SESSF Industry Development Subprogram: alternative fuels for fishing vessels

Project number: 2007-200
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $137,291.91
Principal Investigator: Laurie O. Goldsworthy
Organisation: University of Tasmania (UTAS)
Project start/end date: 30 May 2007 - 30 Sep 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

With most of Australia's fish stocks at fully fished or overfished status, there is reduced opportunity for increasing economic returns from larger catches or unexploited resources. As a result, the fishing industry is looking for opportunities to increase its profit margins by reducing the cost of fishing. Generally, fuel is the one single highest operating cost to fishing vessels, accounting for up to 50% of the operating costs of a fishing vessel in Australia.

The Australian (and New Zealand) Fishing Industry requires assistance in becoming a more efficient user of energy. Some forms of fishing, such as trawling, expend more fuel per kg of fish landed compared to passive methods such as longlining and trap fishing. In all cases however, rising fuel prices impinge on the profitability of the operations, and ultimately put their viability in jeopardy; this has reach a critical situation for many operators in Australia.

The R&D plans and strategies of all advisory bodies to the FRDC contain high priority goals to achieve FRDC’s Industry Development goal (planned outcome):, The commercial sector of the Australian fishing industry is profitable, internationally competitive and socially resilient. This investigation into alternative fuels for the fishing industry, some of which also achieve lower greenhouse gas emissions, has the intention of improving the economic viability of fishing enterprises and shifting the industry towards a more secure position with respect to future fuel needs.

Objectives

1. Demonstrate the feasibility of Marine Gas Oil (or other lower cost distillates) in fishing vessel engines, as a cheaper form of petroleum based diesel fuel.
2. Investigate the technical feasibility of fishoil as a biofuel source related directly to the activities of the industry.
3. Evaluate LPG as a relatively user friendly option with established supply chain, and detail the required technology in the context of fishing vessels.
4. Evaluate natural gas (LNG, CNG) as a prospect for significant fuel cost savings, and detail the required technology in the context of fishing vessels.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-86295-509-7
Author: Laurie Goldsworthy

Related research

Adoption
Environment
Industry

Recfishing Research: National Strategy for Recreational Fisheries Research, Development and Extension

Project number: 2007-227
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $286,263.00
Principal Investigator: Bill Sawynok
Organisation: Recfish Australia
Project start/end date: 30 Oct 2007 - 1 Jul 2010
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The need for a more cohesive national approach to recreational fisheries RDE has been recognised by Recfish Australia and FRDC for some years. The first move towards a more cohesive approach occurred in 2001/02 with the establishment of the National Strategy for the Survival of Released Line Caught Fish. For the first time a national approach was developed to a priority issue for the recreational fishing industry and over the following years a new very inclusive approach was taken. Key priorities have been addressed through the strategy, leading to a significant improvement in our knowledge on the survival of released fish and an improvement in the best practices for releasing fish.

In 2005 the FRDC Board recognised the need for a new approach to the broader range of recreational fishing RDE priorities and identified the need for the recreational sector to form a body to take these issues forward. The recreational fishing industry needs information on the social and economic benefits provided by recreational fishing to inform resource sharing and access, counter falling participation rates and facilitate growth of the sector in line with changing community values. Research and promotion of best fishing practices is needed to meet community concerns regarding sustainability and ethical conduct of recreational fishing. Extension of new knowledge needs to be improved as past R&D projects have not adequately used recreational fishers communications networks to transfer new knowledge. This proposal seeks to provide for the formation of that body, to provide for the ongoing planning and coordination needed at a national level in a way that adds value to work undertaken by the States. It will also address FRDC’s requirements for effective extension and adoption of R&D results which is reflected in the adding of E to the traditional R&D.

Objectives

1. Through extensive and ongoing consultation with the recreational sector, develop and maintain a list of current national-level recreational fishing RDE priorities.
2. Work with recreational fishing stakeholders and researchers at all levels to facilitate the development of RDE projects to meet identified priorities.
3. Develop an extension network that will promote the adoption of new knowledge generated by recreational fishing related R&D by decision makers, recreational fishers, and the wider community.
4. Assess the adoption of new knowledge by decision makers, recreational fishers, and the wider community, and identify constraints and barriers to the adoption of new knowledge by these groups.