172 results

Description of the biology and an assessment of the fishery for silver trevally off NSW

Project number: 1997-125
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $108,390.00
Principal Investigator: Kevin Rowling
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 22 Jun 1997 - 19 Dec 2000
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Because of the increasing significance of silver trevally to a number of fisheries off NSW (including the trawl sector of the SEF, where it is one of 16 species managed by Total Allowable Catch) and the current lack of data on which to assess the impact of fishing on the stock, it is important to undertake research which will lead to an understanding of the current status of the stock.

There is a need to determine the basic biological parameters, including growth rates and spawning biology for use in stock assessment modeling.

In order to provide the data necessary to adequately assess the status of the trevally stock, there is a need to document the portion of the stock utilised by the various fishery sectors, and to determine the relative impacts on the stock of each sector. It is also important that a monitoring regime be established which will provide data on which to base advice for the future sustainable management of exploitation of the resource.

Objectives

1. The first objective of this research program is to describe the size and age composition of the catch of silver trevally taken by each of the sectors utilising the resource in waters off NSW..
2. The reproductive biology of the species will also be investigated, including determination of the size at first maturity, spawning period and fecundity.
3. Techniques to age silver trevally will be refined and applied to samples from both commercial and recreational catches following which a growth rate model for this species in NSW will be developed.
4. All relevant data will be incorporated in an initial stock assessment which will describe the relative impact on the silver trevally stock of the various fishery sectors.
5. Advice will be provided to fishery managers on the status of the stock, and the appropriateness or otherwise of establishing a minimum legal size for silver trevally.

Aquaculture Diet Development Subprogram: ingredient evaluation

Project number: 1996-391
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $503,574.00
Principal Investigator: Geoff L. Allan
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 5 Nov 1996 - 7 Jun 2004
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. Determine nutrient digestibility of major terrestrial protein and energy feed ingredients for which information is not currently available.
2. Determine contribution to fish and prawn growth of the most promising new ingredients and identify the maximum amounts which can be included in practical diets.
3. Evaluate carbohydrate utilisation and determine effects of carbohydrate type, content and processing on digestibility.
4. Use results to determine first limiting nutrients for fish and prawn diets based on Australian ingredients, and to formulate practical diets for evaluation in commercially relevant facilities.
5. Communicate results to producers of feed ingredients, feed manufacturers, aquaculturists and the scientific community.

Selective breeding for disease resistance and fast growth in Sydney rock oysters

Project number: 1996-357
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $332,308.00
Principal Investigator: John Nell
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 27 Feb 1997 - 18 Mar 2004
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The NSW oyster industry has suffered from QX disease and winter mortality for a very long time. It has responded to these disease challenges by vacating affected leases seasonally or in the case of Georges River by abondoning the infested part of the estuary. The history of inter-estuary transfer of oysters for on-growing has not allowed the development of resistant strains in NSW. However, if resistant strains of oysters are not developed, the industry will have no better management tool available in future than that used in the past, ie moving or selling oysters before a disease outbreak is expected or abondoning oyster leases.

If the opportunity for breeding QX disease resistance in Sydney rock oysters is not taken up, a unique opportunity will be lost, to use breeding lines previously selected for fast growth in the selection for disease resistance. It is important that breeding for QX resistance begins now, before another estuary is infested with this parasite. In Georges River, the industry responded to the QX outbreak by abandoning affected leases.

Growth rates in Sydney rock oysters have been improved by an average of 4% for the first generation of selection in Port Stephens. Now the initial progress has been made and four breeding lines are established, it is important that the momentum is maintained and selective breeding for fast growth is continued. The growth rate of the Port Stephens selection lines can be increased by 4% for each successive generation.

Growth rates in Sydney rock oysters can be improved by both selective breeding (an average of 4% faster growth for the first generation of selection) and triploidy (30-40% faster growth). However, triploids have not previously been produced from improved breeding lines. It is important to determine if improvements in growth rates by these two methods are additive. For example with triploids produced from improved breeding lines, a 30% increase in growth rate with triploidy plus another 8% for two generations of selective breeding may increase growth rates of oysters by 38%.

Objectives

1. Evaluation of the resistance of fourth selected generation Georges River oysters to QX disease and winter mortality against controls
2. Evaluation of the growth rate of fourth selected generation Port Stephens selection line diploids and triploids against non-selected diploid and triploid controls

Review of shellfish purification technology research and development

Project number: 1996-355
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $23,216.00
Principal Investigator: Kerry Jackson
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 31 Dec 1996 - 11 Aug 1999
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The NSW oyster industry and the Australian shellfish industry at large can ill afford further food poisoning episodes either from seage borne viral contamination or potential deaths from organisms such vibro vulnificus. Other diseases such as hepatitis A and salmonellaosis can also pose a continuing underlying risk to growers and consumers of shellfish. As urban development continues along the NSW coast there is also a concomitant increase in proposals for sewage treatment plants to discharge treated effluent into rivers and clear STP performance standards, guidelines and recommendations from a shellfish farming perspective are needed.

The development of a broader understanding of the limitations of purification and the possible development of technology to enhance and render the current purification process a more active technique, which does more than just rely on the shellfish to "self clean" would make an important contribution to public health as well as the the image, confidence and ultimate financial well being of the industry.

Current purification techniques alone are now seen to be incomplete in ensuring that oysters are safe for human consumption, especially in regard to viral infection. It is now recognised that the current UV purification process has to be linked to water quality monitoring at the time of harvest and monitoring at the time of harvest and monitoring of meat samples. However, there has been considerable work done around the world related to R&D in purification technology since the legislation was first introduced in NSW. A number of purification related R&D project proposals have been referred to the NSW Oyster Research Advisory Committee for support for funding by the FRDC. Although the NSW Shellfish Quality Assurance Committee does not believe that there is likely to be a "one step cure all", in purification technology, an appraisal of the current state of play, the practical limitations of purification and recommendations on areas worth pursuing in shellfish purification technology development by a suitably qualified consultant is timely if not overdue. The form of this investigation would be a desk top review and such a review has potential application for emerging shellfish farming industries in other states. This review was identified as one of the urgent priorities in the recently completed NSW Oyster Industry R&D Strategic Plan.

Objectives

1. To conduct a desktop review of R&D in shellfish purification technology that is pertinent to the NSW oyster industry and the aims and objectives of the NSW Shellfish Quality Assurance Committee.
2. Provide advice to industry, the NSW Shell fish Quality Assurance Committee and the Oyster Research Advisory Committee on the status of shellfish purification R&D to enable industry to make decisions on future directions in purification technology investments and identify areas requiring further R&D in purification.
3. Provide a summary of the current "state of the art" and limitations in purification technology and R&D accomplishments to date.
4. Identify promising and likely future directions in matters relating to purification, particularly in terms of efficacy and issues such as viruses and biotoxins and usefulness of rapid detection techniques.

Final report

Author: Kerry Jackson
Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Final Report • 1999-01-28 • 27.04 MB
1996-355-DLD.pdf

Summary

Depuration in the context of this report can be defined as the process by which harvested shellfish are placed in land based plants containing clean estuarine water to permit the purging of their gastrointestinal contents under controlled conditions. Depuration does not include the practice of relaying shellfish to clean estuarine waters for long periods to promote self cleansing.

Shellfish (defined as bivalve molluscs for the purpose of this review) filter large volumes of water and trap particulate matter and dissolved substances suspended in the water as a source of food. Consequently, if the water in which they are grown is polluted, then the shellfish may concentrate microbes or chemicals which may be injurious to the consumer. Because shellfish are often consumed raw (or slightly cooked) and whole (including their gastrointestinal tract), they are generally classified as a high-risk food group by health authorities worldwide.

Shellfish are depurated in order to reduce the likelihood of transmitting infectious agents to consumers. Depuration has been demonstrated to successfully reduce to low levels the number of bacterial and some viral agents in moderately polluted shellfish. The effectiveness of the depuration process is dependent on a number of variables including the health status of the shellfish, environmental parameters within the depuration plant (salinity, temperature, turbidity), the type of pathogen, and level of contamination.

Depuration has been practiced around the world since early this century. In 1978 the practice was formally introduced in NSW as a response to a food poisoning outbreak over 2000 cases of viral gastroenteritis, which was attributed to oysters farmed in the Georges River. Depuration of all oysters harvested in NSW became a statutory requirement in 1983.

After reviewing the literature and consulting industry and relevant experts, two areas of contention have been identified with the practice of depuration in NSW and perhaps elsewhere in the world. The first issue relates to operational parameters and regulation of the process, the second appears to be a simple failure by sections of industry and regulatory authorities to appreciate that depuration alone does not ensure shellfish food safety.

Keywords: depuration, shellfish, quality, viruses, bacteria, HACCP.

Production of micro algal concentrates for aquaculture - An extension to project 1993/123

Project number: 1996-342
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $41,617.00
Principal Investigator: Mike Heasman
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 8 Aug 1996 - 13 Aug 2002
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To determine the best harvesting and concentration method for each algal species especially chemical flocculation and resuspension.
2. To determine the best manner of further processing, preservation, packaging, storage and transport of concentrates of each algal species and blends thereof (PSRC, WBL).
3. To carry out growth and survival studies in which pilot production packs of selected single species algal concentrates or blends thereof are compared with equivalent algae culture diets (as controls) under commercial hatchery and nursery conditions (PSRC and additional specialist commercial and research hatcheries when required).
4. To prepare user-guidelines to facilitate adoption and efficient utilisation of algal concentrates (PSRC, MUABL, WBL).
5. The ultimate objective is to assist the Australian aquaculture industry by providing a reliable source of a high quality, reasonably priced microalgal concentrates. Furthermore, such products will also have international markets, thus providing a new export opportunity for Australian aquaculture.
6. The targets for this project are: 1) nutritionally superior algal concentrates with a shelf-life of 12-30 weeks 2) at a cost well below current estimated costs of $200-$400/kg.

Physical effects of hauling on seagrass beds (stage 2) (an extension to 95/149)

Project number: 1996-286
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $44,992.34
Principal Investigator: Nick Otway
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1997 - 30 Jun 2000
Contact:
FRDC

Need

In discussions with estuarine hauling crews, it is clear that they avoid landing their nets in areas of dense seagrass. This potentially confounds the results obtained in the survey of the 9 estuaries. Given that we must sample sites where hauling occurs and hence where the nets are landed (logically), there can be at least two ways of interpreting consistent differences in shoot density and/or leaf-lengths between the control and hauled sites. First, the results provide some evidence that hauling has an impact on seagrass beds. Second, that the results simply reflect industry's choice to land their nets in areas of reduced amounts of seagrass and hence hauling has little or no impact. Clearly, if this project is to make some recommendations regarding the impacts of hauling and hence its management, we should, if at all possible, avoid concluding the research with these 2 alternatives at the centre of debate.

This seemingly intractable situation is not as hopeless as it would first appear. Previous research (e.g. Larkum et al., 1984) has shown that Zostera capricorni undergoes a cycle of growth in the spring and summer months followed by a dieback in the autumn and winter months. Given that the sampling for the survey has already been completed i.e. well prior to the seagrass attaining maximal shoot densities and leaf-lengths, it would be possible to take advantage of this period of enhanced growth to overcome the shortfalls discussed above. To do so would require that the the same sites be sampled again in late summer because if hauling was having an effect on shoot density and/or leaf-length it would be more clearly evident at this time of year. Furthermore, as we would have a baseline dataset we would predict that the change in shoot density and/or leaf-length from time 1 to time 2 would differ at the hauled compared to the control sites This would occur because the growth of the seagrass would be unaffected at the control sites where it would reach maximal shoot densities and leaf-lengths compared to the hauled site where it would not.

Clearly, the additional sampling described above would require an extension of the project beyond its current completion date in December, 1996. It is envisaged that a further 6 months would be required to complete the additional work necessary. It is important to note that this increased cost of identifying the potential impacts of hauling on seagrass will better serve the fishing industry as the greater scientific rigor gained will reduce the likelihood that the industry is blamed for changes that are not of its own making. Moreover, this approach would likely be the most cost-effective solution to overcome the potentially confounded result that will stem from the existing sampling. A far more costly solution would be to carry out a large-scale field experiment over a number of years to provide 'Before' and 'After" data for hauled and control sites.

Objectives

1. To identify whether the effects of estuary hauling on seagrass meadows is identifiable at the estuary level.
2. To assess the 'within-estuary' impacts of hauling, if any, on seagrass frond height, density and cover.
3. To interpret the results in relation to known information on the utilisation of the seagrass habitat by fish.

BCA - Changes over 20 years in relative abundance of species and composition of catches from fishery-independent surveys of South East Fishery trawl grounds

Project number: 1996-139.80
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $5,981.04
Principal Investigator: Gerry Geen
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 26 Oct 2002 - 28 Oct 2002
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To quantify changes in the comparative abundance of quota and other important upper slope fish since 1976-77.
2. To collect fishery-independent comparative data on the size composition of these trawl-fish after 20 years of exploitation.
3. To collect fishery-independent representative samples of otoliths and other biological information as required by the South East Fishery Assessment Group.

Changes over 20 years in relative abundance of species and composition of catches from fishery-independent surveys of South East Fishery trawl grounds

Project number: 1996-139
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $234,892.08
Principal Investigator: Ken Graham
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 1996 - 22 Jun 1998
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To quantify changes in the comparative abundance of quota and other important upper slope fish since 1976-77.
2. To collect fishery-independent comparative data on the size composition of these trawl-fish after 20 years of exploitation.
3. To collect fishery-independent representative samples of otoliths and other biological information as required by the South East Fishery Assessment Group.

Project products

Assessment of the need for national standards and review of output for fisheries research

Project number: 1995-177
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $6,750.00
Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Gordon Werner
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 2 Mar 1996 - 30 Jun 1997
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. An assessment of the preceived need for national standards for fisheries research inputs (researcher training and development, priority setting, support structures) and outputs (review structures, dissemination procedures, accountability for research advice,reward structures).
2. Recommendations on the need for national standards.
3. Recommended strategies to improve Australia's research performance.

Final report

View Filter

Organisation