38,007 results
Communities
PROJECT NUMBER • 2017-092
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Valuing Victoria's Wild-catch fisheries and aquaculture industries

This project provides the first evaluation of the social and economic contributions of wildcatch professional fisheries and aquaculture of Victoria to the communities in which the industries are located and to the entire state. This project was developed in consultation with the...
ORGANISATION:
University of Technology Sydney (UTS)
People
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-150
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Attendance at the Annual Session of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) - 4-9 December 2018 in Honolulu, USA

This report is an overview of my attendance at the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Meeting 15 Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 9–16 December 2018 which was made possible through a FRDC Development Award. The report includes information on: (i) what issues were discussed at the meeting,...
ORGANISATION:
Narooma Seafood Direct

Reassessment of intertidal macroalgal communities near to and distant from salmon farms and an evaluation of using drones to survey macroalgal distribution

Project number: 2014-241
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $61,915.04
Principal Investigator: Christine D. Crawford
Organisation: University of Tasmania (UTAS)
Project start/end date: 19 Jan 2015 - 30 Dec 2016
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The proposed expansion of salmon farming to new sites in south eastern Tasmania earlier this year has already elicited opposition from some neighbouring residents, wild abalone fishers and environmental groups, which has been well displayed in the media. One of their major concerns is lack of information on whether salmon farms are affecting intertidal and subtidal macroalgae, and no ongoing monitoring of these habitats. This highlights the importance of repeating the survey eleven years later to assess changes in intertidal macroalgal abundance and species composition around salmon farms.

Drones are increasingly being used to record agricultural environments, including salmon farms. However, methods to quantitatively assess coastal environmental change using drones, such as macroalgal distribution and abundance have not been assessed. The effectiveness of this technique to monitor salmon farms is needed to maximise usage of this data and before it can be incorporated into monitoring programs.

This project will provide information important to several FRDC Strategic Priority Areas.
• Program 1: Environment: Themes 2 and 4: Habitat and Ecosystem Protection and Ecologically Sustainable Development, especially providing information to the community to demonstrate improvements in the aquaculture industry’s environmental performance and quantifying the environmental carrying capacity of aquaculture operations.
• Program 2: Industry: Theme 6 and 7: Resource Access and Allocation, and Production, Growth and Profitability, especially increasing knowledge among diverse groups of stakeholders about each other’s expectations for resource access and allocation, and increase and diversify opportunities for the aquaculture sector.
• Program 3: Communities: Theme 10: Resilient and Supportive Communities, especially understanding and influencing the community perceptions about the fishing and aquaculture industry and improving interactions between them, and increasing the community’s capacity to accept and incorporate higher levels of aquaculture activity.

Objectives

1. To repeat the assessment of intertidal macroalgal composition and abundance near to and distant from salmon farms in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region eleven years after the initial assessment.
2. To evaluate the potential of using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (drones) to monitor macroalgal distribution.

Final report

ISBN: Print 978-1-925646-20-7 Online 978-1-925646-21-4
Author: Christine Crawford and Stephen Harwin
Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

Final Report • 2018-07-05 • 3.59 MB
2014-241-DLD.pdf

Summary

The salmon farming industry has significantly expanded in South-eastern Tasmanian both in production and in number and location of farms. Along with this expansion has been an increasing concern from the general community about the effects of salmon farms on the environment. This includes a reported spread of ‘nuisance’ algae in the intertidal zone; however, this has not been verified scientifically. As one of the main effects of salmon farming is an increase in nutrients to the environment from waste products, a possible flow-on effect could be a proliferation of macroalgal beds near salmon farming operations. However, a survey of intertidal areas in the Huon and D’Entrecasteaux Channel region in 2002/03 found no clear patterns of macroalgal abundance with distance from salmon farms, (Crawford et al 2006), and it was recommended that any future studies focus on surveying the abundance of key species in the intertidal, Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii, which are widely distributed and readily identified.

In this project researchers from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania repeated the survey of intertidal macroalgae conducted in 2002/03 to assess whether abundances have significantly changed at these sites. We also investigated monitoring macroalgal abundance at a larger spatial scale using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones. Since the previous survey in 2002/03, the technology for UAVs has significantly advanced and they are now a much more cost effective option. However, the techniques and quantitative analyses required to monitor intertidal algal assemblages using drones have not been assessed.

Although the percentage cover of all species of intertidal algae in the quadrats was recorded, the analysis focussed on the two dominant species types Ulva spp and Hormosira banksii. Similar to the previous surveys conducted in 2002/03, there were no clear patterns in abundance of Ulva or Hormosira with distance from salmon farms, even though production from salmon farms has increased substantially over this time. However, the abundance of Hormosira in 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than in 2002/03. This species had almost disappeared from the mid tide region at nearly all sites in 2015-16, whereas the percentage cover of Ulva was significantly higher. These results suggest that factors other than nutrients from salmon farms were also influencing the abundance of intertidal algae, as the results were consistent across sites, regardless of distance from salmon farming operations.

The drone survey in December 2016 produced over 1500 photographs but only a portion of these were suitable for orthomosaic processing due to the system failing to deal with refraction issues in deep water during the image matching stage. Although boundaries of Macrocystis beds were visible and could be mapped, the refraction effects with water depth would likely hinder change analysis if the beds were mapped at a later date. Similarly, the drone surveys in March 2016 were not that successful because even at low tide sections of the intertidal were covered with water, and a depth of only 1 cm was found to severely limit camera recordings, including poor colour definition.

SCRC: Seafood Success – Entrepreneurship & Innovation Program – Seafood CRC Professional Diploma

Project number: 2009-702
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Evan Douglas
Organisation: University of the Sunshine Coast (USC)
Project start/end date: 28 Feb 2009 - 27 Feb 2012
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Very few ideas are turned in commercial successes. A great many of them have potential and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. The good news is that there are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increased the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality.

The Seafood Success program is designed to focus on the commercialisation process - it will comprise seminars and workshops that deal with identifying the business models that are most appropriate for the innovation, the IP arrangements that need to be put in place, the marketing, financial and human resource considerations to name a few of the topics covered.

Participants will learn the skills and apply them to their own innovations and ideas to create a robust business plan that can be used to attract investment, by the SFCRC or others. The program will be self selecting, people with an idea and the enthusiasm and resources to support the development of a business plan will be able to participate. The CRC may also make participation a condition of investment in an innovative product or process.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925983-33-3
Author: Evan Douglas
Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

Final Report • 2012-02-28 • 671.08 KB
2009-702-DLD.pdf

Summary

One of the original aims of the Seafood CRC was to create opportunities for industry (especially) and research participants to expand their knowledge and to encourage further education opportunities. To enable individuals to take innovative concepts right through to a business plan via an educational process that expanded their horizons with regards to what could be achieved would be ground breaking.

Very few ideas are turned into commercial successes. A great many of them have potential, and significant investment is usually directed to overcoming any technical issues that may be encountered. The resulting innovations still need to be commercialised. It is this commercialisation process that can make the difference between an innovation succeeding or failing. There are a number of tools and techniques that can be learned that will increase the chance that an innovation can become a commercial reality therefore a program focusing on the commercialisation process was required.

The program was delivered in two main formats, an eight month program over eight weekends (producing a business plan) and a four day program focussing more broadly on developing management and decision making skills. The eight month version attracted a smaller more narrowly focussed group of attendees but resulted in slightly higher outcomes in terms of overall satisfaction, impact and stronger ongoing networks, while the shorter version had broader appeal, attracted more attendees and still resulted in high levels of satisfaction and impact (but not as strong ongoing networks).

SCRC: Seafood CRC: ‘WERA’ Industry Bursary 2008

Project number: 2008-707
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Roy D. Palmer
Organisation: Seafood CRC Company Ltd
Project start/end date: 20 Jan 2008 - 29 Jun 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This subject was suggested as an education and training priority at the Oyster Consortium meeting in Sydney March’07, was reaffirmed at the Oyster Consortium planning meeting in Hobart in September 07, and was broached again at the Shellfish Futures Conference in Hobart, Nov 07. Whilst Roy Palmer was in Rhode Island (on other business) he had a meeting with the Chair of WERA and obtained information which he put into a report that was circulated to the Oyster Consortium.
WERA objectives are
1. Provide a forum for geneticists, physiologists, nutritionists, biotechnologists and others interested in the aquaculture of molluscan shellfish to exchange ideas and information on molluscan genetics, reproduction, pathology, brood-stock management, breeding programs, hatcheries, husbandry techniques, and restoration strategies.
2. Develop protocols for the preservation of valuable genetic material for future use by researchers.
3. Maximise and co-ordinate research efforts among scientists on the Pacific, Atlantic and Gulf coasts, USA, as well as international researchers.
4. Identify research needs for enhancement of commercial molluscan production through genetic improvement while maintaining environmental quality.
5. Evaluate different approaches for restoration of depleted stocks of native oysters.
6. Provide industry members with up-to-date research information that will lead to optimal brood-stock management and breeding programs to enhance commercial production.
7. Publish committee reports and documents.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9756044-1-0
Author: Tony Troup
Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Final Report • 2008-03-26 • 4.89 MB
2008-707-DLD Extended.pdf

Summary

Judd Evans and I attended the WERA 099 Broodstock Management, Genetics and Breeding Programs for Molluscan Shellfish meeting on Sunday the 6th of April and the National Shellfish Association Annual Conference, 6th to 10th of April, held in Providence, Rhode Island. We then travelled, via New York, to Newport, Oregon (the Hatfield marine Research Centre) and up to Shelton, Washington (Taylors’ Shellfish) visiting an oyster farm and a hatchery along the way. We returned home on the 18th of April. The following is a report, in diary form, of this trip.

Final Report • 2019-03-26 • 1.79 MB
2008-707-DLD.pdf

Summary

The WERA conference is a meeting held yearly in conjunction with the National Shellfish Conference and brings together the foremost researchers involved with oyster genetics and breeding from across America. France usually sends their top researchers to attend and this year Tony and I were invited to observe on behalf of the Australian oyster industry. I was impressed with the level of research being undertaken by the Americans although some areas of research struck me as lacking a commercial purpose or outcome. One example of this was a reference to a small study completed in conjunction with their breeding programme which asked both the public and oyster farmers what shell coloring most appealed to them, I believe the results came back that both parties preferred their shell coloring to be "just right" not to dark and not to white, they also liked the patterns on the shells to be well defined. It was then mooted that this could be achieved and might be incorporated into the breeding programme. I wonder where the profit might be in such research, I was to learn that American research is not geared towards the bottom line and return to industry like it is in Australia.

An area where we might become involved which would be of benefit would be in their genomics area, a lot of the information discussed was very much over my head from what I could understand, they were mapping the oyster genome and finding which genes were responsible for which characteristics and then finding if they could be "turned off" or "on" to get desired results in the breeding programme. This may have application for our own breeding programmes in that we can identify recessive genes, mark them and breed away or turn them "off" to enhance our selected lines.

Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2017-175
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Linking ecosystem services to the profitability of prawn fisheries linked to 2017-188

The FRDC Project 2017-175 Linking ecosystem services to the profitability of prawn fisheries delivered new methods, data and indicators to a case study on prawn fisheries in a broader project entitled Lifting farm gate profits: the role of natural capital accounts (RnD4Profit-16-03-003). This FRDC...
ORGANISATION:
CSIRO Land and Water Canberra

Recfishing Research Subprogram: Travel bursaries for attendance at the 8th World Recreational Fisheries Conference - Vancouver Canada 2017

Project number: 2016-129
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $102,026.16
Principal Investigator: Frank B. Prokop
Organisation: Curtin University
Project start/end date: 26 Apr 2017 - 1 Oct 2017
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The recreational fishing industry in Australia is extremely important. The FRDC has invested in development of responsible programs for innovative and outcome focused recreational fisheries management initiatives, with strong emphasis on empowering young leaders.

This project is based on the initiative of previous projects 2008-319 and 2006-314 relating to the 5th and 7th World Congresses respectively. Both were highly successful in providing an opportunity for future leaders to embark upon leadership and management careers which has resonated at the national, state and local level. The opportunity exists following the 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference in Vancouver Canada to establish a program based on merit-awarded bursaries to build on and enhance previous successful projects and provide significantly better outcomes beyond conference attendance.

One of the great strengths of this project is the networking and exchange of ideas among participants. Applications will be encouraged from young future leaders, young researchers with demonstrated communication and extension skills, and people in associated industries such as aquaculture or commercial fisheries. The project will also extend invitations to other Australian delegates to the conference, to be full paying participants of the study tour.

Canada and Australia share many common interests in fisheries management and administration. There will be delegates from around the world, with a strong presence from the UK, Europe and central America. There will be delegates from New Zealand and South Africa which will also allow strong, relevant networking for bursary winners. The close proximity, and expected strong presence of the United States is an additional advantage for the study tour.
There are significant benefits in being able to see innovative programs and their champions on site or in operation. Issues to be examined include - resource allocation between and among sectors, managing tourism and interactions between guided and non-guided fishers, community based education programs, fish passage and habitat maintenance, first nation management issues and social licence to operate.

Objectives

1. To build domestic capacity, empowerment and increase knowledge within and across the recreational fishing sector
2. To establish and further develop strong effective national and international networks.
3. Educate recreational fishers in Australia of relevant recreational fisheries management initiatives for inclusion in strategic and operational plans and gain expert feedback on Australian initiatives.
4. Educate recreational fishers in Australia of international recreational fisheries research and management initiatives for inclusion in strategic and operational plans.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9577587-6-6
Authors: Frank Prokop Samuel Williams Evan Dixon Isaac Tancred Jamie Crawford Sean Tracey Domenic Holland James Florisson Travis Preece Jackson Davis Mike Burgess David Ciaravolo
Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

Final Report • 2018-03-06 • 4.33 MB
2016-129-DLD.pdf

Summary

The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference, held in Vancouver Canada in July 2017 was seen as an opportunity to build on previous educational and leadership opportunities associated with the 5th and 7th conferences, and to hopefully develop a new tranche of young leaders for the recreational fishing sector.

Through the Recfishing Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC), an application was made for a delegation to attend the conference and to conduct a study tour after the conference.

With a high standard of applicants, the project was enhanced to allow participants from all jurisdictions in Australia to attend. The  group (13) included some working in existing leadership roles, scientist and grass root fishers. The bursary recipients composed a part of the Australian contingent of 38 (second largest) at the conference.

Although there were some challenges with the timing of the application process, some bursary recipients were able to take part in the conference, with a total of 6 presentations. All sessions of the conference were attended and summarised for this report and for a significant following on social media (Facebook).

Following the conference, the bursary recipients investigated salmon and halibut allocation and management processes, habitat restoration following natural and human impacts, the  white sturgeon fishery and management of wilderness fishing for cut throat and bull trout. Key areas which drove fisheries, management and fishery related projects were the roles of hatchery fish, community education and advocacy processes.

There was considerable international interest in the FRDC structured study tour at the conference with several countries looking to emulate the program for the next World Recreational Fishing Conference.

The participants in the study tour performed extremely well, gelling together as a groups and operating as a team for all the tasks that they were given. They have been able to identify synergies with issues or opportunities investigated in Canada and have started to develop strategies and procedures for integrating several elements in Australia. Participants have identified personal development strategies and support networks to assist them with progressing these issues, the PI and also the FRDC will also be working to ensure participants have opportunities to further develop in the future.

There were many key leadership and development learnings within this project, however the compressed nature of the application process to tour meant there was little time for planning which would have been ideal for participants to connect prior to the trip. Most other of the elements of this study tour should be replicated should there be future opportunities for people in recreational fishing and associated industries to undertake a study tour.

View Filter

Species

Organisation