133,668 results

Whose fish is it anyway? Investigation of co-management and self-governance solutions to local issues in Queensland's inshore fisheries

Project number: 2009-211
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $300,000.00
Principal Investigator: Daryl McPhee
Organisation: McPhee Research Consultants Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 8 Oct 2009 - 30 Jun 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Traditional management approaches have in many cases failed to address equity, socio-economic, sustainability and environmental issues raised by stakeholders in fisheries from a local, or regional perspective. This has been particularly the case for inshore fisheries.

A range of 'local' issues were raised in the recent Regulatory Impact Statement and Draft Public Benefit consultation process for the Queensland East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery. This project sets out to take an experimental approach to developing solutions to these concerns by investigating a limited number of local problems in a comprehensive manner, with the hope that they will assist in the development of models which can be used to tackle similar situations, both within Queensland and in similar fisheries around Australia, identified in the 2008 FRDC Inshore Fisheries Forum. The project will showcase the first attempts to adopt the 'Steps in implementing co-management' proposed in FRDC's 'Co-management' report (project no. 2006/068).

This project will support both the Queensland fishing industry and the Queensland Government's aspirations to develop improved partnerships between all stakeholders involved in the fishing industry, and through greater sharing of responsibility for management arrangements re-position the Fisheries Group's relationship in the 'management arena' as both a stakeholder and facilitator, in contrast to its historical role of authorising agent.

The implementation of this program will also assist in capacity building of the industry organisation (QSIA), particularly in terms of its readinesss to be involved with, and take a lead role in the development and assessment of new fisheries management tools in the new era of Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management (EBFM).

Objectives

1. Trial the implementation of a locally based co-management approach in three areas.
2. Empirically assess the local socio-economic environment as it pertains to the fishery and identify the various tools that may be applied to local management issues.
3. Assess the applicability of the identified management tools to each local circumstance, and the socio-economic cost and benefits of their application.
4. Develop appropriate proposals for local area fisheries management and identify the pathways and timeframes necessary to implement them.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-646-80487-3
Author: Daryl McPhee and Renae Tobin
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Final Report • 2019-08-02 • 7.94 MB
2009-211-DLD.pdf

Summary

The management of inshore fisheries represents one of the most significant challenges for fisheries management. Inshore fisheries and their management are facing an unprecedented level of attention on economic, social and environmental grounds. Such fisheries are typically small scale, accessed by competing stakeholders. Co-management is an established approach for managing small scale fisheries, including inshore fisheries and is of particular interest in developing countries. While the concept behind co-management is logical, it is not without its challenges in terms of practical implementation.
Industry

Tactical Research Fund: Providing social science objectives and indicators to compare management options in the Queensland trawl planning process

Project number: 2009-100
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $95,000.00
Principal Investigator: Cathy M. Dichmont
Organisation: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
Project start/end date: 31 May 2010 - 29 Oct 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Fisheries management has mostly been directed by economic and ecological objectives. With the introduction of the call for triple bottom line assessments of industry and government performance, a need for social objectives has become apparent which has remained largely unaddressed in terms of integration into management plans for specific fisheries.

In addition, consideration of social impacts of different management options are very important for the Queensland trawl fishery. The reason for this is that the fishery ranges from having communities where trawling is the major source of income to the opposite case where trawling is only a minor component of the community activities and income. The fishery also spans almost the whole length of the eastern Queensland coast with a complex multi-species, multi-fleet fishery which is worth about $100M - Queensland's most valuable fishery. Management options need to balance community, economic and biological needs. Any changes to the management of the fishery can substantially change the biological status of stocks, fishery profitability but also equity between fleets and communities.

Queensland DEEDI are presently developing a new draft Plan for comment and input to this is essential and urgent.

There is therefore a need for specific social objectives and associated relevant indicators for Queensland DEEDI to use in the development of management plans and the assessment of them.

Objectives

2. Test and verify applicability of social objectives and indicators using semi-quantitative analyses with stakeholder groups
3. Identify social objective and indicators of relevance to the Queensland trawl fishery

Final report

ISBN: 9780643109223
Author: Catherine Dichmont

Tactical Research Fund: measuring dropout rates from commercial demersal gillnets in Western Australia

Project number: 2009-097
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $63,280.00
Principal Investigator: John C. Harrison
Organisation: Western Australian Fishing Industry Council Inc (WAFIC)
Project start/end date: 31 Aug 2010 - 31 May 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Demersal scalefish species account for between 11 and 17% of the total catch composition of the Western Australian Temperate Gillnet Fishery (1994 to 1999). Scalefish landings for 2005/06 amounted to 236t in the JASDGDLMF and the WCDGDLMF.

While demersal scalefish are a legitimate component of the catch, strong concern has been raised by the recreational sector, that considerable numbers of scalefish are dropping out of commercial gillnets, particularly iconic species such as West Australian Dhufish (Glaucosoma hebraicum), Blue Groper (Achoerodus gouldii) and Snapper (Pagrus auratus). As a result of this perception, conflict between recreational and commercial sectors has escalated substantially over the last five years.

In light of recent restrictions on recreational bag limits for iconic WA finfish such as G. hebraicum and P. auratus, the issue of scalefish ‘dropouts’ from commercial gillnets raises concern with respect to the catch efficiency and the ability of nets to retain demersal scalefish. The issue has the potential to negatively impact upon the security of future commercial access to the fishery.

Quantifying the number of scalefish that encounter nets, identifying species vulnerable to dropout and knowing where and when they are more likely to drop out of commercial gillnets (alive and dead) will complement existing catch composition data obtained by the DoF.

The WA Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Association encourage the implementation of initiatives consistent with the principles of ecological sustainable development. Professional fishermen have expressed a willingness to investigate the claims of high dropout rates of finfish from gillnets, ensuring catch rates are sustainable and improving the public’s perception of the fishery. As the fishery is now undergoing pre-assessment for Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification, the need for accurate data to determine if demersal scalefish are dropping out of demersal gillnets is critical for an informed risk assessment of this fishery.

Objectives

1. Determine the dropout rate of targeted demersal scalefish from commercial gillnets
2. Determine the retention rate (catch efficiency) of commercial gillnets.
3. Identify species prone to dropouts and quantify dropouts at a regional level
4. Identify stages in the fishing process where dropouts are more likely to occur.
5. Determine the level of interaction between commercial fishing gear and non-target species

Informing rick assessment through estimating interaction rates between Australia sea lions and Western Australia's temperate demersal gillnet fisheries

Project number: 2009-096
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $50,000.00
Principal Investigator: Alex Hesp
Organisation: Murdoch University
Project start/end date: 31 Aug 2010 - 29 Aug 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Australia’s only endemic pinniped, the Australian sea lion (ASL) Neophoca cinerea, is one of the rarest sea lions (~ 14,700) worldwide and listed as “threatened” under Australian Commonwealth legislation and as “Specially Protected Fauna” under the WA Wildlife Conservation Act.

There is considerable concern among some researchers and community sectors that incidental bycatch of ASLs by commercial gillnetting may be preventing the recovery of ASL populations from their current depleted states. Goldsworthy et al (2010) recently estimated that several hundred ASLs die annually in SA due to gillnetting, indicating that there is an urgent need to explore the extent to which ASLs in WA are affected by commercial gillnetting.

WA temperate gillnet fisheries will soon commence Marine Stewardship pre-assessment and their members are acutely aware of the urgent need for research on ASL/gillnet interactions in WA, without which, they cannot achieve certification and are vulnerable to the Commonwealth’s Marine Park planning process (if that process is not based on sound information).

As the distribution of ASL colonies, foraging areas of ASL individuals, and of gillnet fishing in WA are very different from SA, the results of the SA study cannot be applied directly to the WA situation.

Goldsworthy et al. (2009) based their analyses on distance from colonies and depth, but possibly because of limited tagging and/or observer data, did not consider the direction of ASL foraging trips from breeding colonies and haul out points and may have thus overestimated ASL mortality rates due to commercial gillnetting. The accuracy of estimates of ASL/gillnet interactions has major implications for both the conservation of ASL populations and for the viability of important fisheries. Developing improved methods of analysis, e.g. the agent-based modelling approach proposed here, and comparison of results with those from existing approaches are key to facilitating sound risk assessments.

Objectives

1. Develop a tool to assist in determining the implications of the current distribution of commercial gillnet fishing for different colonies of Australian sea lions
2. Estimate the proportion of Australian sea lions, in different colonies, that encounter commercial gillnets in Western Australian waters each year

Tactical Research Fund: topping up the "Crystal Bowl" for Barramundi

Project number: 2009-094
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $62,000.00
Principal Investigator: Bill Sawynok
Organisation: Infofish Australia Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 31 Aug 2010 - 29 Aug 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Application 2010/018: A "Crystal Bowl" for Barramundi was submitted to the FRDC 2010 round. While the application was rejected the Board indicated it was sympathetic to the approach described and suggested further discussion with Recfishing Research in the development of any future application. It is proposed that a further application be developed for the FRDC 2011 round addressing the issues raised by the Board.

The "Crystal Bowl" concept will underpin any move to regional management which is dependent on fine scale data collection on Barramundi in the Fitzroy River system and remains pivotal to the further development of the concept.

Data collected will also be used as baseline data for two coal port developments proposed by Xstrata for the Fitzroy River. These proposals are in their early stages. One proposal at Balaclava Island at the mouth of the river could impact on Barramundi and Threadfin spawning grounds and the other to barge coal down the Fitzroy River will significantly disrupt fishing activities. Discussions are underway with consultants for Xstrata to establish a monitoring program however this is unlikely to commence until the project are approved.

The data required is commercial catch, recreational catch and recruitment. Also required are the environmental conditions including connectivity of wetland lagoons, river flows and rainfall.

Data on commercial catch is available from Fisheries Queensland. CapReef, a community based monitoring program, has collected data on recreational catch since 2007 and recruitment since 1999. A further application for the "Crystal Bowl" will not be submitted until November 2010 and if approved would not commence until around June 2011.

Objectives

1. Collection of commercial catch and recreational catch data for the Fitzroy River in 2010-11
2. Collection of Barramundi recruitment and environmental data for the 2011 recruitment season from January to April
3. Use of that data in the development of commitment to local or regional management among local stakeholders and as baseline data for estimating the impact of proposed coal port developments for the Fitzroy River

Tactical Research Fund: Reference points for the Queensland scallop fishery

Project number: 2009-089
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $30,984.70
Principal Investigator: Alexandra Campbell
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 31 Aug 2010 - 29 Nov 2010
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Reference points are essential for the effective management of any large fishery. The spatially complex nature of scallop fisheries makes the construction of robust reference points difficult. FRDC project 1999/120, "Reference point management and the role of catch-per-unit-effort in prawn and scallop fisheries", concluded that "new types of data are essential to improve the accuracy of stock assessments, such as spatial indices of abundance collected through fishery independent sampling and VMS", and that "more accurate and robust reference points may exist using these data". FRDC project 2006/024, "Harvest strategy evaluation to optimise the sustainability and value of the Queensland scallop fishery", made effective use of both these data types to answer questions about the optimal timing of spatial closures and other management strategies. The proposed TRF project will build on this work by completing the path to adoption of the recommendations contained in the 2006/024 report, and noted by the FRDC external reviewer (review attached). In particular this will involve using the already constructed HSE framework to devise and test robust reference points.

In order to adopt the recommendations from FRDC project 2006/024 in the current review of management arrangements for the fishery, Fisheries Queensland requires this additional work on sustainability reference points. This work on the sustainabililty reference points is required to be completed by August 2010 with a final report available no later than September 2010.

Objectives

1. Propose and construct a set of reference points for the scallop fishery (e.g. target and limit effort)
2. Test the reference points in the (already constructed) MSE framework, i.e. what levels for the reference points perform best in terms of the sustainability and profitability indicators

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-7345-0424-1
Author: Alexander Campbell

Tactical Research Fund: sustainable shark fisheries - a National Research, Development and Extension Framework

Project number: 2009-088
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $34,977.96
Principal Investigator: Andy Bodsworth
Organisation: Cobalt MRM Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 10 Aug 2010 - 30 Sep 2010
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Recent risk assessment work for elasmobranchs caught in marine fisheries has highlighted their vulnerability to fishing pressure and many species are now a high priority for research and management attention. This, combined with their key ecological role, and an increasing community awareness and attention on the sustainability of shark fisheries; as well as the need for increasingly efficient use of fisheries research funding, demonstrates the need for a defined framework for shark fishery RD&E, both nationally and regionally, and at a tactical and strategic level.

There is also a requirement to co-ordinate FRDC investments in RD&E projects for shark-associated fisheries with key national investments in infrastructure such as the IMOS Australian Acoustic Tagging and Monitoring System. The huge distances moved by individual sharks and the widely dispersed nature of many shark populations will require cross-jurisdictional research and management responses that should be informed by these new technological opportunities.

Given the constraints for fisheries RD&E funding, and recognising the business challenges confronting many fishing operators, shark related fishery RD&E must reflect management priorities and help deliver practical cost-effective solutions to identified problems. Furthermore, projects must demonstrate strong and relevant collaboration, both for efficiency and development of RD&E capacity. Without these, and other key attributes, shark-oriented RD&E will not achieve its potential to drive demonstrable improvements in management outcomes for these species and fisheries.

Objectives

1. Develop a national Research, Development and Extension Framework to underpin improved management outcomes for Australian commercial, recreational, and indigenous fisheries where shark species are caught.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9808262-2-7
Author: Andy Bodsworth

Empowering Industry R,D&E: an analysis of water, sediment and biological samples from the Clarence River to identify potential causes for poor growth of school prawn during 2009/10

Project number: 2009-087
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $25,000.00
Principal Investigator: John C. Harrison
Organisation: Professional Fishers Association (PFA)
Project start/end date: 7 Jun 2010 - 29 Sep 2010
Contact:
FRDC

Need

On 14 December the Clarence River estuary prawn trawl fishermen made a ‘gut wrenching’ decision – they closed the River and Lake Wooloweyah to prawn trawling until January 4. This at a time when harvest rates should be peaking to meet the demand for the school prawns over the Xmas and New Year period. The reason for the decision was based on the small size of the school prawn in the lake and river. It appears that they are not growing despite what seems to be ideal conditions. Following the major flood in May and a minor fresh in October it was expected that the up coming river trawl season would be a bumper.

For months there has been a problem with the size of the prawns in the river system. Although the reason is unknown, many theories are being proffered:

• high water temp (29 – 30 degrees) and maybe that is not conducive (too high) to the micro food the prawns eat;
• something left as a residue after the floods because the prawns are travelling when thy should not be (small ones going to sea);
• bream dying in crab traps;
• prawns are not separating into different class sizes as they usually do;
• flood mud on the banks from May that still has no grass growing on it in some places;
• pocket nets catching small travelling prawns when they normally catch a better grade of prawn;
• fish kill up the Coldstream River about mid November;
• eels dead in traps (South Arm) and look like they have been boiled;

Unless possible causes are eliminated and the likely problem identified then there could be ongoing impacts and a possibility that the prawn trawl season for the next few years affected.

Objectives

1. Identify 18 key sites in the lower Clarence river for sediment and water sample testing
2. Engage a certified testing labarotory to sample and test these sites for a range of possible contanimants
3. Report on these test and results and determine a course in conjunction with relevant authorities of action if test results determine this

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9808239-1-2
Author: John Harrison
View Filter

Species

Organisation