Safety & Wellbeing Steering Committee annual workshops
Developing capability and capacity for seafood international trade in new and existing markets
The Food and Wine Collaboration project (F&W project) intends to expand trade across agriculture and fisheries sectors into emerging export markets and/or high-growth, high-potential markets. Building existing and developing new markets is a priority for the industry, not only to identify new opportunities beyond China and reduce the reliance on a single market, but also to take a more proactive approach to leverage Australia’s key bilateral relationships and trade partnerships. South Korea, Vietnam and Indonesia have significant growth potential. The new Federal government has identified market diversification as a priority area for R&D.
South Korea is one of Australia’s largest trading partners and we have had favourable trading and bilateral relationships for a long time, made stronger when the Korea Australia Free Trade Agreement (KAFTA) which came into force in 2014. Recent technical market access wins – in particular, for lobster at the end of 2021, continues to make South Korea an active market for seafood exporters.
South Korea is a stable, advanced, and growing economy and while COVID-19 reduced consumption and business activity, food and beverage consumption hit record double digit, year-on-year growth during the pandemic – driven by e-commerce. Koreans are high consumers of seafood and import more than 70 per cent of their food and agriculture products, with demand for high-end, niche premium food including seafood such as (but not limited to) lobster, sea urchin and yellowtail kingfish is increasing.
Vietnam has one of the fastest growing economies and the World Bank predicts a GDP growth of more than 5.5% pa in 2022. Australian exports during the pandemic rose to $9.7 billion – an increase of 61 percent in 2021. Vietnam’s strong growth and expanding middle-class has increased demand for imported goods including premium food and beverage products such as seafood.
Australia and Vietnam have strong trading relationships and have had a long alliance. It has a commitment to global economic integration and a rules based trading process with a growing amount of free trade agreements including ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Area (AANZFTA), the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).
With 100 million people and a growing economy, it is expected to surpass Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines over the coming years. Vietnam is a strong relationship-based society and being in country and building personal relationships and trust are key pillars for doing business in Vietnam.
Indonesia is one of the fastest growing economies and with strong bilateral relationships supported through favourable trade agreements such as Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IACEPA and ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA), this is a strong potential market for the seafood industry.
According to Euromonitor Consulting (2021), Australia has a good reputation for providing premium products, however recognition of Australian seafood brands overall is relatively low and there is a need to increase awareness and exposure of our products. Establishing and building relationships across retail and food service, supported through embassy representation will help expand market presence. Also, as the market sees strong growth of modern grocery outlets, high-end supermarkets, e-commerce platforms and food service outlets; consumer demand and reach is growing including wealthy Chinese expats seeking premium ‘status’ products such as abalone and lobster. This market represents long-term trading opportunities for the industry.
Succeeding in business across any Asian market – including South Korea, Vietnam and Indonesia involves developing strong business relationships, and a clear understanding of the market and the environment. The F&W project provides an opportunity for SIA and industry to develop this understanding and to build capacity and capabilities across these markets. There is also the opportunity to engage with and learn from other agriculture sectors, Australian representatives, and in-country staff to help build capable leaders in the international trade space and develop long-term beneficial trading opportunities for the industry.
Safety in Seafood - Saving lives through a culture of safety
The primary objective of this program is to measurably improve personal safety culture and outcomes in the Australian Seafood Industry through an industry led behavioural change approach underpinned by a national engagement process. Engagement will occur at all levels of industry to ensure that sustainable culture change is driven through shifts in core beliefs from leadership (top down) as well as grassroots and peer to peer (bottom up). Every person from owner to junior and even volunteers have a responsibility to keep themselves and each other safe. By leveraging and deepening existing relationships at all levels of industry, behaviours at every level will shift as a result of educational, experiential and peer to peer learning and influence.
The application is needed because current and traditional methods of improving safety are not working – people are still dying in our industry. Almost all effort in safety in our industry to date has been compliance driven and from the 'office' down. Compliance based activities, such as safety management systems remain an imperative part of a safe operation, but without the underlying values and behaviours that drive people’s desire to stay safe, to arrive home from work safely, systems and processes become checklists and box ticking. Other Industries and the Stay Afloat program have demonstrated that a culture-based approach to safety behaviour change is the most effective strategy - examples can be seen in high-risk settings such as construction through to linked industry bodies such as the South Australian Research and Development Institute. The Independent Evaluation of the Stay Afloat program indicated the potential strength of the peer-to-peer approach and also endorsed the centralised support and management structure that was utilised. A similar approach is being proposed for this project. Using peer-based education and intervention is key to facilitating and expediting this change.
This program will educate and engage industry members in exploring their beliefs and values and reflecting on how that relates to their work and their safety each day. The significance of the capacity and capability that will be built across our industry cannot be underestimated. The investment in the relationship with AMSA, through to the enormous impact of capacity building in local community over a 4-year period will change the game for our industry. Communities will have confidence that their families and friends will come home safely and that they will enjoy a workplace with vastly lower fears for their safety – physically and psychologically.
The collaborative approach will build capability, knowledge, confidence and resilience through a combination of activities based around minimising risk of incident and also risk of long-term physical and psychological harm.
The project will span 4 years and will be evaluated against a detailed program logic model. A program logic model enables the measurement or evaluation of qualitative and complex human behaviour related projects where quantitative measures may not be useful or achievable in terms of outcomes. The program logic model will measure short term, medium- and long-term indicators of the work being done to achieve outcomes as well as the outcomes themselves. We expect that by the end of Year 2, every industry member body and each of its members will have had initial exposure to the program with a goal of reaching 8,000 people in a meaningful way over the course of the program.
Year 1 – Establish and consolidate industry collaborators, partnerships and steering/advisory groups – set 4-year calendar for consultation and discussion to ensure best practice collaboration and consultation for life of project. Develop terms of reference for Steering Committee to ensure appropriate oversight, governance and contribution to project.
- Establish program logic and project evaluation models which will be core activities
- Finalise project plan ensuring alignments to program logic and evaluation framework
- Establish relevant program policies, guidelines and tools
- Establish program risk register (aligned with the FRDC online risk register) and stakeholder feedback mechanisms.
- Establish program performance and conflict management policy and procedure
Year 1 – Establishment of industry networks made up of two types of influencers
- Peak/industry leaders to act as ‘enablers’ to link us to and encourage forums for conversation, education and consultation. To assist in identification and introductions to grassroots industry members
- Grassroots Safety Advocates – Grass roots in this instance referring to all operational and hands on industry members from supervisors and skippers to deck hands and labourers. These people will be the centre of the peer-to-peer learning, storytelling and ultimately education and influence. They will also be key to the continuing identification of Safety Advocates in industry.
Year 1 – Collect information and extend education tools through online and face-to-face forums
Year 1 – Develop and continually refine a robust communications and extension plan
Year 1 – Launch first industry initiative (eg, Personal E-perb targets)
Year 2 – Full integration of Fish Safe Australia and SeSAFE activities into this program
Year 2 – Expand network of Safety Advocates
Year 2 – Expand and increase uptake of education, storytelling and example sharing
Year 2 – Complete first industry initiative (eg, Personal E-perb targets) and consult with industry on next initiative for greatest impact
Year 2 – Commence promoting short- and medium-term outcomes in early adopting communities
Year 3 – Continue narrative based and other behaviour change activities
Year 3 – Second industry initiative rolled out
Year 4 – Establish methods for continuation of culture of safety activities to be led by industry
Year 4 – Identify the role of potential sponsors for ongoing leadership
Year 4 - Consultation with AMSA and other industry bodies to refine and set strategic safety direction for industry
Industry members from managers to junior staff will influence one-another through narrative, stories and other means to effect behavioural change that reduces risk-taking behaviours - even when no-one is looking. The channels for sharing this narrative and gradual shift in beliefs will be twofold. Firstly, through day-to-day interaction and information sharing that is promoted through the various program elements including the Safety Advocates. These activities will be captured through monthly activity reporting to be designed as part of the program logic and evaluation planning on project kick off. Secondly through the use of the Sensemaker platform which collects narrative and sentiment in a way that also enables users to review the stories and experiences of others. In simple terms industry members will learn from the experience of peers.
As outlined in the project plan, quarterly meetings will be held for the duration of the program to report, review and collaborate with key partners and stakeholders ensuring that the program is maximising reach and impact as well as ensuring that the potential of partners and sponsors to maximise program communications and activities is leveraged. Reporting measures will be finalised with the assistance of expert consultant(s) familiar with program logic design and evaluation.
A robust communications and extension plan will ensure maximum program awareness and uptake of initiatives and training.
Climate resilient wild catch fisheries
The need for this project is to activate and engage industry in viable options towards climate resilience by 2030. This includes the need to demonstrate that immediate options exist and are viable and meaningful, while also gaining support for a clear plan to transform the industry and supply chain with support both internally and beyond the sector. The key needs are:
01 | Industry awareness of the problems and solutions around climate change and resilience is below where it needs to be to activate broad transformation. There is little action towards climate resilience (1 player) in comparison to other agricultural sectors.
02 | There will be increasing competition within the protein market to validate and promote sustainable practices and positive contributions to the environment/climate.
03 | Leaders and innovators in the industry are attempting to act in isolation with few resources to support industry and supply chain coordination and acceleration.
04 | Change around the edges that can be achieved by some stakeholders operating alone will not deliver the transformation at a scale or pace that is required to meet growing and broadly felt consumer expectations that indicate demonstrable action on climate change.
05 | There is a surplus of tools, resources and research around climate change and resilience, but to this point, little of that work has been translated into forms fishers find usable and valuable.
06 | There is a need to identify early adopters and innovators in the space to lead new ways operating into the future.
07 | There is an FRDC funded project to undertake a Lifecycle Assessment being concluded early November. This work has been preliminarily identified fuel, transport, and refrigeration as key challenges requiring new solutions/opportunities for industry.
08 | Propulsion and fuel have been identified as key challenges in wild catch fisheries achieving climate resilience and reducing carbon emissions, and will be the focus of this project.