96,554 results

Fisheries Social Sciences Research Coordination Program

Project number: 2009-041
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $313,917.35
Principal Investigator: Kate J. Brooks
Organisation: KAL Analysis
Project start/end date: 15 Jan 2009 - 27 Feb 2012
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The need for this coordination program arises from the limited understanding that we have of the social aspect of fishing at the individual, business/group or sectoral levels, and the ways in which this activity interacts with the broader community. It has become increasingly clear that the management of fisheries (commercial, recreational or traditional) has profound social implications for fishers, their families and the communities they support. Equally, the co-management of the fisheries resource is unlikely to be comprehensively achieved without awareness of the different drivers for decision making by both fishers and management agencies. These decisions, while related to economics are not necessarily solely driven by economics, but also by the social dimension. The current lack of information in this area inhibits effective engagement on issues affecting fishers and fishing, and the facilitation and development of leadership, communication and adaptation capacity within and across the different sectors.

Through a range of different techniques, social science research can address these issues and complement biological and economic research, to support practice and community perception change. While previous investment into the social aspects of fisheries has (due to circumstance) been opportunitistic and uncoordinated, this coordination program will provide a strategic approach to the social aspects of sector issues and operations. Specifically, the program will seek to leverage research from past projects, and build synergies between current projects in both the social and other discipline research areas, across all sectors. In this way, it is envisaged that funds invested by FRDC will be more efficiently used, with project outcomes that have a greater reach than if they were implemented in isolation.

Objectives

1. Establish a social research coordination program to facilitate the leverage of effort between projects
assess the synergy of project proposals, and optimise beneficial resource allocation and opportunities for all fishery activities.
2. Identify social research and development priorities affecting the wild harvest, aquaculture, post harvest,recreational and indigenous fishing sectors.
3. Address research needs arising from FRDC's existing programs and ensure the quality and relevance of proposed social research projects.
4. Coordinate and undertake the communication of key social research priorities to the research community, and research outcomes to fishers.
5. Provide program management for social projects including, evaluation, commisioning of projects, review and provision of advice on projects.

Final report

ISBN: 978‐0‐646‐57437‐0
Author: Kate Brooks

Fish stocking programs - assessing the benefits against potential long term genetic and ecological impacts

Project number: 2009-040
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $549,951.00
Principal Investigator: John Russell
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 30 Aug 2009 - 31 Jul 2012
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES

Need

Recreational fish stocking is widely practiced throughout Australia and has delivered considerable benefits to anglers and substantial economic flow-on effects have been previously documented in some fisheries (Rutledge et al. 1991). The long-term “success” of freshwater fish stocking in Queensland and other States is, however, contingent on demonstrating that it is an ecologically sustainable practice having no detrimental effects on wild populations and ecosystems. Some environmental groups and government agencies (e.g. Wet Tropics Management Authority) are now questioning if freshwater fish stocking is a sustainable activity and the Threatened Species Scientific Committee considered a nomination to list the introduction of live native or non-native fish into Australian watercourses that are outside their natural geographic distribution as a key threatening process. One of the criteria that fisheries managers now use for assessing freshwater fish stocking applications is the risk that they pose to local aquatic communities, although there is very little real information on the likely ecological and genetic impacts of native freshwater fish stocking activities to support this decision making process. This type of information is therefore urgently needed if our stocking industry is to adopt “world’s best practice” to ensure future sustainability.
These same concerns were expressed at a recent FRDC national expert workshop “Towards responsible native freshwater fish stocking” where the potential ecological and genetic impacts of fish stocking, particularly for barramundi and Murray cod, were nominated as the most pressing research and management issues. This proposed project and another being developed on Murray cod, are part of a coordinated national response to these critical issues.

Objectives

1. Assess movements and ecological impacts of stocked barramundi in a model river and impoundment
2. Determine if barramundi stocking has any discernable adverse genetic impacts on wild populations in a previously stocked river system

Final report

ISBN: 9 780734 504333
Author: John Russell
Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2009-038
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Aboriginal fisheries in New South Wales: determining catch, cultural significance of species and traditional fishing knowledge needs

This report presents the results of a Fisheries Research Development Corporation (FRDC) funded study of Aboriginal fisheries in New South Wales. A key objective of the study was to address information gaps in relation to catch, cultural significance of species and traditional fishing knowledge (TFK)...
ORGANISATION:
Southern Cross University (SCU) Lismore Campus

Sustaining productivity of tropical red snappers using new monitoring and reference points

Project number: 2009-037
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $102,481.00
Principal Investigator: Michael F. O'Neill
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 4 Oct 2009 - 7 Oct 2010
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The northern Australian red snapper fisheries between the Kimberleys and Cape York comprise of five key species from the family Lutjanidae (Lutjanus erythropterus, L. malabaricus, L. argentimaculatus, L. johnii and L. sebae). Status reports indicate about 1500-1800 tonnes per year of red snappers are caught across northern Australia, with a landings value of $6-8 million. The stock range of the crimson and saddletail snappers extends well into Indonesian waters, with significant landings and overfishing by trawling outside of Australia’s Fishing Zone (AFZ). Illegal foreign fishing also occurs in the AFZ.

Limited data, the species longevity (30-40 years) and unquantifiable external catch compromises analytical assessments. Improved fishery monitoring and management in the AFZ is needed to ensure the sustainability and commercial profitability of red snappers.

In September 2007 the Northern Australian Fisheries Committee (NAFC) resolved to develop a Harvest Strategy Framework (based on the Commonwealth HSF) to guide the management of red snappers across northern Australia. NAFC’s Northern Management and Science Working Group (NMSWG) held workshops late 2007 to develop the HSF and identify means of improving our knowledge on the uncertain status of red snappers. It was clear that critical indicators developed from relative abundance indices and age composition data are needed to service management decision rules in a harvest strategy framework.

The next important requirement to finalise the HSF is to design databased reference points and a complementary monitoring program. Analyses on the historical data held by fishery agencies (WA, NT, QLD and Commonwealth) will lead to monitoring by industry vessels to provide independent data for the HSF. This high priority tactical work will enhance agency collaborations and deliver the needs for sustainable and profitable stocks. The HSF will provide greater certainty for managers and industry through an open and transparent process for ongoing adjustment to management arrangements.

Objectives

1. Analyse current monitoring and logbook data sets, as well as survey and other information, to establish whether these data provide sufficient power to develop critical indicators of fishery performance.
2. Provide a risk analysis that examines the use of age structure and catch rate information for development of critical indicators, and response rules for those criteria, in the absence of other fishery information.
3. Develop a monitoring program that uses commercial vessels from the fishery to provide independent data.

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-7345-0420-3
Author: Michael O'Neill
Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Final Report • 2011-11-29 • 4.01 MB
2009-037-DLD.pdf

Summary

Australia’s tropical snapper fisheries harvest six main Lutjanid species. They are the Crimson, Saddletail, and Goldband snappers, Red Emperor, Golden snapper and Mangrove Jack. These fish live up to 40 years of age, weigh up to five to ten kilograms and are highly valued for commercial marketing. The fisheries operate in tropical offshore waters across northern Australia from the Kimberley coast to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The fisheries are primarily commercial using demersal trawl, trap and line fishing gear. The fisheries have a long and varied history of foreign and domestic exploitation. Indicative foreign harvests were two to five kilotonnes per year up to 1990. After 1990, foreign vessel permits were removed and domestic fishing expanded landing in the order of two to three kilotonnes of tropical snappers annually.

In 2007, NAFC listed tropical snapper research as a priority. Past assessments and management settings required revision. New monitoring data on snapper abundance and age composition were needed for assessment of stock status and contemporary management procedures. In response, northern fisheries jurisdictions and the FRDC commissioned tactical research to develop a survey / observer structured fishery monitoring program and critically evaluate the potential use of data. A total of 39 data sets and a range of analyses were used in this process.

Statistical analyses of commercial fishery catch rates quantified variances to establish abundance indicators from structured monitoring. The variances were used to calculate the number of survey / observer days required to monitor tropical snapper catch rates (e.g., standardised number of fish caught per unit area swept by trawling). This result was required to ensure accurate monitoring of catch rates and fish ages so the data were directly aligned for estimation of fishing mortality or, possibly, biomass.

Keywords: Age frequencies, Catch curves, Catch rate standardisation, Fishery management, Lutjanidae, Monitoring, Population modelling, Simulation, Tropical snapper.

Taking female mud crabs (Scylla serrata): assessment of risks and benefits

Project number: 2009-031
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $67,499.00
Principal Investigator: Ian Brown
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 31 Jul 2009 - 30 Jul 2010
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES

Need

Over two decades ago Dr Burke Hill (in the FIRTA report on Queensland's Mud Crab Fishery) recommended a trial period allowing the take of females provided there was a monitoring programme in place to evaluate the result. Such a trial has not yet been implemented, and while much excellent work on mud crabs has been done in recent years, it is not sufficient to answer the 'big-picture' question of sustainability.

Information based on empirical data is needed to inform the Mud Crab Fishery Management Plan development process. At present there are many points of view about the relevance and need for the SSHP, but there is little hard evidence.

For some years industry has argued for a relaxation of the legislation, bringing it into line with that in NSW and NT. However without scientific evidence management is reluctant to change the status quo, and in turn FRDC has been unwilling to fund the necessary work because of a perception that the recommendations may not implemented. DPI&F is now actively seeking ways to improve the profitability of the State’s fishing industry, and a relaxation of the SSHP has been endorsed by all parties as one way to achieve this aim.

There are two primary issues that need addressing in relation to changing the SSHP – sustainability and profitability. The risks associated with both need to be determined objectively before a decision can be made to progress any investigation into the effects of the policy.

The project aligns closely with the DPI&F joint priorities of industry profitability and sustainability, and directly addresses QFIRAC Key R&D Topic #3 - A critical evaluation of management strategies to optimise the soci-economic value of portunid crab fisheries, particularly in terms of the potential value and/or ecological impact of altering the current single-sex harvest policy in Queensland.

Objectives

1. Evaluate the risks and benefits of allowing the harvest of female mud crabs in Queensland.
2. Depending on (1), develop a plan for implementing a change to the SSHP arrangement.

Final report

ISBN: 978 0 7345 0419 7
Author: Ian Brown

Ecological risk assessment for effects of fishing on habitats and communities

Project number: 2009-029
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $120,425.00
Principal Investigator: Alistair Hobday
Organisation: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
Project start/end date: 31 Jul 2009 - 29 Jun 2010
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The risk-based ERAEF approach to assessing impacts from fishing underpins strategic assessment for AFMA-managed fisheries, and is also crucial in the AFMA ERM process.

The ERAEF methodology uses a hierarchical approach to estimate risk from fishing activities. Level 1 (SICA) in the hierarchy has been applied to all Commonwealth fisheries across all five components (target species, bycatch and byproduct species, TEP species, habitats, and ecological communities). The Level 2 PSA species and habitat assessment tools have already been developed and applied for a subset of fisheries in the Stage 2 ERAEF project. In the proposed project we will assist in the development of a framework for ERA to ERM for habitats identified as high risk from the existing analyses, look to integrate the ERAEF results with other projects focusing on habitat impacts (FRDC 2003/021). Level 1 (SICA) in the hierarchy has been applied to all Commonwealth fisheries across all five components (target species, bycatch and byproduct species, TEP species, habitats, and ecological communities). The Level 2 PSA species and habitat assessment tools have already been developed and applied for a subset of fisheries in the Stage 2 ERAEF project. In the proposed project we will assist in the development of a framework for ERA to ERM for habitats identified as high risk from the existing analyses, demonstrate this using worked examples from the SESSF (or GAB), and a fishery that is relatively data poor such as the WDWT. We will also complete the development of the community component methodology.

Objectives

1. Provide a framework for the ERA to ERM for the ERAEF Level 2 Habitat assessment approach
2. Complete the development of the ERAEF Level communities (ecosystems) approach

Final report

ISBN: 978‐1‐921826‐54‐2
Authors: Alistair J. Hobday Catherine M. Bulman Alan Williams Mike Fuller
Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Final Report • 2012-01-09 • 1.43 MB
2009-029-DLD.pdf

Summary

It is now widely recognized that fisheries can have impacts on marine species, habitats and ecosystems beyond the direct impacts of fishing on target species. For example, hundreds of species are regularly caught and discarded in many trawl and longline fisheries and in particular, interactions with threatened species are a concern in many fisheries. Impacts on habitats and ecological communities as a result of fishing activities have also been documented. To address these broader impacts of fishing, ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged as a complementary approach to single-species management. Development of practical methods to implement EBFM has generally lagged the policy mandates, and so development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation has been critical.

Moves towards EBFM have also evolved in Australian fisheries during the past decade, driven by a number of policy directions and initiatives. These include: (i) a national approach to ecologically sustainable development; (ii) development of fisheries legislation that incorporates explicit reference to wider ecological impacts of fishing (e.g. the Fisheries Management Act 1991); (iii) new environmental legislation that assesses fisheries against environmental standards (e.g. the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999); and (iv) Australia’s Oceans Policy, which also adopts an explicit ecosystem-based approach to management.

Environment
PROJECT NUMBER • 2009-024
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Mapping the distribution and movement of gulper sharks, and developing a non-extractive monitoring technique, to mitigate the risk to the species within a multi-sector fishery region off southern and eastern Australia

This two year project provided the science to support the development of a management strategy for three gulper sharks species (genus Centrophorus) being assessed for threatened species listing. Their listing represented one of the most urgent environmental challenges to the South East Scalefish and...
ORGANISATION:
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
View Filter

Species

Organisation