Species identification of Australia’s most significant octopus fishery – the Western Australian Common Octopus
Octopus aff. tetricus or the Western Australian common octopus is an endemic species of the temperate waters of Western Australia. It is closely related to the cosmopolitan O. vulgaris species complex, and the ‘gloomy octopus’, O. tetricus on the east coast of Australia and New Zealand, but has been conclusively identified as a separate species through genetic and morphometric studies (Guzik et al., 2005; Amor et al., 2014). Currently, the common octopus supports the largest single-species octopus fishery in Australia, however the animal caught is an unnamed species, and carries the species affinis “Octopus aff. tetricus” instead. This is not an ideal situation for two reasons. First, it hinders a proper assessment of its significant contribution to the Australian cephalopod fisheries harvest. For example there is no dedicated SAFs report for this species, despite the catch levels harvest being three times greater than the 'Pale Octopus' (Octopus pallidus) from Tasmania, which does have its own SAFs assessment report. Secondly, there is an industry impetus to differentiate the product in the marketplace in order to create a distinct branding of the Western Australian octopus fishery into the future. Thus there is both a scientific/administrative need and a marketing need to formalise the correct species name, and its associated common name.
Final report
Verification program for the use of 'Rapid Test Kits' to safeguard and grow the WA Shellfish Industry
The production and sale of shellfish for human consumption in WA is regulated by the Department of Health (DoH), through implementation of the Western Australian Shellfish Quality Assurance Program (WASQAP). As a result, testing for the presence of biotoxins is a mandatory requirement under the WASQAP. The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (Department) plays a supporting role in implementation of the program through liaison between shellfish growers and the DoH and other government agencies and coordination of research and development requirements.
Currently, there is no capacity to undertake biotoxin testing in WA using the contemporary method of 'Rapid Biotoxin Test Kits'. This often results in long delays, financial loss and market reduction for current shellfish growers.
The verification and subsequent use of these kits (consistent with DoH requirements) has potential to reduce such losses and assist the growth of shellfish aquaculture industry within WA. This is consistent with the State Government's approach of providing strong support for aquaculture development proposals and notably, the recently completed Albany Shellfish Hatchery which will produce high quality spat for both new and existing shellfish growers. The need for this facility is driven by an increasing demand in edible oyster production across the state.
In addition to the new hatchery facility, government has funded the South Coast Aquaculture Development Zone which will deliver large areas of water that have been granted the necessary environmental and regulatory approvals and deemed suitable for large-scale shellfish aquaculture on the south coast. There is an unprecedented level of growth being experienced in WA for bivalve mollusc aquaculture with two large projects likely to move from trial to approval and production within the next 2-4 years.
Final report
Where did the Snapper go? Determining factors influencing the recovery of Snapper stocks on the west coast of Australia
Ensuring that connectivity and stock dynamics are well understood is crucial to determining the appropriate scale for fisheries management and assessment.
There is strong industry and management interest in determining the extent to which connectivity and stock dynamics of snapper along the west coast might have changed over time reflecting changes in environmental conditions and stock abundance.
There is a need to reassess the most appropriate scale for management of the snapper resource in WA under the new Aquatic Resources and Management Act.
There is a need to evaluate whether active-acoustic methods can improve capacity to monitor the spatial distribution and abundance of snapper in key spawning aggregations and whether these methods are complementary to the existing approaches used to assess snapper stocks in the GCB and WCB and elsewhere in Australia.
Final report
This report describes a collaborative project focused on Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) carried out between 2018 and 2021 by researchers from the Western Australian Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD), Flinders University, University of Adelaide, University of Western Australia, and CSIRO. The project was co-funded by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and had three key aims, which were motivated by questions raised by commercial fishers in the Gascoyne and West Coast bioregions of Western Australia, about C. auratus stock structure in relation to current fishery management boundaries and the methodologies used to assess these Snapper stocks.
Firstly, the biological connectivity of C. auratus in waters offshore of Shark Bay (in the Gascoyne Coast Bioregion) and to the south off an area between Kalbarri and Geraldton (in the West Coast Bioregion) were investigated using population genomics, otolith chemistry and larval dispersal modelling. These studies identified, for the first time, nursery grounds inside Shark Bay that are attributable to the Gascoyne oceanic Snapper stock, confirmed the larval transport pathways linking these with known spawning grounds around islands off Shark Bay and commenced the development of a recruitment index for this stock.
Secondly, a novel fishery-independent survey method, combining acoustics (sonar) with underwater cameras, termed acouptics, was trialled for monitoring C. auratus stocks off Shark Bay. The study has shown that these active acoustic methods can be used to monitor Snapper aggregations and estimate numbers of fish/biomass, providing a potential addition to the future Snapper assessment toolkit.
Thirdly, this project explored if there had been any changes in the biological characteristics of C. auratus in oceanic waters of the Gascoyne Coast Bioregion and northern West Coast Bioregion over the past 30 years. The study demonstrated changes in maturity of Snapper in the Gascoyne, with the updated parameters used to inform the most recent (2022) assessment of this C. auratus stock.
The outcomes of this project will provide the basis for a review of stock assessment approaches and management arrangements for C. auratus on the West coast of Australia. Outcomes of the acouptics work provides a conceptual basis for application in C. auratus assessment research elsewhere in Australia and New Zealand.
Developing novel remote camera approaches to assess and monitor the population status of Australian sea lions
The Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) is the only endemic species of Australian pinniped and is listed as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act due to historical reduction in numbers, declining population trends, limited biological productivity and continued bycatch in various fisheries. Measures to mitigate sea lion mortality in the Commonwealth's Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery include extensive gillnet fishing closures that have led to significant displacement of fishing effort. Despite the measures to protect South Australian sea lion colonies, pup production has been estimated to have declined at most South Australian colonies and overall by 2.9% per year or 4.4% per breeding cycle between 2004-2008 and 2014-2015 (Goldsworthy et al., 2015).
Gillnet exclusion areas have also been proposed in the Western Australian Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fisheries, however these have not yet been implemented, in part due to uncertainties in the current status of most Western Australian sea lion colonies and risk of unintended consequences from displaced fishing effort. Despite the high level of conservation concern for this species and the severity of fishery management measures aimed at reducing their bycatch mortality, abundance has not been estimated for most WA colonies since the early-1990s (Gales 1993). Contemporary assessments of colony status are therefore required to identify the WA colonies that are most at risk from depletion (either through fisheries bycatch or other natural or anthropogenic processes) and guide effective conservation decisions.
Historically, monitoring has involved a 'boots-on-the-ground' approach to count the numbers of pups being born. However, this approach is expensive, logistically difficult, hazardous and entirely dependent on accurate estimation of the timing of colony-specific pupping seasons. It is therefore proposed to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of remote camera methods to collect alternative sea lion abundance estimates.