227 results

Development of a process to manufacture powdered shark cartilage

Project number: 1992-125.11
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $26,000.00
Principal Investigator: Craig Davis
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 1994 - 22 Jul 1997
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To develop a method for producing powdered shark cartilage on a pilot commercial scale.
2. To develop relevant tastes to assure product quality
3. To undertake market trials on quality assured pilot scale product
4. To determine the production costs of a full scale production

Final report

Author: Craig Davis
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Final Report • 2017-09-29 • 2.46 MB
1992-125.22-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken in collaboration with Pacific Export Services Queensland Pty Ltd and had the primary objective of developing a powdered shark cartilage product on a pilot commercial scale for the domestic and export markets. The investigations undertaken in this project required several discrete development steps: sourcing of the raw material, removal of excess flesh from the backbone, development of the drying, milling and packaging protocols, establishment of suitable quality manufacturing and testing procedures, and identification of the markets and market requirements. Considerable time and effort was committed to the development of the appropriate techniques and equipment necessary for the production of a quality powdered shark cartilage product. The procedure which is currently employed for shark cartilage powder manufacture involves a heat-pump drying process and a sequence of milling steps. The final product must maintain a low moisture content and produce a fine (<40µm) powder. Additionally, considerable expertise was developed in the handling of the powdered product, and in the further value-adding of the powder into encapsulated and tableted products. Although this project has concluded, the author has a keen interest in the product and in the potential for alternative uses of the shark cartilage. These uses include: treatments of various inflammatory ailments (e.g. arthritis), extraction of collagen or gelatin for the food or pharmaceutical industries, and extraction of chondroitin sulfate for use in corneal transportation media. This project has developed ideas also in the area of total utilisation of the shark, which includes such areas as leather, meat, offal and fin. The project has successfully developed a method for the manufacture of a fine white powder derived from the backbone of the shark. The commercial partner is very satisfied with the results and is keen to continue the development of the process and improvement of the product. Sales of the product in the domestic and international arenas have surpassed expectations.
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 1992-125.03
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Value added eel/rice products

This report sets out the results of a study undertaken by IFIQ to determine the feasibility of producing a shelf-stable eel/rice convenience meal for the Japanese market. The study was divided into three parts: A survey of current technical and marketing information on eel and eel products; ...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 1992-125.02
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Value added beche-de-mer products

In recent years, increased interest has been shown in the Queensland beche-de-mer industry. As a consequence, there has been a number of initiatives taken to ensure the industry will have a sustainable future. The industry, traditionally a 'cottage' industry in the past, has not been able to access...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries (QLD)

Production technology for redclaw crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus)

Project number: 1992-119
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $230,278.00
Principal Investigator: Clive Jones
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 21 Nov 1992 - 30 Jun 1997
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To evaluate the biological characteristics of the recognised stocks of redclaw, determine thier genetic basis and assess their relative suitability to cultivation.
2. To investigate the nutrition of redclaw through studies of digestive physiology/morphology, natural food availability and comparative feeding trials.
3. To develop standard growout techniques in relation to pond preparation, stocking density and size, pond management and harvesting, and to prepare a practical manual for the industry.
4. To investigate the feasibility of polyculturing redclaw and silver perch

Final report

Author: C.M. Jones I.M. Ruscoe
Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Final Report • 1996-08-06 • 3.47 MB
1992-119-DLD.pdf

Summary

This research and development project aimed to define specific guidelines for the aquaculture production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. This aim was achieved, and a comprehensive list of such guidelines is now documented.

Redclaw crayfish aquaculture was a small industry when this project was initiated, generating less than 40 tonnes of product per year. Production technology was undefined and extremely variable across the industry. Now, in 1996, production has risen to around 100 tonnes and a more consistent and appropriate approach is applied to production. This is due to a large extent to the technologies developed by this project, the full benefits of which are still flowing to industry.

Armed with a ‘best practice’ approach, the redclaw aquaculture industry is poised for significant expansion, which will enable it to more fully exploit the excellent export opportunities which have been clearly identified for the product.

Environment

Publication of "Proceedings from the 2nd Australasian Scallop Workshop"

Project number: 1992-092
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $19,370.69
Principal Investigator: Mike Dredge
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 11 Oct 1992 - 30 Jun 1995
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. Disseminate information on the status of significant fisheries and mariculture ventures involving scallops throughout Australasia

Final report

Author: Mike Dredge
Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Final Report • 1994-09-23 • 4.33 MB
1992-092-DLD.pdf

Summary

The First Australasian Scallop Workshop was held in Taroona, Tasmania in July 1988 and was attended by 51 participants from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.

It proved to be a very valuable forum for exchange of ideas on scallop biology, management and culture. The organisers of that workshop, Mike Dredge, Will Zacharin and Lindsay loll, along with Richard McLoughlin must be thanked again for taking the initiative in organising the second Australasian Scallop Workshop at the East Coaster Resort, Triabunna, Tasmania, 23-25 March 1993.

Support for the second Australasian Workshop has been provided by the Fishing Industry Research and Development Corporation, the Commonwealth Department of lndustry Technology Employment and Commerce, state departments responsible for fisheries in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, and the CSIRO Division of Fisheries. Thanks for this support are extended to each of those bodies, in the context of both the workshop and publication of the proceedings.

Scallop resources are notoriously difficult to manage because of wide fluctuations in recruitment and problems with harvesting technology; this emphasises the need for workshops of this nature to obtain maximum benefit from dissemination of knowledge and experience in scallop biology and management.

Recently we have seen progress towards more rational management of scallop resources in this part of the world and for the first time in southeastern Australia there appears to be a cooperative and constructive approach to scallop fishery management. While scallop stocks in Victoria and Tasmania have been in decline in recent years, the saucer scallop fisheries in Western Australia and Queensland have stabilised or are expanding. The background to such variation, and of the associated problems of recruitment variability in scallops from W.A. to Tasmania are discussed in some detail.

It is pleasing to note also that an appropriate time allocation has been made towards considering the impact of our scallop harvesting technology, both on the scallops themselves and on the environment which sustains them. It is clear that the industry cannot afford to continue using inefficient and destructive fishing gear if better technology is available.

The workshop was perfectly placed in Triabunna to explore recent progress in scallop culture and reseeding. Free exchange of ideas on methodology and technology relating to these activities shows promise that scallop enhancement may achieve its full potential in the coming years. The enhancement project in Tasmania has been operating since 1987 and all types of difficulties from appropriate gear to aspects of marketing are still being researched by the company.

This workshop provided an opportunity for biologists, managers, marine farmers, fishers and others with an interest in scallops to expand their understanding of scallops and pass on some of their hard earned knowledge and experience to others.

The make-up of this workshop is unusual, to say the least, in that organisers have brought together so many facets of industry and have recognised the importance of marketing to the scallop fisheries.

Finally, some public health issues associated with scallop fisheries around the world have been brought to the workshop's attention. Such issues, largely associated with dinoflagellate-derived toxins, have not been a major issue in Australia to this time. Their significance in an international context, and their potential to affect scallop marketing and fisheries in Australia, is a major consideration for the future.

Inaugural international seafood conference

Project number: 1992-086
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $25,000.00
Principal Investigator: Stephen Thrower
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 11 Oct 1992 - 30 Dec 1993
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. Attract participants from Australian and overseas from industry, government, and the research community
2. Provide a basis for the Australian seafood industry to move from being a commodity supplier to a producer of value added products by making available the most advanced technology from around the world
3. Enable researchers, producers and regulators to meet and make personal contact with their peers from overseas countries
Industry
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 1992-071
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Live transport of crustaceans in air - prolonging the survival of crabs

We studied the live transport of crustaceans in air, using the spanner crab Ranina ranina as an example, and developed guidelines for handling live spanner crabs which we presented to an industry workshop. Our findings were also of general relevance to the live shipment of other oceanic crab...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
View Filter

Organisation