418 results

Maintaining productivity and access to Estuary Cockle across sectors through improved science-based decision making

Project number: 2021-003
Project Status:
Current
Budget expenditure: $685,927.00
Principal Investigator: Matt D. Taylor
Organisation: NSW Department Of Primary Industries Port Stephens
Project start/end date: 2 Oct 2022 - 29 Mar 2026
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES

Need

The lack of knowledge on fundamental fisheries biology, uncertainty in stock structure, population dynamics, and cross-sectoral harvest levels, means that current stock assessments are unequipped to reliably determine stock status or inform recommended biological catches (RBCs), and that management of the resource occurs within a high degree of uncertainty. These EXCEPTIONAL INCREASES IN HARVEST and UNCERTAINTY SURROUNDING SUITABLE RBCs create an URGENT NEED TO DEAL WITH THE SUBSTANTIAL KNOWLEDGE VACUUM FOR THIS RESOURCE. Without this improved knowledge, the reasonable assessment of the status of the resource, estimation of appropriate harvest levels, harvest strategy development, implementation of appropriate management, and informed decision making on how best to utilise the resource, will continue not to be possible. Furthermore, environmental variability and species-habitat-fishery interactions are likely to impact stock dynamics and biomass, which in turn affects the magnitude, profitability, and social outcomes derived from the resource. Thus, efficient exploitation and effective management of the resource within a harvest strategy framework cannot occur without: 1) spatial definition of likely management units (stock structure); 2) estimates of stock biomass within those units; 3) estimates of basal population parameters and some appreciation of the influence of environmental stochasticity on resource productivity; and, 4) an appreciation of resource access across sectors. There is likely potential for further development in this fishery, to satisfy growing markets for the species both locally and abroad, but this will never be realised until these information needs are met.

Objectives

1. Identify stock structure for Estuary Cockle across NSW
2. Design appropriate fishery-independent survey methodologies to support both priority research objectives, and ongoing monitoring of stock biomass
3. Characterise basal population parameters and spatial and temporal patterns in biomass and recruitment, within a broader context of environmental drivers and species-habitat interactions
4. Improve knowledge on recreational, aboriginal and IUU harvest of the resource
5. Integrate information on biology, ecology, harvest, stressors, impacts, and current/future management arrangements into an Ecological Risk Assessment framework, to define future management, compliance, and communication priorities
Adoption

Seaweed National Hatchery Network (NHN) – Temperate Research Hub for Asparagopsis armata

Project number: 2023-081
Project Status:
Current
Budget expenditure: $1,329,525.00
Principal Investigator: Sasi Nayar
Organisation: Flinders University
Project start/end date: 30 Mar 2024 - 29 Apr 2025
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This project provides the resources for SARDI to establish and operate the Temperate Research Hub for the National Hatchery Network for 18 months (until 25 March 2025) which is the stipulated grant duration.

The FRDC project will provide the funding for SARDI to engage key technical capability needed to support the Hub and establish the facilities for exclusive and continuous use for the project. SARDI will provide facilities and services for up to two ASSA employees working at this Hub for the conduct of this project.

The key components of the project include:
1. Establish facilities and equipment required for the development of the temperate hub of the National Seaweed Hatchery Network
2. Deliver a focused research program to close the life cycle, of Asparagopsis armata, with the goal of being able to produce carpospores, tetrasporophytes, tetraspores and gametophytes.
3. Develop management systems to control contamination in the Asparagopsis armata hatchery.
4. Collect and maintain a clean broodstock culture collection.
5. Develop hatchery technology and equipment needs through experimentation.
6. Contribute to the development of a Hatchery Manual and knowledge sharing and dissemination.

Objectives

1. Establish and maintain the facilities, equipment and consumables for the Temperate Research Hub relating to Asparagopsis armata.
2. Provide research capacity, including staff, for undertaking robust and repeatable hatchery, nursery production and ‘inoculum’ transport techniques for A. armata.
3. Work with the ASSA technical team to further develop hatchery and sporulation techniques and technology for A. armata, undertake further R&D to close any gaps in hatchery technology including ecophysiology to close the lifecycle of this taxa, and develop biological contamination management techniques for seed production and maintenance of a ‘clean’ broodstock culture collection for future industry use.
4. Contribute to the development of a comprehensive hatchery manual addressing wild collection to production and transport of ‘seed’ for onshore and in sea grow out based on protocols and techniques developed from R&D at the research hub for A. armata, with the aim to assist seaweed aquaculturists to be self-sufficient in developing their own hatchery for commercial scale seedstock production.
5. Contribute to the development of standard design drawings for hatchery design for A. armata, incorporating best practice biosecurity procedures to be incorporated in the manual(s).
6. Establish base performance standards for the culture of A. armata to enable others to replicate protocols established in the hatchery manual and compare their level of success.
7. Phylogenetic cataloguing of the strains of A. armata from the viewpoint of assessing strain rigor for selective breeding and biosecurity. This will be made available as a publicly accessible database.
8. Contribute to training and knowledge sharing activities (extension).
9. Contribute to necessary finance, HR, communications, and stakeholder engagement activities associated with the Temperate Research Hub.
10. Provide milestone reporting of technical and financial progress to FRDC against plans, identifying achievements and challenges, and budgets.

Artificial Reefs: Suitability of recycled materials for integration into purpose built artificial reefs for enhancing marine productivity, biodiversity and social outcomes

Project number: 2021-055
Project Status:
Current
Budget expenditure: $280,505.20
Principal Investigator: Andrew Rowland
Organisation: Recfishwest
Project start/end date: 14 Jun 2022 - 14 Feb 2024
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Traditionally, reef projects around Australia have been funded by public money through government agencies, in particular regional development, research or fisheries grants. More recently in WA, new reefs such as Exmouth’s King Reef, have been brought to life through funding partnerships between government, not for profit & other private/industry sectors. Creating new pathways & processes to unlock & utilise alternative materials to create habitat enhancement structures is critical in ensuring the benefits artificial reefs create for our oceans & communities are maximised. Integrating appropriate recycled materials into reef developments provides opportunities from a scalability & financially sustainable perspective for all sectors of the Australian seafood industry, paving the way for more reefs to be deployed for social, economic and environmental benefit.

Playing a leading role in artificial reef development, Recfishwest often receives offers of materials for new reef projects. Examples include concrete in the form of railway sleepers, roadway culverts & bridge beams or steel in the form of storage tanks, structural frameworks & pipelines. Understanding what structures are suitable & acceptable for repurposing into reefs needs to be determined before these opportunities (current & future) are lost. This will unlock new reef options with alternative partners & funders to build more productive marine habitats for the benefit of local communities & the environment. This project is an extension to the previously FRDC funded habitat enhancement project: https://www.frdc.com.au/Archived-Reports/FRDC%20Projects/2014-005-DLD.pdf

Current Commonwealth & State legislation & policies limit the exploration of new reefing opportunities and there is a need to support change within these regulatory agencies.

We regularly consult with stakeholders who also have a need to understand the outcomes of this project including: DPIRD, NERA, WAFIC, NOPSEMA, DAWE, other Regulators, Resources Sector (including operators), Research agencies and the WA fishing community as end users. NERA and DAWE have also provided Letters of Support for this project as critical project partners to help achieve the outcomes and desired benefits.

Objectives

1. Explore existing literature on structures and materials that have been successfully repurposed into artificial reefs globally
2. Create a framework to assess the habitat and fishing suitability of structures for use in artificial reef projects
3. Create a guidelines and a substantial list of structures available for potential use in integrated artificial reefs from multiple industries
4. Develop a pathway with targeted regulators to assist in the development of a better regulatory environment that supports science-based habitat enhancement projects
People
Environment

A South Australian gulfs and coastal ecosystem model to optimise multi-species fisheries management in a changing environment

Project number: 2018-011
Project Status:
Current
Budget expenditure: $218,932.00
Principal Investigator: Simon D. Goldsworthy
Organisation: University of Adelaide
Project start/end date: 3 Jun 2019 - 17 Dec 2020
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The SA State Government has made a commitment to reform the Marine Scalefish Fishery (MSF) that aims to provide long-term sustainability of key stocks for both recreational and commercial fisheries, and unlock the industries economic potential. The key reforms include a voluntary buy-back scheme targeting the removal of at least 30% of commercial licences and the introduction of new zoning and quota management regulations. The timeframe for the reforms will be determined in consultation with the industry. Details on the implementation strategy have yet to be developed, but will need to be underpinned by extensive stakeholder consultation and backed by research that provides confidence that among the approaches considered, those chosen will best deliver the intent of the reforms.

This project aims to develop an SA Gulfs and Coastal ecosystem model to provide a Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) tool to assess and optimise a range of reform scenarios. The project will link in closely with FRDC 2017/014 (Informing structural reform in the MSF), utilising many of its key outputs, including time series of spatial distribution of catch and effort, social-economic performance, and reform implementation scenarios. This project also will extend the investigation by integrating environmental time-series data to evaluate changes in productivity over time, identified as a potential factor in declining fisheries catches in the GSV ecosystem (FRDC 2013/031). Identifying the causes of productivity loss and its impact on fish production are important to resolve, especially in the context of the MSF reforms. Ultimately, the project aims to provide decision support tools to assess and evaluate the performance of diverse fisheries management strategies, and how these may perform under varying production regimes. Such an approach will provide a platform to evaluate and optimise the effectiveness of management strategies, and help ensure the fishery reforms achieve their key objectives.

Objectives

1. Develop an SA Gulfs and Coastal Ecosystem model to provide a MSE tool to inform and optimise multi-regional management, quotas for multi-species fisheries and multi-sector harvest strategies
2. Use the model to run scenarios to assess, evaluate and optimise Marine Scalefish Fishery reform options
3. Assess potential production loss issues, and evaluate how different MSF reform options may perform under different future production scenarios
Industry
View Filter

Species

Organisation