NCCP: Socio-economic impact assessment and stakeholder engagement
Identifying and synthesizing key messages from projects funded by the FRDC Indigenous Reference Group
The IRG has raised a need to synthesise the key messages from previous projects that they have supported. In order to ensure that the data and information from these projects are accessible and easily understood for various audiences (includes Indigenous, commercial and recreational stakeholders, researchers, policy makers and the general public), the IRG has identified a need to create succinct materials that can be useful to those that seek to develop policy and stimulate community driven engagement.
Final report
- To gain an understanding of the materials and formats that policy makers and key fisheries organisations need in their use of research to develop policy.
- To improve general stakeholder awareness of the key research findings in of FRDC and IRG projects.
- To provide Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities with material that they can use in their engagement with government and non-government agencies.
- To develop succinct fact-sheets and a report that integrate the key messages of eight previous IRG projects in a user-friendly and culturally appropriate way.
- Indigenous fisheries
- Governance and management
- Legislation and policy
- Economic empowerment
- Capacity building
Project products
The End of an Era: Acknowledging the socio-cultural history and contribution of Australian small-scale fisheries
'If you don’t know where you are going, you’ll end up someplace else' - Future proofing the Australian Mud Crab Industry through improved strategic direction
Women in Seafood Australasia - Understanding, supporting and promoting effective participation by women within the Australian seafood industry
Methods to profile and connect the provenance of wild caught prawn fisheries and their values to the community
National Social and Economic Survey of Recreational Fishers 2019
Currently there is a lack of national scale, consistent and robust data on the motivations and behaviours of recreational fishers, and lack of robust data on the social and economic contribution of recreational fishing. Where many commercial fisheries have regular collection and estimation process for economic data, this is not the case for recreational fishing in most of Australia. This lack of data also includes behaviour and motivations and how they are changing. These data are useful for informing discussions on resource allocation and in understanding and managing recreational fisheries more generally. If these data are to be used to inform governments and the general public, there is a need to make sure it is collected in a robust way that is representative of the Australian population. Large scale representative data sets are often expensive to acquire and as a result do not get undertaken regularly. One off surveys only provide useful data for any particular point in time, but understanding trends can often be more useful. This study aims to implement and test methodologies to provide a robust and representative sample, while trying to reduce costs to allow for more regular data gathering. To do this requires addressing another need: that of testing new survey methodologies for collecting data from recreational fishers that enables assessment of social and economic contribution. Recreational fishing surveys traditionally use probability based phone or mail surveys, however both methods are experiencing rapid decline in response rates and representativeness. It is expected that going into the future, online surveys that use a range of appropriate recruitment methods will be the most common survey method. There is a need to invest in establishing robust approaches to using these methods, and in understanding how their findings differ to those of traditional probability based surveys.
Final report
- The purpose/objectives of data collection
- Data collection methods, including design of survey instruments and survey recruitment materials, survey sample recruitment methods and sample achieved
- Data processing methods, including data coding and cleaning, and weighting methods.
Project products
Attendance at the Annual Session of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) - 4-9 December 2018 in Honolulu, USA
2019 review of the FRDC investment in People Development
Final report
FRDC has a significant and long-term commitment to supporting the development of people in fisheries and aquaculture. The current guide for investment is the People Development Program Plan 2013-2015. This review has been undertaken to consider progress against that Plan and to provide advice about what the future goals of a FRDC people development program could be.
FRDC invests in people to assist in the delivery of its priorities in Environment, Industry and Communities and to support Extension. Investing in people assists in the future-preparedness of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors and is a core requirement of successful succession planning. It ensures that there is a pipeline of individuals who are representative of the diversity of the sector, understand how to engage with other sectors and the community beyond the boundaries of fisheries and aquaculture and who are equipped to take up leadership roles.
The current review, undertaken by Anwen Lovett Consulting, was asked to consider progress since 2013. The objective being to consider the past and current FRDC People Development Program to determine which elements of it should be the focus of future FRDC investment and what should be the goals of a people development program for next 5 plus years.
FRDC has advised that it remains committed to investment which develops people in fisheries and aquaculture. FRDC asked the reviewer to take a forward-looking perspective when considering the current portfolio, particularly in terms of where and how FRDC should invest to help future-prepare fisheries and aquaculture. That includes:
- appreciating that capacity across fisheries and aquaculture sectors is not equal. The leadership and capacity skills needs, and the interventions that are most suitable will differ;
- developing leaders who can build trust with the community locally, nationally and internationally;
- individuals who have an external and globally orientated outlook;
- future-proofing skills and capabilities in fisheries and aquaculture; and
- enabling the sector to find value and competitive advantage from the rapid digital, Internet of Things and technological revolution which continues world-wide.
The review was conducted from November 2018 until February 2019. The approach taken included a desktop review and evaluation of existing FRDC investments in people development, other related investments in people by other organisations and telephone interviews with 25 stakeholders including FRDC staff, graduates of FRDC supported leadership programs, research providers and other fisheries and aquaculture sector members. A list of stakeholders interviewed is in Appendix 1.
The key outcome of this review was a positive endorsement of FRDC’s leadership role in developing people and that this must continue in the future. FRDC stakeholders consider FRDC to be “the mother ship” organisation for assistance and expertise in identifying and pursuing opportunities to develop people. FRDC is thought to be ahead of the game in its awareness of and durable commitment to investing in people.
More recently there has been a dissipation in the level of internal attention FRDC has directed toward people development. This is in part due to staff changes but also the devolution of some people development responsibilities to IPAs, subprogams and RACs.
The current FRDC portfolio is adequately represented across the leadership hierarchy and maturity levels of workforce development. There are however some areas which may benefit from increased attention. These include building science capacity and encouraging greater diversity in participation – youth, women, other cultures, indigenous and recognising that capacity is not equal across fisheries and aquaculture enabling the development of entry level and early stage leadership capability. FRDC supported leadership programs should also include capacity needs such as global perspectives, collaboration, entrepreneurship and innovation business development.
There also continues to be a mis-match between stakeholders saying people development is important with the level of funding and commitment to participate overall being low. While IPAs and RACs were charged with leading on people development within sectors and regions, outcomes according to stakeholders have been variable and in some cases weak.
There is therefore the opportunity for FRDC to re-engage in its leadership function of people development. This review is recommending a Statement of Intent supported by an implementation and evaluation framework. It is also proposed that FRDC enhances its coordination and information sharing functions in people development, which will assist in increasing awareness, motivating increased rates of application and participation. A stronger coordination and communication function by FRDC will also assist IPAs, RACs and subprograms to engage more strongly in developing people.