Understanding and mapping the Tasmanian public perception to Atlantic Salmon farming
Sex reversal and sex differentiation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)
Based on the National Fishing and Aquaculture RDE strategy 2016, our project relates to Strategic Goal 3: Benefits and value from fisheries and aquaculture resources (productivity and profitability) are maximised, and aquaculture production increased.
Priority area: Develop new technologies and systems to improve the efficiency of production methods.
This project is needed because the Australian Atlantic Salmon Industry is lacking basic and applied knowledge that could lead to the development of a reliable, non-steroidal method to produce all-female populations of Atlantic salmon. One of the drivers of this project is the fact that eliminating males from the production cycle (grow-out period), will reduce the effects of precocious sexual maturation, including reduced growth, reduced flesh quality, and susceptibility to diseases. As a consequence of eliminating males from the production cycle is a concomitant increase in overall productivity (biomass produced) and profitability
We will use genetic and morphological techniques to improve our understanding of sex differentiation in Atlantic salmon. This knowledge is needed to inform the exact period that sex reversal treatments with exogenous substances are more effective to produce neo-males. This exact timing can then be used in the trial of next generation non-steroidal substances, ensuring that they have the greatest chance of success. This will be the first time that detailed gene expression and morphological information will be collected throughout the entire period of sexual differentiation.
Final report
1. Based on histology and morphology, sex differentiation in Atlantic Salmon seems to occur by 79 dph.
2. Based on gene expression, three male specific genes are upregulated prior to morphological sex differentiation, whereas in females only one gene is differentially upregulated prior to morphological sex differentiation.
3. Immersion treatment with MDHT and MDHT+DMSO led to masculinization of genetic females to rates between 81 and 87%.
4. Immersion in MDHT led to the upregulation of male specific genes, which occurred 15 days after (dph) the date observed in normal males (34-66 dph) in the sex differentiation study.
Development of a hydrodynamic model to investigate near field and regional connectivity around Okehampton Bay
Survey of Enterprise-level Biosecurity across the Australian Aquaculture Industry
Aquaculture-Community Futures: North West Tasmania
To secure the future of Australian aquaculture, building and maintaining a sufficient level of support and trust from interested and affected communities is vital. Worldwide, there have been several examples of where aquaculture operations have been threatened because of a lack of societal acceptability. In Australia, a recent example of this has been the environmental non-governmental organisations (eNGOs) campaigns against proposed fish farm operations in Okehampton Bay on Tasmania’s east coast (Murphy-Gregory, 2017). In the Tasmanian context, attitudes toward the commercial exploitation/use of natural resources involve multi-dimensional, often conflicting, values often with a spatial dimension (see Evans, Kirkpatrick & Bridle 2018).
FRDC Project 2017-158 ‘Determinates of socially-supported wild-catch and aquaculture fisheries in Australia’ has revealed that several factors contribute towards achieving community acceptance: the perception that a company offers benefits; that it contributes to the well-being of the region and respects the local way of life; that it listens, responds and exhibits reciprocity; and that relations are based on an enduring regard for each other’s interests. These factors are often based on understanding and contributing towards achieving a certain state or condition of that which is valued by local and regional communities (e.g. a certain level of local employment, or of threatened habitat protection). Indeed, a lack of social acceptance for the aquaculture industry has often resulted in part from their practices being seen to, or in some cases actually, compromising the condition or state of what communities ‘value’ (feel is very important).
This project has been designed to examine the mix of community interests and values, and to identify how the aquaculture industry and regional communities can participate in processes of negotiation, to contribute towards the achievement of desired conditions or states of community values, using NW Tasmania as a case study.
Final report
This report discusses a study conducted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania on marine and costal wellbeing and how it can be considered in regional marine and coastal development decision making. The need for this project arose from a desire by selected Tasmanian aquaculture industry members to better understand levels of community acceptability of their operations (or ‘social license to operate’). The study used a mixed methods approach that combined participatory mapping, qualitative and quantitative primary data, and desk-top research to develop this framework. Wellbeing was found to be comprised of three dimensions: material, relational and subjective. The material relates to welfare or standards of living. The relational is about social relations, personal relationships, and access to the resources we need. The subjective is about how we perceive our individual experience of life. Specific marine and coastal places matter to well-being. Considering wellbeing in the decision-making process is challenging because some aspects are difficult to measure.