39,834 results

SCRC: Seafood Success – Entrepreneurship & Innovation Program – Seafood CRC Professional Diploma

Project number: 2009-702
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Evan Douglas
Organisation: University of the Sunshine Coast (USC)
Project start/end date: 28 Feb 2009 - 27 Feb 2012
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Very few ideas are turned in commercial successes. A great many of them have potential and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. The good news is that there are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increased the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality.

The Seafood Success program is designed to focus on the commercialisation process - it will comprise seminars and workshops that deal with identifying the business models that are most appropriate for the innovation, the IP arrangements that need to be put in place, the marketing, financial and human resource considerations to name a few of the topics covered.

Participants will learn the skills and apply them to their own innovations and ideas to create a robust business plan that can be used to attract investment, by the SFCRC or others. The program will be self selecting, people with an idea and the enthusiasm and resources to support the development of a business plan will be able to participate. The CRC may also make participation a condition of investment in an innovative product or process.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925983-33-3
Author: Evan Douglas
Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Seafood CRC: Factors limiting resilience and recovery of fished abalone populations

Project number: 2005-029
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $629,082.98
Principal Investigator: Craig Mundy
Organisation: University of Tasmania (UTAS)
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2005 - 30 Sep 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Area closure is the only management action yet to be attempted to reverse the declining performance of the eastern zone abalone fishery (see Section B2). However, the socio-economic cost of closures in large areas of the fishery would be significant, and would create considerable tension among researchers and stakeholders. Importantly, area closures have not been successful as a management action to rebuild the Californian and British Columbian abalone fisheries. Therefore there is a need to identify tools to promote rapid and long term recovery, and better alternatives to full closure.

It is likely that the key factors responsible for ensuring population recovery will be the same factors that ensure populations maintain resilience. This proposal thus also meets the need to determine the most effective and efficient means of preventing future stock depletions.

Stock enhancement has been the subject of a North American symposium on rebuilding abalone stocks, and the focus of two major FRDC funded research programs (1994/005; 2001/033). Restocking of populations by releasing larvae and/or abalone seed (juveniles) was ineffective in Australia, Japan and North America, and is also prohibitively expensive. On the other hand, translocation of mature individuals may provide substantial benefits over the release of larvae and juveniles, and if successful, would be considerably more cost-effective (Tegner 2000; Campbell et al 2000). Translocation of mature abalone into depleted populations would also allow us to fast-track the recovery process.

In addition to testing translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding depleted abalone populations, there is a clear need to understand the scale of influence of a translocation exercise. For example, if we were looking to facilitate recovery along a 50km length of coastline, would translocation of animals to one location in the middle serve to seed the entire area, or would we have to translocate animals to five locations spaced 10km apart, or 50 locations at 1km apart? The scale of influence of a translocation event would therefore be a crucial component of assessing translocation as a management tool.

Understanding the key ecological processes limiting stock recovery will enable management strategies to be implemented that either remove impediments to recovery, or trigger stock recovery. The improved governance of wild fisheries addresses FRDC CHALLENGE 1: Improve the sustainability of natural resources supporting wild-catch and aquaculture.

Knowledge of recovery processes is required if the abalone fishery is to be managed sustainably, and is to continue to provide an important economic resource to Australia’s rural coastal populations. Knowledge of ecological processes such as those underpinning stock recovery are clearly identified in the Australian National Research Priorities - An Environmentally Sustainable Australia - Sustainable use of Australia’s biodiversity.

By understanding the key processes of reproductive success, recruitment and early survival, the proposed research addresses the Australian Marine Science and Technology Plan Program 1 – Understanding the Marine Ecosystem, by contributing to Objective 6 - Understand the biological processes in Australia’s oceans and Objective 7 - To understand the dynamics of Australia’s marine habitats and ecosystems. This research also addresses Program 6 – Using and caring for the Marine Environment, specifically Objective 6 - To improve the productivity and sustainability of the wild harvest fisheries, and to improve understanding of the relationships between fished stocks and the ecosystems that support them.

This project covers three of the high priority tasks in the current Tasmanian Abalone Strategic Research Plan (2005-2009): Recruitment, Stock Recovery and Stock Enhancement. The dynamics of stock recovery was identified as the highest priority research issue in 2004 by the Abalone Research Advisory Group.

References cited:
Campbell A (2000) Review of northern abalone, Haliotis kamtschatkana, stock status in British Columbia. In: Campbell A (ed) Workshop on rebuilding abalone stocks in British Columbia. NRC Canada, Nanaimo, BC, pp 41-50.

Campbell A, Lucas BG, Parker G (2000) Discussion on an Experimental Approach for Northern Abalone Stock Rebuilding in British Columbia. Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

Tegner M (2000) Abalone (Haliotis spp) enhancement in California: what we’ve learned and where to from here. In: Campbell A (ed) Workshop on rebuilding abalone stocks in British Columbia. NRC Canada, Nanaimo, BC, pp 61-71.

Objectives

1. To determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
2. To identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery.
3. To quantify the scale of spillover from translocated populations.
4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-86295-606-3
Authors: Craig Mundy Karen Miller and Luisa Lyall
Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Final Report • 2011-03-07 • 3.70 MB
2005-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Determine the efficacy of translocation of mature abalone for stock rebuilding
  2. Identify key ecological processes that limit stock recovery
  3. Quantify the scale of 'spillover' from translocated populations
  4. Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitated habitat

Approximately 2000 reproductively mature abalone were successfully translocated to each of three sites in a depleted region of the Tasmanian Eastern Zone fishery. The success of the translocation provides clear demonstration that translocation of abalone can be achieved easily, and at a relatively low cost. Intensive monitoring of abalone at paired Translocation and Control sites over 24 months demonstrated that Translocation of mature abalone as a tool for rebuilding local populations is a feasible and relatively low cost activity, with high levels of survival easily achieved with appropriate handling and transport of abalone.

Surveys of abalone density and movement at the three translocation sites revealed the translocated abalone responded differently at each site, with increased and earlier emigration of the translocated abalone at the sites and areas with low habitat complexity. Larval recruitment to collectors was found to be highly variable among sites, and through time. Investigation of connectivity at different spatial scales using population genetic tools strongly demonstrated that recruitment is highly localised, with very high levels of self-recruitment to sites or populations. Translocation of wild abalone can only be used if there is an adequate source of mature abalone that are surplus to the requirements of the fishery. For this reason, it is expected that the circumstances where translocation of wild abalone for the purposes of stock rebuilding can be undertaken will rarely occur.

Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2017-175
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Linking ecosystem services to the profitability of prawn fisheries linked to 2017-188

The FRDC Project 2017-175 Linking ecosystem services to the profitability of prawn fisheries delivered new methods, data and indicators to a case study on prawn fisheries in a broader project entitled Lifting farm gate profits: the role of natural capital accounts (RnD4Profit-16-03-003). This FRDC...
ORGANISATION:
CSIRO Land and Water Canberra

Recfishing Research Subprogram: Travel bursaries for attendance at the 8th World Recreational Fisheries Conference - Vancouver Canada 2017

Project number: 2016-129
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $102,026.16
Principal Investigator: Frank B. Prokop
Organisation: Curtin University
Project start/end date: 26 Apr 2017 - 1 Oct 2017
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The recreational fishing industry in Australia is extremely important. The FRDC has invested in development of responsible programs for innovative and outcome focused recreational fisheries management initiatives, with strong emphasis on empowering young leaders.

This project is based on the initiative of previous projects 2008-319 and 2006-314 relating to the 5th and 7th World Congresses respectively. Both were highly successful in providing an opportunity for future leaders to embark upon leadership and management careers which has resonated at the national, state and local level. The opportunity exists following the 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference in Vancouver Canada to establish a program based on merit-awarded bursaries to build on and enhance previous successful projects and provide significantly better outcomes beyond conference attendance.

One of the great strengths of this project is the networking and exchange of ideas among participants. Applications will be encouraged from young future leaders, young researchers with demonstrated communication and extension skills, and people in associated industries such as aquaculture or commercial fisheries. The project will also extend invitations to other Australian delegates to the conference, to be full paying participants of the study tour.

Canada and Australia share many common interests in fisheries management and administration. There will be delegates from around the world, with a strong presence from the UK, Europe and central America. There will be delegates from New Zealand and South Africa which will also allow strong, relevant networking for bursary winners. The close proximity, and expected strong presence of the United States is an additional advantage for the study tour.
There are significant benefits in being able to see innovative programs and their champions on site or in operation. Issues to be examined include - resource allocation between and among sectors, managing tourism and interactions between guided and non-guided fishers, community based education programs, fish passage and habitat maintenance, first nation management issues and social licence to operate.

Objectives

1. To build domestic capacity, empowerment and increase knowledge within and across the recreational fishing sector
2. To establish and further develop strong effective national and international networks.
3. Educate recreational fishers in Australia of relevant recreational fisheries management initiatives for inclusion in strategic and operational plans and gain expert feedback on Australian initiatives.
4. Educate recreational fishers in Australia of international recreational fisheries research and management initiatives for inclusion in strategic and operational plans.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9577587-6-6
Authors: Frank Prokop Samuel Williams Evan Dixon Isaac Tancred Jamie Crawford Sean Tracey Domenic Holland James Florisson Travis Preece Jackson Davis Mike Burgess David Ciaravolo
Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

View Filter

Species

Organisation