2009 in RD&E capability in the fields of fisheries and aquaculture, within: capability area
area of expertise
infrastructure
and investment – and within a regional context
3. To assess criteria (e.g. demonstration of ability, commitment & obligation) for Major, Support and Link research providers

SCRC: Trialing regional grower groups to extend and build on CRC outputs

Project number: 2012-732
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Tom Lewis
Organisation: RDS Partners Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 31 Jul 2012 - 29 Apr 2014
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Oysters Australia has identified the need for development and delivery of a robust, ongoing mechanism to extend and build on outputs from Seafood CRC research.

The CRC RAC has indicated that it is interested in testing grower group models as extension and communication mechanisms for Seafood CRC research investments.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, SA and NSW indicate that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

This project is designed to deliver against the dual CRC and industry needs indentified above by providing the necessary initial support to establish a number of oyster industry grower groups and to build into these groups the independent capability to maintain the on-going, peer-learning opportunities that grower groups can facilitate.

The project will report on and evaluate the success of trialing these grower groups.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925983-00-5
Authors: Tom Lewis Ray Murphy Don Defenderfer and Rachel King
Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Final Report • 2014-04-30 • 1.45 MB
2012-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Oysters Australia Board and the Seafood CRC identified the need to develop and deliver practical, grower-focused extension and communication activities to increase the return from CRC research and development outputs.

Discussions with oyster growers from Tasmania, South Australia and New South Wales indicated that many would value the support to form and establish such groups but lack the time or knowledge to do so effectively.

Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 2012-228
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Atlantic Salmon Aquaculture Subprogram: UTAS Experimental Aquaculture Facility: Obtaining expert international governance, design and operational advice for the Atlantic salmon partners.

While the Australian salmon and shellfish aquaculture industries have international counterparts, there are specific local issues, notably warmer water temperatures and amoebic gill disease (AGD) requiring specific, local research attention. Given the maturity of the industry, the presence of both a...
ORGANISATION:
RDS Partners Pty Ltd

A bibliography of FRDC and CRC aquaculture environmental research reports and related publications

Project number: 2011-525
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $51,750.00
Principal Investigator: Tom Lewis
Organisation: RDS Partners Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 31 Jan 2012 - 7 Oct 2012
Contact:
FRDC

Need

On 25 October the Chair of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), the Hon. Harry Woods, announced to the National Seafood Directions Conference that the results from the last community perception study of the seafood industry was poor and that something needed to be done to rectify this situation. As a result, Mr Woods announced that FRDC would pro-actively promote the results of research to the Australian community, media outlets and seafood consumers, and formally respond to factually incorrect media stories or information in the public arena.

Some activities are areas of work where a few stakeholders will work together. For example: + developing briefing notes on specific fishery issues, such as by-catch or interactions with non-target species.

This project supports this new FRDC direction.

Objectives

1. To provide the Australian “marketplace” with easily understood, factual information demonstrating the sustainable practices of selected aquaculture sectors
2. To build aquaculture’s social licence to operate.

4th International Oyster Symposium

Project number: 2011-510
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $10,000.00
Principal Investigator: Tom Lewis
Organisation: RDS Partners Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 1 May 2011 - 14 Sep 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Tactical Research Fund: Establishing regional indicators of social sustainability in the Tasmanian aquaculture industry - a pilot study

Project number: 2010-219
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $55,000.00
Principal Investigator: Tom Lewis
Organisation: RDS Partners Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 14 Dec 2010 - 29 Aug 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Tasmanian government, communities and industry recognise that a key to increasing aquaculture’s positive impact on regional communities in Tasmania is continued access to shared coastal and marine resources.

The existing aquaculture planning system delivers social licence by including the community in the process that examines the pros and cons of development in their region. Despite this, future opportunities for linkages and collaborative partnerships between industry and the community are less well understood.

Critical to building and maintaining a “social license to operate” are robust and collaborative partnerships between industry and the communities in which it operates. Such partnerships need to be structured to allow meaningful dialogue aimed at increasing the positive impacts of aquaculture development to the community as a whole, balanced against the potential costs.

Community perceptions of aquaculture vary widely. The challenge for planners and the industry is to understand regional perceptions in order to develop policies and approaches that respond to community concerns, improve community understandings and bolster the recognition and acceptance of this sector as a valuable community member.

Specifically, industry and policy makers need to understand the social and economic profiles of specific regions as well as community perceptions of the industry, as the foundation for designing a community engagement strategy that will:
• establish a sound platform of social understandings and values from which the industry can develop its business case, and
• maximise the benefit communities derive from sustainable aquaculture development.

This project has been designed as a pilot study to test methodology and to deliver outputs that will contribute to the needs mentioned above, thereby helping to increase public good outcomes from marine farming in Tasmania.

Objectives

1. A recommendation of social return on investment (SRoI) metrics that can be incorporated into assessment of aquaculture development and activities
2. An understanding of community perceptions of aquaculture in 2 aquaculture regions in Tasmania (e.g. South East Tasmania, North West Tasmania)
3. An understanding of demographic and social infrastructure for each study region
4. An analysis of the impact of aquaculture development on relevant social indicators for each region
5. A community consultation and engagement strategy that could be adopted by industry for each aquaculture region
6. Recommendations for how similar projects could be delivered in other regions in Australia

Final report

ISBN: 978-­0-9872175-1-6
Author: Tom Lewis
Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Final Report • 2013-09-05 • 5.56 MB
2010-219-DLD.pdf

Summary

Understanding the social contribution of aquaculture and fisheries activities is becoming increasingly important as community and market expectations continue to demand greater ethical and responsible social and environmental stewardship from the industry.

The SROI processes and principles offer a structured approach to assessing social impact in partnership with the relevant stakeholders, or communities of interest. In other contexts, the SROI has delivered strong, two-­‐way relationships with stakeholders (Social Ventures Australia, 2012), creating a context within which an enterprise’s future direction, including growth, can be discussed and designed on realistic terms that take into account social impact.

The purpose of this research project was to pilot the use of the SROI principles and processes as a basis for structured community engagement within the aquaculture industry in Tasmania.

This project sought to engage two sectors (mussels and salmon) within the aquaculture industry so as to explore ways to build effectiveness in engaging with comparable communities of interest, and to develop a better understanding of what can support building and maintaining a social licence to operate.

Keywords:  Social indicators, social return on investment, SROI, social licence to operate, community engagement, regional communities.

Capability audit and assessment for fisheries and aquaculture RD&E framework

Project number: 2009-217
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $39,380.00
Principal Investigator: Tom Lewis
Organisation: RDS Partners Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 31 Aug 2009 - 10 Dec 2009
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This proposal is a response to an invitation to tender issued by the FRDC.

The Australian aquaculture and fisheries sectors are among the most diverse and geographically disparate to be managed under any national RD&E framework.

To plan and deliver effective and efficient RD&E services to industry, it is important that government and industry collaborate to understand current RD&E capability and capacity, and match that against current and likely industry demand.

In April 2005, Primary Industries Ministerial Council (PIMC) endorsed the concept of National research with Regional development and Local extension for Primary Industries in Australia. The concept recognises that basic and strategic research (R) can be provided from a distance, with regional adaptive development (D) and local extension (E) required to improve the uptake of innovation by industry.

Subsequently, in April 2006, PIMC agreed to a set of principles to facilitate further cooperation between agencies and industry for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the national RD&E capability. These principles emphasise cooperation, information sharing, maintaining funding, access to capability and reporting.

It was decided that the implementation of the framework would be lead by the relevant Research and Development Corporation supported by Primary Industry Standing Committee (PISC) agencies. A meeting of the PISC Research and Development Sub-Committee and the Council of Research and Development Corporation Chairs on 8 July 2008 ratified that the Fisheries Research Development Corporation (FRDC) and PISC agencies of South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania would take the lead in developing a national research, development and extension framework for the fisheries and aquaculture industries.

The framework will be implemented through an assessment of the status of the relevant industries, the completion of an RD&E capability audit (this project), identification of national RD&E priorities and development of a strategy to guide RD&E investment and capability development nationally.

Objectives

1. To audit and assess the existing RD&E capability in the field of fisheries and aquaculture, and their aquatic ecology and biodiversity, within a national context, and including all research providers in this field.
2. To identify the gaps in the current RD&E capability in the fields of fisheries and aquaculture with respect to meeting defined future sector strategic priorities.
View Filter

Species

Organisation