170 results

Determination of a cost effective methodology for ongoing age monitoring needed for the management of finfish fisheries in Western Australia

Project number: 2004-042
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $224,006.00
Principal Investigator: Dan Gaughan
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
Project start/end date: 14 Aug 2004 - 31 Aug 2007
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The implementation of ESD and the Integrated Fisheries Management Strategy for finfish fisheries of Western Australia will require periodic assessment of the status of the major species within each fishery. In most cases, age structured models are being developed to provide these assessments, but even in cases where full simulation models are not possible, assessing the status of these fish stocks would benefit greatly by having some information on temporal changes to their age structure. Thus, collecting a suitably accurate, time series of age structures for each of the major finfish species is a high priority for the effective management of all commercial and recreational fisheries across WA.

To achieve these objectives, regular monitoring of the age structures of more than 20 stocks/species will be required for inputs into assessment models. It is imperative that the most cost efficient monitoring scheme is developed that will provide estimates of the age distribution for each of these stocks at the level of precision, accuracy and frequency required for suitably robust assessments to be completed. For all species, ages are determined from sectioned otoliths, and validated through marginal incriment analysis. the relationship between age and other proxies for age(including fork length, otolith weight, and other otolith dimensions)will be used when appropriate, to develop alternative predictors of age. Statistical methods will then be used to generate population age structures for market/field samples. The reliability and cost of these proxy-based age estimators, relative to the precision dictated by the stock assessment will then be tested. Irrespective of what age estimator is used, optimising the number of individuals that needs to be aged (100, 200, 500 etc) and determining how frequently these need to be sampled (monthly, yearly, bi yearly, tri-yearly) and what spatial distribution of samples need to provide data of a sufficient quality for use in modelling their abundance must be assessed in a rigorous and explicit manner.

To determine the appropriate monitoring scheme for each of the 20 major finfish species/stocks in WA will require the completion of a series of rigorous cost benefit analyses. These analyses will ultilise the relative level of accuracy of the different age estimators, the cost of obtaining the samples, the costs of processing the samples in relation to the acceptable levels of precision and accuracy needed for the stock assessment purposes for which these data are being collected.

Objectives

1. Determine for stocks of the 20 major WA finfish species (4 - 5 in each bioregion) the relative accuracy of structures used to estimate age (eg. Sectioned/whole otoliths, lengths, otolith weight, other otolith dimensions or some combination of these).
2. For each stock, examine the relative impact on the calculated age-compositions and their effect on model outputs and conclusions from varying (i) the method of ageing used (only where this is possible from available data) (ii) the number of individuals used in the samples (iii) the spatial distribution of the samples used (iv) if possible, the frequency of sampling.
3. Using agreed levels of precision for the model outputs, undertake cost benefit analyses to generate the most appropriate long-term age structured monitoring program for each major finfish species in WA by assessing the method(s) of ageing, sampling intensity within each year and the frequency of sampling among years.

Final report

ESD Reporting and Assessment Subprogram: strategic planning, project management and adoption

Project number: 2004-006
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $215,477.00
Principal Investigator: Warrick J. Fletcher
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2004 - 30 Sep 2007
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Effective coordination of the activities needed to progress the implementation of Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) within the fisheries and aquaculture sectors is essential. The concepts of ESD cover a variety of different disciplines including environmental, social, economic, legal and administrative. Furthermore, the stakeholders involved include the research agencies, fisheries management agencies, environmental agencies, the commercial, recreational and aquaculture industries along with the non-government organizations plus indigenous interests. Therefore, the standard jurisdictional, discipline or stakeholder consultative structures are not appropriate to meet this task.

A “Subprogram structure”, which has a reference group that acts both as a coordinating group and as method of increasing communication amongst the different parties, has proven an effective method of administering these activities for the past two years. The duration of the current ESD Reporting and Assessment (ESDRA) subprogram project will finish in June 2004. At this time, however, a number of ESD based initiatives will still be underway. Moreover, a number of new initiatives have only just been endorsed by the ESD reference group and the Ministerial Council for Natural Resource Management (NRMSC) and are likely to be funded in the coming round of applications. Therefore, to assist in the effective management and coordination of these activities (and any future developments) an extension of the subprogram for a further three year period will be required.

Objectives

1. Facilitate the discussion and coordination of ESD related issues amongst the various stakeholder groups
2. Coordinate and facilitate the development and evaluation of ESD related project applications submitted to FRDC
3. Coordinate the preparation and delivery of the ESD subprogram communications strategy
4. Facilitate travel of ESD Reference group members to the annual workshop and meetings

Final report

ISBN: 1 921258 54 3
Author: Rick Fletcher
Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Final Report • 2017-09-29
2004-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

The second stage of the operation of the ESD Subprogram was successful, but compared to the focus during the first subprogram period, mostly in a consolidation manner rather than from the generation of significant new tools. This was necessary because it takes time to adopt and integrate significant changes to the methods of operation of agencies and industries. The policies must be there before any real activity can occur and we found that for the broader focused, cross fishery/cross sector applications of the framework, agencies were not in a position for much of the time to apply this.

There was also the need to get a level of harmonization of policy and processes amongst agencies - especially between fishery and environment agencies before these broader frameworks can be applied in an effective manner. Such discussions are now occurring in some jurisdictions and these regional types of frameworks are therefore becoming more relevant to their operations and it is likely that they will be used with increasing frequency over the coming few years.

The projects and processes undertaken through the ESD subprogram (and related activities) have overall, been successful. It has provided the basis to demonstrate whether management has credibility with the issues of resource sustainability, functional ecosystem relationships and habitat processes such as is needed to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth's EPBC assessment. Most jurisdictions are now using the tools and frameworks developed by the subprogram or related projects.

Keywords: Ecologically Sustainable Development, Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management, Ecosystem Approaches; Risk Assessment, fisheries management, reporting frameworks, social and economic assessments.

Industry

Development of a DNA database for compliance and management of Western Australian sharks

Project number: 2003-067
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $42,708.69
Principal Investigator: Rory McAuley
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2003 - 30 Jun 2006
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The continued black-market in body parts from vulnerable and endangered sharks, has the potential to cause once common species to become, at least regionally, extinct. A deterrent to the illegal capture of and trade in protected shark species is therefore essential. The sustainability of several commercially important species is likely to be placed under increasing threat without better means of controlling the exploitation of individual species. The development of legally defensible protocols and a dataset of DNA reference samples will provide the WA Department of Fisheries and other regulatory authorities with the tools necessary for enforcing both existing and future management and conservation regulations.

The need for improved species composition data, particularly from bycatch fisheries is recognised in the National Plan Of Action for the conservation and management of sharks (NPOA-sharks). The proposed DNA dataset will provide the basis for fishery management authorities to validate the accuracy of logbook data and determine species composition of catches for which there are currently no catch records (eg. confiscated illegal catches).

Objectives

1. Establish sampling protocols (ensuring methodology will be suitable for evidentiary purposes) and collect reference samples
2. Establish ‘legally robust’ DNA processing protocols and process reference samples
3. Establish a secure DNA ‘fingerprint’ database for WA shark species to act as both a provider of evidence and a deterrent to illegal fishing activity

Final report

ISBN: 1-877098-76-0
Author: Rory McAuley
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Final Report • 2006-01-11 • 1.66 MB
2003-067-DLD.pdf

Summary

The capability to identify individual shark species from processed body parts is necessary for the WA Department of Fisheries to ensure the compliance of all WA fisheries with both existing protected species regulations and proposed new management measures for commercially important shark species. This project established a reference database of genetic profiles or ‘fingerprints’ for nine of Western Australia’s protected and commercially important shark species. Fingerprints from a 10th species, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) could not be obtained due to probable primer sequence mismatching. The database, in conjunction with an associated inspection and testing regime, will act as a significant deterrent to the trade in body parts from protected shark species and also as a source of information on levels of bycatch of commercially important shark species in non-target fisheries. Genetic material from voucher specimens was collected by the principal investigator according to documented species identification and verification procedures. Samples were securely stored in tamper-proof containers until their transfer to the Chemistry Centre (WA) for genetic analysis and profiling. Additional fingerprints were derived from samples from the WA Department of Fisheries’ shark DNA reference collection and included in the database, to ensure that as much genetic variation as possible was represented for each catalogued species. The collection, storage and transfer of each sample was documented and the integrity of each sample was verified on receipt by the project co-investigator prior to analysis. These continuity of evidence protocols were developed according to WA Police Service guidelines for forensic evidence collection to ensure the database’s suitability as a provider of legally robust evidence.
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2003-066
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Comparing conventional ‘social-based’, and alternative output-based, management models for recreational finfish fisheries using Shark Bay pink snapper as a case study

This study has provided for the first time in Australia, an empirical comparison of different management models with a recreational marine finfish fishery. A TAC-based system was introduced for pink snapper in the inner gulfs of Shark Bay for the first time in 2003-2005, to explicitly manage...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
SPECIES
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2003-052
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Spatial scales of exploitation among populations of demersal scalefish: implications for wetline management

West Australian dhufish is endemic to shelf waters of south-western Western Australia (WA). In contrast, snapper (known as "pink snapper" in WA) has a continuous distribution around the southern coastline of mainland Australia and in New Zealand. Dhufish and snapper are the two most important...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2003-027
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Evaluating the recreational marron fishery against environmental change and human interactions

The distribution of marron in the southwest of Australia has seen many changes since European settlement. Reconstructions of their range from historical records suggested that marron inhabited the waters between the Harvey River and Denmark River. Due to translocation, their range has expanded as...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
SPECIES
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2003-026
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Environmentally sustainable development of barramundi cage aquaculture

A preliminary sensory evaluation study was conducted to confirm the presence of a taint issue. Prior to this the issue was reliant on purchaser feedback and was not verified independently. To examine the issue of flavour taint a series of barramundi samples were collected from Lake Argyle (purged...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
SPECIES
View Filter

Organisation