100,266 results

SCRC: PhD: Antiviral activity and resistance to Abalone Viral Ganglioneuritis.

Project number: 2008-739
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Peter Speck
Organisation: Flinders University
Project start/end date: 9 Jan 2009 - 30 Nov 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

In late 2005, a sudden mass mortality in abalone resulting from abalone viral ganglioneuritis (AVG) occurred almost simultaneously on three abalone farms in Victoria. In May 2006, AVG was detected in wild stocks along the Victorian coast near one of the infected farms (Appleford, 2006). The outbreak in wild populations has subsequently been detected in both directions along the Victorian coast. A control zone was established to prevent movement of abalone, other invertebrates and fishing gear in and out of the infected area. Nevertheless, the virus has now spread beyond the control zone (Appleford, 2006; Handlinger, 2007). This presents an enormous threat to the lucrative commercial abalone fishery in Victoria and South Australia, as the range of the virus is currently nearing the South Australian border. Due to the difficulty in containing invasive pathogens in the marine environment, the outbreak of AVG in wild abalone populations is considered to be an issue of national concern.

In a recent report to industry on the research priorities related to the AVG outbreak, Handlinger (2007) identified the need to understand host-virus interactions and the host response. Handlinger (2007) further highlights the need for effective disease surveillance in both the wild and farming abalone sectors, as well as the need to establish health status as part of the family lines program, particularly with respect to the movement of broodstock. This requires the effective identification of infected abalone, including those sub-clinically infected and which harbor persistent virus. Consequently, investigation into the host antiviral response to AVG is timely and worthwhile to help ensure the ongoing economic viability of abalone industries faced with sudden mass mortality events from viral outbreaks.

SCRC: PhD : An Investigation of the microbiology and biotechnical properties leading to extended shelf-life in Goldband Snapper (Pristipomoides multidens)

Project number: 2008-737
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Hannah Williams
Organisation: Curtin University
Project start/end date: 30 Jun 2008 - 29 Jun 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Tropical snapper species are have a highly variable shelf-life during chilled storage. The overall aim of this project is to determine why Goldband Snapper (Pristipomoides multidens) has a greater shelf life than some similar fish species and to use this knowledge to produce some practical applications to increase shelf-life in other species with shorter shelf-life. To do this we will investigate the microbiological and biochemical properties of Goldband Snapper and, using a control species for comparison, determine if any of these properties are responsible for the long shelf life observed with this fish species. The control species for this project, the Saddleback Snapper (Paracaesio kusakarii), was chosen because it is a similar fish but with a much shorter shelf life. If any significant differences are detected, the possibility of transferring or replicating these properties onto other fish will be investigated. This project will impact greatly on the fishing industry if particular bacteria (or lack of bacteria) or other properties which promote long shelf life are able to be identified and replicated on other fish species.

The project is related to and arose as a result of FRDC 2006/209 “Developing targeted strategies for improving product quality through selected low value seafood supply chains.” and will continue working with currently estabished industry partners including WAFIC and WA Department of Fisheries. The project will be under the auspices of the WA Centre of Excellence for Seafood (CoES), and is particularly associated with the supply chain performance theme of the CoES.

Blank

SCRC: Seafood CRC: International trade negotiations impacting on seafood industry interests

Project number: 2008-735
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Andrew Stoler
Organisation: University of Adelaide Waite Campus
Project start/end date: 29 May 2008 - 30 Jul 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The need for the project was identified at the Seafood Access Forum meetings in January and confirmed at the meeting in March 2008. The report will be a key input to discussions at the SAF meeting scheduled for 17 June 2008.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925982-19-0
Author: Andrew Stoler and Victoria Donaldson
Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 806.35 KB
2008-735-DLD.pdf

Summary

Over the past thirty years, international trade in fish and fisheries products has grown significantly and today over 50 percent of the value of fisheries production and about 40 percent of the live weight equivalent of fish and fish products enter international trade. Around the world, some 200 million people are employed in the fisheries sector – mostly in developing countries. At the same time, all but four of the world’s key fishing regions (about 75 percent of the world’s fish stocks) is harvested at or beyond the regions’ sustainable limits.

The Australian seafood sector now achieves gross production worth in excess of AUD$ 2 billion per annum, generates exports worth in excess of AUD$ 1.5 billion, and employs significant numbers of Australians in rural and regional areas of the country. The sector has the potential to be a much bigger contributor to exports, employment and national wealth provided that Governments in Australia undertake to work more effectively with the seafood industry to reduce or eliminate overseas barriers to Australian seafood exports, develop new ways to produce and harvest seafood at home and take steps to ensure that high quality Australian seafood production can be sustainably maintained over time.

SCRC: PhD : Methodologies for the implementation of Micro Mobile Information Systems in the Cold Chain and the resulting implications of Time Temperature logging for Models of Microbial Growth

Project number: 2008-734
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Paul Turner
Organisation: University of Tasmania (UTAS)
Project start/end date: 17 Oct 2007 - 17 Oct 2010
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This project fits squarely into two of the key strategies of the seafood CRC’s theme 2,
Strategy 1 - Traceability and product sensor technologies and,
Strategy 2 – Predicting and managing seafood shelf life

This project intends to work with CRC Participant seafood supply chains and key markets, however identifying which participant is still an ongoing task. Though initial contact has been made with the Tasmanian Abalone industry and the local research community the Sydney Fish market has also been visited (in an unannounced visit) for possible inclusion in this project.

The application is needed to enable better supply chain management of product quality and quality, by being able to identify products remotely (i.e. without the need for and problems of bar codes, scanners etc.) recognise potential quality problems (due to time and temperature), during product distribution, to assess the potential magnitude of those problems and to react to them in a timely manner to correct the problem or minimise its impact.

Blank
PROJECT NUMBER • 2008-733
PROJECT STATUS:
COMPLETED

SCRC: Population genetic structure of Sea Cucumbers (bêche-de-mer) in Northern Australia

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra), a commercially important species of Sea Cucumber, are fished off the northern Australian coast. Elsewhere in the Asia-Pacific region, where they are commonly fished, they have been found to be particularly vulnerable to over-exploitation. Currently, as little is known...
ORGANISATION:
Flinders University

SCRC: Seafood CRC: The ALife Project - Promoting the Australian seafood industry as a career path for Generation Y

Project number: 2008-732
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Emily A. Mantilla
Organisation: Lifeworks Media
Project start/end date: 29 May 2008 - 29 Dec 2009
Contact:
FRDC

Need

This project will address the skills shortage in the Australian seafood industry, particularly in remote and rural areas and will also encourage more women to get involved in the industry.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925982-16-9
Author: Emily Mantilla and Roy Palmer
Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

Final Report • 2008-06-06 • 373.53 KB
2008-732-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Australian Seafood CRC was one of the 100 hand-picked organisations to become involved with ALife. This program aims to replace the career guide that school leavers get when they have finished high school. The Australian Seafood CRC hopes that by participating in this program the younger generation (Generation X and Y) will choose a career within the Australian seafood industry.

So far all Australian schools have been provided with copies of ALife and have access to the website. Students surveyed requested more information on seafood profiles such as: research scientist, aquaculture production assistant and import/export.

SCRC: The Australian Seafood Diet for Intergenerational Health: Development of a healthy high Australian seafood diet that will be acceptable to women of child-bearing age.(PhD student Lily Chan)

Project number: 2008-731
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Lynne Cobiac
Organisation: Flinders University
Project start/end date: 31 May 2009 - 30 Dec 2011
Contact:
FRDC

Need

For pregnant women, the current advice is to keep eating fish but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus. The net outcome of this communiqué may result in fewer women of childbearing age, those who are pregnant or those who wish to become pregnant from consuming fish or consuming inadequate amounts. It is highly important that this key group of consumers receive enough seafood to ensure that the developing foetus obtains adequate levels of DHA.

Therefore, this proposal targets a need in women of child bearing age, to determine if a diet high in DHA (providing an average of at least 200mg/d) obtained from Australian whole seafood (2-4 serves a week) can improve health-related outcomes (plasma phospholipid n-3 concentrations, inflammatory markers, insulin sensitivity, mood) when compared to a 6-week low DHA diet (30 mg/d) and will the diet be at an acceptable cost and without providing adverse levels of methyl mercury and PCBs.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925983-30-2
Authors: L. Cobiac J. Midgley M. Miller C. Thompson L. Chan
Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

Final Report • 2013-07-01 • 1.36 MB
2008-731-DLD.pdf

Summary

Consumers are advised to eat more fish for a range of health benefits, including for growth and development, protection against heart disease and lowering of plasma triglycerides. However, there are some caveats in these recommendations for some sub-groups of the population, such as those women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This in general relates to the level of methylmercury present in fish. In Australia, the current dietary advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for pregnant women is that 2-3 serves of most fish can be safely eaten each week, but to limit the intakes of orange roughy (Sea Perch), catfish shark, swordfish, marlin or broadbill to once a week or fortnight for the purposes of avoiding contaminants that may be damaging to the sensitive developing foetus.

SCRC: Seafood CRC: Codex Alimentarius working group on pathogenic marine Vibrio spp.

Project number: 2008-730
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Tom Madigan
Organisation: SARDI Food Safety and Innovation
Project start/end date: 28 Mar 2008 - 30 Jul 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Marine Vibrio spp. are Gram-negative motile bacteria, which are ubiquitous in marine environments and are recognised pathogens worldwide. These pathogens are commonly detected at low concentrations in seafood and have also been detected in Australian seafood. The Codex Alimentarius Committee on Food Hygiene is holding a workshop in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th of June 2008 to address hygiene requirements for these species of bacteria. As part of the workshop, the committee will consider potential post harvest treatments (PHTs) to reduce the numbers of these bacteria in seafood and will also consider setting a maximum levels for these bacteria in raw seafoods. There is potential that industry may be impacted by requirements to use unnecessary PHTs and may also face unrealistic market access barriers. Consequently, Australia’s position, represented by AQIS, requires technical support from a specialist in marine vibrios.

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-925982-80-0
Author: Thomas L. Madigan
Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

Final Report • 2008-07-31 • 452.29 KB
2008-730-DLD.pdf

Summary

The Codex Alimentarius Commission is a joint body of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). It develops food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program.

The Codex Working Group on the Code of Hygienic Practice for Vibrio spp. in Seafood was held in Kyoto, Japan on the 3rd to the 6th June, 2008 to develop the early draft of the Code.

Australia was represented on this Working Group because of the potential impact on industry (e.g. the requirement to use unnecessary post-harvest treatments and potential market access barriers due to requirements for implementation of the Code in export destinations).

As a result of attending this committee, the author of this report was able to provide specialist technical advice to the Australian delegation leader and identify areas of future research and development which will address data gaps in relation to any emerging Codex requirements. Furthermore, a list of recommendations for Australian input into the draft code has been provided.

Australia has already had significant input into the preparation of this Code. However, Australia needs to closely monitor the progress of the Code through the Codex process. Furthermore, if the bivalve shellfish Annex is approved, Australia should participate in this Working Group again.
There is currently little known about the prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in Australia. It may be beneficial to begin to address these data gaps before the introduction of this Code, particularly in the case of molluscs such as oysters, cockles and abalone and also in the case of warm water prawns.

View Filter

Species

Organisation