Title 

Close-kin mark recapture design study to detect Swordfish stock structure 

Need 

Improve understanding of regional connectivity of Swordfish stock structure to support the management of Swordfish in the Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery. The work would provide a scoping study to assess sampling needs and logistic elements required for the successful implementation of a close-kin mark recapture (CKMR) approach to characterise stock structure for Swordfish. CKMR can provide a connectivity signal at temporal scales that are more relevant to management than other data sources such as tagging and genetic approaches based on population differentiation. 

Deliverables 

Assess the scoping, feasibility and logistics of different sampling needs based on consultation with the Australian Fisheries Management Authority’s (AFMA) Tropical Tuna Resource Assessment Group (TTRAG) and fishing industry (via the peak body Tuna Australia) and determine a sampling program i.e. Provide scientific advice and support to AFMA and TTRAG on CKMR simulation modelling to assess sampling needs (number of individuals per year, number of years, location of samples) to detect stock structure for Swordfish in the southern Western Central Pacific Ocean. 

Timing 

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

Jurisdictions 

Commonwealth 

End user 

AFMA, TTRAG, South Pacific Commission

FRDC Outcome(s) 

Outcome 2. Best practices in production systems 

Other 

This project is linked to previous and current FRDC funded activities – including: 

• 2016-044 “Next-generation Close-kin Mark Recapture: using SNPs to identify half-sibling pairs in Southern Bluefin Tuna and estimate abundance, mortality and selectivity 

• 2017-021 “Southern Ocean IPA - Stock Connectivity of Antarctic Toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni)” 

Title 

Data and modelling to better understand environmental and fishery impacts on Southern Calamari stocks in Tasmania to support management decisions  

Need  

Southern Calamari (Sepioteuthis australis) is a critical species for both commercial and recreational fisheries in Tasmania, consistently representing the largest commercial Scalefish catch in recent years. Despite its economic and social significance, stocks are at risk, with the last 5 assessments showing a “depleting” status, and the 2022/23 stock assessment showing a move to “depleted” status for the east and southeast coasts. This year introduced the first regional stock status classifications for Tasmanian Southern Calamari, highlighting the need for higher resolution and reliable data to support region-specific management strategies. 

To improve the understanding of Southern Calamari breeding seasonality and success, the project will focus on linking fisheries-dependent catch data on adult densities (i.e., spawning aggregations) with fisheries-independent surveys conducted before, during and after spawning closures. Collecting data on the density of egg spawning masses will provide additional fisheries-independent data on the location and timing of spawning. This will involve conducting surveys at previously studied locations in the North of Tasmania (FRDC Project 2016-028) to compare the density and timing of spawning with data collected before the stock was identified as depleting.  Additionally, surveys will be conducted in other key areas around the state known to be important for calamari aggregations. These surveys will provide vital information on the seasonality and spatial distribution of spawning around Tasmania, helping to identify regional trends and areas of particular concern. 

Additionally, the project aims to enhance catch and effort data, by implementing a shift from aggregated trip data to real-time catch rates in kg/hour. This could involve implementing vessel tracking systems and electronic logging of catch and effort during fishing trips, capturing additional details such as the number of fishers on board. Survey and monitoring catches, likely conducted by commercial fishers, would replicate this data throughout the spawning closure period. The project will collaborate with FRDC Project 2023-002 for this purpose. 

Ultimately, this project aims to provide robust data and models to support sustainable management decisions in Tasmania for Southern Calamari.   

Deliverables  

Summarise existing information and available data for Southern Calamari breeding aggregations, locations of previous studies, techniques used, catch and effort data and available environmental data. 

• Design of regional (Fisheries-Independent) Surveys 

• Fine-Scale Catch and Effort Data System (including in spawning closure period): 

• Catch rates in kg/hour reported in real or near real-time. 

• Explore electronic catch reporting options that may utilise vessel tracking and electronic logging of catch and effort during trips. 

• Consideration of recreational information might be captured and integrated. 

• Environmental Modelling Framework: 

Development and validation of models linking environmental conditions, such as sea surface temperature and winter rainfall, to Southern Calamari catch and effort data, as well as to aggregation timing and spawning success. 

• Integration of these models into management decision-making processes through management strategy evaluation of timing, length and location of spawning closures around the state,  

• Fishery Engagement 

At project inception engagement with both the commercial and recreational sectors to inform them of the project.  Periodic engagement with the same stakeholders depending on the level of interest 

Management Recommendations Report: 

• A comprehensive report synthesising all findings from the data collection, surveys, and modelling efforts. 

• Practical recommendations for sustainable management practices to ensure the long-term viability of Southern Calamari stocks in Tasmania. 

A project delivering against this priority should have consideration of conducting extension activities that might include: 

• Pre-briefing of stakeholder groups on the study, need, methods, timelines, intended outputs and outcomes. This should inform further communications planning for the project. It may also be appropriate to consider extending some of this information to Victorian stakeholders as well.  

• Regular updates on project progress to key stakeholders to allow for adequate adoption planning. 

• Consideration of end-user needs with regard to the knowledge generated by liaising with end-users, this could include (video, demonstrations, webinars, workshops etc) 

Timing  

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

End user  

• Fisheries managers: The information generated by this project will increase the capacity for managers to consistently, and adaptively, inform decision making (Enabling strategy V: provide foundational information and support services).  
• Commercial and recreational fishers: benefited by informed management decisions contributing towards a sustainable fishery.  

Jurisdictions 

Tasmania 

FRDC 

Outcome(s) 

Outcome 2. Best practices in production systems 

Other 

This project is linked to previous and current FRDC funded activities – including: 

• 2016-028 “Where do Calamari spawn in Northern Tasmania and how will this information aid the management of the Calamari fishery in Northern Tasmania?” 

• 2021-118 “Developing a cost-efficient stock assessment program for Southern Calamari fisheries” (project still active, there should be close links in the proposed project and this active project) – there is likely to be cross over in learning between this active project and the one being requested in the above priority so there should be linkage between these two. 

Title 

Assessing the functional link between Giant Crab and the bryozoan habitat to understand productivity shifts

Need 

The Tasmanian Giant Crab Fishery has been classified as "depleted" in the Status of Australian Fish Stocks (SAFS) report 2023, despite significant decreases in Total Allowable Catch (TAC). 

Giant Crab habitat is comprised primarily of bryozoans with a slow growth rate and develops over unstable, unconsolidated substrates. Loss of this habitat is considered to affect Giant Crab stock productivity by: 

• affecting recruitment success, as larvae and juvenile crustaceans select physically complex habitats like bryozoans. 

• affecting the development of other species, in turn altering the availability of Giant Crab prey, and consequently affecting life-history parameters such as growth and reproductive success. 

These impacts could potentially interact with climate change, worsening the effects of habitat loss. 

Therefore, there is a need to: 

• Assess bryozoan distribution and relative abundance and understand the potential impacts on these bryozoan habitats—including overlap with other sectors—by building on methods previously applied, with the new feature of including available video surveys and multibeam data. 

• Assess linkages between Giant Crab and bryozoan habitat, as well as the associated biological communities, through diet and prey availability analysis. 

• Assess the potential effects of environmental variations on the larvae of Giant Crab and the bryozoans that make up their habitat. 

• Evaluate the resilience of Giant Crab and their habitat to environmental changes and fishing efforts, by conducting an ecological risk assessment. 

In combination, these data would assist in updating predictions of Giant Crab habitat distribution and factors affecting its productivity to inform future management planning. 

Deliverables 

This project will deliver: 

• An assessment of bryozoan distribution, relative abundance, and overlap with fishing sectors. 

• An understanding of the functional link between Giant Crab and bryozoan habitat (i.e. knowledge about Giant Crab’s diet and prey availability). 

• An assessment of the potential impacts on Giant Crab productivity due to habitat loss as a result of fishing effort and climate change. 

• An understanding of Giant Crab resilience and planning recommendations. 

A project delivering against this priority should have consideration of conducting extension activities that might include: 

• Communication to stakeholders early in the project on what exactly the work will achieve and it what it won’t. Relevant stakeholder groups would include NRE Tasmania, AFMA and the Tasmanian Giant Crab fishers and possibly other industry sectors. In addition, extension to agencies and possibly industry in Victoria and South Australia may also be required.   

• Clear communication of next steps. For instance, will this require further research to attribute impacts on habitat, or will the results lead to recommended management measures. 

Timing 

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

End user 

Primary – Fisheries managers and fishery sector (commercial) 

Jurisdictions 

Tasmania 

FRDC 

Outcome(s) 

Outcome 1. Growth for enduring prosperity 

Outcome 4. Fair and secure access to aquatic resources 

Other 

This project is linked to previous and current FRDC funded activities – including:   

• 2016-033 “Putting potential environmental risk of Australia's trawl fisheries in landscape perspective: exposure of seabed assemblages to trawling, and inclusion in closures and reserves” 

• 2019-114 “Giant Crab Enhanced Data Collection - Innovative approaches to enhance data collection in the Victorian, South Australian and Tasmanian Giant crab fisheries”   

• 2021-025 “Resolving the biological stock structure of Southern Ocean crab fisheries” 

Title 

Assessment of regional population dynamics of Southern Garfish (Hyporhamphus melanochir) to inform stock status and spatial management in Tasmania

Need 

Between 1995 and 2005, commercial catches of Southern Garfish in Tasmanian waters remained stable at 80 – 100 t per annum. However, in 2007, there was a sharp decline to 31 t, coinciding with a reduction in average size and truncation of older age classes in the catch. Consequently, seasonal closures were implemented in 2009 to protect spawning fish. However, catches fluctuated between 40 - 60 t until 2013, after which they declined again, reaching a record low of 7.4 t in 2018/19. This depleted biomass led to the “depleted” current stock status of Southern Garfish in Tasmanian waters (Fraser et al. 2022; SAFS, 2024). The evidence for a depleted stock status is: (1) a continued decline in commercial catches and CPUE since 2006/07, (2) limited observed population recovery following the spawning closure introduced in 2009, (3) vulnerability of this species to capture due to schooling behaviour, and (4) current ageing data indicating the Southern Garfish population is dominated by only a few year classes (Fraser et al. 2022). However, fishery-independent Southern Garfish biological data have not been investigated since 2018 (Reid 2018), and fishery-dependent commercial samples have been restricted to a limited range of locations and size classes available. Comprehensive updated sampling and analyses are critical and necessary to confirm or revise the status of the Southern Garfish stock, and inform regional population dynamics (Fraser et al. 2022). 

Although there have been limited recent ad hoc studies of the biology of Southern Garfish (i.e., Reid, 2018) and collection of samples from commercial fishers, the most comprehensive examination of the biology of this species in Tasmania was last undertaken nearly 20 years ago, between 1995 and 1997 (Jordan et al., 1998). Due to a lack of contemporary ageing data for Southern Garfish, stock assessments for this species are limited to catch-only based methods. However, as Southern Garfish is a schooling species, catch rate information is unlikely to be a reliable indicator of biomass (Fraser et al. 2022).   

Therefore, there is a strong need to provide: 1) an update of the biological parameters for the Tasmanian Southern Garfish population, and 2) contemporary age structure data from both fishery-independent surveys and the commercial fishery. Both elements are necessary to confirm or revise the status of the Southern Garfish stock in Tasmanian waters and to inform and develop spatial and regional management strategies. 

In Tasmania, differences in size and age composition between the north coast and east coast indicate that there may be multiple biological stocks; however, no firm evidence exists at present, and current stock assessments assume a single state-wide biological stock. In 2009, FRDC project 2007-029, informed the spatial management of Garfish in South Australia through the assessment of stock structure and adult movement, and now the South Australian Garfish stocks are assessed and managed as six distinct regions and stocks (SAFS, 2020). Therefore, a further aim of this project would be to use updated otolith-based techniques originally developed in FRDC project 2007-029 to investigate the spatial scale of movement of the adults Southern Garfish in Tasmania (north versus south) and to determine the Tasmanian stock structure. There is currently no understanding of the movement patterns of the adult Southern Garfish, and the influence of that movement on the stock structure. Therefore, there is a need to rectify this lack of knowledge for Southern Garfish, so that management of the Tasmanian fishery can be applied at the appropriate spatial and regional scales. 

Deliverables 

• Provide an update on the biology of Southern Garfish (e.g. spawning time and duration, length and age at maturity, length and age structure, growth). 

• Determine the spatial scale and geographic nature of population structuring of Southern Garfish in Tasmania. 

• Advice on timing and length of current spawning closure and minimum legal length based on contemporary biological data. 

• New spatial and regional management model for the Tasmanian Fishery. 

• Revision and update of Southern Garfish stock status, including regional assessment. 

• Develop models and methods that could be used in other states such as WA and VIC where there has also been no research into the stock structure for populations of Southern Garfish, and they are assumed to constitute a single jurisdictional stock (SAFS, 2020). 

• Updated stock assessment models with improved regional parameter estimates. 

A project delivering against this priority should have consideration of conducting extension and engagement activities that might include: 

• Engagement in the construction of the application with NRE Tasmania to ensure ability for project outputs to be adopted into management.  

• Early engagement with Seafood Industry Tasmania, Scalefish Association and the specific fishers to convey project objectives, implications, and industry assistance required.  

• Consistent engagement with Seafood Industry Tasmania, TARFish, and NRE Tasmania throughout the project to ensure stakeholder understanding of the work.  

Timing 

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

End user 

NRE fisheries managers: The information generated by this project should increase the capacity for managers to consistently, and adaptively, inform decision making (Enabling strategy V: provide foundational information and support services). 

Commercial and recreational fishers: benefited by informed management decisions contributing towards a sustainable fishery. 

Jurisdictions 

Tasmania 

FRDC Outcome(s) 

Outcome 1. Growth for enduring prosperity. 

Outcome 2. Best practices and production systems. 

Outcome 4. Fair and secure access to aquatic resources. 

Outcome 5. Community trust, respect, and value. 

Other 

This project is linked to previous and current FRDC funded activities – including: 

• 2007-029 “Spatial management of garfish in SA - stock structure and adult movement” 

• 2015-018 "Do commercial fishery data reflect stock status in South Australia's Southern Garfish fisheries?"

Title 

Economic analysis of removing pot restrictions in Southern Rock Lobster Fisheries whilst ensuring stock sustainability 

Need 

Recent market access challenges for Southern Rock Lobster exports have highlighted the need for the industry to introduce a business environment that enhances efficiencies and creates economies of scale where appropriate. 

The industry needs to consider all options which may lead to reduced operating costs to make it more resilient to current and future price fluctuations, like those currently being experienced. 

Whilst this analysis should not recommend management alternatives for the Southern Rock Lobster fisheries, it should provide information that enables Management Advisory Groups and Committees to make informed decisions when discussing pot limits in their jurisdiction. 

Deliverables 

• A report detailing an economic analysis of the impacts of removing or increasing pot limits in Australian Southern Rock Lobster fisheries. 

• A report detailing an analysis of the impacts on sustainability of the Southern Rock Lobster stock of removing or increasing pot limits in Australian Southern Rock Lobster fisheries. 

Consideration should be given to experiences of other fisheries, especially recent experiences of changes in the Western Rock Lobster Fishery.  

Final reporting for this project should give consideration of end-user needs with regard to the knowledge generated by liaising with end-users, this could include (video, demonstrations, webinars, workshops etc) 

Timing 

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

Jurisdictions 

Southern Rock Lobster IPA 

End user 

Commercial Southern Rock Lobster Fisheries in SA, Tas and Vic 

FRDC Outcome(s) 

Outcome 1. Growth for enduring prosperity 

Outcome 3. A culture that is inclusive and forward thinking 

Outcome 4. Fair and secure access to aquatic resources 

Other 

This priority is aligned with the Southern Rock Lobster Limited’s Investment Areas:  

• Lower Operating Costs 

• Increase the profitability of the harvest sector   

Title 

Identifying recreational fishing capability and capacity needs 

Need 

There is a need to identify participation (roles, sectors) and current capacity building programs to understand capability and capacity requirements (needs, gaps), career pathways and future opportunities in recreational fishing. Understanding the current state is crucial to inform future needs, opportunities and investment. The FRDC Capability Framework provides a solid foundation that can be utilised in and applied to recreational fishing. 

A critical first step is undertaking a recreational fishing Capacity Building Program Stocktake and Evaluation which will establish the current state of capability and capacity in the sector to inform future needs, opportunities and investment. The stocktake will include identification of the challenges, barriers and opportunities to build recreational fishing capacity (past, present and future), and identify current programs available to understand capability and capacity requirements (needs, gaps) and future opportunities in recreational fishing.  

In parallel, creating a Recreational Sector Snapshot and mapping these to FRDC Capability Framework will enable visibility of the current state and assist in showcasing development needs. 

By identifying existing capacity and capability, as well as gaps and challenges, end users can then gain insights to aligning the expectations, competencies and opportunities for organisations and individuals in relation to a consistent framework for future capability and capacity building.   Enhancing awareness of career opportunities in recreational fishing is essential for attracting and retaining people. Currently it’s challenging to see the range of opportunities to enter, participate, progress and develop in recreational fishing available across Australia.  

Objectives 

• Identify challenges and opportunities for capacity and capability building in the recreational sector. 

• Evaluate past and current capacity and capability building efforts to understand relevance to future needs in the recreational sector. 

• Engagement and collaboration with key stakeholders to enable adoption and use of the framework.  

• Understand current opportunities in recreational fishing to attract and retain people. 

Final reporting for this project should give consideration of end-user needs with regard to the knowledge generated by liaising with end-users, this could include (video, demonstrations, webinars, workshops etc) 

Deliverables 

1. A Recreational Fishing Capability and Capacity Insight Report that will inform future capability and capacity planning in recreational fishing.  The Insight report will:  

• present the current state of capability and capacity in the recreational sector to inform future needs and opportunities, 

• identify recreational sector training/program gaps required for current and future individual and organisational development in recreational fishing, 

• identify successful capacity building programs aligned to current capability needs in recreational fishing,  

• generate clearer understanding of recreational fishing leadership (illustrated by an infographic, flowchart etc.), and 

• provide suggestions on how to identify the future function of organisations in recreational fishing to inform capability and capacity needs. 

2. Use the FRDC Capability Framework to map the RecFishing Research RD&E Plan, and enhance the recreational fishing Capacity Building Pathway 

3. Project establishment with the RecFishing Research Program and periodic engagement based on need.  Insight report and Framework workshop/presentation to RecFishing Research Program Steering Committee  

Final reporting for this project should give consideration of end-user needs with regard to the knowledge generated by liaising with end-users, this could include (video, demonstrations, webinars, workshops etc) 

Timing 

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

End user 

Recreational fishing sector, academics, FRDC 

Jurisdictions 

National, state and territory 

FRDC 

Outcome(s) 

Outcome 1. Growth for enduring prosperity 

Outcome 2. Best practices and production systems 

Outcome 3. A culture that is inclusive and forward thinking 

Outcome 4. Fair and secure access to aquatic resources 

Outcome 5. Community trust, respect and value 

Other 

This project is linked to previous and current FRDC funded activities – including: 

• 2022-033 "Building capability and capacity of women in recreational fishing: online course development"

• 2022-157 "Fishing and Aquaculture Workforce Capability Framework"

• 2022-203 "Developing a framework to evaluate capability and capacity investment and implementation"

• 2023-131 "Understanding diverse learning styles & knowledge transfer opportunities to inform and enable change"  

• 2023-132 "Navigating leadership pathways in fishing and aquaculture (which includes mapping to FRDC Workforce Capability Framework)"

Title 

Stewardship in recreational fishing: a common reference point and roadmap

Need 

Relative to other modes of outdoor recreation, recreational fishing places participants in a unique relationship with nature. Solving the ‘problem’ of catching fish under varying conditions and with uncertain knowledge places fishers within aquatic food webs and can engender connections to place, appreciation of target species and their habitats, and ecological understanding that make recreational fishers ideally suited to acting as environmental stewards (Shephard et al. 2022). When recreational fishers act as stewards and this is realised within appropriate management frameworks, net benefits to aquatic and marine ecosystems can result (Shephard et al., 2022; Landon et al., 2018; Elmer et al, 2017).  

Over the last 2–3 decades, recreational fishing in Australia has seen a trend towards activities and approaches aligned with stewardship, such as increased emphasis on catch-and-release fishing (including in competitions) and greater participation in habitat restoration initiatives. Despite this progress, and the numerous definitions of stewardship in the peer-reviewed literature on recreational fishing (e.g. Dean et al., 2023; van Riper et al., 2023; Landon et al., 2018), an agreed vision for stewardship in the Australian recreational fishing sector is not available (acknowledging that successful stewardship actions will vary widely among fisheries) (c.f. Elmer et al., 2017). Considerable progress also remains to be made to synthesise the experience of stewardship in Australian recreational fisheries to date, understand the drivers that lead fishers to adopt stewardship practices, determine how stewardship uptake of stewardship action can be encouraged, and develop metrics for understanding the impacts of stewardship initiatives.  

This priority addresses the outputs for the Stewardship Pathway within the Recfishing Research Strategy developed by the Recfishing Research Project Steering Committee. 

Deliverables 

Working in conjunction with the Australian Recreational Fishing Foundation (ARFF), the research provider will review the literature on stewardship in recreational fishing with a focus on: 

• Identifying the factors that lead recreational fishers to adopt stewardship practices. 

• Understanding the range and diversity of individual and participatory actions and programs that constitute stewardship in recreational fishing. 

• Identify approaches for encouraging the uptake of stewardship actions by recreational fishers. 

• Identify metrics for understanding success (or otherwise) of a stewardship initiative or program (i.e. measuring behaviour change). As part addressing this component, novel approaches such as social media ‘scraping’ could be considered. 

• Identifying barriers to the uptake of stewardship behaviours/action by recreational fishers. 

• Identifying effective ways to communicate with recreational fishers about stewardship. 

• Based on the results of the review described in (a), collate and analyse Australian recreational-fishing stewardship programs and initiatives to date to: 

• Evaluate success, based on the metrics identified through the review. 

• Identify gaps and opportunities (i.e. with reference to the review component, which aspects of the recreational experience could best be targeted for improvements to best practice through stewardship? Examples might include gear selection to optimise post-release survival, selection of target species based on stock status, participation in habitat-restoration initiatives etc).  

Based on the insights developed through components above, develop a vision for stewardship for the Australian recreational fishing sector and a strategy of core elements discovered in this research, that can be activated across the sector.  

Final reporting for this project should give consideration of end-user needs with regard to the knowledge generated by liaising with end-users, this could include (video, demonstrations, webinars, workshops etc) 

Timing 

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

End user 

The Australian Recreational Fishing Foundation, OzFish, state/territory recreational peak bodies and fisheries management agencies 

Jurisdictions 

Recreational Fishing Research coordination program (national) 

FRDC Outcome(s) 

Outcome 3. A culture that is inclusive and forward thinking. 

Other 

International experiences may also offer insights into this area such as in Europe and America. 

This project is linked to previous and current FRDC funded activities and resources – including: 

• Aquatic Animal Welfare FRDC Website Page

• 2008-215 “Tactical Response Fund: Implementation of the NEATFish environmental standard for recreational fishing tournaments”

• 2015-501 “Empowering recreational fishers as champions of healthy fish habitat”

• 2018-055 “Developing a positive cultural attitude towards the capture and release of sharks and rays”

• 2019-044 “Quantifying post-release survival and movement of Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus): Informing strategies to engage the fishing community in practices to enhance the sustainability of an important multi-sector fishery” 

• 2021-086 “Tuna Champions v2.0: Bluefin and beyond”

• 2021-116 “Recreational fishers in Tasmania: understanding experiences, behaviours, drivers, communication needs and change factors”

• 2023-021 "National Fish Habitat and Climate Response Partnership"

• 2023-108 “Citizen science guidelines in recreational fishing”

• 2023-150 “Normalising voluntary catch reporting on QLD Fishing 2.0 app”

Title 

Is co-management working for the recreational fishing sector? Benchmarking co-management performance for recreational fisheries

Need 

In the report Co-management: Managing Australia’s fisheries through partnership and delegation.  FRDC-Project Neville et. al (2008), defined fisheries co-management as “an arrangement in which responsibilities and obligations for sustainable fisheries management are negotiated, shared and delegated between government, fishers, and other interest groups and stakeholders” with the goal of “obtaining the best economic, environmental and social outcomes from fisheries.”  The report also provided a practical framework for willing governments to introduce co-management for their fisheries, which many did through the adoption of co-management policies and arrangements (e.g. establishment of co-management committees).   

While co-management is widely regarded as a critical management requirement for Australian fisheries management, many agencies continue to face challenges in delivering successful application to recreational and shared fisheries. Consequently, the level of commitment to co-management across Australian fisheries agencies is uncertain and, where such policy exists, the level to which the desired co-management outcomes are achieved remain unclear.   

RecFishing Research has identified the need to understand the status of co-management as it applies to recreational and shared access fisheries, against positions expressed by management agencies. This will be undertaken by assessing the status of co-management in shared fisheries at state, territory and commonwealth jurisdictions against the four types of fisheries management models identified in Neville (2008).  

Research under this priority aims to provide end users with critical information to identify barriers to genuine co-management outcomes and, where relevant, redress co-management performance in recreational fisheries.  This project will drive towards achieving co-management outcomes that meet the needs and expectations of the recreational fishing sector.* 

• The specific research priority described above relates to the required outputs and short-term outcomes presented within the ‘Fisheries Management ‘pathway of the RecFishing Research Strategy (Attachment 1). 

Deliverables 

The successful research provider will deliver the following.  

Deliverable 1 

Successful delivery of the project will require engagement with jurisdictional governments and recreational fishing peak bodies to participate in the project over its entire course.  To achieve this, a detailed engagement plan describing the methods and targets of engagement is required.   

Outputs of the engagement process must measure the willingness of government and community organisations to participate in the project. These will be evaluated to understand the willingness of government agencies to participate in the benchmarking process specified in Deliverable 2 and if necessary, rescope Deliverable 2 to account for varying levels of willingness.   

This will represent a Hold Point (stop-go) for the project and progression to the next stage is contingent upon successfully delivering the required engagement outcomes and if necessary, agreeing a revised scope for Deliverable 2. 

Deliverable 2 

A National benchmarking report that assesses both government and peak bodies in terms of:  

• Government’s purpose for the inclusion of recreational fishing in co-management,  

• drivers of co-management for jurisdictions, 

• the status of preconditions for co-management in recreational and shared fisheries in each jurisdiction, including an assessment of the status of peak bodies, 

• the status of recreational and shared fisheries across the co-management continuum,  

• the level to which desired co-management outcomes are achieved through the current systems and processes and, 

• through case studies, the change in performance of functions delegated under each management model to identify critical success factors, 

The report will also include 

• an appraisal of the key elements which have led to successful co-management in recreational and shared fisheries, 

• definition of the barriers to progressing through the co-management pathway and methods to address them, 

• a review of legislation and policy to determine if there is any correlation between the recognition of recreational fishing and participation in the 4 models of fisheries management within the co-management continuum, 

• consideration of alternative co- management systems and how effective are they for the recreational sector, 

• consideration of whether there is any relationship between co-management performance and investment in the sector, and 

•  a report which measures jurisdictional progress towards adopting and implementing co-management in recreational and shared fisheries. This will explain where each jurisdiction sits in terms of applying co-management in recreational and shared access fisheries, against the 4 management models described in Neville (2008). 

Final reporting for this project should give consideration of end-user needs with regard to the knowledge generated by liaising with end-users, this could include (video, demonstrations, webinars, workshops etc) 

Timing 

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

End user 

Government fisheries agencies, recreational fishing peak bodies and organisations, NRM/Fisheries scientists and managers. 

Jurisdictions 

Commonwealth, all state and territory 

FRDC Outcome(s) 

Outcome 2. Best practices and production systems. 

Outcome 3. A culture that is inclusive and forward thinking. 

Outcome 4. Fair and secure access to aquatic resources. 

Outcome 5. Community trust, respect and value. 

Other 

It is considered that this project will require expertise in the recreational sector and in the fisheries management across various jurisdictions. 

This project is linked to previous and current FRDC funded activities and resources – including:

• 2006-068 “Fisheries co- management initiative” 

• 2008-045 “Co-management in Commonwealth fisheries” 

Title 

Update of national aquaculture ESD assessment frameworks 

Need 

The Australian aquaculture sector is managed at the jurisdictional level. Although each jurisdiction follows its own licensing and assessment processes, applications generally share common categories including: water extraction and discharge, environmental impact, development consent, and sacred site clearances. 

Work in the early 2000s laid the groundwork for ecosystem-based assessment frameworks for aquaculture e.g. 

• National ESD Reporting Framework – the how to guide for aquaculture (Fletcher et al. 2004), and 

• National Application of Sustainability Indicators for Australian Fisheries- Part 2: Ecosystem based frameworks for aquaculture, multi-fishery and international applications (Fletcher, 2012) 

These frameworks developed efficient and effective management systems  

• to identify all relevant environmental, social/economic and governance issues,  

• applied risk assessments to assist in determining the appropriate level of management response, and  

• provide a reporting structure to document outcomes.  

Updating existing risk assessment frameworks for aquaculture operations would greatly benefit the sector. Such a review could: 

• provide a transparent and consistent approach to assessing aquaculture developments 

• provide explanatory materials and case studies to demonstrate the application of the framework 

• incorporate biosecurity risks 

• capture positive impacts of aquaculture e.g. ecosystem services and climate mitigation 

• provide a greater consideration of social and climate change implications  

• review the levels within the likelihood, consequence, and risk matrix tables and include inherent and residual risks 

• improve consistency by standardising terminology  

• develop agreed consequence values for risks and guidance on mitigations 

Deliverables 

• A nationally standardised and consistent approach to assessing risks of aquaculture operations.  

• Develop a handbook to aid agencies in evaluating common risks, offering rationale and mitigation strategies. 

• Produce an information package for industry and agencies, outlining the necessary information, risks, and considerations for Environmental Sustainability and Development (ESD).  

• Provide training sessions on the application of the final outputs. 

Final reporting for this project should give consideration of end-user needs with regard to the knowledge generated by liaising with end-users, this could include (video, demonstrations, webinars, workshops etc) 

Timing 

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

End users 

Government agencies and aquaculture industry 

Jurisdictions 

NT and WA to lead, potential involvement of all jurisdictions 

FRDC R&D Plan Outcome 

Outcome 1. Growth for enduring prosperity 

Outcome 2. Best practices and production systems 

Outcome 3. A culture that is inclusive and forward thinking 

Outcome 4. Fair and secure access to aquatic resources 

Outcome 5. Community trust, respect and value 

Other 

This project is linked to previous and current FRDC funded activities and resources – including:

• 2023-126 "Environment Social Governance (ESG) framework plan for fisheries and aquaculture"

• 2023-206 "Blue Economy Zone - Australia's first aquaculture research trial in Commonwealth waters"

Title 

Minor use permit for Benzalkonium Chloride (BKC) for algae control in prawn ponds

Need 

Harmful algal blooms (HAB’s), such as Heterosigma spp., in prawn farming ponds can result in productivity losses as a result of both stock mortality and growth retardation. Benzalkonium Chloride is a quaternary ammonium compound that has been shown to effectively rupture Heterosigma cells.  

The industry need is coordinating completion of the necessary data package studies required by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) to apply to extend the current Minor Use Permit (MUP) for Benzalkonium Chloride (BKC) to include control of algae in prawn ponds. 

Deliverables 

Coordination and completion of the necessary data package studies required by the APVMA to apply to extend the current Minor Use Permit (MUP) for Benzalkonium Chloride (BKC) to include control of algae in prawn ponds. 

Pre-Application Assistance (PAA) written advice for this project has been obtained from the APVMA and is available upon request to assist the applicant. In summary, the following data modules are required: 

1. Human Health and Safety 

• Toxicology: A Module 3.2 assessment will be required. If any international ADI assessments exist, these can be submitted. 

• Worker Health and Safety: A Module 6.2 assessment is needed, with a comprehensive description of product use, including handling, equipment, application frequency, and exposure time. 

2. Residues and Trade 

• Data demonstrating whether BKC residues are expected in prawn muscle post-application is required. The appropriate module (5.2 or 5.4) will depend on whether residues are expected. Existing data can be used if relevant. 

3. Environmental Impact 

• A Module 7.2 environmental assessment will rely on available data but should include any relevant information on BKC’s behaviour in water/sediment systems. Additional details about pond types, aeration, drainage, and water flow rates are also required. 

4. Efficacy and Safety 

• Efficacy: Module 8.1 efficacy studies must demonstrate BKC’s effectiveness against harmful algal species through laboratory and field trials, including the optimal application rate. 

• Host Safety: Studies are needed to assess BKC’s safety for prawns, including effects on juvenile survival, behaviour, and growth. If repeated treatments are proposed, long-term safety studies should be provided. 

Please note that the environmental data package is to be completed first, after which, a clear stop/go point is required.   

Final reporting for this project should give consideration of end-user needs with regard to the knowledge generated by liaising with end-users, this could include (video, demonstrations, webinars, workshops etc) 

Timing  

APPLICATIONS CLOSE 2 MARCH 2025 

End user  

Australian prawn farming industry. 

Jurisdictions  

All jurisdictions. 

FRDC R&D Plan Outcome 

Outcome 2. Best practices and production systems.  

Outcome 4. Fair and secure access to aquatic resources.  

This project also aligns with Activity 6.2 of AQUAPLAN 2022-2027: Aquatic animal minor use permit applications. 

Other 

Please contact FRDC for more information regarding pre-application advice and to obtain the excel spreadsheet template “Project Budget 2024” that must be completed and submitted with the FishNet application.  

This project is linked to DAFF’s ‘Assistance Grants – Access to Industry Priority Uses of Agvet Chemicals program’ (https://www.agriculture.gov.au/agriculture-land/farm-food-drought/ag-vet-chemicals/improved-access-agvet-chemicals/agvet-assistance-grants).