66 results

National atlas of fishing activities and coastal communities

Project number: 2002-223
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $629,047.50
Principal Investigator: James Larcombe
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 30 Jan 2003 - 1 Jul 2007
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The proposal addresses a number of specific needs, as expressed in the FRDC research and development plan:

- Effects of fishing activities on fish and their ecosystems (Program 1, Strategy 3) - information on the spatial distribution and intensity of catch of species and effort is fundamental to assessing the effects of fishing on the environment. It is also very useful in assessment of individual stocks.
- Access to fisheries resources (Program 1, Strategy 8) - the distribution and value of fishing, as well as the potential social and economic impacts, is a vital consideration in multiple use planning (eg. Marine Protected Area planning).
- Fisheries and ecosystems management (Program 1, Strategy 10) - the proposal would make a significant contribution to ecosystem based and multiple use planning under the Regional Marine Planning process.
- Economic and social values of the industry and its impacts (Program 2, Strategy 2) - the proposal specifically aims to investigate socio-economic aspects of fisheries and connect these to marine resources. This will also assist in fulfilling ESD requirements.
- Community education (Program 3, Strategy 4) - the two major outputs (paper and web) will be widely available and comprise a valuable information resource for all Australians.

A tight schedule has been set for the development of Regional Marine Plans across Australia. Planning will require detailed information on the nature and extent of marine fishing activities. Nowhere has this information been drawn together to provide a body of data for use in regional marine planning. To ensure that the interests of the fishing industry are appropriately represented in the planning process it is important that accurate information is presented in a form that will be useful.

Similarly, the socio-economic nature of coastal communities and their degree of dependence on marine fisheries resources is poorly understood. The proposed research will provide a basis for identifying the social impacts of proposed changes to fisheries management arrangement and developing strategies for appropriate government interventions to reduce adverse impacts.

Objectives

1. To develop a strategy for the management of national fisheries data. The strategy will focus on partnership arrangements and agreements with custodian agencies, scheduled data maintenance and updating and systems of data distribution. The strategy will refer to marine and estuarine commercial fishing and aquaculture specifically but will also consider recreational and indigenous fishing.
2. To develop a strategy for collection and collation of social data on an ongoing basis for future resource management use.
3. To undertake a one off fisheries national fisheries data collection, within the context of the National Fisheries Data Strategy development. These data will focus on catch, effort, method, location and port of landing collected from logbooks and fishery returns.
4. To derive social, demographic and economic profiles of coastal communities from existing data (1991, 1996 and 2001 ABS census data
BRS, AFMA and ABARE data
state and local government and other data sources such as consultants reports etc.)
5. To relate mapped fisheries resource usage to coastal communities.

Final report

ISBN: 1-921192-01-1
Author: James Larcombe

Project products

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Publication • 2006-01-01 • 37.04 MB
2002-223-Marine Matters- Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Costal Communities.pdf

Summary

The Atlas of Australian Marine Fishing and Coastal Communities is the first Australia-wide, comprehensive and authoritative mapping initiative presenting an overview of Australian fishing activities and coastal communities.

The Atlas shows where fish are caught in Australia’s oceans, the value of those catches, where different fishing gears are used and the species that are taken. It also provides information on the socio-economic characteristics of coastal communities in eight Marine Regions around Australia.

This information has not previously been readily available at regional and national levels and therefore difficult to take into consideration when planning. The Atlas is comprised of two products, this document, Marine Matters National and a companion website featuring an interactive online mapping system (www.brs.gov.au/fishcoast).

Marine Matters National has been produced to inform decision makers responsible for the management of activities in Australia’s marine waters, and to aid the Australian and State/Territory Governments in developing and implementing policy initiatives. It is also a flexible and readily accessible information source for anyone with an interest in the management of Australia’s marine estate.

Publication • 2002-01-01 • 170.39 MB
Marine Matters- Atlas of marine activities and costal communities in Australia's South-East Marine Region.pdf

Summary

Marine Matters provides decision makers with a credible scientific resource for informing current and future marine and coastal planning initiatives.

It is the first comprehensive and authoritative description of the range and extent of human activities in the South-East Marine Region and their relationship to coastal communities. For the first time readers can see where fish are caught in Australia's oceans, the value of those catches, and find information on a wide range of industrial, recreational and other uses.

This Atlas also describes coastal communities in the Region, identifies those that depend on commercial fishing and gauges the potential social impacts of changing access to resources. It is a powerful platform to inform debate and decision making.

Community perceptions of fishing: implications for industry image, marketing and sustainability

Project number: 2001-309
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $104,065.00
Principal Investigator: Heather Aslin
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 29 Aug 2001 - 30 Apr 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To conduct focus groups with selected sub-groups of the Australian public to serve as a basis for developing a structured survey instrument.
2. To develop the survey instrument in discussion with the advisory group, conduct a pilot test of the instrument, and administer it to a statistically representative sample of the Australian adult population (18+).
3. To identify implications of survey findings for industry communication, education and marketing activities (from answers to knowledge, perceptions, attitudes and behavioral questions).
4. To identify implications of survey findings for ESD monitoring and reporting frameworks (behavioral questions in particular).
5. In discussions with the advisory group, to develop options and strategies for addressing any negative perceptions of the industry, identifying appropriate actions, agencies to implement actions, and methods for evaluating success of implementing options.
6. To communicate overall survey results to stakeholders in a meaningful and useful form.

Final report

ISBN: 0-642-47539
Author: Heather Aslin
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 
Final Report • 2004-09-09 • 660.85 KB
2001-309-DLD.pdf

Summary

A pioneering national study of Australian public perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the fishing industry, has been completed. It covers the commercial, recreational and traditional  fishing sectors, and also examines seafood consumption and factors likely to affect future consumption. ‘Perception’ is used to refer to held beliefs or cognitions that may or may not be correct as judged by those with specialised knowledge of the industry. The traditional fishing sector, as used here, refers to subsistence fishing activities by Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians of course also participate in the commercial fishing sector.) The study involved a literature review; seven focus group discussions with a total of 63 members of the Australian public from a range of locations, ages and occupational groups; and a telephone survey of 1,004 Australian adults, 18 years and over, randomly sampled from the electronic white pages. While the final sample was reasonably representative of the general public in age distribution, it was somewhat skewed towards people with higher incomes. It is also acknowledged that voluntary telephone surveys like this one tend to have an over-representation of people who are interested in the subject matter of the survey. In this case, both recreational and commercial fishers and their views may be over-represented. These issues and their possibly influence need to be borne in mind in interpreting survey findings.
 
Survey findings indicate considerable community knowledge about recreational fishing and high participation, with twice as many men as women participating
(survey percentages were 58% of males and 29% of females participating over the year prior to the survey). Very few members of either the focus groups or telephone sample (collectively referred to as ‘respondents’) had direct experience with the commercial wild-catch sector or traditional fishing, but many focus group members knew about or had visited local aquaculture ventures. Respondents generally viewed recreational and traditional fishing and aquaculture positively, but not commercial wild-catch fishing. The telephone sample rated the sustainability of the different sectors in the order wild-catch (25% said it was sustainable); recreational (56%); traditional (64%), and aquaculture (77%). Respondents’ most important source of information about the industry was the mass media, particularly television. Recreational fishers relied more on books, magazines and fishing clubs than non-recreational fishers. Government and industry were very minor sources of information for most respondents and were not viewed as highly credible sources. Poor perceptions of the wild-catch sector suggest that much mass media information about this sector is negative, and there could be advantages in industry taking a more proactive media stance and trying to achieve better coverage of ‘good news’ stories. 
 
Members of most of the focus groups and the majority of survey respondents rated their knowledge of the industry as relatively low but interest levels higher (only 25% of the survey respondents thought they were ‘knowledgeable’ but 53% were
‘interested’), providing encouragement to those working to improve public understanding and knowledge of the industry. However, like similar surveys, the study concludes that unless they have a special interest, members of the public are unlikely to actively seek information about the industry nor to make much use of the sources they regard as most credible. Specific options for addressing poor public perceptions of the wild-catch sector include developing media campaigns in consultation with professional communicators; enlisting the support of media personalities to deliver messages; developing and disseminating popular material giving basic facts and figures about the sector and making it available in locations the public regularly uses; supporting production of television documentaries that provide a balanced perspective on wild-catch fishing and its contributions; and developing more integrated fisheries websites, preferably managed and maintained by community-based organisations that the public regards as credible. The industry could also develop more ‘on the wharf’ links to the public, for example by establishing fishing industry information sources within commercial precincts. 
 
To address low levels of public knowledge about the traditional sector, government and industry need to work with Indigenous organisations to develop communication strategies to raise public awareness of this sector and its economic and cultural contribution to Indigenous community well-being.
 
Study findings about community judgements of the sustainability of the different sectors, and the reasons for these judgements, could potentially be used in ESD reporting frameworks. In order to do this, ESD frameworks need to be made more meaningful to the community and less dominated by expert judgements and specialised knowledge. There may be particular problems with the meaningfulness of current fisheries’ jurisdictional and management boundaries. Better understanding of public perceptions, knowledge and behaviour obtained through social surveys could be a basis for re-working boundaries and reporting frameworks so that they relate better to community and local knowledge. In particular, high levels of participation and interest in recreational fishing justify attention to ways of making fisheries management more meaningful to the public and giving local communities a greater role in near shore fisheries management than they may have had in the past. Many community members appear to be engaged and interested but lack ways of being directly involved in management or monitoring. 
 
In terms of seafood consumption, a high percentage of respondents ate seafood (95% of the telephone sample). For those who did not eat it, their main reason for not doing so was taste, with other factors less important. The amount of seafood respondents purchased was likely to be influenced by price reductions (70% indicated this would influence them); labelling and certification about contamination and health risks (65%); labelling about freshness (59%); and labelling about environmentally friendly production (57%). These findings suggest potential to further influence seafood consumption patterns by expanding labelling and certification schemes.
 
Ongoing monitoring of social aspects of the industry, based partly on surveys like the one reported here, could provide the industry with important feedback about the success of its communication and information activities, complementing existing economic information about trends in production and consumption. 

Australian fisheries statistics

Project number: 2001-227
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $117,919.00
Principal Investigator: Graham Love
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 22 Jul 2001 - 30 Oct 2004
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The development of statistics on Australian fisheries production and gross value of production (GVP) is required to meet a wide range of demands.

First: The data are extensively used by the fishing industry and by providers of services to the fishing industry in making investment decisions and in longer term planning of marketing strategies. The importance of the information provided by this project was highlighted at the 1997 FRDC Australian Fisheries Economics Statistics Workshop and the Seafood Directions Conference in 1999. Also the information is used extensively in FRDC's publication "From Antarctica to the tropics: a snapshot of the Australian fishing industry".

Second: The existence of these data in a readily accessible form provides the basis for a range of other activities, including the setting of research priorities by fisheries managers, industry and research organisations and the selection of a research portfolio by funding agencies. The Commonwealth government through ABARE, contributes to a number of international databases including databases managed by FAO and OECD. Information at the international level can be important in relation to international negotiations on issues such as transboundary fisheries, in analysing trade opportunities and threats and is essential for participating in fora such as APEC and WTO.

Third: The gross value of production for specific fisheries are used for determining research and development levies for Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and for determining industry contributions to research. Because the estimates form the basis for research levies for each fishery, it is important for the system to be independent from those involved in the management and marketing processes to ensure the neutrality and integrity of the estimates.

Fourth: There are significant economies in centralising the collection, collation and dissemination of the gross value of production data. In the absence of this project the workload of a range of organsations involved with fisheries management would be substantially increased.

Objectives

1. To maintain and improve the data base of production, gross value of production and trade statistics for the Australian fishing industry, including aquaculture.
2. To provide these data in an accessible form.

Assessment of seal fishery interactions in the South East Trawl Fishery (SETF) and the development of fishing practices and seal exclusion devices (SEDs) in the winter blue grenadier fishery to mitigate seal bycatch by SETF trawlers

Project number: 2001-008
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $287,245.00
Principal Investigator: Richard Tilzey
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 30 Jan 2001 - 30 Jun 2005
Contact:
FRDC

Need

With the continuing recovery in the size of Australian-based fur seal populations post-sealing, a corresponding increase in seal interactions with domestic fishing vessels is occurring and will continue. There is an urgent need to develop effective seal bycatch prevention procedures to prevent fishing operations from being severely curtailed, or closed down, under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

Following the 1999 winter blue grenadier season, incidental seal mortalities emerged as a major issue that threatened the continuation of this fishery; at least that part of the fishery harvested by factory trawlers. These trawlers had successfully developed the fishery, increasing the total grenadier catch from about 3000 t in 1996 to over 9000 t in 1999. The processed value of the factory trawler catch is now around $20 million per year (ASIC 2003) at first sale. The seal deaths in 1999 resulted in significant pressure from some environmental groups to prevent factory trawlers access to this fishery in 2000. This action would have caused significant loss of income in this sector and possibly jeopardised the future participation of factory trawlers in the fishery. There is a strong need for such vessels to demonstrate that seal bycatch can be reduced by adopting appropriate fishing procedures and gears.

It is also likely that pressures will be brought to bear on the ‘wet boats’ fishing for blue grenadier and possibly the rest of the SEF trawl fleet to take measures to reduce incidental seal captures. The study by Knuckey et al. (2002) indicated seal bycatch to occur virtually across the whole multi-species trawl fishery. Some of the results of the development and testing of SEDs and other mitigation measures by the factory trawlers in the targeted ‘single-species’ fishery under this project may be transferable to other vessel operators in the wider multi-species fishery, helping them to avoid many potential operational problems and costs. Increasing the effectiveness of SEDs in both reducing seal mortalities and minimising fish losses would be an important step in helping to gain wider industry acceptance of the potential use of these devices.

Objectives

1. To improve the effectiveness of Seal Exclusion Devices (SEDs) in blue grenadier trawl nets in reducing seal mortalities and minimising losses of fish.
2. To assess the effectiveness of fishing techniques aimed at minimising seal bycatch.
3. To gather full biological information from all seal fatalities.
4. To achieve full observer coverage of freezer-trawler activities during the 2001 and 2002 winter grenadier fishery and monitor seal numbers around vessels and all seal-trawl interactions.
5. To gather information on seal movements/residence time in the winter grenadier fishery.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925983-05-0
Author: Richard Tilzey
Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Project products

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Final Report • 2007-04-30 • 2.06 MB
2001-008-DLD.pdf

Summary

Introducing a Code of Fishing Practice aimed at avoiding seals appeared to halve the incidence of seal bycatch in this fishery. In SED trials, the problems of fish-loss via the SED escape hatch and net blockage via the SED grid were solved by changes in SED design. Although the effectiveness of most SED designs in reducing seal bycatch could not be quantified, the forward facing, ‘top-hatch’ SED design used in 2002 significantly lowered the incidence of seal bycatch in midwater trawl nets. Trials with this design are continuing. Some of the major factors that influence the probability of seal bycatch occurring in this fishery were delineated. Biological sampling of seal fatalities showed the dominant seal bycatch to be sub-adult male Australian fur seals habituated to foraging from trawl nets. Seal tracking studies developed a novel method of tagging seals at sea and indicated that a comparatively small and intransient sub-set of their population interacted with this fishery.

The following recommendations were made in the winter grenadier fishery: use open, forward-facing, ‘top-hatch’ SEDs (or a more effective design if one is developed) in all midwater net shots (or as directed for research purposes); continue the Code of Fishing Practice; continue the shot-by-shot recording of seal bycatch in the SEF1 logbook and maintain a level of scientific observer coverage and biological data collection; and, continue trials of the ‘top-hatch’ SED and gather more information by using underwater filming on the timing and depth–frequency of net entry by seals, and the circumstances of net entry that place seals at risk. 

The following recommendations were made in the rest of the SEF trawl fleet: Priority should be given to assessing the nature and extent of seal-fishery activities across the fishery; The Code of Fishing Practice should be followed where practicable; and, At this juncture, SED use should be confined to large midwater trawl nets in areas where seals are known to be common, as more assessment of SED effectiveness is needed before extending their usage.

Project results also assisted the goal of obtaining accreditation for the SEF under a Section 33 determination under this Act.

Keywords: Blue grenadier trawl fishery, seal bycatch mitigation, Seal Exclusion Devices, Australian fur seal biology.

Monitoring the catch of turtles in the Northern Prawn Fishery

Project number: 1998-202
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $179,471.00
Principal Investigator: Carolyn M. Robins
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 20 Jun 1998 - 8 May 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The effect of prawn trawling continues to be raised by many stakeholders and management agencies as a major problem for sea turtle conservation. In recent years, several developments have reflected these concerns such as the Endangered Species Protection Act (ESPA), the embargo by the United States of America on prawn imports from countries without appropriate turtle bycatch management plans and measures, the public nomination of prawn trawling as a Key Threatening Process under the Endangered Species Protection Act , and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority’s (GBRMPA) submission to the Queensland Fisheries Management Authority (QFMA).

NORMAC/AFMA needs to have an accurate estimate of catch and mortality of turtles in the NPF to be able to address concerns and, develop and evaluate the effectiveness of management measures to reduce the bycatch of turtles eg. effort adjustments, introduction of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). With significant changes to the NPF since 1989/90, there is now a need for further information on the species composition, catch and mortality of turtles in the Northern Prawn Fishery (NPF). There is also a need for critical data for the design of a cost-effective logbook based turtle bycatch monitoring program in the NPF and method of assessing the effect of prawn trawling on turtle bycatch species that are acceptable to all stakeholders.

The data produced by this project will be used to :

1. independently verify the logbook records of turtle catches,
2. measure the impact on turtle populations of the 1988/92 fleet restructure,
3. provide a baseline to measure the impact of the effort adjustment package proposed for 1999,
4. provide information to assess the introduction of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) into the fishery and,
5. further the understanding of the biology and movements of turtles in the fishery.

A successful verified logbook system for ongoing monitoring of turtle catches that is acceptable to most stakeholders is likely to have application to similar species of concern in other fisheries.

Objectives

1. To collect detailed baseline information on the species composition, catch and mortality rates of sea turtles captured incidentally by the Northern Prawn Fishery in 1998 and 1999.
2. To use these results to: a) measure the impact of the 1988/92 restructure, and predict the impact of the proposed effort adjustment package (1998/99) and the introduction of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) into the NPF on the incidental catch of sea turtlesb) to improve the current AFMA logbook monitoring of turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final report

ISBN: 0-642-47562-8
Author: Carolyn Robins
Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Final Report • 2003-02-17 • 5.37 MB
1998-202-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch, the catch of non-target species, is a significant issue in many of the world's fisheries. Sea turtles are of particular concern given their endangered status and the considerable numbers caught, and occasionally killed, worldwide in commercial fishery operations. Trawl fisheries, in particular, are recognised as discarding the greatest amount of bycatch compared to other commercial fishing methods. An estimated 37.2% of the total global discards have been attributed to trawlers (Alverson et al., 1994). In addition, trawling operations have been held responsible for more sea turtle deaths than any other human-related factor (Bisong, 2000). A project conducted in 1989 and 1990 estimated 5 000 to 6 000 turtles were caught by NPF trawlers annually, with a mortality rate of up to 39% (Poiner and Harris, 1996).

For many years Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) have been hailed as the solution to sea turtle mortality from trawl fisheries. TEDs - devices sewn into trawl nets that selectively remove large organisms, such as turtles, while allowing the smaller target species to be caught - have been introduced in many trawl fisheries worldwide. In 2000, the use of TEDs was made mandatory in the NPF.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of TEDs in reducing sea turtle bycatch in the NPF.

Estimation of gross value of fisheries production

Project number: 1998-166
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $98,085.00
Principal Investigator: Deborah Brown
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1998 - 27 Sep 2001
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The development of statistics on Australian fisheries production and gross value of production (GVP) is required to meet a wide rang of demands.

First: GVP for specific fisheries are required for determining research and development levies for Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and Fish Resources Research Fund (FRRF) and for determining industry contributions to research. Because the estimates form the basis for research levies for each fishery, it is important for the system to be independent from those involved in the management and marketing processes to ensure the neutrality and integrity of the esimates.

Second:The data is extensively used by the fishing ndustry and by providers of services to the fishing indusry (such as banks) in making investment decisions and in longer term planning of marketing stategies. The importance of the information provided by this project was highlighted at the 1997 FRDC Australian Fisheries Economics Statistics Workshop, and has been reafirmed by the Fisheries Economic Statistics Steering Committee.

Third: the existences of these data in a readily accessible form provides the basis for a range of other activities, including the setting of research priorities by fisheries managers, industry and research organisations and the selection of a research portfolio by funding agencies. The project data are used to meet Australia's obligations to provide fisheries information to international organisations, such as FAO and OECD, a task which was handed over to ABARE under the FRRF arrangements and for which support has been provided under FRRF.

Fourth: there are significant economies in centralising the GVP data project. In the absence of this project the workload of a range of organisaions involved in Commonwealth fisheries management would be substantially increased to dealwith public, industry and government enquiries. This inturn, woud result inan increase in the costs of fisheries management and admiistration.

Fifth: the costs of administration of fisheries research would be similarly affected. The current arrangements for the allocation of fisheries research funding and for determining research priorities could not be feasibly undertaken in the absence of the project.

Objectives

1. To develop and maintain a data base of producion, value and trade statisitcs for the Australian fishing industry, including aquaculture.

Final report

Author: Deborah Brown
Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Final Report • 2001-06-22 • 615.51 KB
1998-166-DLD.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing on an annual basis, detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The research undertaken in this project (98/166) produced data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, covering the years 1995-96 to 1999-2000. These reports also contain industry structure profiles of Commonwealth and state fisheries. 

An important part of this project was the requirement to implement a process of continuous improvement over the life of the project. These improvements were aimed at enhancing the coverage of fisheries, so all commercial fishing activities were included, maintaining the relevance of the data presented in both the production and trade tables, and implement processes so that the valuation of commercial fishing was undertaken in a consistent framework.

Support for Outlook 98 and a post-economic analysis of Wallis Lakes: impact of hepatitis A

Project number: 1997-349
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $13,015.00
Principal Investigator: Perry Smith
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1997 - 1 Dec 1998
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This project has arisen because of the Hepatitis A outbreak possibly associated with oysters at Wallis Lakes, 1997. Food safety issues are regarded by sea food industry as a major threat. While the majority of industry can see the benefit of implementing food safety plans others are still to be convinced. The hepatitis outbreak offers a unique opportunity to determine the cost both socially and economically of a major disease outbreak, its impact on consumers, and the economic benefit of effective food safety plans. The need for the project is:

1. to quantify the economic cost to the industry as a result of reduced market acceptance for oysters products;
2. to determine the extent that the outbreak impacted on other seafood products both from Wallis lakes and other sources;
3. the development of this economic analysis will allow the industry to assess the risk associated with addressing food safety issues;
4. to provide the basis for ABARE’s presentation to Outlook 98, which can be further extended to industry as a case study; and,
5. additionally, the project will act as a vehicle as part of FRDC's sponsorship of the fisheries outlook session of the 98 Outlook conference .

Objectives

1. 1. to quantify the extent of reduction in oyster sales as a result of the hepatitis A outbreak
2. 2. to quantify the costs to other sectors of the seafood sector as a result of the hepatitis A outbreak, this will primarily focus on the Sydney seafood markets
and,
3. 3. to extend the results both as part of Outlook 98 and as a case study for industry.

Update and world-wide distribution of Australian fisheries resource information

Project number: 1997-302
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $90,080.00
Principal Investigator: Albert Caton
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 20 Jul 1997 - 25 May 2000
Contact:
FRDC

Need

There is a need to make information on important Australian fishes available to Australian scientists, managers, policy-makers, industry, business, students and the public so they can make timely and better informed decisions on matters concerning fish.

Increasingly, there is a need to quickly access information from outside Australia to assist in understanding Australian fishes eg. obtaining information on a fish stock Australia shares with another country, or a new fish resource that already has a history in another country. The most efficient way of doing this is via a centralised database containing information on fishes world-wide.

The work on FISHBASE forms part of a world-wide initiative facilitated by FAO and ICLARM to make technical information for fisheries resources more widely accessible to scientists and other users of the information. Australia makes considerable resources available to these organisations, and has a high profile and good reputation in international fisheries fora. The provision of Australian information into FISHBASE will profoundly enhance FISHBASE and is likely to engender greater use and success of the product; this will undoubtably be viewed favourably by international agencies.

Objectives

1. To provide a useful, up-to-date, national and international database of species biology, ecology and management for the commercially-important fish in Australia (about 70 species according to the 'Australian Fisheries Resources’ publication).

Evaluation of factors influencing prices of domestic seafoods

Project number: 1995-118
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $177,983.00
Principal Investigator: Perry Smith
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 30 Oct 1995 - 1 Apr 1999
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To evaluate the importance of handling and quality attributes to prices paid at auction on the Sydney Fish Market auction for selected species
2. To establish proce flexibilities for major South East Fishery species on the Sydney Fish Market

Final report

ISBN: 0642 26631 X
Authors: Perry Smith Greg Griffiths and Nick Ruello
Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Final Report • 1998-06-30 • 2.83 MB
1995-118-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australian fisheries are managed by governments to ensure that commercial fishing is undertaken in a sustainable and economically efficient manner. Fisheries management decisions influence the level of catch from a fishery, either directly through setting the total allowable catches that the industry may take or indirectly through restrictions on the number of operators and the equipment they may use. It is therefore important that the impacts of fisheries management decisions can be evaluated in the light of their impact on the fishing industry and on the public.

The relationships between the volume of fish landed and the prices that oper­ators receive are central to considerations of economic efficiency. The commercial value of fisheries is determined by the volume, the species and size composition of catches and the values placed on them at commercial markets. To establish the benefits and costs of fisheries management options, such as reducing the catch in a fishery or changing the composition of catches through introducing gear restrictions, it is desirable to know how industry revenue will be affected by the change.

The objective in the first part of this study is to establish the relationships between prices received by operators and the volume supplied to the market. The analysis is conducted for product landed from the south east fishery, which is a major source of fresh fish for domestic consumption. The fishery is managed under an individual tradable quota system, based on setting of total allowable catches to restrict the commercial harvest. The analysis covered the quota species of the south east fishery which were sold on the Sydney market.

If relationships exist between the quantity of fish produced from the fishery and the prices received by fishing operators, industry revenue will be affected by market factors. For example, if prices received by fishing operators are responsive to changes in volume sold then the impact on revenue of a reduc­tion in total catches will be partly offset by higher prices. Where prices are determined by the catch in the fishery then the economically optimal catch will be lower than the optimal catch where prices are determined indepen­dently, such as by overseas markets.

Determination of Australian fisheries statistics 1994-95 to 1996-97

Project number: 1994-146
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $120,000.00
Principal Investigator: David Campbell
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 29 May 1995 - 30 Jun 1998
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To develop and maintain a data base of production, value and trade statistics for the Australian fishing industry including aquaculture

Final report

Author: Perry Smith
Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Project products

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

Final Report • 1996-12-24 • 355.63 KB
1994-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project was undertaken to maintain and develop the collection of industry production, value of production and trade data. These are the only collated, published source of information on commercial industry catches and are used for a wide range of purposes , including determination of Commonwealth allocations for fisheries research funding, industry levies and for addressing a wide range of the information needs of both Government and industry.

Since the project's commencement in 1995 there has been an increased focus on developing the statistics to better meet the information needs of all users. In February 1997, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation convened the Australian Fisheries Economic Statistics Workshop in Canberra to review the best means of addressing these needs. At this Workshop there was strong support for the approaches adopted in Australian Fisheries Statistics and the form in which it was published. However, there was agreement on the need to address a number of areas where statistics were either not available or were not of the robustness required.

Report • 1997-01-07 • 2.35 MB
1994-146-PDT.pdf

Summary

To meet the needs of the fishing industry and fisheries managers, policy makers and researchers, ABARE has been publishing detailed production and trade data in Australian Fisheries Statistics since 1991. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in this report are used, for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year.

This publication, the sixth in the series, contains a comprehensive set of data on the volume and value of production from Commonwealth and state fisheries, and the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product, for the three years to 1995-96. The report also contains a profile of Commonwealth and state fisheries for 1995-96.

Australian Fisheries Statistics can be used in conjunction with ABARE's major annual statistical bulletin, Australian Commodity Statistics, which provides ahistorical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities, and ABARE's quarterly journal, Australian Commodities, in which forecasts for major fisheries commodities are updated throughout the year. Together these three publications provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Detailed analysis of selected fisheries is also provided in the annual Australian Fisheries Surveys Report.

View Filter

Organisation