134,628 results

Developing Australian fisheries management training

Project number: 2000-308
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $149,974.07
Principal Investigator: Marc Wilson
Organisation: Australian Maritime College (AMC)
Project start/end date: 5 Sep 2000 - 1 Jun 2002
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This application comes from the need to service the training requirements of those involved in fisheries management. These are

(i) MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MAC) REPRESENTATIVES – from all stakeholders groups and
(ii) GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATORS from all major fisheries agencies.

The AMC has completed 6 years of FRDC funded training 1994-2000 and wishes to resubmit this nationally oriented project for the 2000-2001 period an then articulate with Seafood Training Australia (STA).

MAC TRAINING: progress to date and developing needs.

There are approximately 900 people involved in Management Advisory Committees in fisheries management through out Australia. We have trained in excess of 240 representatives since 1994 in:

(a) an introductory level MAC course covering all technical and policy issues faced in the MAC and

(b) a MAC II course which addresses the representative skills required in making a MAC work well.

STA have identified that leadership training is required in the seafood industry. This is proposed at two levels in the scoping exercise. Industry Sector Leaders (ISL) representing local industry boards and related industry committees. Strategic Industry Leaders (SIL) "who need to position the industry to best advantage by influencing government policy, the direction of related industries and public opinion".

The MAC training project is illustrative of developing SIL, but in the context of MACs and resource management processes. The need is for the AMC program to enable attendance at the MAC program to obtain national recognition of learning undertaken in the Australian Qualification framework. AMC will interface with STA in development of the MAC training units.

We currently are developing a third level course yet to be delivered which builds on the foundation of levels I and II.

MAC III will enable representatives who wish to spend time studying externally, to have an opportunity to do so. The MAC III will also go deeper into community expectations, media skills and strategic thinking and analysis and developing management skills. All three courses are currently being accredited.

The developing need of the MAC member is in the areas of:

(1) technical knowledge of fisheries management/economics/stock assessment;
(2) representative knowledge and skills (communication, conflict resolution and management /leadership skills);
(3) integrating leadership and management skills with the MAC/department process.

The project recognises and contributes towards people with knowledge and leadership attributes at the “second level”, rather than a few “positional” leaders. The need for this training is actually increasing and it has to be more "in-depth" than previously envisaged. Current MAC trainees are in the fisheries management process and have opportunities to increase their personal skills if assisted along the way.

The intention of the MAC process is to promote more involvement in self-governance by stakeholders eventually moving to management arrangements where stakeholders have been empowered and are held more accountable. The people with such skills are not going to suddenly appear, but will come from a concerted training effort which enables representatives with the desire to progress to and be equipped for the role.

The need for MAC training has been apparent for some time, but in the recent review of South Australian fisheries management by Pivotal in 1998, the priority need to train FMC/MAC representatives is re-confirmed. This is representative of the national scene. There is still a significant need in the people development side of industry and stakeholder groups in the MAC process.

TRAINING FISHERIES ADMINISTRATORS

Under the revised FRDC submission undertaken in July 2000 the MAC training continues for one year until June 2001. The training of those in the fisheries administration has been a key part of the fisheries management training strategy and the project has enabled the gulf to be bridged between both sides of the project in the last three years. We have had 5-10 fishers who have attended the FRDC A (10 days) fisheries management course and the FRDC B fisheries management workshop. To cease this opportunity will impact industry in reducing the training available to fisheries management agency staff and fishers who want to progress past MAC I and II.

One of the major needs identified by industry is the need to have well trained and industry aware staff in fisheries management agencies. We intent to resubmit the fisheries management needs for submission in the 2000-2001 FRDC round.

The need for administrator training is as important as MAC member training as quality staff with vision are needed in fisheries administration, if the empowerment of stakeholders is to continue. We note, with some concern, the rapid turnover of staff in fisheries administration and the need to make young administrators aware of the requirements of industry. We also receive feedback from industry and stakeholder groups on the need to keep training administrators on "the way it really is" and the "need to listen to stakeholders views".

After university training and time in administration, they need to develop people and policy skills with the industry /stakeholder considerations in mind. We intend to fully integrate the training of stakeholders and administrators in “integrated fisheries management workshops” in place of the FRDC B course previously provided.

In summary the need for fisheries management training are distinct and diverse. Many changes taking place in fisheries have to be addressed by well trained personnel at all levels. This proposal is to continue the production of knowledgable people with leadership skills.

Objectives

1. To provide fisheries management training to industry and non-government representatives on MACs.(i) To train 15 representatives in MAC I courses in 1 year(ii) To train 15 representatives in MAC II courses in 1 year
(iii) To train 10 representatives to MAC III level in 1 year
(iv) To develop a whole MAC course, (15 people in 1 year) to enable MACs to operate with a new dynamic.
2. To improve the quality of fisheries management in Australia by enabling fisheries administrators and industry/MAC members to gain specialist training in fisheries management through attendance at residential schools at AMC.(v) To train 15 administrators/ MAC reps in FRDCA level fisheries management in 1 year (2000-2001)
(vi) To train 12 administrators and industry/MAC members in Integrated Fisheries Management Workshops in 1 year (2000-2001)

Final report

Development and delivery of a model for a national seafood industry advanced leadership program

Project number: 2000-307
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $187,386.00
Principal Investigator: Grant Carnie
Organisation: Australian Maritime and Fisheries Academy Port Adelaide
Project start/end date: 9 Sep 2000 - 13 Apr 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Need

A need to focus on developing commercial fishing industry personnel with the necessary skills to confidently, articulately and professionally represent the industry at a sectoral and broader level has been identified as one of the major issues facing the Australian fishing industry in a number of reports and strategic plans released in recent years, including:
1. The Miriam O’Brien report (1997) commissioned by FRDC
2. The Pivotal report (1998) commissioned by the South Australian Minister for Primary Industries
3. The 5-year Research and Development Strategy (1999) prepared by the FRAB
The latter two reports provide introductory strategic plans for the industry in terms of research and management respectively. Both suggest that development of the people resource will be a critical limiting factor in future operations of the industry at all levels.

The Miriam O'Brien report identifies the limited range of personal development options open to members of the seafood industry at present. Seafood Directions ’99 identified “strategies to develop people in leadership roles including public speaking and negotiation skills” as a critical action task for ASIC to undertake. There is clearly a need for an industry specific advanced leadership program that prepares a pool of next-generation leaders and is part of an overall national strategy for developing an effective people resource for the seafood industry.

Seafood Training Australia is currently developing competencies for leadership and people development components associated with the seafood industry. There is a need to develop training programs to co-ordinate with that process and deliver methods that will enable industry members to gain the competencies identified by STA. The proposed program would pilot these competencies and develop an aligned training model for national use. It needs to be horizontally integrated to the existing MAC course and linked to the Australian Rural Leadership Program but structured so as to be personal development focussed and relevant to the seafood industry.

Objectives

1. To develop a training needs analysis that identifies current skills and highlights competency gaps
2. To link program outcomes to the seafood industry training package leadership competencies as developed by Seafood Training Australia
3. To develop a model national industry advanced leadership training program for the seafood industry
4. To develop a suitable identification and recruitment process for participants
5. To trial the developed program from January to December 2001
6. To produce a comprehensive program facilitators guide to include resource assessment

A workshop to investigate the development of training and accreditation procedures for provision of scientific data by the fishing industry

Project number: 2000-304
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $14,785.00
Principal Investigator: Tony D. Smith
Organisation: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
Project start/end date: 30 May 2000 - 30 Sep 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Need

There would be many advantages in having the fishing industry collect some of the basic data needed for stock assessment and environmental monitoring. The need is to develop a program for this to occur in an efficient, effective and accountable manner. The first need is to bring together key stakeholders who would need to be involved if such a program were to be developed. The stakeholders would include fishing industry associations, fisheries scientists (government and non-government), fisheries training agencies, resource and environmental management agencies and groups like Ocean Watch.

Objectives

1. To discuss and scope ideas for developing industry capability for scientific data collection
2. To develop a full proposal for submission to FRDC in December 1999.

Final report

Seafood Directions 2001- second biennial national seafood industry conference

Project number: 2000-303
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $45,000.00
Principal Investigator: Ted Loveday
Organisation: Queensland Seafood Industry Association (QSIA)
Project start/end date: 8 Oct 2000 - 30 Jul 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The Australian Seafood Industry Council has identified a need to hold a biennial national seafood industry conference where the industry can gather in an appropriate forum to discuss and learn about issues of critical nature affecting the industry and to use this forum as a means of providing the basis for future planning and directions.

It will be a critical component of SD 2001 to measure the achievements of ASIC against the SD 99 Action Plan and to build upon this Action Plan for the two years from 2001 - 2003.

There are a range of industry needs which have been identified as critical and which a National Seafood Conference can immediately and directly address at a national level.

The needs identified at Seafood Directions '99 and written into the SD 99 Action Plan were:

• Implement the FAO code of conduct (has been distributed, what hasn’t been implemented - how to finish, include in all environmental plans, must have ownership, link to communication strategy, time limit, include the content in education circular in any training, report to FAO annually on the implementation of the code 2001.

ACCESS SECURITY
• Needs to be continuous efforts to clarify rights
• Maintain existing current rights
• Extend current rights in future
• Need to educate our policy makers to ensure our rights are preserved
• Plain English document on what property rights are - what the different access security structures are
• Consistent approach nationally to expectations on what access rights are
• Industry and environmental NGOs needs to drive the process
• Clarification of tenure on access
• Ensure gear types are included in conditions of access
• Recreational, traditional need to be included
• Need an economic study on the Australian industry
• Include non extractive users rights and - biodiversity

ENVIRONMENT
• Develop an innovative approach to meeting environmental requirements (industry in the broad definition including green groups) and work with Environment Australia to a joint approach to legislation.
• Develop a communication strategy
• Identify debilitating impacts on marine environment and work with conservation groups to rectify
• Develop resources for ASIC to meaningfully meet its charter
• Whole of government approach needs to be considered - AFFA
• Meet with National Farmers Federation (NFF) environmental sub committee to discuss joint issues (Nigel Scullion to arrange through ASIC)
• National standard for fisheries ESD

INDUSTRY PROFILE

• Ensure education material is comprehensive in its development to ensure that all stakeholders are involved
• Develop a strong credible peak body that represents the whole industry
• Seafood Training Australia (STA) should develop similar program as New Zealand (see G Morris)
• All local groups to develop mechanisms to keep informed their local elected representatives • tell your story
• Develop central one page document that are used by all - develop a common message
• Strategies to develop people in leadership roles including public speaking, negotiations skills

QUALITY

• Develop environmental management systems
• Support industries that are developing Environmental Management Systems (EMS)
• Develop a whole of chain approach to quality
• D develop a link between price and quality
• Develop standards for quality and specifications and educate what they mean
• Educate consumer what quality is and where to get a quality product
• Standards must be well written and user friendly and meet all fisheries requirements
• A set standard for fish handling on the boat that meets customer expectations • training to include quality
• Need to train the consumer in how to handle seafood until consumed
• Strategy to include the broader seafood industry through ASIC process
• Can the resource sustain the level of cost recovery

Given the results and Action Plan from SD 99, the following is clear:

1. There is a critical need for the seafood industry of Australia to promote itself and it's image.

2. There is a critical need for the industry at national level to adequately address issues of Access Security.

3. There is a critical need for the industry at national level to adequately address issues of Quality.

4. There is a critical need for the industry at national level to adequately address issues relating to the Environment.

5. There is also a critical need for industry to address the public's perception of seafood and associated issues such as quality, health benefits and product promotion.

6. There is a clear need for the Australian seafood industry to develop a 'conference culture' at a national level, which is critical to ensuring effective information transfer.

7. Other issues such as training and education, marketing and industry development also have international aspects which could be addressed through attracting international industry delegates to Australia through a conference.

Objectives

1. To conduct a national seafood industry conference in Brisbane, in October, 2001.
2. To utilise the conference as a means of transferring information regarding critical issues to the seafood industry.
3. To inform the industry about and to empower the seafood industry with relevant information with which to make informed decisions about the directions in which the industry is moving in the future.
4. To provide a forum whereby the national seafood industry can obtain information regarding critical issues from overseas experts.
5. To enhance the image of the Australian seafood industry amongst the national and international community.
6. To measure and check against the Action Plan from SD 1999
7. To hold the first National Seafood Industry Awards Dinner and to establish this as an ongoing process

Project products

Marine scalefish sector - Seafood Services Australia food safety pilot project

Project number: 2000-269
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $14,900.00
Principal Investigator: Lorraine Rosenberg
Organisation: South Australian Fishing Industry Council
Project start/end date: 9 Oct 2000 - 3 Apr 2002
Contact:
FRDC

Need

With the establishment of state based networks it is increasingly important to ensure that the products and services developed and delivered by Seafood Services Australia are relevant to and driven by local needs.

The original SeaQual food safety guidelines for harvesting, processing and retailing seafood were developed specifically to meet the requirements of Victorian legislation. Since then there have been changes in the development of the ANZFA national food safety standards as well as a number of SSA initiatives including the seafood food safety risk analysis, development of a draft seafood safety standard and the development of a national seafood food safety emergency management plan. The National Seafood Industry Training Package, released in March 2000, identifies food safety as one of the core competencies for anyone working in the seafood industry.

It is now timely to review the SeaQual food safety guidelines to ensure that they are pragmatic and relevant to various fishing industry sectors. In particular it is important to demonstrate that developing a food safety plan can be done at any level in the industry. To date there has not been much effort placed in relation to food safety in small, multi species, multi method fishing operations.

Demonstrating that the SeaQual food safety guidelines are useful pragmatic tools relevant to the whole industry will be an important aspect in developing the customer focus necessary to achieve an internationally competitive industry. The project will use the SeaQual food safety guidelines for harvesting and the associated template to develop specific fishery type models to further enhance the capacity of fishing businesses to understand and comply with their customer’s and the legislative requirements for production of safe food.

Objectives

1. Develop and implement food safety plans for selected marine scale fish enterprises using the SeaQual food safety guidelines for harvesting seafood and the accompanying food safety plan template.
2. Provide input and feedback to Seafood Services Australia on how to improve the SeaQual guidelines and template for use by other fishing operations.
3. Assist in developing capacity within the SA Marine Scale Fishery to identify and manage current and potential food safety risks.
4. Provide four model templates for the sectors within the SA Marine Scale Fishery, enabling all operators within this fishery to comply with required consumer and government standards.

Project products

Environment

International Association of Astacology (freshwater crayfish) symposium and workshop

Project number: 2000-265
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $15,000.00
Principal Investigator: Glen Whisson
Organisation: Curtin University
Project start/end date: 12 Sep 2000 - 30 Apr 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Research into freshwater crayfish has resulted in steady production increases in Australia over the last two decades. In an effort to take production and profitability to the next level, scientists in Australia have taken the opportunity to host IAA 13. Furthermore, the strategy of organisers has been to couple the event with a one-day workshop/seminar focussing on Australian crayfish aquaculture. The timing of the workshop/seminar (the day before the conference begins) has been set to attract participation from international astacologists, already in Fremantle for IAA 13. This will promote technology transfer into Australia, by giving access to local industry participants at a non-scientific level.

Following on from the one day aquaculture workshop, the IAA 13 symposium will provide a mechanism for the direct transferal and dissemination of cutting-edge research within Australia, as well as providing an international platform for local crayfish scientists to present their research to world-renowned astacologists, and pursue collaborative links for future research. Fisheries WA are planning to present at least six papers at the symposium, including recent research into yabby and marron aquaculture.

The fragility of crayfish aquaculture was highlighted in the 1980s when the crayfish plague, Aphanomyces astaci, obliterated stocks throughout Europe. Research has subsequently identified Australian crayfish as being extremely vulnerable to this infection, reminding Australia of the importance of comprehensive translocation policies. This has been further highlighted by recent disease concerns within the yabby industry. A forum for discussing these issues, and hearing from scientists representing afflicted countries, will augur well for the continuation of sound policy to protect Australia's prime market niche.

Objectives

1. To conduct the 13th biennial symposium of the International Association of Astacology in Fremantle, in August 2000.
2. To capitalise on the expertise gathered for IAA 13 by staging a one day workshop focussing on the aquaculture of Australian crayfish species, on the day prior to the beginning of the symposium.
3. To identify and initiate collaborative research programmes between local researchers and astacologists from interstate and overseas.
4. To gain maximum exposure for the Australian freshwater crayfish industry within the international aquaculture arena.
5. To provide a forum for an international gathering of crayfish scientists to consider environmental, technical and regulatory issues important to international communitiesat the outset of a new century.

Final report

ISBN: 0-9581-424-2-4
Author: Glen Whisson
View Filter

Species

Organisation