121 results
People
PROJECT NUMBER • 2002-652
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Aquatic Animal Health Subprogram: enhancement of the emergency disease management capability in Victoria - developing a Victorian Control Centres Management Manual

AQUAVETPLAN and its associated manuals, and in particular the ‘AQUAVETPLAN Control Centres Management Manual’ provide the necessary framework for the development of a Victorian management/operational manual that would meet the planning needs in relation to aquatic animal diseases. The...
ORGANISATION:
Agriculture Victoria

SEF Industry Development Subprogram: agricultural trials of a fish-based fertiliser (BioPhos) produced from Australian seafood processing wastes - pasture trial during 205-06 irrigation season

Project number: 2002-250.20
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $143,198.00
Principal Investigator: Aravind Surapaneni
Organisation: Agriculture Victoria
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 2006 - 30 Jun 2006
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Commercial in confidence. To know more about this project please contact FRDC.

Objectives

Commercial in confidence
People
PROJECT NUMBER • 2001-257
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Australian aquaculture - practical solutions to the triple bottom line - a national workshop

Federal and state legislation is increasingly demanding more stringent environmental controls on aquaculture activities and place the onus of proof for demonstrating environmental performance on the industry. In addition, regulation for and approval of aquaculture activities is increasingly...
ORGANISATION:
Agriculture Victoria

Assessment of the importance of different near-shore marine habitats to important fishery species in Victoria using standardised survey methods, and in temperate and sub-tropical Australia using stable isotope analysis

Project number: 2001-036
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $553,689.00
Principal Investigator: Gregory Jenkins
Organisation: Agriculture Victoria
Project start/end date: 7 Nov 2001 - 15 Aug 2005
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To increase our understanding of fisheries/habitat links using a combination of standardised survey methods in Victoria and Queensland, and isotope analyses across southern Australia and Queensland.
2. To identify the importance of different near shore habitats for important fish species from recruitment to older-life stages, for individual habitats at broad scales and habitat mosaics at finer scales.
3. To improve the quality of data derived from isotope analyses by including a greater range of potential sources of primary production.
4. To understand the transfer of primary production from important habitats to food chains of fish that occur outside that habitat, and also the sources of primary production for fish inhabiting habitat mosaics.
5. To integrate existing near shore habitat data-sets with detailed descriptions of fish/habitat associations in a spatial information system (GIS) that can be accessed by a variety of user groups.

Final report

ISBN: 1-74146-474-9
Author: Gregory Jenkins
Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

Final Report • 2005-11-01 • 2.67 MB
2001-036-DLD.pdf

Summary

The first part of this project was a basic survey of fish use of intertidal habitats such as mangroves, mudflats and saltmarshes, which previously had hardly been considered in temperate Australian coastal waters.

Mangroves (Avicennia marina) and mudflats were used by at least 41 species of fish. Juvenile stages of 41% of the species were sampled and economic species were common. Mangrove habitat in temperate Australian waters supports a richer juvenile fish assemblage than adjacent mudflats, but there is little difference between habitats for the subadult/adult assemblage. Ultimately, the ‘value’ of mangrove habitats to fishes depends strongly on the time and place.

Saltmarshes were difficult to sample because of unpredictable amounts of water cover. Saltmarsh flats were generally only covered with water during low-pressure weather systems. Most fish caught in this habitat were not of commercial value. Water temperature, salinity, depth or barometric pressure did not explain variability in the number of fish species present or fish abundance. Fish species in the saltmarsh flats also live in other habitats such as seagrass, and the observed patterns of habitat use seemed to partly relate to feeding behaviour.

The second part of the fish-habitat survey work aimed to see how the use of habitats by fish changed within different parts of the habitat, and also with respect to the location of other habitats.

Results from the study will be valuable in the future detection of environmental perturbations, providing a baseline data set against which disturbance effects can be assessed. Information on habitat use, and how multiple habitats interact with each other, will put managers in a stronger position to argue for the preservation of important nursery habitat. Results from this project may also be important in advising on the appropriateness of marine park designs to ensure, among other things, fisheries sustainability.

Keywords: Mangrove, mudflat, saltmarshes, fish, zonation, landscape, seagrass, stable isotope, base for nutritional support, carbon and sulphur stable isotopes, commercial

View Filter

Research

Organisation