32 results
Environment

Empowering industry through improved understanding of stock assessments and harvest strategies

Project number: 2010-306
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $237,385.00
Principal Investigator: Ian Knuckey
Organisation: Fishwell Consulting Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 31 Aug 2010 - 29 Jul 2012
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Participation of Industry and recreational members in the stock assessment process is vital and there is a real need for succession planning in MACs and RAGs. Their input provides important observations and anecdotal information that can help to interpret trends in the data, improving the quality and completeness of stock assessments and recommendations made. Furthermore, it can foster a better understanding of the science behind stock assessments, and create more support for buy-in of subsequent management policies. Without Industry and recreational sector participation, catch and effort data would be used with only a limited understanding of the factors that influence these data, beyond what is collected in logbooks and by observer programs. Participation, however, is more effective if they have a working knowledge of the data collected and processes and models used to assess fish stocks. This will lead to more efficient, beneficial, informative participation in the stock assessment process, and overall, better stock assessment and management of the fishery. Industry and recreational understanding of harvest strategies and stock assessment processes will also improve the level of co-management that can be achieved in a fishery.

Despite improvements in the assessment and harvest strategy process over the last decade, their remains a great deal of industry frustration / misunderstanding about how this translates into management decisions. Having spoken to many industry members during this time, we know that much (but not all) of this frustration is a direct result of lack of knowledge about assessment techniques and assumptions and how these interplay with the harvest strategy. Once they ahve acquired this knowledge, Industry members, with their extensive experience on the water, become extremely valuable members of RAGs / MACs and can help improve the assessment and management process and the understanding of other members.

Objectives

1. Identify a possible suite of capacity building approaches that would suit commercial and recreational fishers and assist them to actively participate in resource assessment groups through improved understanding of stock assessments and harvest strategies.
2. Determine the most suitable suite of capacity building approaches for commercial and recreational fishers through testing with selected fishers.
3. Use the results of objective 2 to deliver capacity building to a broad group of fishers in 3 case-study Commonwealth fisheries.
4. Review the efficacy of the capacity building undertaken in the 3 case studies.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9873286-4-9
Author: Ian Knuckey
People
PROJECT NUMBER • 2009-300
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Empowering Industry R&D: Developing an industry driven R&D model for the Australian fishing and seafood industry - partnerships to improve efficiency, profitability and performance

'Empowering II' sought to develop an ongoing, cost-effective and transparent process, whereby the best industry RD&E ideas, on a national or regional scale, could be obtained, linked with the most suitable RD&E providers, and developed into successful projects with valuable industry outcomes...
ORGANISATION:
Fishwell Consulting Pty Ltd

Empowering stakeholders to initiate and advance R&D projects in the seafood industry

Project number: 2007-304
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $136,000.00
Principal Investigator: Ian Knuckey
Organisation: Fishwell Consulting Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 26 May 2007 - 30 Aug 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

As outlined in the consultation section there is qualitative evidence of support for such a project and there has been an indication that Industry would relish the opportunity to develop their R&D ideas into projects. This would empower their members and associations to conduct relevant R&D and champion the need to take more responsibility for R&D directions.

This project seeks to achieve outcomes identified in all the programs in the FRDC 2005-10 R&D Plan. In addition, all proposals will need to link in with existing industry specific R&D plans so it will allow stakeholders to develop research projects that will assist in achieving the outcomes identified in relevant stakeholder R&D plans

Currently some industries and individuals are paying hundreds of thousands dollars for R&D. They are often unaware, or do not have the knowledge to use their financial and human resources to value add to their research dollars by leveraging further assistance. This project will provide a means for this to occur, leading to improved projects and more wide ranging outcomes.

There is a general lack of expertise amongst stakeholders including commercial, recreational associations and indigenous groups to develop their own R&D projects. As such they often merely tag onto research agencies’ projects which may not really provide desired stakeholder outcomes.

A significant proportion of R&D funding is directed towards agency overheads and oncosts, as well as directly towards projects. It is envisaged that proposals that are developed under this project will seek to minimise oncosts apportioned towards such externally funded projects.

The process used in this project will allow stakeholders to develop a range of skills so as to be able to participate in research programs that focus on good management, maximising economic, environmental and social benefits for the whole community through stakeholder specific research.

Objectives

1. For stakeholders to be empowered and develop the necessary skills to prepare, submit and conduct their own R&D projects
2. To increase leverage for existing research resources expended by stakeholders
3. To quantify the need and level of use of the service and identify if the qualitative level of support is corroborated
4. The development of at least 5 stakeholder sponsored applications during 2007/8 with Industry members being the principal, or co-investigator, in all projects
5. To improve extension and take up of findings through improved stakeholder ownership of outcomes.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9805388-4-7
Author: Ian Knuckey

Implementation of fishery independent surveys for the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery

Project number: 2006-028
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $3,349,385.60
Principal Investigator: Ian Knuckey
Organisation: Fishwell Consulting Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 30 Aug 2006 - 30 Nov 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Catch and effort data obtained from commercial logbooks is the primary source of information used as an index of abundance for most SESSF species. The assumption underlying this is that commercial catch rates change in a linear fashion with abundance. This assumption, however, has little independent support for many SEF species and is frequently criticised by industry and scientists alike. One of the most significant problems with commercial CPUE data in the SEF is that fishers modify their fishing practices to suit quota availability and market demands. Also, many fishermen only put the retained catch in logbook data, not the total catch. Furthermore, the influence of environmental conditions on fish availability also reduces the effectiveness of CPUE as an index of abundance. Low or bycatch TACs also prevent catch rate data being used as an index of abundance.

Implementation of a fishery independent survey is the most cost-effective and feasible means to get an independent index of abundance for the suite of SESSF species.

Recognising this, the SESS Fishery Assessment Group (SESSFAG) has placed highest priority on the need to implement fishery-independent methods for surveying relative abundance of SESSF fish stocks.

Objectives

1. Review the current fishery independent surveys that are operating in the SESSF and determine their efficacy and potential for use in a multi-species survey. Determine which survey methods are most suitable for the main species in the SESSF.
2. Design a suite of cost-efficient fishery independent surveys that will meet the needs of the fishery in providing indices of abundance for most major species in the SESSF. Determine the most practical way of undertaking the surveys and gain broad stakeholder acceptance of the survey design.
3. Determine the cost structure for the surveys and how funding and research quota will be allocated.
4. Undertake a full one-year trial of the survey design. Review the results of the survey with respect to cost-efficiency, practicality and provision of high quality (precise) indices of abundance and modify the design accordingly.
5. Implement a long-term (5-10 year) survey program that can be progressively funded by industry under standard CRIS Policy
Environment

The influence of environmental factors on recruitment and availability of fish stocks in southeast Australia

Project number: 2005-006
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $347,505.00
Principal Investigator: Ian Knuckey
Organisation: Fishwell Consulting Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 6 Sep 2005 - 28 Feb 2009
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The dynamics of fish stocks are significantly influenced by environmental and oceanographic factors. Although this is now recognised by industry and scientists alike, there is increasing frustration with the application of single species stock assessments or CPUE analyses that do not incorporate any information about the broader environmental/oceanographic factors. There are clear examples in the SESSF of cyclic patterns in recruitment and availability and indications of regime shifts, but there has been little support for compiling these data and incorporating them in a quantitative manner into stock assessments of fisheries in SE Australia. Much of this information about the influence of environmental factors is in the heads of experienced fishermen but needs to be formally (and quantitatively) incorporated into the assessments/analyses that underpin the TAC setting process for the fishery. Clearly, a better understanding of the influences of the environment will improve several aspects of the assessment and management processes. Including environmental factors in the standardization of catch rates has the potential to remove a significant source of uncertainty that can lead to misleading population estimates. There is also a need to include environmental factors directly into the assessment, for example through models of environmentally-driven cycles (eg blue grenadier). As outputs from the assessments flow directly into management decisions, for example through the TAC setting process and appropriately chosen harvest strategies, the project will enhance management’s confidence in the decisions being made, and also improve industry’s faith in the assessment/management process. Industry members are currently getting disillusioned with assessments that do not take environmental factors of fishery dynamics into account to the point where they are beginning to walk out on the fishery assessment process. This only further decreases the relevance and applicability of these assessments. This trend can be turned around if industry is listened to and empowered with the capability of bringing quantitative information into the stock assessment process (rather than anecdotal).

From information passed down through generations and decades of their own experiences, good fishermen have an informed understanding of the influence of environmental and oceanographic on fish stocks. Industry and scientists would both appreciate the means to incorporate environmental/oceanographic data into the stock assessment process in a formal manner. Subsequent benefits to the management process will ensue through the provision of better developed harvest strategies that can explicitly account for environmental fluctuations in key fishery parameters (eg projections of cyclic patterns in availability and recruitment), and an exploration of flexible multi-year TACs. Also, short-term predictions of environmentally driven changes in biomass (either increases or decreases), that have led to unnecessary changes to TACs, may be offset by an increased ability to forecast biomass changes and thereby enable management to respond in a manner that does not unduly impact the stock or the financial stability of the industry. This project provides the datasets and models that would enable this to occur.

Most importantly, this project is the first step in the process of getting fishers to collect the information that is so needed to manage the fish stocks. With the burden of increasing costs of fishery monitoring, data collection and analysis, the fishing industry is looking towards cost effective alternatives to this work always being undertaken by government agencies. Industry members are already purchasing software that will enable them to collect and analyse much of this information themselves. There is a need for this to be a coordinated process which will ultimately empower the industry to bring valuable interpretations and analysis into the stock assessment process in a quantitative manner. Using the resources from this project to begin with, we aim to assess whether industry can be self-sufficient in collecting these data by the end of this three year project.

Objectives

1. Hold a workshop with major stakeholder groups to develop hypotheses about the major environmental drivers and their potential influence of gross fishery characteristics (catch composition, seasonal variations, recruitment pulses etc)
2. Model the influence of environmental/oceanographic conditions on fishery recruitment success and availability
3. Examine the efficacy of industry-based environmental data collection capabilities
4. Trial environmental data collection instrumentation on strategic fishing vessels across the SESSF and methods of incorporating this information into assessments

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9805388-9-2
Author: Ian Knuckey

Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Industry Development Subprogram: strategic planning, project management and adoption

Project number: 2004-254
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $129,196.00
Principal Investigator: Ian Knuckey
Organisation: Fishwell Consulting Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 14 Aug 2004 - 30 Sep 2007
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Until the establishment of the SEF Industry Development Subprogram, there was a dearth of R&D projects focused on industry development for the SESSF. The Subprogram was established in 2000 and has since accessed over $700K in funding (of which almost half has been from sources external to FRDC) to increase the value of the fishery by value-adding to fish products, adopting new technologies and improving utilisation of catches. The current Subprogram project finishes in December 2003 but there are sufficient funds to extend its work until June 2004. Members of the Seafood Industry involved in the SESSF see the need for R&D into industry development projects to continue and are supporting the submission of this proposal to continue the Subprogram.

Many of the economic indicators for the commonwealth scalefish fisheries in south eastern Australia are poor. The low profitability in the fisheries is recognised by most operators in the catching sector and this has flow-on effects throughout the supply chain. Industry is now looking to investigate the impediments to economic efficiency in the fishery. To achieve the complementary outcomes of sustainability and economic benefits to the stakeholders in the SEF, a whole of chain approach to R&D is required (which is in accordance with government direction on R&D planning). Current practice focuses on the biology and fishery management which has precluded more innovative ways of adding value and meeting sustainability performance measures.

Recognising that catch levels are unlikely to increase in the future, fishers are looking for various options to improve profitability by increasing the value of their catch. This type of industry development is a primary goal of the SESSF Industry Development Subprogram.

By continuing to link groups of people in the seafood industry with expertise in the whole of supply chain, the Subprogram will continue to deliver the successful outcomes for the seafood industry involved in the SESSF. The through-chain approach being adopted by the Subprogram for industry development is continuing to attract interest from a wide range of stakeholders and will continue to be successful in accessing considerable funds that are not usually available to the seafood industry. For example, the Subprogram has recently accessed $10,000 to develop up a $500,000 through-chain market development and innovation project under the National Food Industry Strategy program. In this manner, the Subprogram easily pays for the initial investment it receives from the FRDC. Nevertheless, through the involvement of FRDC in various industry development projects under the Subprogram (eg. as an ASCo shareholder), the Subprogram intends to return dividends to the FRDC that will make the Subprogram cost neutral to the FRDC by the end of this project.

Objectives

1. Adopt a supply chain approach to R&D for the SESSF to increase the value of the fishery by value-adding to fish products, adopting new technologies and improving utilisation of catches.
2. Determine priority industry development projects for the SESSF and seek a broad range of funding sources to support this R&D.
3. Integrate with other FRDC and externally funded SEF projects to ensure maximum leverage of industry funds and avoid duplication.
4. Coordinate the FRDC SESSF Industry Development Subprogram (applications, workshops, communication) and facilitate the input from industry members throughouth the seafood supply chain
View Filter

Organisation