8 results
Environment
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-114
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Completing Australia’s First National Bycatch Report

Bycatch (non-targeted organisms that are unintentionally caught when fishing for particular species or sizes of species) remains an important issue concerning the world’s fisheries. Discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of...
ORGANISATION:
IC Independent Consulting Pty Ltd
People
PROJECT NUMBER • 2017-097
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Reducing bycatch using modifications to sweeps and lines anterior to the trawl mouth - collaboration with the Technical University of Denmark

Prawn trawling is among the world's least selective fishing methods and there has been a great deal of work done over the past few decades to develop modifications that reduce unwanted bycatches. Much of this work has focussed on modifications at, or near, the codend (at the aft section) of trawls,...
ORGANISATION:
IC Independent Consulting Pty Ltd
Adoption
PROJECT NUMBER • 2017-065
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Disseminating existing bycatch reduction and fuel efficiency technologies throughout Australia's prawn fisheries

Prawn trawling is among the world's least selective fishing methods, the unintended consequence being large quantities of bycatch. It is also a method that can disturb benthic habitats and use large quantities of fuel—a significant running cost for many fisheries. Issues of bycatch and fuel...
ORGANISATION:
IC Independent Consulting Pty Ltd

Developing a National Bycatch Reporting System

Project number: 2015-208
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $300,000.00
Principal Investigator: Steve J. Kennelly
Organisation: IC Independent Consulting Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 30 Jun 2015 - 29 Jun 2017
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The only national estimate of bycatch and discarding for Australia’s fisheries suggests that our fisheries discard more than they retain (ie. 55.3% is discarded - FAO, 2005). This figure may surprise many people including environmental groups, those concerned with "sea"-food security and protein-poor countries. This figure also has the potential to adversely affect Australia’s well-earned brand as a responsible fisheries management nation. However - this figure is probably very wrong and much too high. This project aims to correct this.

In 2012, Australia completed its first national report describing the status of Australia’s fish stocks (“Status of Key Australian Fish Stocks Reports”). An issue that arose during its preparation (from AFMF, DAFF, DoE and others) was that there exists no national system for reporting on bycatches or discards. That is, there exists no mechanism by which the public, governments, NGOs, ecolabels, other stakeholders or international agencies can assess Australia’s performance in dealing with bycatch, discards, TEPs interactions, etc.

A recent study (extension to FRDC 2013/233) summarized the recently completed US National Bycatch Report and other similar international reports (FAO’s 1994 and 2005 global reports), investigated future FAO initiatives in this area (FAO are currently planning a decadal repeat of the global report), benchmarked the current Australian situation against these, and recommended a pathway towards an appropriate national bycatch reporting system. That pathway recommended a comprehensive synthesis of available bycatch information available in Australia and the development of a repeatable reporting system, running as an adjunct to the current SAFS system, against which Australia’s record in bycatch management can be assessed against agreed best-practice benchmarks. This project aims to deliver such a system.

Objectives

1. Using 4 jurisdictions as case studies, compile and synthesize all available reports/papers/datasets on fisheries bycatches, discards and TEPs interactions for each
2. Assess the quality of the data gathered using appropriate metrics
3. Develop templates and reporting processes, and identify programs, fisheries and/or species (including any surrogates/indicators), that together will form a national framework for bycatch reporting
4. Compile the above into a framework for future periodic bycatch reporting that dove-tails into the current SAFS system
5. Provide discard inputs (as available) for the Fisheries Health Check system being developed under FRDC 2014/008

Report

ISBN: 978-0-9924930-5-9
Author: Steven J Kennelly
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.

Project products

Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Report • 2018-03-01 • 1.48 MB
2015-208-DLD.pdf

Summary

Bycatch from fishing (the unintended, non-targeted organisms caught when targeting particular species or sizes of species) remains one of the most important issues concerning the world’s fisheries. And discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of seafood resources, may include Threatened, Endangered and Protects (TEP) species, and attract significant controversy and interest for many stakeholders including other fisheries, conservation groups, eco-labelling organizations, stock assessment scientists and the general public (who own this part of the catch).
Whilst fisheries jurisdictions have recognised the need to report to the public and other stakeholders regarding the status of exploited stocks, there is growing acceptance and international, regional and national agreements that encourage (or require) governments to also report on the status of bycatches and discards. There have been several efforts to do such reporting including FAO’s decadal global reports and the United States’ very comprehensive National Bycatch Reporting process. But Australia currently does not have a process for reporting on bycatch, and this current project is aimed at developing such a methodology for commercial fisheries. We do this by examining how one could most effectively report on bycatches in 4 of Australia’s 8 fisheries jurisdictions, selected to represent the diversity and size of commercial fisheries in Australia: New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Environment

Bycatch Reduction Devices (BRDs) to reduce the incidental catch of cuttlefish in the Spencer Gulf Prawn Trawl Fishery

Project number: 2013-052
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $71,000.00
Principal Investigator: Steve J. Kennelly
Organisation: IC Independent Consulting Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 2 Dec 2013 - 31 Jul 2014
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The Giant Cuttlefish population in Spencer Gulf is the largest in the world and is highly valued by local residents, the tourism industry and the recreational diving sector. But surveys over the last 13 years has indicated that the northern population has, and continues to, decline markedly - leading to major public consternation.

The Spencer Gulf Prawn Fishery is known as one of the best managed trawl fisheries in the world and is permitted to only land three species, the western king prawn, bugs and southern calamari

A recent SARDI study correlated the observed decline in Cuttlefish abundances with a range of potential factors including: water temperature, weather, pollution (including those from increased shipping activities), predators, prey, habitats, diseases, fishing pressure and tourism. Of these, rainfall was the only factor found to correlate inversely with peak cuttlefish abundance. The study noted the incidental capture of Giant Cuttlefish in the Prawn Fishery but found no clear association between the decline in cuttlefish and fishing intensity. The study noted a positive correlation between trawl effort and the size of the cuttlefish population but this relationship is counter-intuitive and is likely to be coincidental. The evidence therefore does not support an assertion that the recent decline in the abundance of Giant Cuttlefish in northern Spencer Gulf has been caused by prawn trawling or any other forms of fishing.

Nevertheless, due to the low population numbers, all sources of potential mortality of cuttlefish, including that from prawn trawl bycatch, need to be minimized urgently and carefully managed. This project is focused on an attempt to reduce the bycatch of cuttlefish in this fishery using modifications to the trawls used (termed ‘bycatch reduction devices’ or ‘BRDs’). If successful, such BRDs should be suitable for use in locations and at times where cuttlefish bycatches are significant.

Objectives

1. To test four grid-based designs to determine the best way forward in developing a BRD for this fishery that excludes cuttlefish and crabs, yet does not reduce prawn catch by any more than approx 6% and has a negligible variation in the grade composition of prawns.

Final report

View Filter

Research

Organisation