24 results
People
Industry
People
People
PROJECT NUMBER • 2019-124
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Shared science and Indigenous knowledge to support fisheries capacity building in Torres Strait

This report presents the results of a collaborative science capacity building project involving CSIRO researchers and Torres Strait Islander Fishing Industry representatives. Project participants worked together in the development and delivery of science capacity building programs tailored to each...
ORGANISATION:
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
TAGS
Training
Trade
Resource Access And Allocation
Rac Cmwth
Indigenous
SPECIES
Tropical Rock Lobsters
Sea Cucumbers
Environment
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 2016-244
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

TSRA: Assessing direct export feasibility, marketing and branding opportunities for Torres Strait Fisheries derived products

Commercial fishing is an economically important activity in the Torres Strait providing financial opportunities for the traditional inhabitants of the region. A key barrier to development of this fishery has been identified as the additional cost of reaching markets and the cost of doing business...
ORGANISATION:
Honey and Fox Pty Ltd
TAGS
Workshop
Supply Chain
Stakeholder
Policy
Marketing
SPECIES
Sea Cucumbers
Communities
PROJECT NUMBER • 2014-409
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Production of a Sea Cucumber product processing training video for Torres Strait communities

FRDC Research Project 2014-409, Production of a Sea Cucumber Product Processing Training Video for Torres Strait Communities, was developed to educate fishers about the management and best practice identification, handling and processing techniques for achieving optimum quality and price for the...
ORGANISATION:
My Pathway
TAGS
Stakeholder
Recreational Fishing
Leadership
Habitat
Community
SPECIES
Sea Cucumbers
Blank
PROJECT NUMBER • 2012-739
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

SCRC: Defining the legacy from the CRC's research in Future Harvest

As at March 2013 the Seafood CRC had invested $6.79 million into research projects in its Future Harvest research theme to broadly address the issue of ‘fishing for profit’. The overall outcome and benefit of this legacy project is the improved application of research from the Future...
ORGANISATION:
Thalassa Consulting
TAGS
Profitability
Post Harvest
Modelling
Economic
Aquaculture
SPECIES
Sea Cucumbers

SCRC: Optimising Industry Adoption: Case Studies on the Efficacy of Current Australian Seafood CRC Research Extension Processes

Project number: 2012-731
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Anni Conn
Organisation: Conn and Associates
Project start/end date: 31 May 2012 - 31 May 2013
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES
Sea Cucumbers

Need

The application relates to Seafood CRC Program 3 Education and Training.

This project directly satisfies an overdue milestone in program 3 in the commonwealth agreement: Milestone 3.2.3 Case studies illustrating industry application of outputs from Research Program 1 completed

There is a distinct need for evaluation of the effectiveness of current Seafood CRC research extension practices and tools in order to understand how the extension pathways utilised by researchers have impacted upon industry adoption of research outputs.

This project will assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of research outcomes, will highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of research outputs and will provide an insight into potential solutions and alternative strategies for future seafood industry research extension programs.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925982-97-8
Author: Anni Conn
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Final Report • 2013-06-01 • 1.22 MB
2012-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aim of this study was to assist in identifying the strategies and processes utilised in the extension, education and training of Seafood CRC research outcomes and to highlight the associated challenges and successes encountered during industry application of Seafood CRC facilitated research project outputs.

A series of case studies were carried out on four unique Seafood CRC Program 1 (Production Innovation) research projects, specifically focusing on the extension processes and strategies used in each and the subsequent level of industry adoption.

The most commonly identified research and development extension and adoption strategies, recognised as being effective by the interviewees from all four projects are as follows:

  • Prioritising of commercial outcomes by research provider.
  • Research direction and process driven by industry participant / participants
  • Simple working / communication structure such as one research provider – one industry partner.
  • Pre-existing, solid, respect based relationship between research provider and industry participant / participants.
  • No obstacles between researcher, industry partner and adoption.
  • Fostering of research ownership by the industry partner / industry participants.
  • Research, development and extension process not bound up in policies or process.
  • Willingness to share IP and an open door policy to wider industry
  • Effective project facilitation by Seafood CRC to underline expectations and streamline communication processes
  • Ongoing face-to-face meetings between research provider and industry
  • Real time communication between research provider and industry
Blank
PROJECT NUMBER • 2012-714
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

SCRC: PDRS: Use of next generation DNA technologies for revealing the genetic impact of fisheries restocking and ranching

Several initiatives by the Australian Seafood CRC’s Future Harvest theme involve some form of stocking or enhancement of fisheries. In Western Australia, populations of Roe’s Abalone (Haliotis roei) are currently being restocked after the occurrence of a catastrophic mortality event,...
ORGANISATION:
Flinders University
TAGS
Sustainability
Resource Enhancement
Reproduction
Genomics
SPECIES
Sea Cucumbers
View Filter

Research

Category

Species

Organisation