76,435 results

Seafood CRC: value adding to the school prawn industry: Clarence River case study

Project number: 2011-746
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $52,859.50
Principal Investigator: Karen McNaughton
Organisation: SARDI Food Safety and Innovation
Project start/end date: 31 Jan 2012 - 30 Jan 2013
Contact:
FRDC

Need

School prawns are the main volume catch for Clarence River Fishermen's Co-operative and nearly half of this yearly catch is supplied as fishermen’s bait and not for human consumption.

The traditional bait market is being eroded by changes to the use of artificial bait so the fishery needs to investigate alternative markets and revenue streams for their school prawns.

Because of their very small size, it is near impossible to produce a cost effective whole, value-added product. However, there is a technical opportunity to extract the green prawn meat from the whole prawn and potentially market this product as an ingredient/product solution for the restaurant and catering trade.

The potential market opportunity of the extracted product was seen to be positive and worth investigating when tested as part of another Seafood CRC project, receiving a good response from the chefs/end users interviewed.

To understand the extraction of school prawn meat, its uses and success within the market, the Clarence River Fishermen's Cooperative believe that this technology could add another avenue of value-add to the prawn industry, making a product that is available all year round without relying on seasonal changes.

This project aims to provide a commercially viable income generation tool to the school prawn fishery.

Objectives

1. To identify and pilot an economically feasible end-use/new market for extracted green school prawn meat
2. To increase profitability for the commercial school prawn fishery

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-921563-53-9
Author: Stephen Pahl and Karen McNaughton
Final Report • 2014-02-21 • 3.14 MB
2011-746-DLD.pdf

Summary

School prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) are marine and estuarine prawns found along the east coast of Australia, between southern Queensland and eastern Victoria. Given that school prawns are low to medium priced, there is significant opportunity to increase the margin for this species by value adding. Due to the small average size of school prawns, it is not possible to produce a peeled product with current technology, but there is an opportunity to extract prawn meat from whole prawns.

This project investigated the production of an extracted school prawn meat from green and cooked prawns. The prawns were processed in a Baader separator which squashed the soft tissue (prawn meat) into a perforated drum. The extracted products were collected, packaged and the shelf life assessed through sensory, microbiological and biochemical methods.

Final Report • 2014-02-21 • 3.14 MB
2011-746-DLD.pdf

Summary

School prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) are marine and estuarine prawns found along the east coast of Australia, between southern Queensland and eastern Victoria. Given that school prawns are low to medium priced, there is significant opportunity to increase the margin for this species by value adding. Due to the small average size of school prawns, it is not possible to produce a peeled product with current technology, but there is an opportunity to extract prawn meat from whole prawns.

This project investigated the production of an extracted school prawn meat from green and cooked prawns. The prawns were processed in a Baader separator which squashed the soft tissue (prawn meat) into a perforated drum. The extracted products were collected, packaged and the shelf life assessed through sensory, microbiological and biochemical methods.

Final Report • 2014-02-21 • 3.14 MB
2011-746-DLD.pdf

Summary

School prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) are marine and estuarine prawns found along the east coast of Australia, between southern Queensland and eastern Victoria. Given that school prawns are low to medium priced, there is significant opportunity to increase the margin for this species by value adding. Due to the small average size of school prawns, it is not possible to produce a peeled product with current technology, but there is an opportunity to extract prawn meat from whole prawns.

This project investigated the production of an extracted school prawn meat from green and cooked prawns. The prawns were processed in a Baader separator which squashed the soft tissue (prawn meat) into a perforated drum. The extracted products were collected, packaged and the shelf life assessed through sensory, microbiological and biochemical methods.

Final Report • 2014-02-21 • 3.14 MB
2011-746-DLD.pdf

Summary

School prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) are marine and estuarine prawns found along the east coast of Australia, between southern Queensland and eastern Victoria. Given that school prawns are low to medium priced, there is significant opportunity to increase the margin for this species by value adding. Due to the small average size of school prawns, it is not possible to produce a peeled product with current technology, but there is an opportunity to extract prawn meat from whole prawns.

This project investigated the production of an extracted school prawn meat from green and cooked prawns. The prawns were processed in a Baader separator which squashed the soft tissue (prawn meat) into a perforated drum. The extracted products were collected, packaged and the shelf life assessed through sensory, microbiological and biochemical methods.

Final Report • 2014-02-21 • 3.14 MB
2011-746-DLD.pdf

Summary

School prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) are marine and estuarine prawns found along the east coast of Australia, between southern Queensland and eastern Victoria. Given that school prawns are low to medium priced, there is significant opportunity to increase the margin for this species by value adding. Due to the small average size of school prawns, it is not possible to produce a peeled product with current technology, but there is an opportunity to extract prawn meat from whole prawns.

This project investigated the production of an extracted school prawn meat from green and cooked prawns. The prawns were processed in a Baader separator which squashed the soft tissue (prawn meat) into a perforated drum. The extracted products were collected, packaged and the shelf life assessed through sensory, microbiological and biochemical methods.

Final Report • 2014-02-21 • 3.14 MB
2011-746-DLD.pdf

Summary

School prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) are marine and estuarine prawns found along the east coast of Australia, between southern Queensland and eastern Victoria. Given that school prawns are low to medium priced, there is significant opportunity to increase the margin for this species by value adding. Due to the small average size of school prawns, it is not possible to produce a peeled product with current technology, but there is an opportunity to extract prawn meat from whole prawns.

This project investigated the production of an extracted school prawn meat from green and cooked prawns. The prawns were processed in a Baader separator which squashed the soft tissue (prawn meat) into a perforated drum. The extracted products were collected, packaged and the shelf life assessed through sensory, microbiological and biochemical methods.

Final Report • 2014-02-21 • 3.14 MB
2011-746-DLD.pdf

Summary

School prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) are marine and estuarine prawns found along the east coast of Australia, between southern Queensland and eastern Victoria. Given that school prawns are low to medium priced, there is significant opportunity to increase the margin for this species by value adding. Due to the small average size of school prawns, it is not possible to produce a peeled product with current technology, but there is an opportunity to extract prawn meat from whole prawns.

This project investigated the production of an extracted school prawn meat from green and cooked prawns. The prawns were processed in a Baader separator which squashed the soft tissue (prawn meat) into a perforated drum. The extracted products were collected, packaged and the shelf life assessed through sensory, microbiological and biochemical methods.

Final Report • 2014-02-21 • 3.14 MB
2011-746-DLD.pdf

Summary

School prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) are marine and estuarine prawns found along the east coast of Australia, between southern Queensland and eastern Victoria. Given that school prawns are low to medium priced, there is significant opportunity to increase the margin for this species by value adding. Due to the small average size of school prawns, it is not possible to produce a peeled product with current technology, but there is an opportunity to extract prawn meat from whole prawns.

This project investigated the production of an extracted school prawn meat from green and cooked prawns. The prawns were processed in a Baader separator which squashed the soft tissue (prawn meat) into a perforated drum. The extracted products were collected, packaged and the shelf life assessed through sensory, microbiological and biochemical methods.

Adoption
PROJECT NUMBER • 2019-023
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Practicing aquatic animal welfare: Identifying and mitigating obstacles to uptake and adoption by the Australian Fishing Industry

This FRDC funded research focuses on the obstacles to, and drivers of, positive practice change relating to aquatic animal welfare (AAW) in Australia’s wild-catch commercial fishing and finfish aquaculture sectors. It was conducted between December 2019 and March 2022 in response to...
ORGANISATION:
ENVision Environmental Consulting

SCRC: Seafood CRC Product and Resources Mapping within the Seafood Industry and Hospitality Training Packages

Project number: 2014-719
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Barbara McPherson
Organisation: River Murray Training Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 10 Aug 2014 - 14 Dec 2014
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This project is needed to be able to identify which CRC products and resources link to various units from a variety of training packages to extend their use beyond CRC participants (e.g. for use as training material)

Industry

Seafood CRC: innovation in traceability for the Australian seafood industry” Austral Fisheries/Northern Prawn fishery case study

Project number: 2012-702
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $75,323.77
Principal Investigator: Janet Howieson
Organisation: Curtin University
Project start/end date: 31 May 2012 - 29 Mar 2014
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products. An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.
The advantages would include
1. Unequivocal identification of lots and batches to vastly improve the tracking and accounting for prawns through the various stages of handling and dispatch through transport and retail sale.
2. Facilitation of certainty and location of product streams, ensuring logical movement of consignments in correct order to meet appropriate market requirements, confidence in stock control, and elimination of transcription and readability errors with consequent efficiencies and reductions in manpower.
3. Faster and more cost effectively identify product of concern at retail by boat or date of harvest. Reduction in product loss for both the producer and end-user and simplification of recalls are expected outcomes.
4. As more fisheries are moving to MSC so chain of custody certification is a critical part of gaining accreditation and this will facilitate that process. It would also assist in meeting ever increasing legislative and/or market standards for traceability in both domestic and export markets.
5. The ability to monitor time, temperature and location of individual cartons from harvest to retail sale would enable identification/validation of cool chain issues through the chain, possibly resulting in an improvement in product quality.
6. The ability for the consumer to, at purchase, access information on the source of their purchase, along with photos, recipes, and other information, will assist to build value in the Australia Fisheries brand. Such transparency and easy access to information may also have wider implications in improving the community perceptions of seafood.

Objectives

1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
2. Characterize the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9925568-1-5
Authors: Janet Howieson Barbara Bell David Carter Lesley Leyland Dr Allan Bremner Ewan Colquhoun
Final Report • 2015-03-01 • 1.36 MB
2012-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products.  An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.

As reported in the 2007 CRC report ‘Review of Traceability and Product Sensor Technologies relevant to the Seafood Industry’ two major factors compel the need for food traceability; consumer safety and brand protection.  These factors are relevant to two separate stakeholders in seafood supply chains, the consumer and the primary producers.  In regards to consumer safety consumers need to be assured of the safety of a product, of its origins, that it was made by approved procedures, that it consists of appropriate ingredients and that the food is true to label. The general increase in interest in the environment, climate change, animal welfare, sustainability, organic production and ecology means that there is growing public awareness about the source of seafood and whether it meets these requirements. From the producer’s point of view the prime concern must be protection of their brand because the loss of consumer and buyer confidence in their product can result in far reaching consequences.       

In Australia’s seafood industry, paper traceability systems are the norm in most of the catching and harvesting sectors, despite the fact that the catch sector uses many sophisticated electronic instruments and devices in their operations and that electronic communications and computer use are wide spread on board, dockside and in processors. Whilst paper based systems can work, they are inherently inefficient and offer no scope for improvement. There is now a whole suite of non-paper based traceability systems that could be applicable to the Australian seafood industry.  However a case study is required to identify the most relevant   technologies, and implement and evaluate the traceability system, hence enabling informed decision making around costs and benefits by other sectors of the industry.

Therefore, this project aimed to:

  1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
  2. Characterise the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood
Final Report • 2015-03-01 • 1.36 MB
2012-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products.  An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.

As reported in the 2007 CRC report ‘Review of Traceability and Product Sensor Technologies relevant to the Seafood Industry’ two major factors compel the need for food traceability; consumer safety and brand protection.  These factors are relevant to two separate stakeholders in seafood supply chains, the consumer and the primary producers.  In regards to consumer safety consumers need to be assured of the safety of a product, of its origins, that it was made by approved procedures, that it consists of appropriate ingredients and that the food is true to label. The general increase in interest in the environment, climate change, animal welfare, sustainability, organic production and ecology means that there is growing public awareness about the source of seafood and whether it meets these requirements. From the producer’s point of view the prime concern must be protection of their brand because the loss of consumer and buyer confidence in their product can result in far reaching consequences.       

In Australia’s seafood industry, paper traceability systems are the norm in most of the catching and harvesting sectors, despite the fact that the catch sector uses many sophisticated electronic instruments and devices in their operations and that electronic communications and computer use are wide spread on board, dockside and in processors. Whilst paper based systems can work, they are inherently inefficient and offer no scope for improvement. There is now a whole suite of non-paper based traceability systems that could be applicable to the Australian seafood industry.  However a case study is required to identify the most relevant   technologies, and implement and evaluate the traceability system, hence enabling informed decision making around costs and benefits by other sectors of the industry.

Therefore, this project aimed to:

  1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
  2. Characterise the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood
Final Report • 2015-03-01 • 1.36 MB
2012-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products.  An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.

As reported in the 2007 CRC report ‘Review of Traceability and Product Sensor Technologies relevant to the Seafood Industry’ two major factors compel the need for food traceability; consumer safety and brand protection.  These factors are relevant to two separate stakeholders in seafood supply chains, the consumer and the primary producers.  In regards to consumer safety consumers need to be assured of the safety of a product, of its origins, that it was made by approved procedures, that it consists of appropriate ingredients and that the food is true to label. The general increase in interest in the environment, climate change, animal welfare, sustainability, organic production and ecology means that there is growing public awareness about the source of seafood and whether it meets these requirements. From the producer’s point of view the prime concern must be protection of their brand because the loss of consumer and buyer confidence in their product can result in far reaching consequences.       

In Australia’s seafood industry, paper traceability systems are the norm in most of the catching and harvesting sectors, despite the fact that the catch sector uses many sophisticated electronic instruments and devices in their operations and that electronic communications and computer use are wide spread on board, dockside and in processors. Whilst paper based systems can work, they are inherently inefficient and offer no scope for improvement. There is now a whole suite of non-paper based traceability systems that could be applicable to the Australian seafood industry.  However a case study is required to identify the most relevant   technologies, and implement and evaluate the traceability system, hence enabling informed decision making around costs and benefits by other sectors of the industry.

Therefore, this project aimed to:

  1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
  2. Characterise the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood
Final Report • 2015-03-01 • 1.36 MB
2012-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products.  An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.

As reported in the 2007 CRC report ‘Review of Traceability and Product Sensor Technologies relevant to the Seafood Industry’ two major factors compel the need for food traceability; consumer safety and brand protection.  These factors are relevant to two separate stakeholders in seafood supply chains, the consumer and the primary producers.  In regards to consumer safety consumers need to be assured of the safety of a product, of its origins, that it was made by approved procedures, that it consists of appropriate ingredients and that the food is true to label. The general increase in interest in the environment, climate change, animal welfare, sustainability, organic production and ecology means that there is growing public awareness about the source of seafood and whether it meets these requirements. From the producer’s point of view the prime concern must be protection of their brand because the loss of consumer and buyer confidence in their product can result in far reaching consequences.       

In Australia’s seafood industry, paper traceability systems are the norm in most of the catching and harvesting sectors, despite the fact that the catch sector uses many sophisticated electronic instruments and devices in their operations and that electronic communications and computer use are wide spread on board, dockside and in processors. Whilst paper based systems can work, they are inherently inefficient and offer no scope for improvement. There is now a whole suite of non-paper based traceability systems that could be applicable to the Australian seafood industry.  However a case study is required to identify the most relevant   technologies, and implement and evaluate the traceability system, hence enabling informed decision making around costs and benefits by other sectors of the industry.

Therefore, this project aimed to:

  1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
  2. Characterise the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood
Final Report • 2015-03-01 • 1.36 MB
2012-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products.  An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.

As reported in the 2007 CRC report ‘Review of Traceability and Product Sensor Technologies relevant to the Seafood Industry’ two major factors compel the need for food traceability; consumer safety and brand protection.  These factors are relevant to two separate stakeholders in seafood supply chains, the consumer and the primary producers.  In regards to consumer safety consumers need to be assured of the safety of a product, of its origins, that it was made by approved procedures, that it consists of appropriate ingredients and that the food is true to label. The general increase in interest in the environment, climate change, animal welfare, sustainability, organic production and ecology means that there is growing public awareness about the source of seafood and whether it meets these requirements. From the producer’s point of view the prime concern must be protection of their brand because the loss of consumer and buyer confidence in their product can result in far reaching consequences.       

In Australia’s seafood industry, paper traceability systems are the norm in most of the catching and harvesting sectors, despite the fact that the catch sector uses many sophisticated electronic instruments and devices in their operations and that electronic communications and computer use are wide spread on board, dockside and in processors. Whilst paper based systems can work, they are inherently inefficient and offer no scope for improvement. There is now a whole suite of non-paper based traceability systems that could be applicable to the Australian seafood industry.  However a case study is required to identify the most relevant   technologies, and implement and evaluate the traceability system, hence enabling informed decision making around costs and benefits by other sectors of the industry.

Therefore, this project aimed to:

  1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
  2. Characterise the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood
Final Report • 2015-03-01 • 1.36 MB
2012-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products.  An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.

As reported in the 2007 CRC report ‘Review of Traceability and Product Sensor Technologies relevant to the Seafood Industry’ two major factors compel the need for food traceability; consumer safety and brand protection.  These factors are relevant to two separate stakeholders in seafood supply chains, the consumer and the primary producers.  In regards to consumer safety consumers need to be assured of the safety of a product, of its origins, that it was made by approved procedures, that it consists of appropriate ingredients and that the food is true to label. The general increase in interest in the environment, climate change, animal welfare, sustainability, organic production and ecology means that there is growing public awareness about the source of seafood and whether it meets these requirements. From the producer’s point of view the prime concern must be protection of their brand because the loss of consumer and buyer confidence in their product can result in far reaching consequences.       

In Australia’s seafood industry, paper traceability systems are the norm in most of the catching and harvesting sectors, despite the fact that the catch sector uses many sophisticated electronic instruments and devices in their operations and that electronic communications and computer use are wide spread on board, dockside and in processors. Whilst paper based systems can work, they are inherently inefficient and offer no scope for improvement. There is now a whole suite of non-paper based traceability systems that could be applicable to the Australian seafood industry.  However a case study is required to identify the most relevant   technologies, and implement and evaluate the traceability system, hence enabling informed decision making around costs and benefits by other sectors of the industry.

Therefore, this project aimed to:

  1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
  2. Characterise the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood
Final Report • 2015-03-01 • 1.36 MB
2012-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products.  An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.

As reported in the 2007 CRC report ‘Review of Traceability and Product Sensor Technologies relevant to the Seafood Industry’ two major factors compel the need for food traceability; consumer safety and brand protection.  These factors are relevant to two separate stakeholders in seafood supply chains, the consumer and the primary producers.  In regards to consumer safety consumers need to be assured of the safety of a product, of its origins, that it was made by approved procedures, that it consists of appropriate ingredients and that the food is true to label. The general increase in interest in the environment, climate change, animal welfare, sustainability, organic production and ecology means that there is growing public awareness about the source of seafood and whether it meets these requirements. From the producer’s point of view the prime concern must be protection of their brand because the loss of consumer and buyer confidence in their product can result in far reaching consequences.       

In Australia’s seafood industry, paper traceability systems are the norm in most of the catching and harvesting sectors, despite the fact that the catch sector uses many sophisticated electronic instruments and devices in their operations and that electronic communications and computer use are wide spread on board, dockside and in processors. Whilst paper based systems can work, they are inherently inefficient and offer no scope for improvement. There is now a whole suite of non-paper based traceability systems that could be applicable to the Australian seafood industry.  However a case study is required to identify the most relevant   technologies, and implement and evaluate the traceability system, hence enabling informed decision making around costs and benefits by other sectors of the industry.

Therefore, this project aimed to:

  1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
  2. Characterise the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood
Final Report • 2015-03-01 • 1.36 MB
2012-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

Austral fisheries have identified the need for establishing the efficacy and efficiency of establishing an electronic traceability system for their seafood products.  An ideal system would also provide real time monitoring of temperature and location from point of harvest to retail sale and enable electronic access at purchase by the supermarket customer to provide product information.

As reported in the 2007 CRC report ‘Review of Traceability and Product Sensor Technologies relevant to the Seafood Industry’ two major factors compel the need for food traceability; consumer safety and brand protection.  These factors are relevant to two separate stakeholders in seafood supply chains, the consumer and the primary producers.  In regards to consumer safety consumers need to be assured of the safety of a product, of its origins, that it was made by approved procedures, that it consists of appropriate ingredients and that the food is true to label. The general increase in interest in the environment, climate change, animal welfare, sustainability, organic production and ecology means that there is growing public awareness about the source of seafood and whether it meets these requirements. From the producer’s point of view the prime concern must be protection of their brand because the loss of consumer and buyer confidence in their product can result in far reaching consequences.       

In Australia’s seafood industry, paper traceability systems are the norm in most of the catching and harvesting sectors, despite the fact that the catch sector uses many sophisticated electronic instruments and devices in their operations and that electronic communications and computer use are wide spread on board, dockside and in processors. Whilst paper based systems can work, they are inherently inefficient and offer no scope for improvement. There is now a whole suite of non-paper based traceability systems that could be applicable to the Australian seafood industry.  However a case study is required to identify the most relevant   technologies, and implement and evaluate the traceability system, hence enabling informed decision making around costs and benefits by other sectors of the industry.

Therefore, this project aimed to:

  1. Identify, establish and evaluate an innovative, electronic traceability system for Austral seafood products
  2. Characterise the choices, issues and opportunities around implementation of innovative traceability systems for Australian seafood
Communities
PROJECT NUMBER • 2016-417
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

National People Development: Membership of PIEFA to support and encourage the teaching and learning in Australian schools of information related to the Australian Fishing Industry

PIEFA was established in 2007 with bipartisan government support following an extensive series of roundtables and working party meetings supported by the federal Minister of Agriculture. PIEFA became operational in April 2010 with support from the government, education and industry sectors. The...
ORGANISATION:
Primary Industries Education Foundation Australia (PIEFA)

SCRC: Seafood CRC: a review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies relevant to the Australian seafood industry

Project number: 2007-708
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Ken Dods
Organisation: ChemCentre (WA)
Project start/end date: 11 Sep 2007 - 1 Nov 2007
Contact:
FRDC

Need

AS an input to Business Plan development by the Australian Seafood CRC for the Product Quality and Integrity Research Program, conduct a review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies relevant to the Australian Seafood Industry

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925982-02-2
Author: Kenneth Dods and Allen Bremner
Final Report • 2008-03-31 • 1.24 MB
2007-708-DLD.pdf

Summary

This study comprised a literature review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies for the seafood industry. Predictive technologies are becoming well established in the food industry to deal with issues of safety, spoilage and shelf-life. The Seafood Shelf-life and Safety Predictor (SSSP), available as freeware, is most commonly used for seafoods throughout the globe.

However, information on specific spoilage organisms (SSO) under Australian conditions is lacking and it is therefore not clear which particular organisms, conditions or compositional characteristics are critical to minimise spoilage losses. The use of the concept of icedays (equivalent days in ice) for expressing transit periods, shelf-lives and storage periods could greatly improve communication and understanding along the production chain and the use of the Quality Index, which is consistent with icedays, similarly could improve understanding and aid in troubleshooting.

Final Report • 2008-03-31 • 1.24 MB
2007-708-DLD.pdf

Summary

This study comprised a literature review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies for the seafood industry. Predictive technologies are becoming well established in the food industry to deal with issues of safety, spoilage and shelf-life. The Seafood Shelf-life and Safety Predictor (SSSP), available as freeware, is most commonly used for seafoods throughout the globe.

However, information on specific spoilage organisms (SSO) under Australian conditions is lacking and it is therefore not clear which particular organisms, conditions or compositional characteristics are critical to minimise spoilage losses. The use of the concept of icedays (equivalent days in ice) for expressing transit periods, shelf-lives and storage periods could greatly improve communication and understanding along the production chain and the use of the Quality Index, which is consistent with icedays, similarly could improve understanding and aid in troubleshooting.

Final Report • 2008-03-31 • 1.24 MB
2007-708-DLD.pdf

Summary

This study comprised a literature review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies for the seafood industry. Predictive technologies are becoming well established in the food industry to deal with issues of safety, spoilage and shelf-life. The Seafood Shelf-life and Safety Predictor (SSSP), available as freeware, is most commonly used for seafoods throughout the globe.

However, information on specific spoilage organisms (SSO) under Australian conditions is lacking and it is therefore not clear which particular organisms, conditions or compositional characteristics are critical to minimise spoilage losses. The use of the concept of icedays (equivalent days in ice) for expressing transit periods, shelf-lives and storage periods could greatly improve communication and understanding along the production chain and the use of the Quality Index, which is consistent with icedays, similarly could improve understanding and aid in troubleshooting.

Final Report • 2008-03-31 • 1.24 MB
2007-708-DLD.pdf

Summary

This study comprised a literature review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies for the seafood industry. Predictive technologies are becoming well established in the food industry to deal with issues of safety, spoilage and shelf-life. The Seafood Shelf-life and Safety Predictor (SSSP), available as freeware, is most commonly used for seafoods throughout the globe.

However, information on specific spoilage organisms (SSO) under Australian conditions is lacking and it is therefore not clear which particular organisms, conditions or compositional characteristics are critical to minimise spoilage losses. The use of the concept of icedays (equivalent days in ice) for expressing transit periods, shelf-lives and storage periods could greatly improve communication and understanding along the production chain and the use of the Quality Index, which is consistent with icedays, similarly could improve understanding and aid in troubleshooting.

Final Report • 2008-03-31 • 1.24 MB
2007-708-DLD.pdf

Summary

This study comprised a literature review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies for the seafood industry. Predictive technologies are becoming well established in the food industry to deal with issues of safety, spoilage and shelf-life. The Seafood Shelf-life and Safety Predictor (SSSP), available as freeware, is most commonly used for seafoods throughout the globe.

However, information on specific spoilage organisms (SSO) under Australian conditions is lacking and it is therefore not clear which particular organisms, conditions or compositional characteristics are critical to minimise spoilage losses. The use of the concept of icedays (equivalent days in ice) for expressing transit periods, shelf-lives and storage periods could greatly improve communication and understanding along the production chain and the use of the Quality Index, which is consistent with icedays, similarly could improve understanding and aid in troubleshooting.

Final Report • 2008-03-31 • 1.24 MB
2007-708-DLD.pdf

Summary

This study comprised a literature review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies for the seafood industry. Predictive technologies are becoming well established in the food industry to deal with issues of safety, spoilage and shelf-life. The Seafood Shelf-life and Safety Predictor (SSSP), available as freeware, is most commonly used for seafoods throughout the globe.

However, information on specific spoilage organisms (SSO) under Australian conditions is lacking and it is therefore not clear which particular organisms, conditions or compositional characteristics are critical to minimise spoilage losses. The use of the concept of icedays (equivalent days in ice) for expressing transit periods, shelf-lives and storage periods could greatly improve communication and understanding along the production chain and the use of the Quality Index, which is consistent with icedays, similarly could improve understanding and aid in troubleshooting.

Final Report • 2008-03-31 • 1.24 MB
2007-708-DLD.pdf

Summary

This study comprised a literature review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies for the seafood industry. Predictive technologies are becoming well established in the food industry to deal with issues of safety, spoilage and shelf-life. The Seafood Shelf-life and Safety Predictor (SSSP), available as freeware, is most commonly used for seafoods throughout the globe.

However, information on specific spoilage organisms (SSO) under Australian conditions is lacking and it is therefore not clear which particular organisms, conditions or compositional characteristics are critical to minimise spoilage losses. The use of the concept of icedays (equivalent days in ice) for expressing transit periods, shelf-lives and storage periods could greatly improve communication and understanding along the production chain and the use of the Quality Index, which is consistent with icedays, similarly could improve understanding and aid in troubleshooting.

Final Report • 2008-03-31 • 1.24 MB
2007-708-DLD.pdf

Summary

This study comprised a literature review of predictive and rapid diagnostic technologies for the seafood industry. Predictive technologies are becoming well established in the food industry to deal with issues of safety, spoilage and shelf-life. The Seafood Shelf-life and Safety Predictor (SSSP), available as freeware, is most commonly used for seafoods throughout the globe.

However, information on specific spoilage organisms (SSO) under Australian conditions is lacking and it is therefore not clear which particular organisms, conditions or compositional characteristics are critical to minimise spoilage losses. The use of the concept of icedays (equivalent days in ice) for expressing transit periods, shelf-lives and storage periods could greatly improve communication and understanding along the production chain and the use of the Quality Index, which is consistent with icedays, similarly could improve understanding and aid in troubleshooting.

View Filter

Species

Organisation