Seafood CRC: industry management and commercialisation plan for the Sydney rock oyster breeding program

Project number: 2005-209
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $205,514.03
Principal Investigator: Ray Tynan
Organisation: Select Oyster Company Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2005 - 1 Feb 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The success of FRDC supported breeding and hatchery production programs has demonstrated to industry that faster growing disease resistant oysters can be bred and distributed. Industry has now established a company, SOCo, to accept responsibility for the management, future development and distribution of the SRO breeding lines. Initially the company undertook management and coordination of the sales of faster growing seed and now wishes to expand its role to determine the future of the breeding program. To ensure the successful adoption of technology, a previous FRDC review of oyster hatchery and breeding programs (Benzie et al., FRDC 2001/213) strongly emphasised the need to inform, equip, and assist industry to understand and adopt this technology. Accordingly, there is a need to 1) conduct an independent assessment of current selection practices and their relevance to ongoing breeding line maintenance and improvement, 2) establish the genetic status of the current breeding lines with respect to the natural populations of SRO and 3) assist in the development of cost effective strategies and technology for the maintenance of selected lines and their genetic integrity. The outcomes of these assessments need to be presented in a form that is suitable for incorporation in the company’s business plan and that would be of value to other industries undertaking or contemplating breeding programs.

Objectives

1. To survey industry breeding requirements and establish the economic values of different SRO traits in order to determine the market sustainability of developing and marketing multiple lines and to determine the optimum breeding objectives of different lines.
2. To evaluate alternative methods for selection for the most desirable traits, as identified by industry (faster growth, QX, disease resistance, winter mortality resistance etc).
3. To review breeding program designs and apply the best approach to develop a new 10 year breeding strategy for SRO, in consultation with industry.
4. To develop a risk assessment and reduction model against the loss of broodstock.
5. To determine the best methods for use and protection of existing & future intellectual property for industry development.
6. To prepare a technical manual for the continued operation of an SRO breeding program.
7. To prepare fully costed options for funding a breeding program for the next 10 years.
8. Review the genetic status of the current breeding lines by examining genetic variation.

Related research

Industry
Industry
Industry

Engagement for Success: evaluation of engagement events to inform industry management strategies

Project number: 2019-074
Project Status:
Current
Budget expenditure: $135,450.00
Principal Investigator: Lowri Pryce
Organisation: OceanWatch Australia Ltd
Project start/end date: 29 Feb 2020 - 27 Feb 2021
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Commercial fisheries and aquaculture activities with insufficient levels of social support can negatively affect industry member well-being and contribute to restricted resource access. More & appropriate engagement is needed to improve stakeholder and community trust & support, both with those affected by industry activity, and with those who affect industry activity (i.e. decision-makers and influencers).

This project addresses the need to ensure that the range of engagement activities and strategies undertaken by organisations and operators within fisheries and aquaculture are effective at:
- building relationships and trustworthiness;
- understanding concerns and needs arising from industry activity; and
- influencing preferences and decisions.

Limited evaluation has been undertaken regarding the effectiveness of engagement strategies and activities in meeting predefined goals. Similarly, limited opportunities exist to transfer knowledge between industry organisations of successful and future engagement practice; or to support improved return on investment of engagement strategies.
The NSW Fishing Industry has a need to improve relationships and trustworthiness with key stakeholders, and to achieve specific outcomes for PFA members, which include; improve social license by industry taking the lead on its own imagery, and an increase in the consumption and variety of NSW seafood.

In addition, there is limited feedback on whether communication strategies about to embark on will be effective at achieving the PFA’s desired outcomes, and there is information to help develop long term engagement strategies and direct limited resources to the most effective activities.

Therefore, there is a need to select a range of community engagement strategies and activities, and evaluate these against predefined goals. Engagement successes need to be extended to other industry organisations,
and if appropriate, decision support materials to be developed to extend knowledge adoption of the findings and materials.

Objectives

1. Evaluate these engagement activities and strategies against their predefined goals, applying an engagement evaluation framework developed by Clear Horizon as part of "FRDC project 2018-201" using standardised and defensible monitoring and evaluation methods.
2. Pilot and refine the evaluation framework using the above.
3. Develop materials to support other industry organisations based on the specific case studies, in selecting, designing, implementing and evaluating types of engagement activities and strategies which have been demonstrated to be highly effective at achieving specific engagement goals. (REVIEW with Stop/Go point)
4. Contribute to extension and knowledge mobilisation of these findings and materials. (REVIEW with Stop/Go point)

Resource list

Resource list

Summary

This user-friendly tool helps you choose the most suitable engagement activities based on your specific goals, target audience, and resources. By considering factors like budget and expertise, the tool suggests effective strategies to connect with your community.

Project products

Guide • 599.67 KB
How-To-Resources Engagement for Success.pdf

Summary

How can this Digital Toolkit help you?

The seafood industry plays a vital role in economies worldwide. However, its success often hinges on strong relationships with local communities and stakeholders. This toolkit is designed to help fisheries and aquaculture businesses build trust, transparency, and influence decisions effectively by providing resources that will help you engage with your community in a deeper way and effectively communicate your business’s value.

 

What's Inside?

Our toolkit offers two primary resources:

 

Interactive Selection Tool

You can access this tool above.

 

How-to Informational Resources

These PDFs guides provide step-by-step instructions for implementing various engagement activities. Learn how to organize community meetings, develop effective communication materials, and measure the impact of your efforts.

'If you don’t know where you are going, you’ll end up someplace else' - Future proofing the Australian Mud Crab Industry through improved strategic direction

Project number: 2018-177
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $101,563.00
Principal Investigator: Chris E. Calogeras
Organisation: C-AID Consultants
Project start/end date: 28 Feb 2020 - 28 Jan 2021
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES

Need

Australian mud crab fisheries are managed across four jurisdictions (WA, NT, Qld, NSW) with Industry having little cross-jurisdictional connectivity, and agencies appearing to generally operate in isolation, even though it is a national market.

Industry is undergoing significant structural and management changes. This project is critical for the Australian industry's future as it navigates these changes and seeks to optimise outcomes.

This projects genesis came when mud crab leaders from key jurisdictions caught up by phone, discussing the status of individual fisheries. It was apparent that as a product going into a national market there were many common issues to resolve. Although high-quality work is undertaken across jurisdictions; from an industry perspective R&D, monitoring and management approaches didn’t appear coordinated enough, with no national marketing plan.

It became clear that, although a $48+M/annum national market, connectivity is poor and improved outcomes can be achieved through a collaborative approach across jurisdictions. It was agreed, this approach may provide whole of industry benefits via a strategic workshop that includes licensees/quota holders, fishers, supply chain partners and agencies to increase knowledge, foster sustainable economic, environmental and social benefits.

Initial areas identified included:

• Data - Elogs, VMS, Industry science
• Research – uncoordinated nationally, modelling consistency, ecological impacts
• Succession – a plan allow entry for new people in a more structured environment, NT Indigenous involvement etc
• Quota Transition/structural changes – e.g. ownership structures, impacts, opportunities, issue, improved holding/storage to optimise product value
• Regulations – possible harmonisation/code development etc
• Biosecurity
• Product identification
• Community support/licence
• Markets and logistic opportunities
• National RD&E priorities.

There has been unanimous support across jurisdictions for this project (see attachment).

The industry doesn’t have logistical coordination at this time to coordinate this, or resources to carry it out, and would rely on FRDC funds and significant industry and agency in-kind.

Objectives

1. Share experiences and understandings to identify issues and opportunities for collaborative approaches across the industry and agencies
2. Build industry cohesion and capacity through development of a national industry plan and communication network.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9871427-8-8
Author: Dr Chris Calogeras and Dr Rik Buckworth
Final Report • 26.15 MB
2018-177-DLD.pdf

Summary

BACKGROUND
Australian mud crab fisheries extend from northern Western Australia (WA) across the Northern Territory (NT) and Queensland (Qld) through to northern New South Wales (NSW) and are managed across the four jurisdictions. The product from each jurisdiction is sold into a larger common market valued at around $50M/annum1, mainly within Australia, but also into a number of international markets.
This project’s genesis came when mud crab Industry leaders from key jurisdictions caught up by phone, discussing the status of individual jurisdiction’s fisheries. To them it became apparent that they were catching the same species, Scylla serrata and S. olivacea, (which are called mud crabs), and were all supplying the same markets, and therefore there were many common issues to resolve.
It was noted there was no formal cross-jurisdictional connectivity and it was felt that there could be improved outcomes achieved through a collaborative approach across jurisdictions. This was particularly so as, after a number of years of relative status quo in the Australian fisheries, recent years had seen significant structural and management changes that will lead/have led to operational changes in the fishery landscape. 
 
A national workshop was considered the optimal mechanism to bring Industry, and importantly, Agencies, together, to develop a common purpose. Through an approach where participants learn from each other and build relationships, Industry leaders believed that a coordinated approach to building the Industry’s future would lead to improved outcomes from an operational, economic, ecological, social and regulatory perspective. Each major Industry group and relevant Agency in Australia was contacted and provided unanimous support for this approach.
 
Like many projects that were planned for this period (2020) the impacts and uncertainty caused by COVID restrictions led to significant delays, and the project value was questioned due to the time from its genesis to its potential completion. This view was tested with Industry and Agency participants who unanimously supported the holding of a face-to-face workshop to address the project’s objectives. As such, the workshop was deferred from 2020 until it was eventually held in late 2022.
 
KEY FINDINGS
It was apparent that there is considerable opportunity to improve the future for the Australian mud crab industry on several fronts. Foremost among these is to develop a coordinated direction based on the National Plan, developed as the workshop summary (Attachment 3), to address the seven key investment areas identified. This will require communication within and between sectors.
A major recommendation was to form a Working Group which will have interim responsibility for progressing the National Plan, and to gauge the appetite to move to a more formalised arrangement for the Industry to coordinate its activities nationally. What was also clear was that a process where diverse participants learn from each other and build relationships can support a coordinated approach to building the Industry’s future from an operational, economic, social and regulatory perspective. It was noted that in the short term
a standalone Industry approach would most likely fail, and that Agency involvement in the process was a critical component of generating agreed, sustainable and positive outcomes.
In addition, it is clear that many of the key areas that require investment are not solely the remit of the Australian mud crab industry. A process to ensure that sectoral and regional needs can be amalgamated and coordinated to undertake high level and nationally focussed Research and Development (R&D) could lead to positive outcomes for many fisheries around Australia, particularly if there were a two way feedback process to share information (positive and negative) of new R&D and practices (i.e. impacts of climate, better understanding of ecological, weather and climate processes, capacity and capability, communications etc).