Establishment of Seafood Services Australia stage 1 - extension and advisory services
Demand for assistance from clients in areas such as live transport, modified atmosphere packaging, value adding, market information, etc continues. Requests for information in three new areas have increased. These are:
(i) A search for alternative export markets and domestic outlets for product formerly sent to Asia. In order to assist in this area, Alan Snow has recently competed an export facilitation course through the Australian Institute of Export.
(ii) A need to comply with food safety regulations and quality assurance specifications of customers and ultimately ANZFA. This is expected to increase as a result of the SeaQual initiatives.
(iii) A requirement to support the SeaQual Chooser initiative through supply of suitable material for the SeaQual packs and through an increased volume of requests for customised information packages resulting from the distribution of 35,000 Choosers.
More specifically, industry needs from AUSEAS that we have identified are:
1. Assistance to people who are exploring new ventures, products, and processes. This includes value adding and processing options, market details, and technical information.
2. Information on contacts in markets, government agencies, and other service providers (eg consultants, freight forwarders, equipment providers). AUSEAS needs to maintain a comprehensive list of contacts and to keep information on the capabilities of providers of services to improve coordination across the seafood industry.
3. Customised assistance to companies implementing food safety plans and quality management programs in cooperation with SeaQual initiatives.
4. Trouble shooting when problems occur, usually in the form of telephone advice or short targeted written material.
5. Advice on funding assistance, usually in the areas of product and process development applications to NSC. This can include reviewing applications before and after submission and assessment of reports.
6. Demand for brief targeted information to be provided free of charge through delivery methods such as internet, fax-back, etc.
7 A centralised delivery point for information on seafood related matters acting as a "one stop shop" for the industry.
8 A need to promote the national post-harvest infrastructure services of FRDC. i.e. AUSEAS, NSC, and SeaQual.
Final report
This report covers the activities projects 1996/341 and 1999/333 for the period 1996 to 2000. In October 1999 AUSEAS along with the National Seafood Centre (NSC) and SeaQual were brought together under the umbrella name of Seafood Services Australia (SSA).
To avoid confusion, for the remainder of this report, the previous name of the service AUSEAS (Australian Seafood Extension and Advisory Service) has been replaced with the new title SSA.
The report begins with a review of current activities including:
- industry inquiries and the SSA responses;
- consultancies;
- the preparation of the Australian Seafood Industry Directory;
- the sales of technical literature packages.
A discussion of the available information resources is then followed by promotional activities. This is followed by a consideration of staffing issues including staff skills development to better service clients’ needs.
Finally, there is a discussion of planned new initiatives including development of a “one-stop shop” Internet site for the post-harvest fisheries sector. This will allow clients to access a wide range of information held in the SSA databases including: the bibliography of the technical information available through this service; sources of assistance for industry development; and a topical issues discussion line. A special feature of this will be a series of technical advisory notes.
Keywords: Literature searches; Publications; Information; Advice; Research.
Impoundment stocking strategies for eastern and northern Australia
Creating a shelf stable marinated jelly fish product from the underutilised species (Catostylus mosaicus)
Final report
A survey of jellyfish products in both the domestic and Japanese markets showed that dried whole and low value semi-prepared jellyfish was available, but there was a clearly demonstrated demand for a convenience food product. In Japan, reports indicated that demand for high quality jellyfish has always exceeded supply to date and retail prices range from AUD 8/kg to AUD 85/kg depending on the product form and quality.
The world market demand for dried jellyfish is around 25,000 tonnes per year, with the main producers being China, Indonesia and Malaysia. In recent years, Asian countries have found that their local wild jellyfish stocks have declined and have approached Australia for access to our unutilised resource. The jellyfish species, Catostylus mosaicus, is identifed as one of ten species that are traditionally used as a food product and is seemingly abundant in Australian waters. Preliminary feed back from buyers of dried processed jellyfish indicate that Australian product would be comparable to that considered as high quality in their markets.
One of the major impediments to establishing a viable commercial fishery for jellyfish in Australia is the lack of value-adding options for the industry. Seafood processors have high-lighted this issue and emphasized the lack of available knowledge of jellyfish processing techniques.
The focus of this project was to develop a high value ready-to-eat jellyfish product for the Japanese and other Asian markets. To achieve this outcome, all the aspects of producing dried jellyfish were investigated including harvesting, transport, the drying process, stabilisation of the dried-product and storage. Then the product development was considered including factors of: most appropriate rehydration process; cooking and cooling process; desired product texture and appearance; marinade formulation; jellyfish to marinade ratio; consumer preference for product quantity and product packaging.
We therefore measured the physical, microbial and sensory attributes of the product. The product and the package design was assessed by consumers who were familiar with, and commonly ate, jellyfish.
Results showed that the Australian jellyfish species Catostylus mosaicus is ideally suited for processing for the Asian market. The finished product appears to be more opaque and yellow-coloured than imported salted products, although this did not affect the acceptability of the jellyfish end-product produced. The appearance of the salted jellyfish was perceived as ‘expensive looking’ by the two Japanese consumers recruited to assist in establishing cooking and preparation parameters. Difficulty was experienced in defining cooking and marinating regimes as little documented information is available. This difficulty was compounded by advice from several consumer sources conflicting with results from sensory trials.
Keywords: jellyfish, dried, processing, sensory evaluation, Asian market