126,240 results

Seagrass strategic review and development of an R&D plan

Project number: 1998-223
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $178,918.00
Principal Investigator: Alan Butler
Organisation: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1998 - 13 Nov 2000
Contact:
FRDC

Need

FRDC has identified a critical need to obtain a stategic review of seagrasses and to develop an R&D plan to address seagrass-fisheries related issues. It has requested that CSIRO develop a proposal to address its needs. These include the need to:
· determine the status of Australian seagrass research and knowledge
· review of seagrass monitoring and assessment
· review of knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries sustainability
· review knowledge on seagrass and fisheries management
· review information on seagrass remediation and restoration projects
. develop and R&D plan that includes key strategic areas, goals, priority research, a framework of how
agencies will link and to define the various leadership roles.

Objectives

1. To review the status of Australian seagrasses with respect to the status of Australian seagrass research and knowledge.
2. To review the status of Australian seagrasses with respect to the status of seagrass monitoring and assessment.
3. To review the status of Australian seagrasses with respect to the status of knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries sustainability.
4. To review the status of Australian seagrasses with respect to the status of knowledge of seagrass and fisheries management.
5. To review the status of Australian seagrasses with respect to the status of knowledge of remediation and restoration projects.
6. To develop an R&D plan that includes:. key strategic areas. goals . priority research. framework, how agencies will link e.g. EA, FRDC, State, etc. definition of leadership roles

Report

ISBN: 0-643-06442-7
Author: Alan Butler Peter Jernakoff
Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Project products

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Report • 1.11 MB
1998-223-Seagrass in Australia.pdf

Summary

The FRDC Seagrass Review follows the Corporation's Fisheries Habitat Review. It reflects a shift from viewing fished species or even fisheries habitats as separate, unconnected entities to viewing them as components of larger ecosystems, and it seeks to develop a comprehensive, ecosystem-based management.

Reviewers were asked to assess:

  • Gaps in existing knowledge of seagrass ecosystems
  • Knowledge of links between seagrass and fisheries
  • The state of the art in rehabilitation and restoration of damaged seagrass beds
  • Monitoring and assessment of seagrass
  • Seagrass and fisheries management

They were also asked to prepare a research and development plan to guide FRDC's future investment in the context of FRDC's Ecosystem Protection Program. The review will also guide FRDC's interaction with other agencies who have responsibilities in marine habitat management.

Each of the five areas listed above was reviewed by a separate team of three experts, who co-opted other experts as necessary. The five reports were edited, and the R&D plan drafted, by the principle investigators. The whole report was discussed with the steering committee and reviewed by four independent experts.

Developing and assessing techniques for enhancing tropical Australian prawn fisheries and the feasibility of enhancing the brown tiger prawn (Penaeus esculentus) fishery in Exmouth Gulf

Project number: 1998-222
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $49,945.00
Principal Investigator: Neil Loneragan
Organisation: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
Project start/end date: 15 Sep 1998 - 1 Dec 1999
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Prawn fisheries throughout Australia are intensively fished and some have shown signs of overfishing. In some cases, the current stocks of prawns are now lower than those which would produce maximum yields. Prawn stocks can vary greatly from year to year because of environmental fluctuations and this leads to highly variable catches. Fishery managers must therefore adopt conservative harvest strategies to prevent fishers reducing stocks to dangerous levels in years when recruitment is low. However, the harvesting and processing sector tend to be on average, over-capitalised, in order to cope with years of high recruitment. Enhancement of prawn stocks through releasing juvenile prawns has the potential to reduce fluctuations in stocks. It provides a possible way of adjusting the catching and processing capacity to more stable levels of prawn stocks, which would reduce the need for over-capitalisation.

The enhancement of Australian penaeid prawn fisheries has the potential to be a useful management tool to increase fishery yields, rebuild over-exploited stocks, and reduce fluctuations in catch due to variable recruitment. It also has the ability to improve the management of fisheries by collecting more precise information about the biological characteristics of the stock (e.g. survival and growth, production in nursery grounds, migration pathways and factors affecting fluctuation in populations). For stock enhancement to be successful, the biology and ecology of the target animal must be thoroughly understood (including the production of the postlarvae/juveniles, environmental requirements, carrying capacity, and all factors that contribute to mortality), and methods must be available to monitor and assess the success of the releases. Much ecological information for stock enhancement is now available for many commercially important species of penaeid prawn in Australia, and novel approaches to tagging prawns (e.g. stable isotopes, rare alleles and reporter genes), release strategies, and assessment of carrying capacity are being developed.

Most of the preliminary assessments of the costs and benefits of prawn stock enhancement in Australia have not assessed a particular fishery or region in detail – they have to some extent developed generic models. For our knowledge on how to enhance prawn stocks in Australia to progress further, it is essential to develop, apply and refine bioeconomic models to a specific region and fishery. For the reasons outlined above (see background), the Exmouth Gulf Prawn Fishery is an ideal location to focus on applying the concepts and the simple model that have been developed from different studies around Australia. The much more intensive study outlined in this proposal will also help to evaluate enhancement projects for other prawn fisheries around Australia.

The beneficiaries of stock enhancement would be expected to contribute to the costs of research and monitoring, and ultimately pay for the enhancement. Therefore, stock enhancement must be cost-effective and a cost-benefit analysis using a bioeconomic model, is an essential part of any enhancement project. Bioeconomic models need to be developed in the early stage of the feasibility study. If the outcomes are favourable for enhancing tiger prawns in Exmouth Gulf, it will be used to optimise the design and management of the trial enhancement program proposed for Stage 2 of the full project.

Objectives

1. Develop a bioeconomic model to assess the costs, benefits and risk of enhancing the stock of brown tiger prawns (P. esculentus) in Exmouth Gulf.
2. Collate and critically review the information relevant to the enhancement of prawn fisheries for the Exmouth Gulf prawn fishery, and related prawn fisheries and aquaculture.
3. Use this information to develop protocols for enhancing stocks of penaeid prawns, both as applied to tiger prawns in Exmouth Gulf, and in Australia in general. This should include:(a) the production of large numbers of undamaged, optimally sized (10 mm carapace length) juvenile prawns that have been screened for known pathogens
(b) ways of ascertaining the optimal scale of enhancement for a site/fishery (number of prawns, number of sites)
(c) strategy(ies) of release (where, when and how to release the juveniles without increasing mortality)
(d) consequences of enhancing stocks on other parts of the ecosystem (habitat, prey, predators)
and(e) methods to ensure that the results of stock enhancement can be rigorously evaluated.
4. Identify risks (eg. disease and pest introduction, genetic pollution etc.), describe the possible risk impacts, quantify the probability to each risk and describe the methods proposed to ensure that they do not occur.
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 1998-221
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Impoundment stocking strategies for eastern and northern Australia

Fish stocking is a valuable and widely used fisheries management tool. If managed well, a fish stocking program can improve the status of declining or threatened fish stocks, restore species diversity to a degraded waterway, and even create a fishery where there was none before. The positive image...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 1998-219
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Enhancement of populations of abalone in NSW using hatchery-produced seed

Several critically important steps to achieving the central long-term aim of this project namely, cost-effective enhancement of abalone fisheries using hatchery produced seed stock, were achieved. The first was year-round controlled temperature conditioning and spawning of captive broodstock. This...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)

Coastal floodplain management in eastern Australia: barriers to fish and invertebrate recruitment in acid sulphate soil catchments

Project number: 1998-215
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $601,379.00
Principal Investigator: Bob Creese
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 1999 - 30 Sep 2004
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Fish habitat in coastal floodplains will continue to degrade unless practical guidelines for improvement of water quality and management of floodgates and other tidal barriers to allow passage of fish and invertebrates are developed. This is being increasingly recognised by many decision making agencies. However, landholders will not change current management practises unless as a minimum, there will be no adverse effects to their productivity. Guidelines for change must be developed in an integrated manner with a focus on land, water, agriculture and fisheries if all industry groups are to accept the changes.

Recent studies by NSW Fisheries (some funded by FRDC) show that a change in coastal floodplain and wetland habitats from freshwater to estuarine and recruitment of fish and invertebrates to these modified habitats can be achieved by increasing the degree of “leakiness” in the floodgate barriers (Gibbs et al. 1997). However, no data are available on the relationship between fish and invertebrate recruitment and the opening size or the frequency and timing of the opening of these floodgate barriers.

A second issue is the long term impact of chronic acid drainage, which does not cause major fish kills but which may have less obvious effects on the recruitment of migratory and catadromous fish such as Australian bass, striped mullet, freshwater herring, eels and school prawns. The life history, behaviour and demography of the catadromous Australian bass shows it is susceptible to such an impact (Harris 1983,1989). The Basscatch program (Harris 1989) has expanded in recent years and the population collapse through recruitment failure of Australian bass in NSW rivers such as the Hastings and Manning is partially attributed to acid drainage (Harris pers comm).

The management of floodgates and floodplains to allow passage of fish and invertebrates and the development of stable faunal communities in previously alienated habitat above the structures significantly enhances fish and invertebrate stocks. The consequent protection of fish habitats and fish and invertebrate species supports biodiversity conservation and the habitat restoration can assist in the development of management plans under the relevant Threatened Species Legislation.

Gibbs, P., McVea, T. and Louden, B. (1997). Utilisation of restored wetlands by fish and invertebrates. FRDC Project 95/150 Final Report (In Preparation).

Harris, J. H. (1983). The Australian bass, Macquaria novemaculeata. Ph. D. Thesis UNSW.

Harris, J. H. (1988). Demography of Australian bass, Macquaria novemaculeata (Perciformes, Percichthyidae), in the Sydney basin. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 39: 355-369.

Harris, J. H. (1989). Basscatch - A co-operative fisheries project. Modern Fishing 80-83.

Objectives

1. To develop guidelines for floodgate / tidal barrier specifications and management based on: (a) The relationship between recruitment of migratory and non-migratory fish and invertebrate species and the opening size of, and the frequency and timing of the opening of tidal barriers. (b) The impacts of changed hydrological conditions on watertable and water flows in associated agricultural land.
2. To assess the behaviour of catadromous fish to the tidal flows through openings in barriers and the behavioural response of recruiting juveniles to low level (chronic) concentrations of acid sulphate soil drainage water.
3. To develop and implement an extension program on the outcomes of the project, and to communicate the above guidelines to agricultural industry groups, local government and other agencies with interests in management of land and water resources in coastal floodplains using demonstration study areas and supporting literature.

Final report

Author: Bob Creese
Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Project products

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Final Report • 2004-10-06 • 6.36 MB
1998-215-DLD.pdf

Summary

Estuarine habitats, and in particular coastal floodplains and wetlands, provide essential nursery habitat for a large number of fish and prawn species, many of which are commercially and recreationally significant. Human activities on coastal land, such as those associated with grazing and intensive cropping or industrial and residential development, can have detrimental downstream effects. For fisheries production in the estuaries of northern NSW, two of these land-based activities, drainage of acid sulfate soils and the alienation of significant habitat areas, may have severe consequences.

These two issues were addressed in this research project, the findings from which will be used to restore degraded fish habitats and enhance access to them by fish, thereby improving fisheries in affected areas.  Ultimately, fishers, farmers and landholders will benefit from improved water quality in their drainage systems. The research findings will have specific implications for management of floodgates in those catchments studied and will be more generally applicable to acid sulfate soil catchments throughout NSW and Queensland.

Guide • 1.40 MB
Restoring the balance.pdf

Summary

Many coastal floodplains in Australia have an extensive network of floodgates, constructed drains and modified water courses. These are designed to mitigate the impacts of floods and large rainfall events. Floodgates prevent flood waters and tidal brackish water from inundating low areas of the floodplain. Constructed drains have converted prior wetlands into dryland farming areas. Whilst these developments have enhanced rural settlement and industries they have also caused unintended adverse impacts to fisheries, the ecology of estuaries and downstream water users.

The expanded drainage network has increased the generation and export of acidity from acid sulfate soils. Drainage systems can rapidly transfer acidity and deoxygenated water from backswamp areas to creeks and estuaries after rain. Floodgates and constructed drains have also blocked fish movement to upstream habitat areas and provide conditions that are conducive to the formation of poor water quality, particularly water with low dissolved oxygen.

These guidelines outline principles and strategies which can be employed to improve the environmental performance of coastal floodplain drainage systems, while retaining their benefits for agriculture. They have a particular focus on reducing drainage of acidity from areas with acid sulfate soils. The benefits, limitations and risks associated with management changes are described.

Sustainable development of Tropical Australia: R&D for management of land, water and marine resources

Project number: 1998-213
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $25,085.00
Principal Investigator: Ian Poiner
Organisation: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 1998 - 22 Oct 1999
Contact:
FRDC

Need

In response to the need for sustainable development of tropical Australia, CSIRO (Divisions of Marine Research, Tropical Agriculture, and Land and Water) in collaboration with State and Territory Departments (Queensland, Northern Territory and Western Australia), and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) and Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) are developing a project which aims to overcome the significant gaps that exist in current knowledge relating to the impacts of catchments and their associated land uses on the coastal zone and to integrate current and new knowledge to underpin the development of negotiated approaches to multiple use management.

The project will by necessity require strong integration across a range of physical, chemical, biological, economic and social disciplines. The integration of scientific knowledge with a broad suite of innovative approaches to regional planning will allow new benchmarks that exceed current practice in natural resource management. As such, it is likely that the proposed project could serve as a model for future work and, in so doing, deliver significant benefits to both tropical Australia and the nation.

Objectives

1. Identify natural resources priority issues with stakeholders, and determine their management priority, R&D needs, and institutional and organisational capacity
2. Identify and review existing natural resource management data, process understanding and information
3. Examine and critically review opportunities for R&D to underpin improved natural resource management and identify potential obstacles and risks to R&D in natural resource management
4. Specify R&D priorities to underpin improved natural resource management and options for implementation.

Final report

ISBN: 0 642 26751 0
Author: Ian Poiner and Andrew Johnson
Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Final Report • 1999-03-08 • 834.06 KB
1998-213-DLD.pdf

Summary

In May 1998, CSIRO Marine Research and Tropical Agriculture were commissioned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation (LWRRDC) to undertake a six-month scoping study to examine opportunities for the development of research proposal(s) aimed at supporting the sustainable development of land, water and marine resources in tropical Australia. The study region extends westwards from the Cape York Peninsula to the Broome region in Western Australia.

This scoping study builds on a workshop held at CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland, in September 1997 to consider issues for the sustainable development of marine resources in northern Australia, and on two major reports: one to the former Meat Research Corporation (now Meat and Livestock Australia) on the impacts of grazing in northern catchments; the other to the FRDC on the R&D needs for marine habitats to sustain fisheries production. However, this study differs from previous work by being an integrated attempt to address the question of natural resource use from land to sea. It is also unique in its approach, which involved interviews of stakeholders (85 people from 61 organisations) and a review of the literature from the terrestrial through to the marine environment. In addition to technical questions, we also considered the effectiveness of institutions, and the capacity of regional stakeholders to support the planning and management of natural resources. We also substantively incorporate Indigenous issues and needs within this review.

Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 1998-212
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Determination of the disease status of Western Australian commercial prawn stocks

There is little published information on the disease status of the prawns on the north-west shelf, yet these prawns (Fenneropenaeus merguiensis, Metapenaeus endeavouri, Penaeus esculentus and Melicertus latisulcatus) form the basis of a commercial fishery worth in excess of A$42 million in...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
SPECIES
Environment
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 1998-209
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Detection and abundance of Paramoeba species in the environment

Amoebic gill disease (AGD) remains the major disease associated with sea-cage culture of Atlantic salmon in Tasmania. AGD is associated with a Paramoeba species infecting the gills. Current treatment involves multiple freshwater bathes for all fish. This treatment has a significant financial impact...
ORGANISATION:
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 1998-208
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Habitat modification and its influence on prawn and crab fisheries

Experimental trawling in Gulf St Vincent indicated that epifaunal assemblages experienced substantial trawling mortality, which varied depending on sediment characteristics. Locations with strong currents and coarse sediments experienced minimal effects, whereas those with weak currents and...
ORGANISATION:
SARDI Food Safety and Innovation
View Filter

Species

Organisation