311 results
Environment

Guidelines on a tiered, risk-based approach to bycatch management

Project number: 2015-200
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $512,809.00
Principal Investigator: Simon Nicol
Organisation: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) ABARES
Project start/end date: 30 Jun 2015 - 29 Nov 2016
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Australia’s wild-capture fisheries have led the way in addressing bycatch issues and moving towards ecosystem-based management. However, there remain significant challenges in public perception, maintaining profitable fishing industries, ensuring equitable access to fish resources and meeting market expectations. Bycatch management involves numerous, often data-poor species, covering a wide range of life history strategies and including protected species with special requirements and keystone species with crucial ecosystem roles. Guidelines at this level will be a world-first and contribute to the development of fisheries standards.

Bycatch management in Commonwealth fisheries currently involves a risk assessment process (ERA and residual risk assessment) and the associated management response, the ERM (e.g. monitoring, bycatch mitigation and management action). An overarching priority is to build on the ERA–ERM approach and effectively implement a tiered, risk-based framework for bycatch management that is affordable, effective and has transparent performance monitoring and reporting. The framework will integrate current assessment tools (e.g. PSA and SAFE) and associated management responses that relate to the level of interaction, understanding and risk.

The proposed project will build on the current ERA–ERM approach and draw together findings from recent research to develop guidelines on a risk-based framework for bycatch management. This will directly contribute to the broader set of guidelines required for the implementation of the Commonwealth Fisheries Bycatch Policy. It will contribute to policy guidelines that provide greater certainty for industry, potential equivalence for third party certification and confidence for consumers and the general public.

Objectives

1. Develop and test guidelines for a tiered, risk-based framework for bycatch management where bycatch species are assessed and managed according to the level of interaction, the level of understanding and the risk of the impact of the interaction. This framework will be consistent with the Harvest Strategy Policy, be efficient and cost-effective and encompass sub-objectives 2-6 listed below (sub-objectives funded by DA are indicated).
2. Develop and test a system for identifying bycatch species in each fishery, including the reclassification of bycatch as commercial species and vice versa. (DA-funded)
3. Provide guidance on the development of explicit and transparent objectives (DA-funded), appropriate benchmarks and equivalent levels of risk that can be applied on a fishery-by-fishery basis.
4. Provide a continuum of assessment, management response and adaptive management, depending on data availability and risk, that utilises and builds on AFMA’s ERA–ERM approach.
5. Detail a system for performance monitoring, reporting and evaluation, including the assessment of the policy’s overall success. (DA-funded)
6. Trial and evaluate draft guidelines in several Commonwealth fisheries.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-76003-160-2
Author: Department of Agriculture and Water Resources 2018
Final Report • 2018-11-21 • 954.16 KB
2015-200-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 2018 Commonwealth Fisheries Bycatch Policy (Bycatch Policy) establishes the requirement for bycatch management in Commonwealth-managed fisheries. The Guidelines for the Implementation of the Commonwealth Fisheries Bycatch Policy aim to provide assistance to Australian Government entities (principally the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) but also bodies (industry or otherwise) that AFMA outsources to, including industry-based co-management arrangements) in interpreting and implementing the requirements of the Bycatch Policy.

Bycatch is defined as a species that is either incidentally taken in a fishery and returned to the sea, or incidentally killed or injured as a result of interacting with fishing equipment in the fishery, but not taken. The Bycatch Policy distinguishes between two classes of bycatch—general bycatch and Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) listed species. General bycatch are species that are not listed under the EPBC Act. EPBC Act–listed species are managed in parallel and, where feasible, jointly with general bycatch. However, these species are principally managed under Australia’s national environment legislation—the EPBC Act. Specific guidance for managing EPBC Act–listed species is provided separately by the Department  of the Environment and Energy. These guidelines do not aim to alter or influence  that management. These guidelines are for general bycatch species only and not  EPBC Act–listed species.

1.1 Relationship with the Harvest Strategy Policy: These guidelines operate in parallel with the Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy (Harvest Strategy Policy) and the Guidelines for Implementation of the Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy (Harvest Strategy Policy Guidelines) and support AFMA’s approach to fisheries planning and documentation. AFMA has recently revised its approach to planning and documenting the management of Commonwealth fisheries. AFMA has commenced the development of a Fisheries Management Strategy (FMS) for each of its Commonwealth fisheries to combine management of commercial species (under a harvest strategy), non-commercial species (under a bycatch strategy), habitats and communities, research, and data and monitoring into a single integrated document for each of its fisheries. This single strategy approach aims to provide greater consistency, clarity, transparency and cost efficiency in how AFMA develops, documents and implements its management processes. It also aims to ensure better linkages between these components.

These guidelines are designed to assist AFMA deliver against the requirements of the Bycatch Policy and assist in developing the bycatch chapter of the FMS for each Commonwealth fishery. Where appropriate, examples are provided to illustrate key points that address specific fisheries management challenges.

1.2 Intent of the Bycatch Policy Guidelines: The Bycatch Policy advocates a risk-based approach to assessing and managing general bycatch. These guidelines provide information to assist AFMA in operationalising this approach. They encourage innovation and adoption of global best practice where appropriate. They also promote a balance between the risks to bycatch and the consequences of additional management on the fishery. Where the risks of negative impacts from fishing on bycatch are low, management responses are expected to prioritise innovation to minimise interactions without unnecessary restriction on commercial operations. Conversely, where the risks are high, greater prescription may be required to reduce the risks to bycatch (that is, to medium or low risk through appropriate management responses) in addition to promoting innovative solutions. This approach is consistent with the principles of risk–cost–catch applied to the development of harvest strategies for commercial stocks. The guidelines assist AFMA with recognising information uncertainty and incorporate it into its assessment of risk and application of the precautionary principle.

Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-114
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Completing Australia’s First National Bycatch Report

Bycatch (non-targeted organisms that are unintentionally caught when fishing for particular species or sizes of species) remains an important issue concerning the world’s fisheries. Discards are considered the most important component of bycatch because they represent a perceived wastage of...
ORGANISATION:
IC Independent Consulting Pty Ltd
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 1999-163
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

A coordinated commercial fishing industry approach to the use of marine protected areas

Government agencies, NGO’s and local and international conservation groups are increasingly advocating the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the conservation and management of Australia’s oceanic and estuarine resources. In December 1998, the Australian Commonwealth...
ORGANISATION:
University of Canberra
People
Blank
Environment
Environment

People development program: 2011 FRDC International travel bursaries- Gretta Pecl

Project number: 2008-314.22
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $7,200.00
Principal Investigator: Gretta T. Pecl
Organisation: University of Tasmania (UTAS)
Project start/end date: 14 Jul 2011 - 27 Feb 2012
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This travel bursary application is to attend a 3-day workshop, ““Data Management and Local Knowledge: Building a Network to Support Community-Based Research and Monitoring" to be held in Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A, on November 15, 16, 17, 2011. The purpose of the workshop is to bring together researchers, industry and community members, organizations, and projects working on issues surrounding data management for both Local and Traditional Knowledge (LTK) and information from community and industry-based research and monitoring. They are interested in projects and initiatives that work with LTK and are addressing data management issues in some way – from asking questions about how we can archive our data and information for future generations, to fully operational data management systems. The organisers have written to invite me to attend (pdf attached) in order to exchange experiences and information on how we can better gather, utilise and acknowledge important information that is held within our marine industries and communities.

Formally incorporating fisher knowledge into our assessment and management frameworks has never been so critical. Fishers need to alter what they do in response to marine ecosystem changes (i.e. adaptation), yet many fishers do not acknowledge climate change or trust traditional scientific information about climate change. We need platforms that collect and display information fishers trust -their own industry information.

Objectives

1. Hear presentations from a diverse group of projects working on community or industry-based research and monitoring, with emphasis on data management (challenges, issues, questions, systems, etc.)
2. Discuss and identify key topics on the theme of data management, local knowledge, and community or industry-based research - how can we formally incorporate and value industry and community data into assessment and management frameworks?
3. Explore the potential for an international network on data management and local knowledge through collaboration and partnership.
4. Guest edit a special journal issue on community-based research and data management, based on papers arising from the workshop
People
View Filter

Species

Organisation