Role of marine reserves in sustainable management of Australia's ocean estate - review of the Heard Island and McDonald Islands bioregion
Transformation in Commonwealth Fisheries Management Policy: connecting research, policy and practice in addressing shifting expectations
Australia’s fisheries management system is facing significant challenges with the resilience of small-scale operators under threat and growing pressures on the fisheries sector. New policy pathways are needed to address rising costs, climate adaptation and other cumulative pressures on industry (resource competition, market volatility, restructures, and rising operational costs).
The main purpose of this short duration (6 month) project is to identify transformational strategies that can be supported and sustained by industry and fisheries managers and provide insight into current policy reviews in progress (Nature Positive and Fish Harvest Strategy in particular).
This project is an initiative of the Commonwealth Fisheries Association (CFA) and its members, with support from two Australian government agencies/authorities (AFMA and DAFF) and Seafood Industry Australia (SIA).
This is a collaborative action research project using technical workshops and case study scenario testing to examine ‘out of the box’ management tools, such as triage capability, co-management and ecosystems approaches.
A two-day residential workshop will be undertaken to facilitate open discussion, knowledge sharing and scenario testing of alternative management approaches and adaptation options in three fisheries scenarios. The project will be supported by targeted pre and post activities to support linkages developed in the workshop and ensure practical outcomes.
The residential workshop will be a solutions-focussed, consultative event with participants asked to come prepared to collaborate and to make commitments for change. The event is aimed at CEOs, senior level fisheries managers, commercial fishers, and youth delegates. Numbers are strictly limited.
Economic Impact assessment of FRDC's annual RD&E investments: a three year procurement
It is becoming increasingly important for Rural RDCs to continually monitor and evaluate the returns from RD&E investment, as government and industry require greater transparency and accountability of RD&E funds.
In addition to FRDC’s Statutory Funding Agreement requirements for valuing return on investment and use in its Annual Reports, impact assessments of FRDC’s RD&E investments are needed to inform:
– Future investment decisions
– CRRDC’s overall performance review of impact generated by RDCs
– Levy payers and government of the performance of investments.
GHD understands that the project will comprise two key components:
– An economic impact assessment of up to 20 research projects for the three-year period FY23/24, 24/25, and 25/26
– An individual and aggregated report of all assessed projects at the completion of assessments.
GHD notes that within this period the first five assessments for FY23/24 are required by June 2024 with the remainder of the projects, i.e. 10, due in September 2024. These assessments are required to be consistent with the CRRDC Guidelines for Impact Assessments. FRDC RD&E projects are to be assessed annually to meet Statutory Funding Agreement (SFA) requirements for valuing return on investment for use in FRDC’s Annual Reports and performance of FRDC’s investments.
In conducting the impact assessment project it will be important to note that one of FRDC’s key responsibilities is to ensure that research to assist management of fisheries and aquaculture resources is being undertaken to maintain ongoing sustainability. While the primary focus of these benefit-cost analyses over time has been economic impact, with references to environmental and social implications where appropriate, FRDC is increasingly interested in understanding the impact of R&D investments on environmental, social, and economic aspects more holistically.