National Workshop to develop a regional collaborative plan to control the invasive Longspined Sea Urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii)
Larval dispersal for Southern Rock Lobster and Longspined sea urchin to support management decisions
Assessing the benefits of sea urchin processing waste as an agricultural fertiliser and soil ameliorant
Improving data on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander marine resource use to inform decision-making
Monitoring abalone juvenile abundance following removal of Centrostephanus and translocation
Waste to profit in urchin fisheries: developing business opportunities to ensure fishery sustainability and safeguard reef dependent fisheries from destructive urchin grazing
Rebuilding abalone populations to limit impacts of the spread of urchins, abalone viral ganglioneuritis and other external impacts
Local abalone populations can be severely depleted by a range of impacts, including loss of habitat from the spread of sea urchins, diseases such as AVG and Perkinsus, environmental change and theft. Many of these impacts have been increasing for over a decade, although impacts of sea urchins on abalone and reef habitats in the last 5 years have been spreading in eastern Victoria, and appear related to climate change. Similarly, impacts remain from the spread of AVG through western Victoria.
There is evidence that production from commercial abalone fisheries continues to be reduced by the ongoing increase in external impacts to local abalone populations. While tools have been developed at a small-scale to help recover abalone populations, there is a strong need to investigate, implement and assess these at a larger scale to be able to minimise further impacts and recover productivity of abalone populations.
VicFRAB this year rated its highest priority to facilitate the investigation of translocating abalone to address declines caused by urchins and disease. Similarly, the NSW DPI strategic research plan identifies a priority to "determine methods to restore depleted reefs of abalone through techniques such as transplants, habitat rehabilitation and reseeding". The ACA Strategic Plan also details actions to plan and support remedial action to reduce the impact of pests, disease and theft on abalone.
The ongoing spread of impacts to local abalone populations is having a broad impact on shallow reef habitats. Small-scale research has demonstrated the potential of recovery techniques, but have not been implemented at a broad scale to actually attempt to recover lost productivity. This project will address the need to investigate the scaling up of recovery techniques, and their costs and long-term benefits, in an attempt to recovery lost productivity from abalone populations in south east Australia.
Can commercial harvest of long-spined sea urchins reduce the impact of urchin grazing on abalone and lobster fisheries?
The long-spined sea urchin Centrostrephanus rodgersii has gradually increased in extent and biomass on the East coast of Tasmania over the past three decades. Options for direct and indirect intervention are being considered to limit numbers of this urchin to that required to minimise the destruction of the kelp and understory habitat essential for other benthic species such as abalone and rock lobster. Over the past two years a fledgling urchin harvest industry has developed in Tasmania, with the potential for market demands to create a significant fishery in terms of harvest biomass. Whether harvesting of urchins is beneficial (synergistic) to existing fisheries needs to be determined to inform development of a Harvest Strategy of all species reliant on healthy shallow (20m) sub-tidal ecosystems. The efficacy of commercial urchin harvesting as a ‘control tool’ is dependent on the degree of spatial overlap with other fisheries (co-dependent on habitat), the capacity of urchin harvesting to minimise localised destructive grazing, and, whether the urchin harvest is economically sustainable given the practical limitations of harvesting at depth.
Final report
fishing pressure.
Tactical Research Fund: Limiting impacts of the spread of urchins by rebuilding abalone populations
The impact of urchins (i.e. Centrostephanus) on reef habitats in south-east Australia has been increasing for over a decade, and may be related to climate change (FRDC 2009/070). Urchins can clear and maintain areas of reef free from macro-algae, and reduce the productivity of abalone populations and other reef species. Extensive research projects to monitor urchin populations and reduce their impacts have been completed or are under-way in NSW, Victoria and Tasmania. There is an urgent need to consolidate the findings of these research projects, and to quickly plan and coordinate the on-going development of responses to the spread of urchins.
There is evidence that production from commercial fisheries in NSW, Vic and Tas has been reduced by the spread of urchins. Small-scale clearance of urchins, and the translocation of abalone, has demonstrated the ability to recover abalone populations impacted by urchins, but consequent return of production has not yet been demonstrated in any fishery. In eastern Victoria, a joint project between Industry and Government has recently seen commercial-scale removal of urchins from previously-productive abalone reef, and the consequent recovery of appropriate habitat for abalone over a large-scale. There is now a tactical opportunity and strong need to take advantage of these removals before urchins re-invade, to demonstrate that past research can be scaled up to larger areas of reef and recovery of larger abalone populations, with the intent to maintain them over long-periods to demonstrate outcomes of sustained productivity.
Recent observations indicate urchins have also spread to western Victoria, where abalone are still recovering from Abalone Viral Ganglioneuritis. There is also an urgent need to both develop a survey to estimate the extent of Centrostephanus in western Victoria, and to investigate the potential of translocating abalone at a large-scale to re-establish populations in depleted areas, before urchins spread further.
Tactical Research Fund: trial of an industry implemented, spatially discrete eradication/control program for Centrostephanus rodgersii in Tasmania
Over the last three decades the distribution of long-spined sea urchin has extended from its native range in NSW down the east coast of Tasmania and west through Victoria. The impact of this range expansion is expected to intensify. This large sea urchin overgrazes seaweeds and invertebrates on rocky reefs, causing catastrophic regime shifts in the coastal ecosystems. The 'barren' habitats that are left after the establishment of an urchin population are unable to support commercial or recreational fisheries for abalone or rock lobster among other species. Therefore the incursion of this species into non-endemic regions pose a significant threat to the integrity of shallow reef ecosystems and the associated biodiversity and fisheries these regions support.
Final report
The cost of manually controlling an invasive species in the marine environment is inherently expensive due to the costs associated with mobilising logistics to a target area, and secondly the limitations of diver time in the water. In this report we present models that can be used to generate cost estimates to cull a given area based on urchin density and dive depth, with the maximum depth chosen having a great effect on the overall cost. A local scale model estimates the maximum cost to cull Wineglass Bay to a depth of 20 m at $1,617,802, based on a constant density estimate of 1.5 urchins.m‐2. The cost to cull reef areas within Fortescue Bay to a maximum of 20 m using the same model at $877,019 based on a constant density of 0.29 urchins.m-2.
This report shows that systematic culling can significantly reduce the density of C. rodgersii in discrete areas. The implications of these findings are that culling can be considered a viable method in the management strategy evaluation of controlling the deleterious effects of C. rodgersii. The costing models provide tools to estimate the direct cost of implementing a culling strategy at a range of spatial scales across the east coast and can be manipulated to provide a bio-geographically accurate estimate of cost depending on the area (and size of area) selected.
FRDC-DCCEE: preadapting a Tasmanian coastal ecosystem to ongoing climate change through reintroduction of a locally extinct species
Changing marine climate is driving species south, impacting recreational and commercial fishers and biodiversity and conservation values. At the same time, the local environment is changing the capacity of ecosystems to respond to an increasing array of environmental pressures. Is adapting our social and economic systems the only option for conservation managers and planners, or can we increase the resilience of the local environment to the increasing pressures? Can we gain time, or could we even influence the trajectory of change?
Assisted translocation (within the historic range) may preserve isolated populations of terrestrial animals. Is this appropriate in marine environments? Translocation typically emphasizes individual species. Would a more influential approach be to translocate species that would benefit the receiving ecosystem? We propose to develop the protocols and safeguards to reintroduce a key temperate reef predator – the blue groper – that became locally extinct in Tasmania over a century ago. The blue groper is a temperate wrasse that grows to over 50kg. It is a charismatic component of the NSW fish fauna interacting with snorkelers, divers and recreational fishers. Its diet includes the long-spined sea urchin currently establishing in Tasmania. Rearing and transporting similar species is well understood and the sequential hermaphroditism potentially provides the opportunity to introduce only larger male fish.
This will be a test case to determine whether translocating marine species is a viable option to improve resilience to climate change and what processes, knowledge and changes in policy are required before attempting this. Our application is regional but the implications are national (and global). While we are using the blue groper as the focus for our work, we will be exploring more generally the opportunities for assisted translocation, local enhancement to increase the resilience of temperate reefs, and the protocols and safeguards that would be required.
Final report
FRDC-DCCEE: adaptive management of temperate reefs to minimise effects of climate change: developing new effective approaches for ecological monitoring and predictive modelling
Waters along Australia’s most densely populated east coast are warming at 3.8 times the global average rate, which is the most rapid change in the Southern Hemisphere. Ecosystems in this region are likely to be severely impacted by climate change and significant biodiversity change is expected. The rapid nature of these ecosystem changes will require science-based decisions about where, how and when to apply adaptive management interventions. Predictive models have high uncertainty when extrapolated into new conditions, as do CC scenario models. Unless protocols for tracking and predicting ecological changes are well informed, the remote nature of marine habitats, with associated difficulties and expense when mapping biodiversity assets, will inevitably translate to sub-optimal management interventions. Potential management interventions could include targeted spatial closures to protect vulnerable habitats, targeted translocation of key predators, direct manipulation of abundances of threatening and or threatened species.Our project will address these challenges using Australia’s east coast as it is the region of greatest change and hence under the most imminent threat. Using the longest available worldwide (18-yr) ecological reef data record of fishes, invertebrates and macro-algae in marine reserves, we will identify thresholds in ecological responses such as significant assemblage shifts, kelp decline and predator-prey relationships. These outputs combined with future climate scenarios will empower, state management and NRM agencies with mproved capacity to build ecosystem resilience through spatial management actions. The project addresses three NCCARP priority questions by: (3.1) identifying priority ecosystems and species most vulnerable in this globally significant warming hotspot; (2.1) identifying vulnerable inshore reef species of commercial fisheries importance (including southern rock lobster, abalone, and temperate wrasses) and priority locations for adaptive management; and (3.2) clarifying management benefits from one intervention strategy – MPAs – for enhancing resilience of temperate ecosystems.
Final report
Sponsorship of 13th International Echinoderm Conference
The conference theme - Echinoderms in a Changing World - focuses on major current issues including climate change and ocean acidification, as well as incorporating echinoderm physiology, biogeography, genetics, genomes and development as major focal points in marine research. Tasmania is a highly appropriate location given international attention to the circumstances of climate change driving range extension of an echinoderm into Tasmanian waters, where it poses a significant threat to biodiversity of shallow rocky reef systems and the sustainability of associated fisheries.
Rebuilding Ecosystem Resilience: assessment of management options to minimise formation of ‘barrens’ habitat by the long-spined sea urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii) in Tasmania
There is clearly potential for C. rodgersii barrens to cover ~50% of nearshore reefs on the east coast of Tasmania, as is already the case in NSW and the Kent Group in Bass Strait. This would reduce both the Tasmanian abalone and rock lobster fisheries by ~15%, with a loss of value totalling ~$25M (before processing). The need for a management response is self evident.
Large rock lobsters (=135 mm CL) are the key predators of C. rodgersii in Tasmania, and experiments have shown clearly they can prevent sea urchin populations from building to the point where overgrazing occurs. There is urgent need to assess the viability of controlling C. rodgersii populations through changing current management of the rock lobster fishery, and through targeted removal by divers as a tactical response on small scales.
However, before management instruments are invoked in an attempt to minimise the risk of further development of barrens habitat or rehabilitate existing barrens, it is imperative to carefully evaluate the effectiveness of potential management strategies. The proposed research will provide the necessary information and knowledge base to enable robust management decisions.
The proposed work has strong support from managers and the fishing industry in Tasmania, is acknowledged as a high priority by the relevant RAGs, and addresses several high priorities on both the State and TAFI strategic research plans.
Final report
By overgrazing seaweeds and sessile invertebrates, essentially back to bare rock, the advent of the long‐spined sea urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii in eastern Tasmanian waters poses a significant threat to the integrity, productivity and biodiversity of shallow (<40 m) rocky reef systems and the valuable fisheries (principally abalone and rock lobster) that they support. The present research examined means of managing this threat at small, medium and large spatial scales.
Divers have the opportunity to limit C. rodgersii densities at local scales by culling or harvesting to prevent formation or expansion of urchins ‘barrens’ habitat at incipient stages when barrens occur as small patches in seaweed beds. To ensure sufficient time for seaweed recovery in cleared patches, local control in this way requires that sea urchins show a high fidelity to their particular incipient barrens patch so that once a patch is cleared of sea urchins there is little likelihood of it being quickly recolonised by other individuals from nearby patches. We found that on all types of barrens habitat C. rodgersii is highly nocturnal in behaviour, and has a strong tendency to return to its home crevice at the end of each night. Individuals in incipient barrens patches show strong fidelity to their patch over periods of several months, with little tendency to cross the boundary between barrens and seaweed cover, such that mean net movement in small patches is less than 1 m in 3 months. Accordingly, there is little tendency to migrate among patches, which is explained in part by laboratory experiments indicating that C. rodgersii lacks a directional chemosensory response to either macroalgae or conspecifics. Thus, urchin behaviour suggests that localised culling is likely to be effective in rehabilitating existing incipient barrens patches and reducing risk of further patches forming.
However, this outcome is unlikely to be achieved by the activity of professional divers culling urchins while fishing for abalone. Our trials indicate that abalone divers are motivated primarily by catching abalone. Thus, while they can be effective at culling urchins from the individual incipient barrens patches they encounter so that seaweeds recover in these particular patches, the number of patches they are able to visit while fishing through an area is small so that the overall effect of their culling activity within the area that they fish is not detectable except at the scale of individual patches visited. Given typical revisitation times to fish in a given area, divers culling urchins while fishing abalone are unlikely to provide meaningful local control of urchin populations. In this context, systematic and targeted harvesting of urchins as an independent industry, or killing urchins with quicklime or by deploying divers whose sole task is to cull urchins, is likely to be much more effective (but at added cost).
Abalone divers culling C. rodgersii while fishing can be successful in helping to regenerate seaweed cover on particular targeted barrens patches, but this is unlikely to have any significant effect in controlling urchins at the level of dive sites or reefs. Abalone divers should be encouraged to cull C. rodgersii while fishing.
Keywords: Sea urchin, Centrostephanus rodgersii, rock lobster, Jasus edwardsii, abalone, Haliotis rubra, sea urchin barrens habitat, ecosystem based management, modelling, stock rebuilding, maximum economic yield.
Aquaculture nutrition subprogram: post harvest enhancement of sea urchin roe for the Japanese market
Development of urchin fisheries in Australia is currently limited by economic viability due to low recovery rates. This fishery has a large opportunity to expand given:
1. There is a large sea urchin resource
2. The high price urchin roe fetches
3. Low cost of fishing (relatively shallow water).
The opportunity to develop this fishery into a highly profitable one is dependent on the development of innovative solutions. This proposal examines the potential for enhancing recovery rates using supplementary feeding for short periods. If this can be done cost effectively it opens the opportunity to dramatically increase the profitability and size of this fishery. Without this technology the urchin fishery will not fully develop. With this technology the fishery has the potential to be worth tens of millions. This project has been initiated by support through both existing permit holders and Aquaculturists.