10 results
Communities
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-189
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

NCCP: Socio-economic impact assessment and stakeholder engagement

The present study, undertaken by University of Canberra, was developed to investigate the potential to engender support for the recommendations included in the NCCP byassessing potential impacts of carp control on different groups, and ensuring key stakeholders are able to access, understand and...
ORGANISATION:
University of Canberra
Communities
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-161
PROJECT STATUS:
CURRENT

National Social and Economic Survey of Recreational Fishers 2019

The NRFS involved three stages of data collection. An overview of the three stages of data collection and the purpose of each, and a guide summarising which chapters draw on data from each stage of data collection, are provided in the next section. Sections 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6 provide a detailed...
ORGANISATION:
University of Canberra
Environment
Communities
PROJECT NUMBER • 2016-152
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

NCCP: Building community support for carp control: understanding community and stakeholder attitudes and assessing social effects

The present study, undertaken by University of Canberra, was developed to investigate the potential to engender support for the recommendations included in the NCCP byassessing potential impacts of carp control on different groups, and ensuring key stakeholders are able to access, understand and...
ORGANISATION:
University of Canberra

Development of a fisheries stream in a new an innovative online course in environmental statistics offered by the University of Canberra

Project number: 2002-322
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $8,000.00
Principal Investigator: Arthur Georges
Organisation: University of Canberra
Project start/end date: 13 Mar 2003 - 30 May 2006
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Statistics is an indispensable tool in modern research. All involved in research and development require some grounding in statistics, whether it be to design and implement a research program and analyse the results, or to properly evaluate the published results of others, or to assess the promise of a proposal put forward for funding.

Fisheries management is grounded in science, and good science requires an underpinning of sound experimental design, sampling and statistical analysis. There is a need to increase the base level of competency in statistics at the workplace and for all levels of people involved particularly in the developing countries, and in so doing, provide support for the research effort that underpins the management of our fisheries resources.

Objectives

1. To develop a graduate certificate course in environmental statistics specifically targeted at fisheries and aquaculture and to deliver it to individuals in their current working environment by delivering the course online.

A coordinated commercial fishing industry approach to the use of marine protected areas

Project number: 1999-163.90
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $4,285.00
Principal Investigator: Kylie Dunstan
Organisation: University of Canberra
Project start/end date: 2 Sep 2003 - 24 Sep 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The numerous government initiatives related to resource access, mentioned in the Background to this application have, in the main, been prepared by groups of professionals working for months or years with the support of considerable government infrastructure. This is appropriate for issues of such significance. What is not appropriate is that draft policies are headed for finalisation without due input from the group most effected, the fishing industry.

The industry will of course respond most positively to proposals for conservation and management of resources which lead to greater certainty for healthy and prosperous fisheries resources and ecosystems which support them. But, to do so, all levels of industry need to understand the principles of these proposals and be convinced of the merit of the logic which underpins them. For issues as fundamental as access to fishing grounds extensive and intensive consultation and debate must be anticipated. For peak bodies to coordinate the compliance and support necessary for the cost-effective implementation of new management strategies the great majority of fishers must back the initiatives. For a new national initiative such as NRSMPA industry must be coordinated nationally.

Support from the majority of fishers will be dependent upon clear and unambiguous answers to questions which currently cloud understanding of the efficacy of using MPA’s as resource conservation and allocation tools.

Questions which researchers, and many resource managers would like answered include:

How do we accommodate series of isolated, closed areas within the broader context of the total ecosystem management (Total Catchment Management) necessary for efficient and cost effective resource conservation, utilisation and allocation?

Is the restriction of access by groups primarily a resource allocation (fisheries management by AFMA or State agencies) issue or biodiversity conservation (Environment Australia)?

What are the implications for further utilisation of the multiple-use model of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) for which Australia has received international acclaim?

Questions to which industry must have answers in order to deliver orderly harvest of our seafood resources include:

Is concern over access to protected areas (resource access) being confused by industry and Government with security of long-term access to maximum sustainable yields (resource security)?

Is the principle of (maximum) economic efficiency (AFMA) compromised by restriction of access to areas (MPA) closed for reasons other than efficient yield management?

Questions which industry itself must address if it is to fully understand the principles and then provide full support to the design, implementation, monitoring and adaptive management of a national system of MPA’s include:

What contribution can industry make to the selection of areas which justify categorisation as representative, or which may need some form of protection for other purposes? Can an area which is unique (such as the one spawning or nesting area) be “representative”? If not is there also a need for a series of “unique protected areas”?

What protection is required for each of these areas and what impact will such measures have on current and future seafood supplies and on activities of the fishing industry?

Will industry be required to meet totally, or contribute to, enforcement or other management costs associated with protected areas?

What data and/or other assistance can industry provide to help assess the effectiveness of protection, and the impact of protection on the ecosystem?

What measures are necessary within the industry to ensure understanding by all of the role of MPA’s, and to engender full cooperation and support for the appropriate use of MPA’s?

The numerous state and national peak bodies do not all have permanent staff with training and expertise to respond immediately and appropriately to the numerous Government initiatives which affect resource security and allocation. When shifts in Government policy are likely industry is compelled to employ consultants or submit project proposals to potential funding sources, such as FRDC. The latter process normally results in more considered and more professional outputs and therefore better quality advice to industry, but unfortunately requires several months lead time for submission of applications and often years to complete the task. Therefore with an issue as fundamental as the principles of access to areas of resource distribution, it is essential to take a national approach and to be given time to prepare a considered and positive response which has the support of at least the majority of fishers.

Access to the resource is of fundamental concern to both commercial and recreational users of this resource; the principles of restricted access to areas as a conservation or management tool are relevant to both groups. The common interest is acknowledged, however this project has arisen directly from state and national peak commercial industry bodies and has been designed to specifically assess policy impacts on commercial industries. It is proposed that the project proceed with commercial industry focus until at least the end of first year, at which time a major milestone report is envisaged. This would allow FRDC to consult with recreational fishing interests and then, if appropriate, negotiate including additional recreational perspectives with the Steering Committee.

Objectives

1. To assist national and State fishing industry bodies with the development of a positive response to Government initiatives to increase the use of marine protected areas (MPA) for conservation and management.
2. To compare the objectives and implementation strategies of the numerous Government policies on marine resource use and conservation and prepare an assessment of their collective impacts on fishing industries.
3. To provide a concise and easily understood summary of the advantages and disadvantages to commercial fishers of present and proposed policies on MPA’s.
4. To facilitate the development of a strategy to promote sustainable resource use as an objective of future use of MPA’s.
5. To assist with the development of a nationwide fishing industry strategy to identify areas which could be included in future resource management by the use of MPA’s.
6. To develop guidelines for industry involvement in monitoring the effectiveness of MPA’s.

A coordinated commercial fishing industry approach to the use of marine protected areas

Project number: 1999-163
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $295,399.02
Principal Investigator: Robert Kearney
Organisation: University of Canberra
Project start/end date: 25 Jul 1999 - 30 Apr 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The numerous government initiatives related to resource access, mentioned in the Background to this application have, in the main, been prepared by groups of professionals working for months or years with the support of considerable government infrastructure. This is appropriate for issues of such significance. What is not appropriate is that draft policies are headed for finalisation without due input from the group most effected, the fishing industry.

The industry will of course respond most positively to proposals for conservation and management of resources which lead to greater certainty for healthy and prosperous fisheries resources and ecosystems which support them. But, to do so, all levels of industry need to understand the principles of these proposals and be convinced of the merit of the logic which underpins them. For issues as fundamental as access to fishing grounds extensive and intensive consultation and debate must be anticipated. For peak bodies to coordinate the compliance and support necessary for the cost-effective implementation of new management strategies the great majority of fishers must back the initiatives. For a new national initiative such as NRSMPA industry must be coordinated nationally.

Support from the majority of fishers will be dependent upon clear and unambiguous answers to questions which currently cloud understanding of the efficacy of using MPA’s as resource conservation and allocation tools.

Questions which researchers, and many resource managers would like answered include:

How do we accommodate series of isolated, closed areas within the broader context of the total ecosystem management (Total Catchment Management) necessary for efficient and cost effective resource conservation, utilisation and allocation?

Is the restriction of access by groups primarily a resource allocation (fisheries management by AFMA or State agencies) issue or biodiversity conservation (Environment Australia)?

What are the implications for further utilisation of the multiple-use model of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) for which Australia has received international acclaim?

Questions to which industry must have answers in order to deliver orderly harvest of our seafood resources include:

Is concern over access to protected areas (resource access) being confused by industry and Government with security of long-term access to maximum sustainable yields (resource security)?

Is the principle of (maximum) economic efficiency (AFMA) compromised by restriction of access to areas (MPA) closed for reasons other than efficient yield management?

Questions which industry itself must address if it is to fully understand the principles and then provide full support to the design, implementation, monitoring and adaptive management of a national system of MPA’s include:

What contribution can industry make to the selection of areas which justify categorisation as representative, or which may need some form of protection for other purposes? Can an area which is unique (such as the one spawning or nesting area) be “representative”? If not is there also a need for a series of “unique protected areas”?

What protection is required for each of these areas and what impact will such measures have on current and future seafood supplies and on activities of the fishing industry?

Will industry be required to meet totally, or contribute to, enforcement or other management costs associated with protected areas?

What data and/or other assistance can industry provide to help assess the effectiveness of protection, and the impact of protection on the ecosystem?

What measures are necessary within the industry to ensure understanding by all of the role of MPA’s, and to engender full cooperation and support for the appropriate use of MPA’s?

The numerous state and national peak bodies do not all have permanent staff with training and expertise to respond immediately and appropriately to the numerous Government initiatives which affect resource security and allocation. When shifts in Government policy are likely industry is compelled to employ consultants or submit project proposals to potential funding sources, such as FRDC. The latter process normally results in more considered and more professional outputs and therefore better quality advice to industry, but unfortunately requires several months lead time for submission of applications and often years to complete the task. Therefore with an issue as fundamental as the principles of access to areas of resource distribution, it is essential to take a national approach and to be given time to prepare a considered and positive response which has the support of at least the majority of fishers.

Access to the resource is of fundamental concern to both commercial and recreational users of this resource; the principles of restricted access to areas as a conservation or management tool are relevant to both groups. The common interest is acknowledged, however this project has arisen directly from state and national peak commercial industry bodies and has been designed to specifically assess policy impacts on commercial industries. It is proposed that the project proceed with commercial industry focus until at least the end of first year, at which time a major milestone report is envisaged. This would allow FRDC to consult with recreational fishing interests and then, if appropriate, negotiate including additional recreational perspectives with the Steering Committee.

Objectives

1. To assist national and State fishing industry bodies with the development of a positive response to Government initiatives to increase the use of marine protected areas (MPA) for conservation and management.
2. To compare the objectives and implementation strategies of the numerous Government policies on marine resource use and conservation and prepare an assessment of their collective impacts on fishing industries.
3. To provide a concise and easily understood summary of the advantages and disadvantages to commercial fishers of present and proposed policies on MPA’s.
4. To facilitate the development of a strategy to promote sustainable resource use as an objective of future use of MPA’s.
5. To assist with the development of a nationwide fishing industry strategy to identify areas which could be included in future resource management by the use of MPA’s.
6. To develop guidelines for industry involvement in monitoring the effectiveness of MPA’s.

Final report

ISBN: 0-9577-5875-8
Author: Robert Kearney
Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Final Report • 2002-02-27 • 1.10 MB
1999-163-DLD.pdf

Summary

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources.  In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth Government launched its Oceans Policy, which included as a key component the acceleration of the establishment of a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA).

For industry to effectively and appropriately respond to a new national initiative such as the development of the NRSMPA requires a national approach.  However, State, Territory and national peak industry bodies do not always have the required resources and expertise to develop a national approach.  One of the major aims of the project was to assist industry in developing a nation-wide uniform understanding of, and consistent response to, the principles and tools used in developing MPAs in order to promote its participation in the process.  This requires first identification and acknowledgement of industry’s needs and concerns.

Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 1999-160
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Assessing Australia's future resource requirements to the Year 2020 and beyond: strategic options for fisheries

The Australian fishing industry has grown rapidly into an industry with a gross value of production of approximately $2.4billion. However, in recent years many of the resources that underpin the industry have shown the effects of excessive human impact, both targeted and accidental. As human...
ORGANISATION:
University of Canberra

Issues affecting the sustainability of Australia's freshwater fisheries resources and identification of research strategies

Project number: 1997-142
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $185,948.59
Principal Investigator: Robert Kearney
Organisation: University of Canberra
Project start/end date: 22 Jun 1997 - 29 Jun 2000
Contact:
FRDC

Need

It is accepted that the plight of our fresh water systems necessitates urgent action. FRDC itself identified the need for this project.

It is indeed significant that the comments provided in “Australia : State of the Environment” on each of the ten key threats to sustainability confirm that indicators of all ten show continuing deterioration.

While most of this broad spectrum of issues has been the subject of at least some research our knowledge of the interrelationships betwen fisheries and fresh water ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements include:

· a current review of the factors which influence productivity of Australia’s inland fisheries,
· correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified,
· correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority,
· an assessment of data and knowledge (research) needed to facilitate management action,
· an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant management action,
. an evaluation of what strategies have worked, or are working, in one or more State or
Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from nationalising, or at least broadening
or transposing, this strategy,
. an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and funding priority
research

Objectives

1. To identify the key issues facing the sustainability of Australia's freshwater fisheries resources and suggest strategies for addressing those of highest priority. Component objectives include:
2. To identify the major threats to sustainability of freshwater fisheries resources in each State and Territory.
3. To identify the probable primary causes for the most significant threats in each State and Territory.
4. To assess which threats could be approached by a national or State to State cooperative strategy for research.
5. To propose a national strategy for coordinating and funding new research relevant to ensuring the sustainability of Australia's freshwater fisheries resources

Final report

Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
Final Report • 16.53 MB
1997-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

The plight of our freshwater systems necessitates urgent action. It is significant that the comments provided in 'Australia: State of the Environment' (SoEAC 1996) confirm that commonly used indicators of each of the ten key threats to sustainability show continuing deterioration. While most of the threats to freshwater systems have been the subject of at least some research/ knowledge of the interrelationships between fisheries and freshwater ecosystems remains seriously inadequate. Urgent requirements at the commencement of this project included:
• a current review of the factors which influence the productivity of Australia's
inland fisheries;
• correlation of cause and effect for the major threats identified;
• correlation of cause with the relevant management or regulatory authority;
• an assessment of data and knowledge needed to facilitate management action;
• an assessment of areas where research is most likely to lead to significant
management action;
• an evaluation of strategies that have worked, or are working/ in one or more
State or Territory and assessment of the likelihood of success from broadening
or transporting these strategies; and
• an assessment of potential cooperative approaches to commissioning and
supporting priority research
 
The present study identifies the six major threats to Australia's freshwater fisheries resources as:
• habitat degradation;
• pollution/water quality/water temperature;
• reduced environmental flows;
• barriers to migration;
• introduced species/carp; and
• fishing.
 
Each of these threats is examined in more detail in the report to provide answers to the requirements listed above.
 
View Filter

Species

Organisation