In May 2006 an epidemic caused by Abalone Viral Ganglioneuritis (AVG) began infecting wild stocks of abalone in the Victorian western zone, rapidly spreading through the zone causing mortality rates of 40-95%. In response infected reefs have been closed since infection and to date remain closed resulting in the zonal TAC being reduced by >90%. It is the observation of WADA’s divers that, having been closed to fishing for several years, the reefs that suffered relatively lower mortality rates (75%) are, to this time, recovering well. Supported by an FRDC TRF project ‘Indicators and strategies for resumption of harvesting following catastrophic loss of abalone’ WADA members agreed that these ‘lightly’ impacted reefs should be closed for at least threes closure before being re-opened (some in 2009) with conservative size limits and catches.

In contrast to reefs that suffered relatively low mortality rates WADA’s divers observe that a number of formerly important reefs which suffered high mortality rates (>90%) do not appear to be recovering. Worryingly Californian studies suggest disease related reductions of abalone grazing pressure can lead to overgrowth of suitable settlement surfaces which retards natural rates of re-colonisation. WADA estimates one ‘high mortality’ reef, Kilarney, lost 100-200t of biomass and members are concerned that without intervention there will be a semi-permanent loss of productivity from some important reefs.

To prevent this WADA’s members are discussing initiating in 2009 rehabilitation projects for heavily impacted reefs by alternatively:
• Re-seeding of hatchery produced juveniles,
• Translocation of adults from other reefs in the western zone
• Long term closure to allow natural recruitment processes.

A cost-benefit analysis of alternative rehabilitation techniques is needed to inform members of the relative merits of alternative rehabilitation techniques and the likely magnitude of cost for rehabilitating at the scale of entire reefs.

This study documents the needs and concerns of fishers and their families in Queensland coastal regions to expand the corpus of knowledge about fishing as an industry, for the sake of informing government of social impacts, and to incorporate local social considerations into current and future management plans. The study focuses on how fisheries policies impact on fishers and their families socially and culturally, and how these groups negotiate and respond to political, market and ecologically driven management measures. It is significant as it brings together important but little researched aspects of the impact of management decisions on fishers, families and communities. Research is crucial to understand the social legacy of those decisions on the social wellbeing of fishing communities, including the health and quality of life of fishers, families, and those involved in fisheries-related businesses.

Understanding the social costs of policy decisions can help mitigate harmful physical and mental health outcomes, a situation of critical significance to rural, state and national economies. Fishing families and communities are important; they provide substantial regional employment and income to local economies; they underpin the social fabric of many coastal regions which display a strong fishing cultural heritage and are substantial contributors to the social and economic viability of rural communities. However, their ability to weather the social and economic stressors of closures, especially at times of increasing global fisheries pressures, has received limited attention. Few studies have been conducted on the way fishers and their families perceive and value their status as fishers, and how their worldview influences their quality of life, social wellbeing, and their attitudes towards place and the marine environment. Our findings will be of direct use to policy developers in adopting intrinsic measures for social impact assessment, and in integrating local knowledge into future social impact assessments.

The ecological risk assessment process recently undertaken jointly by AFMA and CSIRO has identified that sharks generally, are high priority species which require focussed management attention. In the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (SESSF) this is particularly the case for upper slope Southern and Eastern gulper sharks (including Harrison’s dogfish and Southern dogfish) which have been found to be severely depleted and have been nominated as threatened species under the EPBC Act. AFMA is now developing management responses to address these identified ecological risks, and there are a number of complimentary processes currently underway. These include the bycatch working group in the SESSF, which is currently preparing a bycatch work plan to be developed and implemented during 2008. AFMA is also establishing an expert shark and ray (Chondrichthyan) working group to develop appropriate management responses for these species across all fisheries. There is also a small working group in the South East Trawl Fishery (SETF) which is looking closely at the deepwater shark species of the lower slope and additional work is being undertaken to provide immediate management recommendations in relation to Harrison’s dogfish in particular. However, despite these various initiatives, there is a need to review available information on the upper slope gulper sharks (including species other than just Harrison’s dogfish) to improve understanding of levels of interaction and to provide advice on future management options.

The Exmouth Gulf Prawn Fishery from 2008 will become a single operator fishery with M.G. Kailis Gulf
Fisheries Pty. Ltd., operating all licenses and trawlers in the fishery. An opportunity exists to assess the
value of Co-Management for the management for the fishery and for progressing certification under the Marine Stewardship Council through a ‘local self management’ governance model that reports to a locally based community advisory committee. This new direction in fisheries management is anticipated to improve flexibility in real time management, and reduce the burden on the Department of Fisheries for management, research and especially compliance and legislative action. Any self governance must also facilitate reporting of key performance indicators to meet and gain acceptance of fisheries managers and meet longer term reporting needs of the EPBC Act and the Marine Stewardship Council and the broader community.

The case study will provide a strategy for progressing the ‘local’ management of other Western
Australian fisheries, where the catch interaction with other sectors is minimal or where resource shares have been determined for competing sectors. The case study will also provide directions for legislation amendments to WA Legislation necessary to support co-management changes.

This work needs to be immediately undertaken as cabinet approval is being sought from the WA Government for amendments to the Fish Resources Management Act. There is limited time opportunity (about 12 months as drafting proceeds) for the case to be made to government for changes to legislation. Additionally the availability of the Principal Investigator beyond this window of opportunity cannot be guaranteed.