7 results

People development program: Aquatic animal health training scheme - Boosting biosecurity capability in Western Australia

Project number: 2009-315.16
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $38,000.00
Principal Investigator: Susan Gibson-Kueh
Organisation: Aquaculture Council Of Western Australia Inc
Project start/end date: 31 Jul 2011 - 29 Aug 2012
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Aquaculture health and biosecurity are complex multidisciplinary areas that require specialized human resource development (van Beek 1997). There is a wealth of lessons to be learnt from more established aquaculture industries. As each industry is unique in fish species farmed and local environmental issues, there is a need to process information into a practical biosecurity plan.

The Western Australian aquaculture industry is regionalized, with large distances between centres of activity. Ready access to veterinarians with expertise in fish and shellfish is rare, often resulting in heavy losses. There is a need to
increase/consolidate knowledge amongst fish farm managers & operational staff in aquaculture health. Involving local veterinarians will improve access to fish health services. The workshops will create greater networking allowing fish farm managers and their local veterinarians the small pool of veterinarians within Fisheries and Universities with experience in fish and shellfish health

The above need is consistent with WA industry's RDE priorities, FRDC's environmental program theme 1

Objectives

1. Develop & run 2-day workshops on biosecurity, aquaculture health and emergency response targeted at fish farm managers, key operational staff and their local veterinarians, to critically review current operations using available information, identify gaps and develop a biosecurity action plan for future improvements
2. To further develop the technical network using the plan developed to improve fish health and biosecurity on farm
3. Run 1 day follow-up workshop, six months after final 1st workshop to review progress and decide what, how to go from here.
4. Publish online biosecurity tool kit for the australian aquaculture industry

Final report

People Development Program: 2008 FRDC indigenous development scholarship - Phillip Ugle

Project number: 2008-326.20
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $10,000.00
Principal Investigator: Dan Machin
Organisation: Aquaculture Council Of Western Australia Inc
Project start/end date: 31 Mar 2008 - 31 Mar 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The indigenous development scholarship is part of the suite of professional development opportunities developed and managed through the FRDC people development program. This particular scholarship addresses the following objectives of the people development program 2008-2013:

Objective 1 Enhance industry leadership within all sectors
and; Objective 3 Provide opportunities for knowledge transfer and R&D adoption

The significant drivers identified in the FRDC people development program, addressed by this project
are:
- There is a shortage of industry leaders in all sectors of the fishing industry.
- There is an urgent need to develop people within all sectors who have the skills to effectively contribute to debate and policy development for significant challenges, including access to fish resources.
-Early career researchers and emerging industry leaders lack opportunities for formal mentoring and
professional development.
-There is a shortage of opportunities for people in industry to develop skills that are going to directly
improve business profitability and sustainability.
-The industry is geographically dispersed and fragmented, and needs opportunities to learn within and
across sectors.

Objectives

1. To provide one annual scholarship for an indigenous person
2. To encourage maximm benefit from the scholarship with a personalised learning program and mentoring
3. Support and encourage the development of sustainable and mutually beneficial relationships between emerging indigenous leaders and host organisations
People

A workshop to address the cooperative development of the Australian mussel farming industry

Project number: 1999-378
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $11,200.00
Principal Investigator: Simon Bennison
Organisation: Aquaculture Council Of Western Australia Inc
Project start/end date: 13 Feb 2000 - 31 May 2002
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. The development of an industry profile on the mussel sector within Australia giving recognition to the fact that the industry will expand production fourfold over the next five years.
2. Develop a strategy for national cooperation and collaboration amongst producers particularly in regard to supply and demand and product quality. Activities to include: Evaluating the development of a code of practice that addresses the following: - post harvest handling(emphasis on freshness and quality).- adoption and implementation of a condition index.
3. Develop a Research and Development Strategy that will ensure viability and improved international competitiveness.

Final report

ISBN: 0-9580791-0-2
Author: Simon Bennison

Aquaculture genetics workshop

Project number: 1998-342
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $19,205.00
Principal Investigator: Alan Lymbery
Organisation: Aquaculture Council Of Western Australia Inc
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1998 - 30 Aug 2000
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The 1995 review of world aquaculture resources by the Food and Agriculture Organisation identified the major constraints to future development of aquaculture as being: the availability of feed ingredients; disease and health management; environmental impacts; and genetic and diversity issues. There are two areas in which genetics is especially important in aquaculture development: 1) Appropriate broodstock selection and breeding programs for the genetic improvement of important production traits; 2) Genetic implications of the translocation of aquaculture stocks within and outside their natural range.

Genetic improvement: The power of selective breeding in increasing productivity and efficiency has been amply demonstrated in traditional agricultural species. Aquaculture species have hardly benefited from modern developments in animal breeding, despite their typically high reproductive capacity and therefore high potential for genetic improvement. The key issues which need to be addressed are the appropriate traits for improvement and their genetic parameters (heritability, correlations with other traits); optimal selection methods (mass selection, family selection, construction of selection indexes); avoidance of inbreeding; and the role of recombinant DNA technology (transgenesis, marker-assisted selection and cytogenetic manipulation).

Understanding the power of genetics is particulary important with aquaculture species where egg supply is a limiting factor. This applies to many fish species where the first generation bred in captivity often become the broodstock for the industry. Accidental initial selection of a slow growing strain (compounded by inbreeding), or starting with a small genetic base often leads to an uncompetitive industry.

Translocation: The issue of translocation is likely to become an increasingly important constraint upon aquaculture development. Although policy guidelines are currently being produced in Western Australia and other states, their application will be hampered by a lack of genetic knowledge on two fronts. Firstly, we know very little about the genetic population structure of most endemic potential aquaculture species. Secondly, what we do know comes almost entirely from studies of neutral genetic markers, and may bear no resemblance to the genetic structure of traits of ecological importance. The issues that need to be addressed are: laboratory and analytical techniques for measuring population genetic structure; relating population genetic structure to genetic variance in traits of ecological importance; the effects of breeding for stock enhancement on inbreeding and variance effective population sizes.

These issues of genetic improvement of breeding stock and genetic effects of translocation are two sides of the same coin, because the traits which we wish to improve through breeding are in most cases precisely those traits which determine the adaptedness of local populations to their environment. Both issues need to be addressed at this early stage in the development of the aquaculture industry in Australia.

Restocking of native fish stocks is also becoming increasingly important in Australia as the political power of recreational anglers and the value of their sport to local economies increases. Restocking programs should not be undertaken without an understanding of the genetic structure and variance of existing populations or the knowledge needed to ensure that the restocked fish do not alter this balance.

Objectives

1. To hold an aquaculture genetics workshop.
2. To focus the Australian aquaculture industry on the importance of genetics in relation to aquaculture production.
3. To identify and initiate appropriate species specific genetic improvement programmes by Australian industry and government research sectors.
4. To provide a scientific basis for assessing genetic risks arising from the translocation or restocking of aquaculture species.
5. To identify research and development needs.

Final report

Author: Alan Lymbery
Final Report • 2001-11-06 • 47.32 KB
1998-342-DLD.pdf

Summary

Aquaculture in Australia is a rapidly growing industry.  More than 60 aquatic species including crustaceans, molluscs, finfish, crocodiles and microalgae are presently cultured in Australia, although less than ten species support around 80% of the total value of the industry.  In 1995, a review of world aquaculture resources by the Food and Agriculture Organisation identified genetic and diversity issues as major constraints to the future development of aquaculture.  There are two areas in which genetics is especially important in aquaculture development: (1) the genetic improvement of important production traits; and (2) genetic implications of the intentional movement (translocation) of organisms for aquaculture or restocking programs.

Genetic improvement of aquaculture species offers substantial opportunities for increased production efficiency, disease control, product quality and ultimately profitability for aquaculture industries.  Most aquaculture industries in Australia are at an early stage of development and would benefit from the introduction of genetic improvement programs.

The first step in a genetic improvement program is to determine which traits should be improved (the breeding objective), and find measures for those traits (the selection criteria).  Size at harvest is perceived by industry participants, managers and researchers as the trait that will most influence profitability for all major aquaculture species in Australia.  Other traits of general importance are survival to harvest, disease resistance (especially in edible molluscs), meat yield and feed conversion efficiency. For some aquaculture species, such as trout, there are good estimates of the heritabilities and genetic correlations among these traits, and studies are beginning for a number of crustacean and mollusc species.  In most cases, however, we still lack the basic information needed to define effective selection criteria for the traits we wish to improve.

Once the breeding objective and selection criteria have been determined, we need to consider the methods by which superior breeding stock will be selected.  Mass selection, where breeding stock are chosen on the basis of individual performance, is most common in aquaculture species.  This may lead to inbreeding, however, because individuals with superior performance will often be closely related.  One method of overcoming this is by taking the performance of relatives into account when choosing breeding stock (family selection).  The major research priority for genetic improvement across all aquaculture species in Australia is the development of genetic markers to enable accurate pedigree determination.  This would allow the more widespread use of family data in selection decisions, without costly maintenance of separate family lines until individuals can be physically marked.

The major constraint upon the implementation of genetic improvement programs by aquaculture industries is lack of available funds and resources.  Many aquaculture industries in Australia are small and immature, and uncertainties over production costs and market opportunities limit investment in long-term genetic improvement programs.  Ensuring industry ownership of genetic improvement programs, and national coordination among researchers, are vital in all aquaculture industries.  Government support may be necessary in the early stages of development, and the favourable benefit:cost ratio demonstrated, for example, by the Norwegian breeding program for salmonids, should encourage the targeted investment of public funds into genetic improvement programs for aquaculture species.

Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 1995-077
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Code of practice for the yabby industry

A major reason for the code is to ensure that quality of product is maintained throughout the industry, particularly with new entrants. With the appointment of a full-time extension officers to the freshwater crayfish industry and an increased profile of the support agencies at field days and...
ORGANISATION:
Aquaculture Council Of Western Australia Inc

Customer response to WA aquaculture marketing programme

Project number: 1993-255
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $8,000.00
Principal Investigator: Simon Bennison
Organisation: Aquaculture Council Of Western Australia Inc
Project start/end date: 4 May 1994 - 30 Dec 1994
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To test the awareness of the Singapore market to three species, black mussels, trout and yabbies
2. Use the materials to engender a cooperative approach to overseas marketing by aquaculturalists
3. To test the marketing theme "NOWHERE CLEANER NOTHING FRESHER"
View Filter

Research

Category

Product Type

Species

Organisation