Identification of muscle parasite in Yellowtail Kingfish (Seriola lalandi) and Mahi Mahi (Coryphaena hippurus), and determination as to the efficacy of non-invasive screening technology for the purpose of identifying infected fish in a commercial fish processing environment
Industry stakeholders have a need to prevent fish infected with these parasites, being further traded through the value chain. However, identifying an appropriate level of technology will be the challenge to stakeholders. Such technology will need to be cost effective, non-destructive, rapid and relatively simple to use.
Stakeholders also need to identify the parasites concerned for both species, and identify technology capable of screening out such infected fish is required in the processing environment. The work proposed here will identify the parasite concerned for both species, identify appropriate technology applicable is a regional processing environment, and trial such technology at the place of processing in NSW.
Final report
Incidents of muscle parasite infections that cause muscle softening in both species have been reported with increasing frequency in recent years. These parasites cause fishers to lose money in the short term by way of buyer reimbursement. However both species are now experiencing a loss of buyer confidence which has also reduced the market price to wholesalers. These issues of product confidence are now threatening the viability and thus the continuation of this fishery.
The ongoing development, implementation, communication and extension of the Australian Fish Names Standard (AS 5300) and the Australian Aquatic Plant Names Standard (AS 5301) for 2021-2025
Australian Standards have status and are recognised as best practice, but are not legal documents. However, a Government can reference a standard in legislation and it becomes mandatory.
AS 5300 is not yet mandated in Australia, but is listed in the FSANZ Standard 2.2.3 - Fish and Fish Products as an advisory note (https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2011C00569 ) and AS 5301, is not reference anywhere.
Both SRB's recognise and industry stakeholder groups, recognise the standards must be mandated within FSANZ or other appropriate legislation. It is key that legislation covers the complete supply chain including food service, for the Standards to become fully effective. Further communication and extension of the required to support better adoption. Through this project, we will continue to articulate the need for the standards to become consumer law, whilst also advocating for further industry adoption of the standards.
The use of standard names achieves outcomes that are consistent with the aims of the seafood industry and Government:
1. Improved monitoring and stock assessment enhances the sustainability of fisheries resources.
2. Increased consistency and efficiency in seafood marketing to improve consumer confidence and industry profitability.
3. Improved accuracy and consistency in trade descriptions enables consumers to make more informed choices when purchasing seafood and reduces the potential for misleading and deceptive conduct.
4. More efficient management of seafood related public health incidents and food safety through improved labelling and species identification.
FNC undertook a stakeholder survey (Attachment1), with the key net benefits considered to be: consistency, integrity, transparency, improved management of food fraud and food safety and strengthening public, consumer and stakeholder confidence of the industry. These net benefits align with the FRDC's Fish forever 2030 vision and R & D Plan 2020-25; with strong relevance to Strategy V: Provide foundational information and support services; and Outcome 5: Community, trust, respect and value.
Attachment 2 & 3: Letters of support and net benefits summary show for further support of the Standards.
Processing and packaging of king crab
Management of ‘tough fish syndrome’ in tropical Saddletail Snapper to re-instill market confidence
Data obtained from field trips as part of the current project (FRDC 2008/208) indicate the development of TFS may not be due to inappropriate onboard handling practices. Textural issues appear to be due to a combination of biological, geographical and seasonal factors. Results from the current research suggest a significant influence of both sex and season on the toughness observed in Saddletail Snapper. Current findings do not discount potential compounding influences such as ‘cold shock’ for example. Collagen content and ultimate pH of Saddletail Snapper muscle also represent significant influences of measured toughness. However, these factors alone do not provide a definitive explanation for the toughness observed in the species.
Results to date are provisional only. Further investigation across multiple seasons is required to substantiate or refute observed trends and preliminary statistical correlations. The potential influence of ‘cold-shock’ also needs to be clarified. The limited timeframe of FRDC project 2008/208 will not provide this clarity.
This project is needed to obtain the additional seasonal data to provide a definitive information base which will enable the development of strategies for the management of TFS. This will enable stakeholders to market their product with confidence, achieve an increase in price commensurate with premium quality reef fish and ensure the ongoing sustainable use of the resource.
The resolution of the problem or the adoption of management strategies to minimise the occurrence of TFS will have positive spin offs in all sectors of the supply chain i.e. catcher, buyer, exporter, wholesaler, distributor, retailer, restaurateur, and home consumer.
This proposed project addresses the focus of increasing profitability and optimum utilisation of fish identified by the NT, Qld and WA within their respective current fisheries research and development priority documents.
Final report
A major achievement of this research is the confirmation of fish age being the primary driver of toughness in cooked Saddletail snapper flesh. Knowing the cause provides confidence to develop solutions and make business decisions for the reef fish fisheries.
The influence of other fish physiological factors was shown to have little impact with respect to fish flesh toughness. Additionally, there was no apparent connection between flesh toughness and seasonality nor year to year conditions. The possibility of toughness being engendered through in appropriate chilling immediately post capture was ruled out as a factor contributing to tough fish syndrome (TFS).
The outcome following on from identification of the cause of TFS surrounded developing procedures for reducing the incidence of tough fish where the cause was preventable . However, as post-harvest handling was not a contributor to toughness, implementing alternative handling procedures was irrelevant. The focus of this outcome shifted to developing strategies to ensure fish at risk of exhibiting TFS did not enter the value chain. This was addressed by provision of currently available technology on non-invasive ultrasonic imaging and near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to the industry partners.
Keywords: Saddletail snapper, Lutjanus malabaricus, flesh toughness, fish texture, fish age, consumer perception
Developing case ready retail and bulk catering pack for seafood using M.A.P technology
Development of five UHT seafood soups using waste and under-utilised species
Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) Strategic and R&D Plan 2020-25
The Australian farmed prawn sector faces a number of existing and emerging strategic issues that will impact its performance of the next 5-10 years. The forces driving these trends are quite dynamic and therefore demand an up-to-date planning processes be always available to the APFA Executive Committee.
Some of these drivers and trends are beyond APFA's control (eg weaker A$, import competition and market positioning, proposed significant new domestic investment in the sector), while others are not (improved sustainability across Australian farming systems, reliance on casual labour, communication across the sector, alignment of sector R&D with strategy direction, precompetitive marketing, etc). The APFA's strategy review workshop (Mid 2015) identified a list of issues which collectively indicate that the sector needs to review its strategic and R&D Plans.
In July-Sept 2016 the APFA undertook a process to establish a new marketing strategy for the sector. This scanning process related to this Plan also revealed a number of broader issues in new farm investments, production technologies, and supply, that will influence the sectors marketing performance in coming years.
As a result of these reviews and processes and recent discussion across the industry, the APFA Executive Committee intends to undertake a comprehensive Strategic and R,D&E Planning process to bring together and document all the relevant issues in a coordinated and fosussed process lead by an independent party. The new Strategic and RD&E Plan document will be a tangible output from that 5 month process.