129,954 results

Waterproof labelling and identification systems suitable for shellfish and other seafood products

Project number: 1998-360
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $9,800.00
Principal Investigator: Damian Ogburn
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 7 Oct 1998 - 15 Feb 2000
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To evaluate technology and products currently availabel for the individual tagging and identification of seafood products.
2. To identify the most appropriate technology and products (systems) and possible improvements to existing systems to enable for the on-farm tagging and identification of shellfish.
3. To evaluate the economic cost to industry of implementing the on-farm and market poace use of appropriate systems.
4. To evaluate the positive and negative impacts in the market place resulting from the labelling of product.
5. To design an integrated "paddock to plate" trial to investigate both the on-farm feasibility of an appropriate tagging system(s) and the reliability tagging system(s) for market place product identification and traceback.

Final report

Author: Damian Ogburn
Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Final Report • 1999-11-12 • 2.41 MB
1998-360-DLD.pdf

Summary

This report outlines the results of investigations into the feasibility of cost effectively marking or labelling individual oysters and other shellfish for product differentiation and to facilitate rapid and efficient recall of product in the event of a potential public health incident.

A number of different types of plastic tags, manufactured in Australia and overseas, can be glued or otherwise secured to oysters and other shellfish but the cost of these tags is prohibitive for all but the most expensive products such as abalone or lobster.

While there is a vast assortment of inexpensive adhesive labels used in the food and beverage industry there is currently no commercial label (or experimental adhesive) that will adequately adhere to a typical damp oyster as packed at an oyster farm.

Thus there is no cost effective label or mark that will survive ‘paddock to plate’ distribution for most shellfish and allow for positive and rapid product identification for a food safety related traceback operation. However a number of adhesive labels were identified that could be securely attached to a vast assortment of clean and dry shellfish including oysters, pipis, abalone, crabs and crayfish.

The cost of these labels ranges upwards from a cent each for the small type commonly seen on apples and kiwi fruit. Such a small label could carry sufficient information for product identification and recall for food safety purposes and some brand differentiation but would be too small for any promotional message.

A one cent added cost for a label (at the farm gate) plus the labour cost for thorough cleaning and drying oysters for label attachment would financially cripple or destroy most oyster farming businesses.

The question of cost effectiveness of larger, slightly more expensive labels (costing about several cents each) for promotional purposes would depend on the value of the individual seafood product itself and the company’s volume of throughput and financial resources. These could be an economically attractive marketing tool for the processors or marketers of large and/or valuable seafood item such as an abalone or lobster.

The absence of a mark or tag suitable for paddock to plate distribution for individual shellfish is commonly perceived as the fundamental problem with shellfish safety, particularly so for oysters.

Risk assessment for the NSW seafood industry

Project number: 1998-359
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $14,500.00
Principal Investigator: John Diplock
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (NSW)
Project start/end date: 8 Sep 1998 - 11 Aug 1999
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To conduct a risk assessment of the health risks by the NSW seafood industry using accepted risk classification models and to identify those areas posing significant and/or immediate threats to human health and to prioritise the areas requiring food safety planning.
2. To review available information and identify any deficiencies in effectiveness and efficiency of current food safety measures for the seafood industry, and any risks not addressed by the current systems.
3. To estimate likely costs to government and industry of implementation of food safety plans over a five year period to address the identified risks.

Final report

Author: John Diplock
Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

Final Report • 1999-08-02 • 230.50 KB
1998-359-DLD.pdf

Summary

Seafood, unlike most other foods, can pose serious food poisoning risks simply as a result of their biology and/or the way in which they are consumed.  This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that animals posing a risk do not show any signs that can easily distinguish them from ‘safe” food.  This has resulted in a widespread lack of appreciation of the dangers posed by seafood amongst those that catch and distribute the products.

The notion amongst those in the industry is that if the product is “fresh” - meaning recently caught- it is safe to eat, with the corollary being that catchers and distributors take little action to ensure that food is safe to eat, other than to keep the product cold to touch.  The lack of data on outbreaks of food poisoning attributed to seafood, except in cases related to shellfish, may have further contributed to the complacent attitude amongst seafood operators to food safety.  However the risks posed by seafood are real, and apart from oysters and pipis, little is being done to ensure that only safe products are offered for sale.  Even enterprises that export under AQIS requirements may sell product onto the domestic market that is not necessarily handled under their export quality program. 

Our study has shown that most operators in the seafood industry are unable to describe the hazards posed by the seafood that they handle and sell and unwittingly subject most to considerable time/temperature abuse.  There is ineffective product identification through the distribution channels and thus the industry has limited ability, if any, for effective product recall in the event of a food poisoning outbreak.

There is sufficient evidence (based on survey and interviews with managers and staff within the NSW seafood industry, and with senior personnel from peak industry organisations) to indicate a significant gap between existing industry practice and what is required to control hazards.

Recommendations are made based on these findings, and suggest a “whole of industry” approach to minimise implementation cost, and maintain consistency from catchers to wholesalers.  We recommend that comprehensive research is carried out to quantify the hazards and effective control measures for the NSW seafood industry.  This research is essential to provide the industry with a scientific basis for the preparation of their HACCP programs, and to ensure that industry can equip itself to provide safe seafood.

A code of conduct for a responsible seafood industry

Project number: 1998-358
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $5,000.00
Principal Investigator: Bill Nagle
Organisation: Australian Seafood Industry Council (ASIC)
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1998 - 30 Dec 1998
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. Develop a code of conduct that is agreed for adoption by industry, stakeholders and governments and the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture.

Update of the Australian prawn farming industry R&D plan

Project number: 1998-357
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $9,908.50
Principal Investigator: Nicky Seaby
Organisation: Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA)
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1998 - 23 Jun 2004
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Prawn farming industry has reached apoint in its development where producers are advanced enough in farming parctices to be now seeking answers from R&D which will extend the industry past current constraints. The FRDC in 1995 funded the development of the Australian Prawn Farming Industry R&D Plan 1996-2005 which assisted industry to collectively focus for the first time on R&D priorities and look at returns relative to the value chain. The plan has given research agencies a clear indication of industry's five major big picture issues at which to target research proposals. APFA now wish to review and update the plan as an integral part of the process of establishing a statutory levy for R&D for the Prawn farming industry. The updated plan will be a key document in the industry's application for a Primary Industry levy for R&D.

Objectives

1. To revise the current prawn farmers R&D plan (95/133.02)
2. Publish a 5 year R&D plan.

Final report

Author: Nicky Seaby
Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Final Report • 2004-06-22 • 554.92 KB
1998-357-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Prawn Farmers Association (APFA) was formed in 1993 to represent the interests of prawn farmers and to foster the development of the Australian prawn farming industry. The industry now produces over 2,000 tonnes of product with a farm gate value in excess of $40 million and, while one of the smaller volumetric producers in the world, leads the world in yield productivity, with an average yield of 4,000 kg per hectare and provides some 600 direct jobs and 1800 indirect jobs.

The industry’s potential economic and environmental contribution to our community is substantial. The industry will conservatively double in size every 5 years for the next two decades and this growth equates to an industry providing 7,000 direct jobs and 21,000 indirect jobs, generating farm gate revenue of some $780 million annually. The value adding opportunities by wholesalers, retailers and exporters will increase these returns by an estimated $400 million.

Equally importantly, successful prawn farming relies on a sustainable environmental resource in the coastal zone and the APFA will proactively contribute to ensure these areas maintain their integrity.

A major problem for the industry has been the serious shortage of scientific data relating to all aspects of prawn farming and the inter-relationship with the environment. Accordingly the APFA has prepared this Five Year Research & Development Plan.

This Research and Development Plan has been prepared by the Australian Prawn Farmers Association as a mechanism to achieve and promote both environmentally and economically sustainable prawn farming. The industry recognises the need for appropriate investment in research and development to maximise returns and to provide a sound base for long term industry sustainability.

Industry
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 1998-354
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Electronic cooking end point determination and the effectiveness of alternative cooking methods for Crustacea

A prawn cooking meter and self-centring thermocouple clip has been successfully developed for monitoring the cooking of prawns. This cooking meter provides a much needed control tool for ensuring reliable and consistent quality required of modern quality assurance programs. The design of the prawn...
ORGANISATION:
Department of Primary Industries (QLD)

Live export opportunities for value-adding of Australian freshwater and estuarine fishes

Project number: 1998-352
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $197,730.00
Organisation: Southern Fishermen's Association Inc
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1998 - 30 Dec 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Preliminary estimates indicate that South Australia's inland/estuarine commercial fishers may be missing out on $3.5-24.5million annually from their relatively static finfish production, representing 67%-540% of the current domestic landed value - all from the lack of a readily available, robust live transport technology! This likely translates to proportionately greater export losses nationally - and missed Industry earnings for reinvestment. At the same time, experts (see FRDC Project Report 92/125.26) indicate much research is already complete. However, for Australian inland/estuarine finfish, no well evaluated and packaged system exists to make live export marketing happen now.

Despite the massive value-adding success from export of quality marine fish products to high demand Asian and other overseas markets, Australian freshwater parallels have not been developed. Production potential from freshwater and estuarine wild capture fisheries has limited capacity to expand, therefore, industry profitability incentives must focus on obtaining greater return on sustainable harvest. Australian freshwater and estuarine fishes are consistently and depressingly undervalued relative to equivalent species on overseas markets (eg, black bream seldom exceed $14A/kg on the South Australian market despite a 96% reduction in harvest since the 1970's while the almost identical Japanese or sea bream, Acanthopagrus latus, regularly returns $45US/kg in Asian metropolitan markets).

Concurrently, development of aquaculture capacity for these same freshwater and estuarine species lags behind higher return marine counterparts due to inadequate profit incentives. This is particularly evident given that similar species worldwide are typically more robust to culture conditions and therefore first to be cultured.

Successful development and transfer of live shipping technology for key Australian freshwater and estuarine species to both wild capture and aquaculture industries has the capacity to overcome these current limitations. Live marketing of wild production can harvest export value, increase profitability per unit production, and provide an identical mechanism for development of a parallel domestic market. Typically, export initiatives provide extremely strong incentives for continuous improvement of product quality. Success in a foreign market also provides excellent protection of our home markets through competitive advantage. The profit incentive of elevated prices domestically and abroad will necessarily spur development of cultured production of these same species.

Objectives

1. To evaluate and document the range of live transport options available worldwide for golden perch, Murray cod, mulloway, cockles (pipis) and black bream relative to survival, cost, and simplicity/practicality.
2. To investigate the value-adding potential of live marketed fish of the nominated species on three major Asian metropolitan fish markets relative to market acceptance/need, value at auction, product tailoring, continuity of supply, promotional needs and import/transport costs.
3. To document the resulting system aimed at maximizing net return to fishers per unit product (by species) in the form of a export marketing plan, and as a brochure providing a step-wise "how to live export freshwater and estuarine finfish" process.
4. To successfully incorporate/transfer any resulting value-adding export marketing system successfully into industry.
Adoption

Establishment and Maintenance of a quality assurance reference service for the seafood industry

Project number: 1998-350
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $43,069.00
Principal Investigator: Stephen Thrower
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 7 Oct 1998 - 30 Jun 2001
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The market research conducted in the Quality Chooser project highlighted a number of specific problems.

· There is a high level of ignorance, doubt and uncertainty about food safety and quality . It must be said that food safety is both fundamental and critical in all quality systems, even those complex and internationally certified systems.

· This is a very complex topic, and information provided must cope with complacency, limited literacy , numeracy and technical knowledge.

· Policy is in a state of flux with authorities reluctant to give prescriptive guidelines and industry demanding a clear statement of requirements.

· There is a wealth of relevant information available from overseas sources which is not reaching the industry.

The needs addressed by this proposal are:

(1) Access to data on which to base food safety plans. Food safety plans will be required by all food producers. The VFIF project will generate information on this subject needed by all industry sectors. Producers will still require detailed technical knowledge on which to plan improve and benchmark their systems.

(2) Current awareness service on global trends in HACCP policy. Seafood is traded on a global market. FPA is already being required of exporters. Overseas authorities are increasing the surveillance and enforcement on imports, particularly at the level of point of entry. Changes in policy will be noted, and clients will be notified.

(3) Negotiation of second party QA requirements or vendor supplier programmes. A number of major corporate buyers of seafood, including supermarket and hotel chains, have shown interest in developing QA schemes for their suppliers. Both suppliers and their customers can benefit from access to a body of accurate, relevant data on which to base their negotiations.

(4) Information to assist in adoption of internationally recognised QA systems and continuous improvement programmes. References on implementation, auditing, and system review.

Objectives

1. To establish and maintain a reference collection of material on seafood safety and quality.
2. To Collate and update the reference materials to be included in the SeaQual Packs
3. To provide detailed customised information packages on quality assurance on both products and processes in response to requests from clients.
4. To liaise with SeaQual on matters relating to quality management for the Seafood Industry

Final report

Author: Stephen Thrower
Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

Final Report • 2000-03-17 • 164.00 KB
1998-350-DLD.pdf

Summary

In order to support national uniform food safety legislation and quality assurance initiatives, a collection of information has been established at the Centre for Food Technology in Brisbane.  Sources include textbooks acquired using the DPI purchasing system and catalogued within the Centre’s library, and a collection of papers, reports etc. acquired through personal networking and through various literature sources.

This collection has been indexed within the framework of the normal bibliographic database used by AUSEAS.

People
PROJECT NUMBER • 1998-348
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Quantitative Training Unit for Fisheries (phase 2)

The Quantitative Training Unit for Fisheries (QTUF) operated at The University of Sydney from 1995 to 2001. There were two distinct phases to the project: Phase I (Project 93/117, from 1995 to 1997) and Phase II (Project 98/348, 1998 to 2001). The QTUF project was designed to address the need for...
ORGANISATION:
University of Sydney (USYD)
View Filter

Species

Organisation