Seafood CRC: Tracking seafood consumption and measuring consumer acceptance of innovation in the Australian seafood industry

Project number: 2008-779
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $117,802.75
Principal Investigator: Nick Danenberg
Organisation: University of Adelaide
Project start/end date: 30 Apr 2009 - 30 Apr 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

It has been acknowledged that the seafood industry is facing increased threats. Thus, the industry needs to attract more people to eat more seafood and on a more regular basis. To do this requires that the industry completely understand and anticipate what consumers value and demand, so that it can take advantage of changing consumer dietary preferences. Therefore, the industry will be better able to add value to seafood products to fulfil this demand, which will ultimately improve the industry’s profitability.

Therefore, there is a need for the seafood industry as a whole to:

• track seafood consumption—over time; more regularly; with complete geographical coverage of all major Australian cities; with greater coverage of all demographic groups; and using a panel of participants to measure real changes in their consumption and what caused such changes;
• understand consumers’ preferences and purchase patterns (and the changes over time), including light- and non-seafood buyers;
• focus on what consumers do, and the choices that they make, rather than just on what they say they will do;
• anticipate and predict chances of success for new products, including messages to do with concepts such as eco-labelling, health claims, sustainability, animal welfare, food miles, quality rating system, freshness index and so on. Ideally, this is done early in the R&D process, before too much money and resources have been spent, or where there is a risk of visible (and damaging) market failure;
• assess the effectiveness of promotional activities;
• build on the previous work of the FRDC in testing and quantifying various recommendations of these reports, especially those related to adding value to products (e.g., deboning fillets and ready-to-heat options);
• better estimate the likely market acceptance (e.g., willingness to pay, market share and differential segment response) of value added innovations.

Objectives

1. Measure seafood consumption levels and patterns including consumers' knowledge and preferences for seafood (Benchmark and track changes over time)
2. Measure consumer acceptance (in terms of consumers’ willingness to pay, the expected market share, segmentation, importance of product features) and forecast the demand for a range of innovative seafood products, packaging, and services
3. Determine the relative impact of different advertising, promotional messages (e.g., health benefits, sustainability and other environmental claims, etc), education programs and the extent those messages would be valued by the consumers

Seafood CRC: retail transformation - identifying opportunities for creating consumer focused Australian salmon value added products

Project number: 2008-794.10
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $28,955.93
Principal Investigator: Ken Dods
Organisation: ChemCentre (WA)
Project start/end date: 31 Dec 2009 - 30 Dec 2010
Contact:
FRDC

Need

There is a need to:

1. Develop low value Australian seafood options in order to give the Australian seafood consumer the chance to purchase local seafood at accessible price points.

2. Evaluate the sensory characteristsics, product acceptability and perception of Australian Salmon from a consumer perspective. The attributes evaluated will include, but not be limited to, taste, texture, appearance, mouth feel portion size, etc. This information should relate to pricing and potential product forms that appeal to consumers. This will demonstrate if the species has the potential to be a sustainable, consumer commercial fishery. There is currently no consumer research information of this type available.

3. Show what attributes consumers value in seafood.

4. Understand the composition profiling, nutritional values and bio chemical factors that:

a) influence the spoiling of desirable characteristics;
b) influence the overall degradation of this particular species

This will fill gaps in the current research that is being undertaken.

Objectives

1. Identify at least 3 concepts for a range of potential new retail added value Australian Salmon products (ChemCentre)
2. Develop a consumer model for the evaluation of product acceptability and perception (Curtin University).
3. Improve understanding of the nutritional and bio chemical profile of Australian salmon as the basis for product and process development (ChemCentre)
4. Report of consumer attributes of Australian Salmon and its current positioning (Curtin University).
5. Provision of a comprehensive final report on potential of retail transformation for the Australian salmon industry (ChemCentre)

Final report

Author: Ken Dods
Final Report • 2008-01-01 • 87.66 KB
2008-794.10-DLD-CIC.pdf

Summary

Australian Salmon represents one of the last sustainable, relatively untapped wild catch fisheries in Australia with capture and harvest techniques not having changed significantly for many decades. Fish quality is quite variable and harvest practices are not optimised. As a result, consumer confidence in Australian Salmon product has been adversely affected. Harvest practice and immediate post-catch handling can be significantly improved, and are major determinants of product quality.

Current and existing research lacks fundamental, basic information on consumer perceptions and acceptance of the Australian Salmon. This project aimed to fill a critical knowledge gap in existing and concurrent research projects.

Final Report • 2008-01-01 • 87.66 KB
2008-794.10-DLD-CIC.pdf

Summary

Australian Salmon represents one of the last sustainable, relatively untapped wild catch fisheries in Australia with capture and harvest techniques not having changed significantly for many decades. Fish quality is quite variable and harvest practices are not optimised. As a result, consumer confidence in Australian Salmon product has been adversely affected. Harvest practice and immediate post-catch handling can be significantly improved, and are major determinants of product quality.

Current and existing research lacks fundamental, basic information on consumer perceptions and acceptance of the Australian Salmon. This project aimed to fill a critical knowledge gap in existing and concurrent research projects.

Related research

Communities
Environment
Environment

Seafood CRC: prevention of muddy taints in farmed barramundi

Project number: 2009-775
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $202,351.42
Principal Investigator: Sue Poole
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries (QLD)
Project start/end date: 30 Apr 2010 - 29 Aug 2012
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES

Need

• The issue of muddy tasting framed barramundi has a long history yet has not been resolved. End chain customers have learnt to expect muddiness and this causes a negative barrier to purchase. The impact of market perception is farmed barramundi has remained at 7-$10/kg (farm-gate price) for >10 years, despite the species having an ‘iconic’ name with consumers.

• There is a huge body of information existing around freshwater algal bloom growth resulting in production of muddy taints in water and fish. There is also existing experience in freshwater farm systems of mitigation methods, although not all of these will be appropriate to farmed food production. This wealth of information needs to be summarised in a concise document as a basis of relevant knowledge for the industry.

• The overview needs to be pulled together in a simple summary of aspects pertinent to Australian fish farming conditions, from which best practice options can be selected for trialling in situ within the different grow-out systems used in Australia.

• Specific protocols to manage water quality for the prevention of taint occurrence are needed to:
- assure the flavour quality of farmed barramundi
- underpin quality standards being developed within the ABFA Code of Practice
- meet requirements for certification as written into the ABFA EMS standards
- underpin other current initiatives, for example repositioning barramundi in the marketplace

This project proposal seeks to address these needs by summarising current knowledge, identifying likely effective mitigation protocols and trialling selected protocols on-farm and assessing the effectiveness. Additionally, there is an opportunity to further assess the potential to enhance barramundi flavour.

Objectives

1. Develop a simple muddy taint flesh evaluation method for use by industry
2. Summarise current knowledge on prevention of algal blooms that cause taints
3. Select best protocols specific to grow-out system for the restriction of algal bloom and trial these on-farm
4. Recommend best practice effective for ABFA members
5. Extend knowledge to the entire industry value chain

Final report

ISBN: 978 0 7345 0447 0
Author: Sue Poole and Paul Exley
Final Report • 2015-02-01 • 4.82 MB
2009-775-DLD.pdf

Summary

End chain customers have learnt to expect muddiness in Barramundi and this causes a negative barrier to purchase. The impact of market perception is farmed Barramundi has remained at 7-$10/kg (farm-gate price) for >10 years, despite the species having an 'iconic' name with consumers.

There is a huge body of information existing around freshwater algal bloom growth resulting in production of muddy taints in water and fish. There is also existing experience in freshwater farm systems of mitigation methods, although not all of these will be appropriate to farmed food production. This wealth of information needs to be summarised in a concise document as a basis of relevant knowledge for the industry.

This project aimed to develop a simple summary of aspects pertinent to Australian fish farming conditions, from which best practice options can be selected for trialing in situ within the different grow-out systems used in Australia. It will also deliver specific protocols to manage water quality for the prevention of taint occurrence to assure the flavour quality of farmed Barramundi, underpin quality standards, meet requirements for certification and underpin other current initiatives, for example repositioning Barramundi in the marketplace.

This project aimed to:

  1. Develop a simple muddy taint flesh evaluation method for use by industry
  2. Summarise current knowledge on prevention of algal blooms that cause taints
  3. Select best protocols specific to grow-out system for the restriction of algal bloom and trial these on-farm
  4. Recommend best practice effective for Barramundi Farmers
  5. Extend knowledge to the entire industry value chain
Final Report • 2015-02-01 • 4.82 MB
2009-775-DLD.pdf

Summary

End chain customers have learnt to expect muddiness in Barramundi and this causes a negative barrier to purchase. The impact of market perception is farmed Barramundi has remained at 7-$10/kg (farm-gate price) for >10 years, despite the species having an 'iconic' name with consumers.

There is a huge body of information existing around freshwater algal bloom growth resulting in production of muddy taints in water and fish. There is also existing experience in freshwater farm systems of mitigation methods, although not all of these will be appropriate to farmed food production. This wealth of information needs to be summarised in a concise document as a basis of relevant knowledge for the industry.

This project aimed to develop a simple summary of aspects pertinent to Australian fish farming conditions, from which best practice options can be selected for trialing in situ within the different grow-out systems used in Australia. It will also deliver specific protocols to manage water quality for the prevention of taint occurrence to assure the flavour quality of farmed Barramundi, underpin quality standards, meet requirements for certification and underpin other current initiatives, for example repositioning Barramundi in the marketplace.

This project aimed to:

  1. Develop a simple muddy taint flesh evaluation method for use by industry
  2. Summarise current knowledge on prevention of algal blooms that cause taints
  3. Select best protocols specific to grow-out system for the restriction of algal bloom and trial these on-farm
  4. Recommend best practice effective for Barramundi Farmers
  5. Extend knowledge to the entire industry value chain