This study documents the needs and concerns of fishers and their families in Queensland coastal regions to expand the corpus of knowledge about fishing as an industry, for the sake of informing government of social impacts, and to incorporate local social considerations into current and future management plans. The study focuses on how fisheries policies impact on fishers and their families socially and culturally, and how these groups negotiate and respond to political, market and ecologically driven management measures. It is significant as it brings together important but little researched aspects of the impact of management decisions on fishers, families and communities. Research is crucial to understand the social legacy of those decisions on the social wellbeing of fishing communities, including the health and quality of life of fishers, families, and those involved in fisheries-related businesses.
Understanding the social costs of policy decisions can help mitigate harmful physical and mental health outcomes, a situation of critical significance to rural, state and national economies. Fishing families and communities are important; they provide substantial regional employment and income to local economies; they underpin the social fabric of many coastal regions which display a strong fishing cultural heritage and are substantial contributors to the social and economic viability of rural communities. However, their ability to weather the social and economic stressors of closures, especially at times of increasing global fisheries pressures, has received limited attention. Few studies have been conducted on the way fishers and their families perceive and value their status as fishers, and how their worldview influences their quality of life, social wellbeing, and their attitudes towards place and the marine environment. Our findings will be of direct use to policy developers in adopting intrinsic measures for social impact assessment, and in integrating local knowledge into future social impact assessments.
Abalone Viral Ganglioneuritis (AVG) was first observed causing unprecedented, catastrophic mortality of abalone in western Victoria during May 2006, and has continued to spread. As a direct consequence, there has already been large reductions in TAC with consequent reductions in the GVP of the Industry and its profitability. Further, the AVG-related mortality has led to great uncertainty about the status of the abalone populations (e.g. depletion) and their future productive ability (e.g. catch). Areas where populations have been affected by AVG, including adjacent to Port Fairy, have now been closed to fishing for periods approaching three years, and as a result, little or no information is available about abalone populations in many of these areas. What information that is available has come from costly fishery-independent surveys completed by VIC DPI in a limited number of areas, and anecdotal information from Industry divers at a finer-scale for a broader selection of areas.
There is now a strong need to develop cost effective and reliable surveys of the AVG-affected abalone populations, to provide information and support decisions about possible re-opening and conservative management. Industry-based surveys and structured fishing have the potential to provide a cost-effective and reliable method of collecting more, finer-scale information about the status and productivity of populations, and to also allow an audit of the resource to enable Industry to fish-to-market within the agreed conservative management guidelines. Both these aims will influence the future profitability of the Industry. Further, finer-scale and more representative information about the stocks, that is possible through the use of more cost-efficient Industry-based surveys, will also be fundamental to better assessment and management of the populations to ensure sustainability for all stakeholders.