402 results
Industry

FRDC Community Engagement Strategy Evaluation Framework

Project number: 2018-201
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $89,891.00
Principal Investigator: Victoria Pilbeam
Organisation: Clear Horizon
Project start/end date: 14 May 2019 - 31 Oct 2019
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The objective for this project is to design and pilot an M&E framework and toolkit for fisheries and aquaculture community engagement. The M&E Framework support a more systematic approach to industry evaluation and generate useful information to support industry decision-making by clearly articulating priority outcomes. While the evaluation toolkit will provide industry organisations with practical resources for planning, conducting and learning from the evaluation of community engagement processes

Objectives

1. Design and pilot an M&E framework and toolkit for fisheries and aquaculture community engagement
2. The M&E Framework will support a more systematic approach to industry evaluation and generate useful information to support industry decision-making by clearly articulating priority outcomes.
3. The M&E toolkit will provide industry organisations with practical resources for planning, conducting and learning from the evaluation of community engagement processes.

Final report

Author: Clear Horizon
Final Report • 2020-12-01 • 3.30 MB
2018-201-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the process and outcomes of the Community Engagement Monitoring & Evaluation Framework and Toolkit project that the FRDC contracted Clear Horizon Consulting to complete.

Developing FRDC’s 2020-2025 RD&E Plan

Project number: 2018-197
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $370,061.23
Principal Investigator: Matt Barwick
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 19 Apr 2019 - 30 Dec 2020
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Section 19 of PIRD Act requires R&D corporations to prepare R&D Plans for each consecutive 5-year period. Each plan is to include (at a minimum):
· a statement of the Corporation’s objectives and priorities for the period to which the plan is expressed to relate; and
· an outline of the strategies that the Corporation intends to adopt in order to achieve those objectives.
Under section 10 of the Funding Agreement between FRDC and the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (DAWR), FRDC is required to develop a consultation plan, which seeks to:
• explain the purpose and objectives of consultation to inform the 2020-2025 RD&E Plan;
• describe who will be consulted;
• outline methods proposed; and,
• explain how input provided will be used.

FRDC is to obtain DAWR approval for the consultation plan prior to commencement of activities.
In order to develop an RD&E Plan which accurately interprets and responds to RD&E needs for Australia’s fishing and aquaculture community it is important to understand the aspirations, pain points, risks and opportunities of each sector over the intended life of the plan through undertaking broad consultation. It is also important to understand the current situation of the fishing and aquaculture (F&A) community (including indigenous, wild catch, aquaculture and recreational, and post-harvest sectors). The situational analysis should provide an updated understanding of what fishing and aquaculture looks like in Australia today, who is involved, what drives them, how they are performing, how the product (if retained) is used, what are the main dominant risks and trends. An earlier situational analysis delivered as an output of FRDC Project 2014/503.20 provides a useful template.
Finally, it is for any RD&E plan to be informed by an understanding of likely future trends, risks and opportunities facing Australia’s F&A community in the future. This requires:
· compilation of evidence to enable consideration of likely future geopolitical, social, economic, environmental and/or technical changes likely to occur in the future, and drivers of those changes;
· generation of projections relating to supply and demand for seafood products as well as cultural and/or recreational time use

Objectives

1. Undertake consultative activities to inform development of the 2020-2025 RD&E Plan
2. Deliver a contemporary situational analysis for Australia’s fishing and aquaculture community to inform FRDC’s 2020-2025 RD&E Plan
3. Deliver a future-scan with a decadal time horizon (2030) to inform FRDC’s 2020-2025 RD&E Plan
4. Undertake activities necessary to enable launch of the 2020-2025 RD&E Plan by 30 June 2020.

Final report

Authors: Jeff Dambacher Alistair Hobday Fabio Boschetti Chris Moeseneder Linda Thomas
Final Report • 2020-05-28 • 2.57 MB
2018-197-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report covers the second of two CSIRO contributions to the project FRDC 2018-197. This project was reviewing FRDC research objectives through a process that developed alternative scenarios of possible futures relevant to Australian fisheries. Discussed here is the development of a quantitative model to explore future seafood scenarios developed elsewhere. The purpose of this modelling exercise was to support the project FRDC 2018-197. The development of these possible future scenarios was undertaken in a process 
that ran in parallel to the CSIRO contribution. This process involved a series of stakeholder workshops and follow-up discussions, to which CSIRO staff were occasional observers.
The qualitative models developed to describe present day dynamics were then tested to see if they could account for previously observed shocks or perturbations the Australian aquaculture and fisheries system. This involved a face-to-face workshop and teleconference with representatives of the Stage 1 expert group.
Based on external input to management, employment and environmental variables, the qualitative models produced a set of predictions that were highly consistent with previously observed impacts in Australian fisheries and aquaculture. 
The models were then tested to see how well they compared to the dynamics described in the future scenarios, and here model predictions were found to be highly consistent with the dynamics played out in the two future scenarios – that is, both worlds are likely.
With ongoing support from CSIRO, these models can now be used to explore alternative perturbations, identify the informative indicators, and to determine when these models of the future (World A and B) are no longer realistic representations of real situation. If insufficient information is being gather on these indicators, the efforts could be made to collect such data, or if the information is too expensive, the alternatives can also be investigated to determine how many alternative indicators provide the equivalent conformation
Final Report • 2020-05-28 • 2.57 MB
2018-197-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report covers the second of two CSIRO contributions to the project FRDC 2018-197. This project was reviewing FRDC research objectives through a process that developed alternative scenarios of possible futures relevant to Australian fisheries. Discussed here is the development of a quantitative model to explore future seafood scenarios developed elsewhere. The purpose of this modelling exercise was to support the project FRDC 2018-197. The development of these possible future scenarios was undertaken in a process 
that ran in parallel to the CSIRO contribution. This process involved a series of stakeholder workshops and follow-up discussions, to which CSIRO staff were occasional observers.
The qualitative models developed to describe present day dynamics were then tested to see if they could account for previously observed shocks or perturbations the Australian aquaculture and fisheries system. This involved a face-to-face workshop and teleconference with representatives of the Stage 1 expert group.
Based on external input to management, employment and environmental variables, the qualitative models produced a set of predictions that were highly consistent with previously observed impacts in Australian fisheries and aquaculture. 
The models were then tested to see how well they compared to the dynamics described in the future scenarios, and here model predictions were found to be highly consistent with the dynamics played out in the two future scenarios – that is, both worlds are likely.
With ongoing support from CSIRO, these models can now be used to explore alternative perturbations, identify the informative indicators, and to determine when these models of the future (World A and B) are no longer realistic representations of real situation. If insufficient information is being gather on these indicators, the efforts could be made to collect such data, or if the information is too expensive, the alternatives can also be investigated to determine how many alternative indicators provide the equivalent conformation
Adoption
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-180
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Benchmarking for health and productivity in aquaculture

Benchmarking is a form of evaluation undertaken by comparing a measure with a standard. With its widespread adoption across many industries, benchmarking was identified as an important area for development in aquatic industries through the national strategic plan for aquatic animal health (AQUAPLAN...
ORGANISATION:
Agriculture Victoria
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-177
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

'If you don’t know where you are going, you’ll end up someplace else' - Future proofing the Australian Mud Crab Industry through improved strategic direction

BACKGROUND Australian mud crab fisheries extend from northern Western Australia (WA) across the Northern Territory (NT) and Queensland (Qld) through to northern New South Wales (NSW) and are managed across the four jurisdictions. The product from each jurisdiction is sold into a...
ORGANISATION:
C-AID Consultants
SPECIES

Refine the Southern Rock Lobster Cold Chain

Project number: 2018-176
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $213,979.00
Principal Investigator: Peter Liddell
Organisation: KPMG Australia Melbourne
Project start/end date: 4 Aug 2019 - 7 Nov 2019
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The majority of Southern Rock Lobster harvest is exported to Asian markets – 95% of Australia’s 2,986 tonne harvest lands in these countries. However, these lengthy supply chains require enhancement, to protect the sensitive and temperature-dependent product and ensure that the end consumer receives a premium product. With price directly correlated to quality of the lobster, ensuring that a high-quality product is received by the end consumer has direct financial outcomes for Southern Rock Lobster stakeholders back in Australia.

The lobster processor does not control the supply chain, and loses visibility when the product is delivered to the freight forwarder. Brand image and product quality are being impacted by the inconsistencies in the packing and transporting of product. Recent developments in technologies, logistics, techniques, and best practice could transform the cold chain to ensure greater visibility and consistency of Southern Rock Lobster supply to Asia. Understanding best practice cold chain practices from other industries is crucial to upgrading the supply chain for Southern Rock Lobster to ensure product flows quickly and remains under strict temperature control. Each leg and handover needs to controlled, consistent and focused on quality to the end consumer.

Therefore, this cold chain review has been commissioned to investigate ways to improve the integrity of the end to end cold chain and reduce time to market. A consistently fresher less spoiled product will earn higher prices and build brand reputation for all Southern Rock Lobster members. The review will consider the use of better technologies for fresh food transport and handling. The review will also advise on policies and regulations to drive conformance and compliance.

Objectives

1. Develop a full understanding of the supply chain for Southern Rock Lobster into export markets, to be able to pinpoint the key challenges faced in ensuring quality and maintaining temperature control.
2. Understand the range of options for improvements to the export cold chain, considering best practice, technologies and efficiencies. This will include opportunities for temperature control, regulatory reforms, and collaborative infrastructure.
3. Identify the innovations and initiatives likely to have the most significant impact on the quality of Southern Rock Lobster exports, and practically prioritise for these for future implementation.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0- 646-81746-0
Author: KPMG
Final Report • 2020-09-08 • 1.06 MB
2018-176-DLD.pdf

Summary

What the report is about? 
The report aims to assist the Southern Rock Lobster (SRL) industry with refining the live export supply chain to China. Research has identified issues relating to the cold chain, particularly at the domestic air freight stage, and practical solutions have then been proposed to address them.
 
The researchers spoke to and met with 29 stakeholders across the supply chain to conduct this analysis, including fishers, exporters, CTOs, freight forwarders and airlines. Desktop analysis was also completed.  This research was conducted over a period of 3 months. 
Background 
Project 2018-176 was commissioned in order to improve export outcomes for the SRL industry – with particular focus on exports to the Chinese market. Exporters have experienced increased issues relating to lobster mortality in the supply chain and maintaining effective temperature control, which has impacted upon returns to industry.   
 
Feedback from industry stakeholders engaged during the project identified the domestic supply chain and specifically air freight operations as critical areas of focus. This research therefore targeted understanding challenges and opportunities at this stage of the supply chain, and crucially, the ways in which the industry can collectively address the pain points and refine the live export supply chain.
 
Aims/objectives
There are three key objectives that the research team agreed with Southern Rocklobster Limited and the FRDC at the start of the project. These were: 
  • Develop a full understanding of the supply chain for Southern Rock Lobster into export markets, to be able to pinpoint the key challenges faced in ensuring quality and maintaining temperature control.
  • Understand the range of options for improvements to the export cold chain, considering best practice, technologies and efficiencies. This includes opportunities for temperature control, regulatory reform and collaborative infrastructure.
  • Identify the innovations and initiatives likely to have the most significant impact on the quality of Southern Rock Lobster exports, and practically prioritise these for future implementation.
Methodology
The research team followed four phases of work, designed to contribute to the project’s outcomes in a logical way.
  • The first phase (2 weeks) focused on kicking off the project with confirmation of the research focus and the goals of the research. A collaborative kick-off meeting was conducted, and a review of background information and contact lists for stakeholder consults.  
  • The second phase (5 weeks) focused on reviewing the current value chain, with the research team speaking to/visiting 29 stakeholders to uncover pain points experienced by SRL exporters across the supply chain, and then conducting additional analysis to verify and add detail to the identified issues.  
  • The third phase (4 weeks) formulated a range of solutions to address identified supply chain issues. Each solution was workshopped, discussed with industry stakeholders to verify suitability, and researched. 
  • The fourth and final phase (2 weeks) focused on creating an implementation plan for the proposed solutions, with timelines and activities listed for Southern Rocklobster Limited and other industry stakeholders to action. 
Results/key findings
Southern Rock Lobsters (SRLs) are a premium, high value product, where the end product quality is a key indication of the performance of the export supply chain. Catch quality by fishers and subsequent handling must be effectively managed throughout the supply chain as the product is highly sensitive to poor handling and temperature variation during transit.
 
The key findings of Project 2018-176 include the identification of key issues faced in the live export supply chain for SRLs, proposed solutions to address them, and implementation work packages to assist the industry with actioning the aforementioned solutions. 
Issues
The 14 issues identified are grouped into four main themes as illustrated below. Issues are explored in depth in the results section of this report. 
Solutions
To address the specific challenges and choke points identified in the current state export supply chain assessment, solutions have been formed which detail how Southern Rock Lobster Limited can support the industry through particular initiatives. These are structured within three classifications, which broadly align to how disruptive and innovative the solutions may be for the SRL industry. The solutions are explored in depth in the results section of this report.
Implementation work packages
Six programs of activity have been developed to support the SRL industry with implementing supply chain solutions that address the issues identified in the review. The timeframes, costs and complexity of each package varies. The formed work packages will facilitate the industry to work towards the incremental and innovative solutions through general industry engagement, stakeholder incentivisation and a combined program of activity. The fundamentally disruptive solutions are broken down from the significant projects into targeted activities. Work packages are explored in depth in the results section of this report. 
Implications for relevant stakeholders
The findings detailed within this report have implications for all stakeholders engaged across the SRL live export supply chain – particularly at the domestic end. SRL exporters in particular will need to action change if they are to realise the maximum benefits of the proposed solutions. This will range from minor initiatives such as AVE labelling, to significant endeavours such as fundamentally changing the way that supply chain transactions are managed and contracted.  
Cross-industry collaboration will be required if the industry is to progress these interests as a whole, meaning that Southern Rocklobster Limited will be required to take on a leadership and coordination role, whilst other supply chain stakeholders such as freight forwarders, CTOs and airlines will need to be incentivised and engaged for many of the solutions to be progressed.
Blank
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-173
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Review of FRDC's Industry Partnership Agreements (IPAs), Research Advisory Committees (RACs), Subprograms and Coordination Programs

This report presents the outcomes of a project commissioned by the Fisheries Research & Development Corporation (FRDC) to provide: ‘…a comprehensive and independent review of the current FRDC partnership models with a view to identifying: how the various models are managed by the...
ORGANISATION:
Forest Hill Consulting
Communities
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-172
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Methods to profile and connect the provenance of wild caught prawn fisheries and their values to the community

The wild prawn industry, as a key influencer of the community's (sustainability) perception of the Australian seafood industry, has addressed identified risks to social license so that it can protect its legal license to operate in public waters. This report provides the results and conclusions on...
ORGANISATION:
Australian Council of Prawn Fisheries Ltd (ACPF)
View Filter

Species

Organisation