138 results

Industry and expert attendance at the ICES Expert Working Group Meetings. 3-7 April 2017 Nelson NZ

Project number: 2016-144
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $12,169.41
Principal Investigator: Crispian Ashby
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 3 Apr 2017 - 30 May 2017
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The ICES working group will be meeting in the southern hemisphere and this is a perfect opportunity for Australian based industry members and researchers to be exposed to the working group on fishing gear as well as acoustics to exchange ideas.

Objectives

1. Deliberate, discuss and synthesize recent research on topics related to: i) Designing, planning, and testing of fishing gears used in abundance estimation
ii) Selective fishing gears for the reduction of bycatch, discard and unaccounted mortality, especially as they relate to EU Landing Obligation
iii) Environmentally benign fishing gears and methods, iv) Improving fuel efficiency and reduction of emission from fisheries, and v) Summaries of research activities by nation

Australian Fish and Chip Awards 2017

Project number: 2016-136
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $91,309.89
Principal Investigator: Peter Horvat
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 8 Mar 2017 - 30 Jan 2018
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The fish and chip awards will be the basis for an integrated communication campaign that will use both traditional and social media. The objective is to generate significant interest for fish and chip lovers around the country to support their local shop.

The jurisdictions have all supported the FRDC decision and have agreed to assist in coordination of the delivery and promotion of the awards. Stage one will see FRDC work with each jurisdiction to run and promote their awards, up to and including judging. FRDC will support the jurisdiction awards with national media articles – such as what is fish and chips, what fish is best?, how to prepare and cook fish and chips?, chef tips and tricks, etc. The FRDC will also work with the ABC to promote local stories and gain further coverage. Once all jurisdictions have been completed their winners will then be put forward for the national fish and chip awards to be announced in Sydney at Seafood Directions.

Objectives

1. Coordinate the state and national Fish and Chip awards
2. Improve consumers awareness of the sustainability of the Australian seafood industry
3. Raise awareness of Fishfiles as a source of seafood information
Adoption

2016 Local Seafood Summit

Project number: 2015-504
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $17,931.62
Principal Investigator: Peter Horvat
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 31 Dec 2015 - 30 Mar 2016
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Developing new ways to add value and increase the social licence of fishers remains a challenge for the fishing industry across the globe. The Australian seafood industry, and in particular small scale inshore fishers are under increasing pressure to meet community expectations, while still servicing a need to provide fresh locally caught seafood. The challenge remains how to balance these two needs.

Objectives

1. Increase the knowledge of the participants participating in the Local Seafood Summit to opportunities for new ways of promoting their industry

Assisting commercial and recreational organisations adapt to national maritime safety standards

Project number: 2015-401
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $79,460.00
Principal Investigator: Jo-Anne Ruscoe
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 21 Apr 2015 - 29 Oct 2016
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012 defines general safety obligations on both the Owner and Master. The Owner has a general safety obligation to implement and maintain a safety management system that ensures that the vessel and the operations of the vessel are, so far as reasonably practicable, safe. The Master also has a general safety obligation aboard the vessel to, so far as reasonably practicable, implement and comply with the safety management system for the vessel and the operations of the vessel. http://www.amsa.gov.au/domestic/vessels-operations-surveys/certificates-of-operation/

The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) is rolling out a program of risk management and SMS workshops to help industry meet the National Standard for Commercial Vessels, Part E Operations. A number of other organisation are also delivering SMS training to meet Part E.
FRDC recognises that some industry sectors face particular challenges in accessing these programs, possibly due to location, timing, English language proficiency, or sector specific operations. These specific needs may be beyond the scope of these other programs. This funding will complement those programs by addressing these challenges.

The Australian Government’s Policy for a More Competitive and Sustainable Fisheries Sector (2013) included a commitment to assist commercial and recreational organisations adapt to National Maritime Safety Standards. Funding is provided by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation on behalf of the Australian Government to deliver on this commitment.

Objectives

1. Manage funding to help industry meet the National Standard for Commercial Vessels, Part E Operations

The development of SAFS, FishNames, FRDC, FishFiles and Seafood Standards websites and web database

Project number: 2015-041
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $1,009,770.00
Principal Investigator: Kyaw Kyaw Soe Hlaing
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 6 Mar 2016 - 30 Dec 2017
Contact:
FRDC

Need

To get around the above issue the majority of the data (content) should be consolidated in one database. This will provide considerable savings in management, and allow for far greater integration in how the data is translated into communication products.
The external sites for which the FRDC has acquired responsibility are located outside on a number of disparate hosting services on different systems. Maintenance and management of these sites remains costly and fragmented.

Objectives

1. Create a single, scalable, trusted source of truth: an authoritative source of data and rich information base for the fisheries and aquaculture in Australia.
2. The systems allow for collection (input) of data from external parties and sharing (output) of the information in different formats including aggregated data for use in communication products.
3. Enhance the web system to allow for greater use and integration of data across the sites

Developing a plan for delivery of FRDC National Priority One and development of Whichfish web template

Project number: 2015-038
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $22,244.76
Principal Investigator: Crispian Ashby
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 31 Dec 2015 - 30 Jan 2017
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Develop priority plan for Priority 1

Objectives

1. Hold workshop to develop plan for Priority 1
2. Develop web based templates for Whichfish risk based evaluation

Leaders idea forum - Seafood Community Think Tank- “A Seafood Community United by Ideas”

Project number: 2013-239.20
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $24,763.56
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 3 Mar 2014 - 31 Aug 2015
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The perception of the seafood Industry is that, while many individual enterprises are successful and forward moving, on an Industry wide level there is a lack of creative thinking and platforms to express Ideas.
The thought processes within the seafood industry need to be fluid enough to evolve, adapt and deal with current and future issues.
By promoting discussion and enabling people to explore ideas and issues in a different context, not bound by existing thoughts and limitations, we can come up with new ideas, distinct solutions and fresh policy options for our industry.

Why is this needed:
• The seafood industry has a perception as being an ageing industry with a lack of fresh thinking.
• The industry faces complex challenges operating in a changing world that is mobile, connected and savvy. There is a need, not just to react to these changes, but rather lead and act in a proactive manner.
• Through the participation of attendees who are not currently part of the decision making processes within the industry, yet intrinsically linked to its evolution, as well as other leaders and influential people from different industries, new idea’s and innovative thought paths can be formed.

People development program: Review and future direction

Project number: 2012-406.20
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Ken Moore
Organisation: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC)
Project start/end date: 29 May 2012 - 30 Nov 2012
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The aim of the review of is to assist the FRDC evaluate its people development program, with a view to informing future direction and management of its investment in this area.
It is proposed to engage a consultant to assist the FRDC understand the strengths and weaknesses of the current program, and plan for future management and activities.
This activity does not include a benefit cost analysis of investment in R&D projects, as this is a separate piece of research currently being undertaken.
Australia’s fishing industry comprises commercial aquaculture and wild catch fishing, recreational fishing and Indigenous customary fishing. Stakeholders include all those sectors of industry, the Australian Government, fisheries managers, research providers and communicators, conservation groups, and the community.

Objectives

1. gauge awareness of the FRDC’s People development program
2. identify current stakeholder priorities for people development investment, and compare these to current program priorities
3. evaluate strengths and weaknesses of internal versus external program management models
and
4. document roles and/or contributions of recipients of Development Awards pre and post development, to understand whether the people invested in have increased their contribution (cogniscent of the variables to succession, advancement and opportunity), and whether there is broader awareness of this pool of talent.
View Filter

Species

Organisation