66,861 results
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-157
PROJECT STATUS:
CURRENT

Evaluation of Cobia and Giant Groper production and health in multiple growout systems, as an alternative species to farm in WSSV affected areas of South East Queensland

The report details the production performance and health performance of Cobia (Rachycentron canadum) and Giant Groper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) reared in tanks, ponds and cages within a farm in the previously white spot syndrome virus affected region of the Logan River, Queensland. Findings of this...
ORGANISATION:
Rocky Point Aquaculture Company Pty Ltd
SPECIES
Industry
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-154
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

A market research-driven and co-management approach to developing an industry strategy for the SA Charter Boat Fishery

This project investigated the South Australian Charter Boat Fishery by conducting analyses to identify potential actions for growth to counter the declining level of activity and profitability in the industry. The SA Charter industry has shown declining in trends in economic returns and...
ORGANISATION:
BDO EconSearch
Industry
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-153
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Agrifutures: FRDC Contribution: Phase 2 of $100 billion growth strategy

In 2017, the National Farmers’ Federation announced a vision for Australian agriculture to exceed a farm gate value of $100 billion by 2030. AgriFutures Australia commissioned ACIL Allen to: Establish a baseline projection which estimated a farm-gate value of $84.3 billion by...
ORGANISATION:
AgriFutures Australia
People
PROJECT NUMBER • 2018-150
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

Attendance at the Annual Session of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) - 4-9 December 2018 in Honolulu, USA

This report is an overview of my attendance at the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Meeting 15 Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 9–16 December 2018 which was made possible through a FRDC Development Award. The report includes information on: (i) what issues were discussed at the meeting,...
ORGANISATION:
Narooma Seafood Direct

2019 review of the FRDC investment in People Development

Project number: 2018-149
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $30,000.00
Principal Investigator: Anwen Lovett
Organisation: Anwen Lovett Consulting
Project start/end date: 29 Oct 2018 - 30 Jan 2019
Contact:
FRDC

Need

There is a need to review FRDCs involvement in people development for the next RD&E plan

Objectives

1. Complete a review of FRDCs investment in People Development to inform FRDCs future investment and RD&E Plan

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-646-94262-9
Author: Anwen Lovett
Final Report • 2019-12-13 • 1.56 MB
2018-149-DLD.pdf

Summary

FRDC has a significant and long-term commitment to supporting the development of people in fisheries and aquaculture. The current guide for investment is the People Development Program Plan 2013-2015. This review has been undertaken to consider progress against that Plan and to provide advice about what the future goals of a FRDC people development program could be.

FRDC invests in people to assist in the delivery of its priorities in Environment, Industry and Communities and to support Extension. Investing in people assists in the future-preparedness of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors and is a core requirement of successful succession planning. It ensures that there is a pipeline of individuals who are representative of the diversity of the sector, understand how to engage with other sectors and the community beyond the boundaries of fisheries and aquaculture and who are equipped to take up leadership roles.

The current review, undertaken by Anwen Lovett Consulting, was asked to consider progress since 2013. The objective being to consider the past and current FRDC People Development Program to determine which elements of it should be the focus of future FRDC investment and what should be the goals of a people development program for next 5 plus years.

FRDC has advised that it remains committed to investment which develops people in fisheries and aquaculture. FRDC asked the reviewer to take a forward-looking perspective when considering the current portfolio, particularly in terms of where and how FRDC should invest to help future-prepare fisheries and aquaculture. That includes:

  • appreciating that capacity across fisheries and aquaculture sectors is not equal. The leadership and capacity skills needs, and the interventions that are most suitable will differ;
  • developing leaders who can build trust with the community locally, nationally and internationally;
  • individuals who have an external and globally orientated outlook;
  • future-proofing skills and capabilities in fisheries and aquaculture; and
  • enabling the sector to find value and competitive advantage from the rapid digital, Internet of Things and technological revolution which continues world-wide.

The review was conducted from November 2018 until February 2019. The approach taken included a desktop review and evaluation of existing FRDC investments in people development, other related investments in people by other organisations and telephone interviews with 25 stakeholders including FRDC staff, graduates of FRDC supported leadership programs, research providers and other fisheries and aquaculture sector members. A list of stakeholders interviewed is in Appendix 1.

The key outcome of this review was a positive endorsement of FRDC’s leadership role in developing people and that this must continue in the future. FRDC stakeholders consider FRDC to be “the mother ship” organisation for assistance and expertise in identifying and pursuing opportunities to develop people. FRDC is thought to be ahead of the game in its awareness of and durable commitment to investing in people.

More recently there has been a dissipation in the level of internal attention FRDC has directed toward people development. This is in part due to staff changes but also the devolution of some people development responsibilities to IPAs, subprogams and RACs.

The current FRDC portfolio is adequately represented across the leadership hierarchy and maturity levels of workforce development. There are however some areas which may benefit from increased attention. These include building science capacity and encouraging greater diversity in participation – youth, women, other cultures, indigenous and recognising that capacity is not equal across fisheries and aquaculture enabling the development of entry level and early stage leadership capability. FRDC supported leadership programs should also include capacity needs such as global perspectives, collaboration, entrepreneurship and innovation business development.

There also continues to be a mis-match between stakeholders saying people development is important with the level of funding and commitment to participate overall being low. While IPAs and RACs were charged with leading on people development within sectors and regions, outcomes according to stakeholders have been variable and in some cases weak.

There is therefore the opportunity for FRDC to re-engage in its leadership function of people development. This review is recommending a Statement of Intent supported by an implementation and evaluation framework. It is also proposed that FRDC enhances its coordination and information sharing functions in people development, which will assist in increasing awareness, motivating increased rates of application and participation.  A stronger coordination and communication function by FRDC will also assist IPAs, RACs and subprograms to engage more strongly in developing people.  

Final Report • 2019-12-13 • 1.56 MB
2018-149-DLD.pdf

Summary

FRDC has a significant and long-term commitment to supporting the development of people in fisheries and aquaculture. The current guide for investment is the People Development Program Plan 2013-2015. This review has been undertaken to consider progress against that Plan and to provide advice about what the future goals of a FRDC people development program could be.

FRDC invests in people to assist in the delivery of its priorities in Environment, Industry and Communities and to support Extension. Investing in people assists in the future-preparedness of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors and is a core requirement of successful succession planning. It ensures that there is a pipeline of individuals who are representative of the diversity of the sector, understand how to engage with other sectors and the community beyond the boundaries of fisheries and aquaculture and who are equipped to take up leadership roles.

The current review, undertaken by Anwen Lovett Consulting, was asked to consider progress since 2013. The objective being to consider the past and current FRDC People Development Program to determine which elements of it should be the focus of future FRDC investment and what should be the goals of a people development program for next 5 plus years.

FRDC has advised that it remains committed to investment which develops people in fisheries and aquaculture. FRDC asked the reviewer to take a forward-looking perspective when considering the current portfolio, particularly in terms of where and how FRDC should invest to help future-prepare fisheries and aquaculture. That includes:

  • appreciating that capacity across fisheries and aquaculture sectors is not equal. The leadership and capacity skills needs, and the interventions that are most suitable will differ;
  • developing leaders who can build trust with the community locally, nationally and internationally;
  • individuals who have an external and globally orientated outlook;
  • future-proofing skills and capabilities in fisheries and aquaculture; and
  • enabling the sector to find value and competitive advantage from the rapid digital, Internet of Things and technological revolution which continues world-wide.

The review was conducted from November 2018 until February 2019. The approach taken included a desktop review and evaluation of existing FRDC investments in people development, other related investments in people by other organisations and telephone interviews with 25 stakeholders including FRDC staff, graduates of FRDC supported leadership programs, research providers and other fisheries and aquaculture sector members. A list of stakeholders interviewed is in Appendix 1.

The key outcome of this review was a positive endorsement of FRDC’s leadership role in developing people and that this must continue in the future. FRDC stakeholders consider FRDC to be “the mother ship” organisation for assistance and expertise in identifying and pursuing opportunities to develop people. FRDC is thought to be ahead of the game in its awareness of and durable commitment to investing in people.

More recently there has been a dissipation in the level of internal attention FRDC has directed toward people development. This is in part due to staff changes but also the devolution of some people development responsibilities to IPAs, subprogams and RACs.

The current FRDC portfolio is adequately represented across the leadership hierarchy and maturity levels of workforce development. There are however some areas which may benefit from increased attention. These include building science capacity and encouraging greater diversity in participation – youth, women, other cultures, indigenous and recognising that capacity is not equal across fisheries and aquaculture enabling the development of entry level and early stage leadership capability. FRDC supported leadership programs should also include capacity needs such as global perspectives, collaboration, entrepreneurship and innovation business development.

There also continues to be a mis-match between stakeholders saying people development is important with the level of funding and commitment to participate overall being low. While IPAs and RACs were charged with leading on people development within sectors and regions, outcomes according to stakeholders have been variable and in some cases weak.

There is therefore the opportunity for FRDC to re-engage in its leadership function of people development. This review is recommending a Statement of Intent supported by an implementation and evaluation framework. It is also proposed that FRDC enhances its coordination and information sharing functions in people development, which will assist in increasing awareness, motivating increased rates of application and participation.  A stronger coordination and communication function by FRDC will also assist IPAs, RACs and subprograms to engage more strongly in developing people.  

A Stock Assessment Toolbox for Australian Fisheries

Project number: 2018-148
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $179,630.00
Principal Investigator: Cathy M. Dichmont
Organisation: Cathy Dichmont Consulting
Project start/end date: 31 Dec 2018 - 30 Dec 2020
Contact:
FRDC

Need

A review of all stock assessments undertaken in Australia and packages in the USA was undertaken by the FRDC 2014-039 project. This project found that of the 76 data rich assessments developed in Australia, about 52 of these could have been undertaken using off the shelf (OTS) packages. Although developing bespoke packages has advantages, the OTS packages that are freely available for use by analysts, have been evaluated using simulations and been extensively peer reviewed. Due to time and financial constraints in Australia, there is a need for a more strategic view of the framework Australia should adopt with respect to stock assessments. For example, there is a greater need to rapidly assess not only data rich but also data poor fisheries’ stocks, which will need the increased use of OTS packages. Transition to these packages is hampered by several constraints: but mainly, the packages are not in a single location and capacity needs to be built in their use. There is thus a need to a) develop a toolbox that links to key freely available OTS packages, and b) allows Australian assessors to contribute their models, and c) provides resources for their use.

Objectives

1. Develop a resource for housing and linking to Australian and International stock assessment packages (the Toolbox).
2. Provide material that will value add expertise to aid use of the packages within the Toolbox.
3. Provide a platform for Australian assessments (with their associated resources) to be housed.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925994-23-0
Authors: C.M. Deng R.A. Dowling N. Punt A.E. Tsang A.
Final Report • 2021-04-30 • 1.34 MB
2018-148-DLD.pdf

Summary

Stock assessment scientists from CSIRO and Cathy Dichmont Consulting designed a web-based tool that collated freely available stock assessment packages (http://toolbox.frdc.com.au/).Web searches and global consultation with assessment scientists identified more than 100 assessment packages. These were assigned to one of 10 classes of assessments and evaluated as to whether they were state-of-the-art within their class. The website provides a novel feature that allows searching and filtering for packages basedon specific features from the extensive model specifications that are provided in a consistent manner between packages (http://toolbox.frdc.com.au/toolbox/). Test data and instructions for some packages are also provided as downloadable files (http://toolbox.frdc.com.au/instructions/for a scientist to run locally on their computer. The test data can also be used to simulation test other assessment methods since these simulated data have been produced from specified, and therefore known, population status and biology. An ability to link a specific stock assessment report to the web site is also provided so that users can search for past assessments reports. Presently there are more than 70 Australian stock assessment reports linked within this repository. This project’s work is also available as a journal publication (Dichmont et al. 2020;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105844)
Final Report • 2021-04-30 • 1.34 MB
2018-148-DLD.pdf

Summary

Stock assessment scientists from CSIRO and Cathy Dichmont Consulting designed a web-based tool that collated freely available stock assessment packages (http://toolbox.frdc.com.au/).Web searches and global consultation with assessment scientists identified more than 100 assessment packages. These were assigned to one of 10 classes of assessments and evaluated as to whether they were state-of-the-art within their class. The website provides a novel feature that allows searching and filtering for packages basedon specific features from the extensive model specifications that are provided in a consistent manner between packages (http://toolbox.frdc.com.au/toolbox/). Test data and instructions for some packages are also provided as downloadable files (http://toolbox.frdc.com.au/instructions/for a scientist to run locally on their computer. The test data can also be used to simulation test other assessment methods since these simulated data have been produced from specified, and therefore known, population status and biology. An ability to link a specific stock assessment report to the web site is also provided so that users can search for past assessments reports. Presently there are more than 70 Australian stock assessment reports linked within this repository. This project’s work is also available as a journal publication (Dichmont et al. 2020;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105844)
Industry

Aquatic Animal Health Technical Forum and Training workshops

Project number: 2018-144
Project Status:
Current
Budget expenditure: $78,000.00
Principal Investigator: David Cummins
Organisation: CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory
Project start/end date: 29 Nov 2018 - 29 Nov 2021
Contact:
FRDC

Need

There is a need to continue the workshops as they provide a forum for representatives from research institutes, Government departments and industry to discuss current aquatic animal health issues facing Australia in a friendly and collaborative setting that encourages open and frank interactions leading to improved mutual understanding of issues facing the different sectors. Workshops have been well supported and have included participants from Government and private laboratories and the aquaculture industry. Industry participants have been from a diversity of farms and representative of a wide variety of aquaculture species. The participant numbers have increased at each workshop from 17 to 35- ideally the maximum group size of 35. This maximum number allows the workshop to be conducted at various locations, as it is not too large a group for host facilities to accommodate.
Previous workshops have led to the exchange of information and methods. This has provided ongoing contacts established at the workshops, for participants to discuss issues, and in turn, respond more effectively to disease outbreaks. With aquaculture facilities and the species farmed continuing to expand in Australia, transferring these vital skills and knowledge to a new generation of researches and those involved in aquatic animal health, will be of benefit to both the aquatic animal health sector and industries.
Due to budgetary constraints in both Government and industry sectors, funding is required to assist workshop participants with travel expenses to attend the workshops. Without partial travel subsidy many forum participants would not obtain authorization to participate. This has repeatedly been raised in feedback and would affect attendance.

The exchange of information and pathways for new people involved in aquatic animal health will be lost and need to be re-established if the workshops fail to continue on an annual basis.

Objectives

1. Source workshop venues, in various States and Territories, that have aquatic animal health capability or services and can accommodate the group size.
2. Organise all aspects of conducting the workshops including
advertising through Health Highlights subscription and peer referrals, guest presenter, presentation program, field trips and practical sessions, accommodation and catering.
3. Encourage new and emerging science and production staff to attend the AAHTF and to gain experience in making presentations
4. Continue to update the contact list and email distribution list/group for continued information exchange
5. Reports and financial acquittals prepared according to milestone schedule.
View Filter

Species

Organisation