This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

This report describes an ex-post cost/benefit analysis undertaken on FRDC project 1994-046, 'Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries', implemented by CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart.

The project was developed in the context of the expected imminent launching of a new American satellite designed to monitor changes in the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll (a measure of biological productivity) in oceanic waters. The availability of such data was expected to substantially advance understanding of the role of the environment on the distribution of many commercial fish species, allow the incorporation of environmental data in stock assessments, and assist fishers identify productive fishing grounds.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.

In this study, all seven projects in the Fishmeal Replacement Sub-Program were evaluated using the techniques of benefit/cost analysis. Projects under this Sub-Program covered the period 1993 to 1996/97. There were two types of project within the Sub-Program. Five of the projects were species-based, investigating fishmeal replacement in the diets of prawns, silver perch, barramundi (two projects) and Atlantic salmon. The remaining two projects, examining aspects of feed processing and the use of diet supplements, supported the species-based projects.

This Executive Summary provides a brief description of the Sub-Program and the results of the analysis on each of the species-based projects. It is assumed that any benefits of the support projects will be realised through the commercial results of the species-based projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the costs of the support projects are, therefore, spread across the species-based projects. Estimates of the costs and benefits for each of the species-based projects and for the Sub-Program as a whole are provided in Table 1 in the "Concluding remarks" section of this Executive Summary.