4 results

FINS case study-Wallis Lake Fishermens Cooperative

Project number: 1996-382
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $9,880.00
Principal Investigator: Norm Grant
Organisation: Australian Seafood Industry Council (ASIC)
Project start/end date: 2 Jun 1996 - 30 Sep 1997
:

Objectives

1. To research and document the efforts of Wallis Lakes Cooperative to improve the quality and identification of their products specifically relating those efforts to the FINS planks
2. ACTo identify reasons for their successes and or failures and document their approaches to dealing with these.

FINS case study-Spencer Gulf and West Coast Prawn Fishermens Association

Project number: 1996-384
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $9,600.00
Principal Investigator: Nick Ruello
Organisation: Australian Seafood Industry Council (ASIC)
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 1996 - 27 May 1997
:

Objectives

1. To research and document the efforts of the Spencer Gulf and West Coast Prawn Fishermens Association to improve the quality and identification of their products specifically relating those efforts to the FINS planks
2. To identify reasons for their successes and or failures and document their approaches to dealing with these.

Promote best practice and skill development in the seafood industry by conducting a demonstration project at the national WorldSkills event in 2004

Project number: 2004-406
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $4,994.00
Principal Investigator: Anita Heijkoop
Organisation: Australian Seafood Industry Council (ASIC)
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2004 - 30 Jun 2005
:

Need

This proposal addresses several priorities articulated in the industry development plans of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry1; the Australian Seafood Industry Council1; and the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation1, namely:
AFFA - More sustainable, competitive and profitable Australian fishery industry.
ASIC - Financial viability of commercial fisheries and associated communities, based on industry stability and growth in both domestic and export markets that is consistent with economic, and social policy goals for Australia.
FRDC - The commercial sector of the industry is profitable and internationally competitive; the commercial, recreational and traditional sectors are socially resilient
The seafood industry WorldSkills competition promotes skill development of the industry’s workforce. This is intrinsic to the sustainable economic development of the industry. To remain globally competitive, the industry needs to be responsive to changes and this implies a workforce capable of adapting.The competition also targets younger people who are the future of the industry. This contributes to the social fabric of the communities in which the industry operates. As the competition is being held in Queensland in 2004, there is opportunity for exposure to indigenous people who would benefit from training based on the Seafood Industry Training Package.The competition encourages performance in the industry and promotes efficiencies by highlighting industry best practice and standards in seafood processing and retailing including the uptake of formal training. The demonstration of our young people’s skills will also have an impact on negative community perceptions of the industry. Positive images of young people showcasing their talents and promoting skills, jobs and careers in the industry will be coupled with a celebrity chef who will promote an enjoyable and glamorous aspect of the industry, an image to which the public can relate. The celebrity chef will conduct a seafood cooking demonstration during the lunch break inviting the audience to taste samples and participate through questions about seafood, how to cook and store it properly and its health benefits.Recipe cards and brochures will be freely distributed to the lunchtime audience and spectators at the competition. This initiative also satisfies Seafood Services Australia’s (SSA) aim to help organisations and people overcome impediments and capitalise on opportunities for developing the seafood industry. With the scheduling of the next SSA network meeting to precede this event, a number of benefits and opportunities for SSA will arise:
Development of the network and its ideas through network members attending the WorldSkills event;
Expansion of the network through the introduction of new members - employers from around Australia who are travelling to Queensland for the competition As a sponsor to the seafood industry WorldSkills competition, SSA will be acknowledged in a number of ways which SSA can negotiate with WorldSkills. This will provide greater exposure for SSA with its attendant benefits.

Objectives

1. Demonstrate and promote best practice in processing and seafood retailing, and compliance with nationally endorsed industy standards
2. Develop a set of documented best practice procedures in seafood processing and retailing within the framework of the Seafood Industry Training Package
3. Develop a more positive profile of the industry

Final report

Incorporating MAC competencies into the seafood industry training package

Project number: 2001-315
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $82,830.00
Principal Investigator: Ross Ord
Organisation: Australian Seafood Industry Council (ASIC)
Project start/end date: 15 Sep 2001 - 30 Jun 2002
:

Objectives

1. Identify the skills, knowledge and attitudes required by industry members to participate as effective members of a MAC.
2. Confirm the need for a MAC or series of MAC training programs.
3. Identify suggested unit titles and outline descriptions for the units.
4. Gather the views of members consulted on the preferred option(s) for delivery of MAC training programs.

Final report

Author: Ross Ord
Final Report • 2002-03-19 • 961.38 KB
2001-315-DLD.pdf

Summary

Governments intervene to manage the exploitation and conservation of aquatic resources for the benefit of current and future generations.  Such management involves balancing an array of complex and sometimes conflicting public policy objectives – canvassing contentious issues such as conservation, development, access rights for fishing and non-fishing activity and resource sharing.
 
All governments have adopted variations of the so-called ‘co-operative partnership approach’ to involve all key stakeholders in the decision making process.  Stakeholders include the industry (commercial, recreational, traditional) as well as conservation, scientific and community interests.  The model is based on the belief that, in the absence of private ownership over fish resources, the fishing industry is prone to resource over-exploitation and economic inefficiency.  By involving all stakeholders in the development of public fisheries policy, it is widely believed that they will take ownership of the policy and assume greater responsibility for the well being of the individual fisheries.
 
Most management advisory committees (MACs) are established under Commonwealth or state/territory legislation, or by Ministers of Fisheries under delegations, to provide a source of advice to government.  Advisory committees are generally formed to provide advice on fishery management or stock assessment issues.  The terms of reference for MACs vary widely between jurisdictions although MACs are generally not decision makers in relation to fisheries management issues.  Governments often access other sources of advice in fulfilling their responsibilities under fisheries legislation.
 
The operation of MACs also varies between jurisdictions.  All have executive officers who may be independent or supplied by the relevant fisheries department.  Similarly, the chairperson role may be filled by a MAC member or by an independent person chosen for their ability to facilitate the progress of MAC business.
 
The work of MACs takes place within a context of high uncertainty and risk.  Most assessments of fish stocks and fishing impacts are imprecise and heavily qualified, making fisheries management consultation more contentious than it otherwise would be.  Such uncertainty creates tension between proponents of conservation and development and between fishery and non-fishery users on the MAC.  Some of this tension is bound to explain the wide spread criticism of the operation of MACs encountered during the consultations.
View Filter

Organisation