Survey of Enterprise-level Biosecurity across the Australian Aquaculture Industry
Improving early detection surveillance and emergency disease response to Pacific Oyster Mortality Syndrome (POMS) using a hydrodynamic model for dispersion of OsHV-1
Assessing the Risk of Pathogenic Vibrio Species in Tasmanian Oysters
Future Oysters CRC-P Communication and Adoption
Risk from Diarrhetic Shellfish Toxins and Dinophysis to the Australian Shellfish Industry
Seafood CRC: Extending biotoxin capability and research in Australia through development of an experimental biotoxin contamination facility to target industry relevant issues
Future oysters CRC-P: Species diversification to provide alternatives for commercial production
Future Oysters CRC-P: Advanced aquatic disease surveillance for known and undefined oyster pathogens
During the February 2016 OsHV-1 outbreak in Tasmania, tracing activities in Tasmania and South Australia required substantial follow-up and surveillance to define diseased areas and prove that response measures had prevented entry of OsHV-1. This surveillance was expensive, and PIRSA and DPIPWE developed a strategy to decrease cost for future surveillance. Cost estimates for ongoing surveillance for early detection have been prohibitive, and both the Australian Pacific oyster aquaculture industries and State governments have expressed a need for more cost effective surveillance options for monitoring disease in affected areas and early detection in currently unaffected regions.
Winter mortality is a major cost impost on the Sydney Rock Oyster industry. Its current status as a syndrome of unknown cause prevents methods from being developed to minimise losses, and an improved understanding of its cause is required to begin to develop management strategies. Mitigating losses will increase profitability for the Sydney rock oyster industry.
SA oyster mortality syndrome (SAMS) is a sporadic, regionally concentrated occurrence of high mortality that is not associated with readily detectable pathogens. The use of the terms SAMS implies that these mortalities have commonalities but this is not proven. This project will aim to provide a focused approach to developing a case definition for SAMS and as a result help direct mitigation strategies to reduce or remove the problem. If a cause can be isolated, an on farm decision tool swill be developed to allow better ‘trigger point’ identification for when farm managers need to engage diagnosticians or instigate identified mitigations strategies.
Final report
This project improved understanding of methods for surveillance for several diseases of farmed oysters. Surveillance is a critical component of biosecurity and aquatic animal health activities. Surveillance supports understanding health status of populations of animals, provides evidence to support claims of freedom or understanding prevalence and increases the likelihood that a new or emergent disease can be controlled.
Mollusc diseases are less well understood than terrestrial animal and many finfish diseases and this project sought to develop understanding of three oyster diseases of substantial economic impact in the Australilan edible oyster aquaculture industries:
Pacific Oyster mortality syndrome (POMS), South Australian mortality syndrome (SAMS), and winter mortality (WM).
Future oysters CRC-P: Polymicrobial involvement in OsHV outbreaks (and other diseases)
Future oysters CRC-P: Advanced understanding of POMS to guide farm management decisions in Tasmania
The OsHv-1 virus was first detected in Tasmanian oysters in January 2016 with massive mortality of oysters on farms in several major oyster growing areas, including Pittwater, Pipeclay Lagoon, Blackman Bay and Little Swanport. In other regions such as Bruny Island and Great Swanport the virus was found in oysters but mortalities were low. Reasons for these differences between oyster growing areas are unknown and there is an urgent need for Tasmanian oyster farmers to have region and site specific information on the period of infection of the virus in Tasmania and to better understand the POMS virus dynamics, leading to the development of a predictive framework and early warning for oyster farmers of POMS disease outbreaks. Oyster farmers in Tasmania also desperately need support to develop farm management techniques that enable them to operate successfully in POMS infected areas, especially during the next few years while selective breeding for POMS resistance is being developed.
Final report
handling is required during the POMS season to reduce biofouling and maintain stocking densities conducive to good growth and survival. Younger and smaller oysters are more susceptible to infection that larger and older juvenile and adult oysters. For oysters of the same age cohort, fast growers had higher mortalities than slow growers.
Future oysters CRC-P: Enhancing Pacific Oyster breeding to optimise national benefits
The introduction of POMS to Tasmania has resulted in an increased requirement for POMS resistant oysters nationally. The Tasmanian industry has an urgent requirement to allow the industry to rebuild towards sustainability for those areas currently affected by the disease and for protection for those areas which are currently free from it. The South Australian industry, whist free from the disease at this point, also requires POMS resistant oysters so that it can hopefully avoid the crippling losses suffered in Tasmania by having resistant oysters stocked onto their farms prior to any potential outbreaks. New South Wales like Tasmania has areas that have been affected and areas that are free from POMS. Biosecurity restrictions as a result of POMS incursions have added an extra layer of complexity to ensuring that the benefits of the selective breeding program are achieved nationally. As a result there is a requirement for further research to adapt the breeding program to the new paradigm of POMS in Tasmania and permit the industry to recover and be protected from the threat of further expansion of POMS into new areas.
Final report
The project was conducted across multiple areas that reflected the objectives of the project. Researchers worked collaboratively to conduct research across breeding strategy development, capacity building in SA, genetic improvement, laboratory and field challenges, accelerated maturation and developing an identification tool.
Future Oysters CRC-P Management and Extension
Oysters Australia through Australia Seafood Industries as the eligible industry applicant has been successful in obtaining funding for the Future Oysters CRC-P. This CRC-P will expend $5.011 million over the next three years (Oct 2016 until Aug 2019) conducting RD&E to address industry issues with aquatic diseases and production. This application addresses the need to manage the overall CRC-Project including the 7 identified research projects that will be undertaken by the 15 partner organisations that comprise the Future Oysters CRC-P. This project will support the governance needs of the CRC-P to ensure that projects achieve agreed industry outcomes and the available budget is adhered to. Specifically the project is needed to support the activities of the management structures of Future Oysters CRC-P, allow effective industry consultation and reporting, including:
• The Executive Group of Wayne Hutchinson, Graham Mair and Matt Cunningham
• Future Oysters Management Committee - Dr Graham Mair (Chair, ASI Independent Director and Professor at Flinders University), Wayne Hutchinson (Deputy Chair, RD&E Manager Oysters Australia)
The project will provide the coordination function needed to maintain cohesive and strategic collaboration between project partners working in different states and on different oyster species and on different aspects of supporting the industry to adapt to the broadening presence of POMS.
Final report
The Future Oysters CRC-P project (CRC-P 2016-553805; Future Oysters) was funded by the Australian Government’s Business Cooperative Research Centres (CRC) Program, which is managed by the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (DIIS).
The Future Oysters CRC-P project was developed to undertake the research and development (R&D) needed to build and evolve the Australian oyster aquaculture industry, due to the severe impacts of disease on oyster production in Tasmania (TAS), South Australia (SA) and New South Wales (NSW) at the time of its initiation. The trigger for the project was the sudden spread of the viral disease ostreid herpesvirus-1 microvariant (OsHV-1), more commonly described as Pacific Oyster Mortality Syndrome (POMS), from NSW to TAS in February 2016.
The project 2016-800: Future Oysters CRC-P Management and Extension was conducted as part of the Future Oysters CRC-P to support the following objectives:
- Establish the Future Oysters CRC-P and its governance structures.
- Manage the Future Oysters CRC-P budget.
- Develop CRC-P Communication, extension and education and training plans.
- Monitoring and evaluation progress of Future Oysters CRC-P research project and approving milestone payments.
- Maintain cohesion and strategies direction of the Future Oysters CRC-P.
- Coordinate and deliver on reporting requirements to DIIS.
- Ensure that Future Oysters CRC-P delivers on its DIIS milestones as per the Funding Agreement.
Development of sector-specific biosecurity plan templates and guidance documents for the abalone and oyster aquaculture industries
Sentinel sensors: revolutionising our understanding and management of the estuarine environment
Oysters Australia IPA: Pacific Oyster Mortality Syndrome - resistant Oyster breeding for a sustainable Pacific Oyster Industry in Australia
Rural R and D for Profit: Easy-Open Oyster automation
Oysters Australia IPA: Australian Seafood Industries Pacific Oyster Mortality Syndrome (POMS) investigation into the 2016 disease outbreak in Tasmania - ASI emergency response
Oysters Australia IPA -workshop – identifying knowledge gaps for development of the native oyster aquaculture industry in South Australia
The establishment of a new native oyster aquaculture sector in SA will not only diversify the business risk of the existing Pacific oyster sector, but has the potential to become a multi-million dollar industry itself. As native oyster is an ideal alternative species to mitigate POMS, the successful development of this aquaculture sector will strengthen the confidence of existing/new growers and investors in both Pacific and native oysters; thereby encouraging further expansion of the industry. In addition, supporting species diversification is one of the high strategic priorities in the Oysters Australia Strategic Plan 2014-2019.
Final report
The 2015-229 “Oysters Australia IPA - workshop - identifying knowledge gaps for development of the native oyster aquaculture industry in South Australia” brought together oyster farmers, hatchery operators and scientists from across Australia to share their knowledge and experience with native oyster (Ostrea angasi) aquaculture and help to identify the key knowledge gaps in the production chain. Through presentations and group discussions, a number of research and development needs were identified. These were categorised into seven key areas: early life history/genetic improvement, farming, oyster health, post-harvest, marketing and branding, industry network and training and education. Across these categories, 19 key research and development needs were identified and prioritised via a post-workshop survey. The following four research and development needs were prioritised as being most important
- Having a constant and reliable spat supply.
Development of a selective breeding program to improve Bonamia resistance, growth rate, meat/shell ratio, colour, lustre, etc.
Establishment of good husbandry practices (e.g. handling, density, growing heights, sub-tidal vs. intertidal, seasonal effects, a system to suit O. angasi production).
Increase the shelf life/improve packaging/develop processing methods.
Identifying these needs will help to target future research to meet industry priorities and establish/develop the South Australian/Australian native oyster industry.
Keywords: Native oysters; Ostrea angasi; Australia; aquaculture
Assessing occurrence of pathogenic species of the marine bacteria Vibrio in Tasmanian oysters from St Helens
This is the first time that an illness associated with Vibrio has been traced-back to Tasmanian oysters. Regrettably, this incident occurred in the only major harvesting area in Tasmania that has not been impacted by the current Pacific oyster mortality event.
In Australia the control of Vibrio is currently limited to temperature controls during storage or transport. Pre-harvest controls used by the shellfish quality assurance programs are predicated on controlling risk posed by faecal contamination and biotoxins and are not suitable for controlling risk from these naturally occurring bacteria. Although the recent implementation of the Codex Standard for pathogenic marine vibrios suggests risk in bivalve growing areas should be assessed to ascertain the risk to public health, there has been limited research undertaken in Australia. The studies undertaken to date have generally been short in nature with no comprehensive longitudinal studies being undertaken and methodologies have now progressed significantly, whereas New Zealand has been undertaking a long-term survey to understand the risk posed by these pathogens (Cruz, Hedderley & Fletcher 2015). This issue may become a risk in accessing key markets that are active in monitoring or who regulate for these pathogens.
There is an immediate need to collect information on prevalence for the remainder of the summer period to understand the risk and evaluate if there is a relationship to salinity, temperature and toxic strains. This information will be immediately useful for developing appropriate management plans in this growing region.
This illness outbreak will likely result in Tasmanian Shellfish Quality Assurance Program and the other state programs having to consider how to manage risk in the growing areas and establish what is an acceptable level. The work proposed here could be used as a framework for future work that assesses risk across the bivalve industry Australia-wide.
Final report
Oysters Australia IPA: the use of FRNA bacteriophages for rapid re-opening of growing areas after sewage spills
Oyster growing areas with reticulated sewage and/or waste water treatment plants (WWTP) in the catchment are all potentially affected by closures caused by sewage spills and overflows. Standard risk management practice following such events is to instigate a 21 day closure resulting in lost production, market share, reputational damage, and potential recall costs. The number of growing area closures related to sewage spills and overflows in Australia is significant. In NSW, harvest areas were closed on 100 occasions due to sewage spills between July 2009 and June 2014, resulting in 2688 days of lost sales. The use of FRNA phage as potential indicators of human enteric viruses could lead to a 50% reduction in the number of days closed.
In Tas, there have been 75 harvest area closures of greater than 21 days relating to sewage spills over the past 5 years, resulting in at least 1575 days of lost sales. One three week closure in the Pittwater growing area is estimated to cost approx. $250-$400k combined sales, depending on the season. The cumulative impact of these spills has been estimated to reduce the value of businesses by a combined value of $12 million. Not all sewage incidents result in human enteric viral contamination of shellfish. Factors such as the level of illness in the community, treatment level of waste, size of the spill, hydrodynamics of the growing area, and local growing area conditions all influence the whether a spill results in significant contamination of oysters. FRNA phages have not been used routinely as indicators in shellfish in Australia to date. If FRNA phage levels show contamination is negligible, regulators may allow re-opening of growing areas as early as 10 days after the spill following results from testing on day 7, significantly decreasing the cost of spills to growers. FRNA phages are also showing potential as general indicators of human pathogenic risk.